The Prickyard

[Wulfgar]

Current, not legal, not prescribed, not at a clinic.

If you knowthis for a fact, please name them.

[Power Tool]

I've prove you wrong so much it's silly. Why are you hiding under this name, everyone knows you're FreckleFreak. They won't let me get a new handle.

If my memory serves me correctly you were Tony on both NR and this site in the past so this is your new handle. The man AaaGabriel, whoever he is, asked you to prove it but you only deflect the question! It seems that TA2 has already proven you to be a liar and Jjbee isn't buying your story and neither am I. I thought you were a douchebag before you changed your handle, it's obvious you are just a bigger one now!

Stay off my lawn!

[LingusUs41]

Well, it looks like the mystery around the sudden disappearance of a certain well known provider might be lifted:

https://escortalligator.com.indianap...post/28370435/

And follow the link within the above link.

https://thebiggestwhore.simdif.com/index.html

So, anyone going to cop to their # being there, somewhere?

Looks like this little pussy boi is a member of this forum. Since you have no problem outing others and putting up their pics. How about you grow a new pair (obviously Renee took your other pair) and post your pic and phone #. May be we can start a go fund me so you can buy some nueticles.

[Jjbee62]

You and my other 2 haters make a lot of assumptions, I don't give ladies money for no reason? You obviously know nothing about me, I've NEVER delivered drugs to anyone, her drama that day had nothing to do with money, make some other stupid assumptions while trying not to pile on.

You're just a bit slow Bob. I've already told you I'm not buying the junk you're selling. Or trading for sex. I'm just enjoying watching you go through your exact routine again.

[DaveRue]

Can we get back to what this forum is about?

Thanks,

Dave.

Seriously?

You know you're fingerwaggen about the fight thread right?

A2

[Bob0324]

Now prove I am way wrong, or shut up!

I've prove you wrong so much it's silly. Why are you hiding under this name, everyone knows you're FreckleFreak. They won't let me get a new handle.

[TryinAgain2]

I've NEVER delivered drugs to anyone,

That's a damn lie. I know at least two girls you frequently provided pharms to, including Mallory, Kristin (and she didn't seem to have any of those issues when I met her before you did) and by your own admission to me via several texts that you were buying $1500/ week worth of H and Meth for Paris when she lived with you for over a year.

[AaaGabriel812]

You and my other 2 haters make a lot of assumptions, I don't give ladies money for no reason? You obviously know nothing about me, I've NEVER delivered drugs to anyone, her drama that day had nothing to do with money, make some other stupid assumptions while trying not to pile on.

You never deliver drugs to anyone. As you said, you insist on home court advantage because that's where your candy store is.

[AaaGabriel812]

Current, not legal, not prescribed, not at a clinic.

Now prove I am way wrong, or shut up!

[NjoyLife]

Bob,

I'm not buying this crap any more than the crap you sent by PM.

You know she's an addict. You know that an addict only has one kind of drama, the need to get their drugs. All other drama is just bullshit to get drug money. Either, you're not very bright, or you left yourself 2 reasons to go help with her "drama. " Either to give her the drugs, or to give her the money for drugs. You don't come across as the world's biggest philanthropist, so I don't see you handing over money for nothing. Did you go for fucking, or to deliver pharms?

I guess I was stupid to assume you wouldn't admit to bringing drugs to a known addict.

You do this to yourself every time. You post some garbage and get called on it. Then you change the story to try and cover the flaws in the original story and get called on it again. Repeat ad nauseum.

Here's a simple solution: KISS. Keep it Simple, Stupid.

If you want to warn the board that a provider is an active addict, that's all you need to say. If you want to say a provider lives in a nasty environment, that's all you need to say. There's no need to dress up like Superman and claim to be Mother Theresa. If you want to elaborate, tell the board she lives, with her kids, in an unhealthy environment and she's an active addict. Simple. To the point. All the information the board needs.

The best part, you don't have everyone pointing out that your post is fucked up.

Don't listen to him the entertainment value is priceless!

[Bob0324]

Bob,

I'm not buying this crap any more than the crap you sent by PM.

You know she's an addict. You know that an addict only has one kind of drama, the need to get their drugs. All other drama is just bullshit to get drug money. Either, you're not very bright, or you left yourself 2 reasons to go help with her "drama. " Either to give her the drugs, or to give her the money for drugs. You don't come across as the world's biggest philanthropist, so I don't see you handing over money for nothing. Did you go for fucking, or to deliver pharms?

I guess I was stupid to assume you wouldn't admit to bringing drugs to a known addict.

You do this to yourself every time. You post some garbage and get called on it. Then you change the story to try and cover the flaws in the original story and get called on it again. Repeat ad nauseum.

Here's a simple solution: KISS. Keep it Simple, Stupid.

If you want to warn the board that a provider is an active addict, that's all you need to say. If you want to say a provider lives in a nasty environment, that's all you need to say. There's no need to dress up like Superman and claim to be Mother Theresa. If you want to elaborate, tell the board she lives, with her kids, in an unhealthy environment and she's an active addict. Simple. To the point. All the information the board needs.

The best part, you don't have everyone pointing out that your post is fucked up.

You and my other 2 haters make a lot of assumptions, I don't give ladies money for no reason? You obviously know nothing about me, I've NEVER delivered drugs to anyone, her drama that day had nothing to do with money, make some other stupid assumptions while trying not to pile on.

[Bob0324]

Well you must have seen past DI chicks (some of the past ones had illegal med issues), because all of the current 13 chicks on the site do not take medication or are on legal medication. By legal, I mean that even if they are going to a clinic for past substance abuse or prescribed medication by a doctor, that is legal and they aren't buying illegal pharms off the street. Now I freely admit that this is based on my current knowledge and assumptions. You are very good at making assumptions also, especially about the one you admit you haven't seen which goes to your credibility. So I will once again state that out of the current 13 chicks on the site, to the best of my knowledge, all 13 do not have ILLEGAL medication issues. I doubt that you have seen 3 of the 13 because as you said they are, your words not mine, "Fat and 40 or over" thus not being your type. Only 3 of the remaining 10 worked elsewhere before joining DI, only one of those fits your body type, so I doubt you have seen the other two. So you said you can "prove that I am way wrong" but, unless you are supplying them with the medication or in the room when they take the medication then your proof is not factual only an assumption. Personally I will believe my assumptions before I would ever believe your assumptions based on your long history of mainly seeing addict providers that fit the type of body you prefer.

Current, not legal, not prescribed, not at a clinic.

[Jjbee62]

I Never go to anyone's place for a session unless it's a first meet and my pants don't come unzipped, been that way fore about 3 years. I insist on the home court advantage. I stopped by her place bc I was out and she claimed to have drama that she needed immediate help with. You made a lot of stupid assumptions.

Bob,

I'm not buying this crap any more than the crap you sent by PM.

You know she's an addict. You know that an addict only has one kind of drama, the need to get their drugs. All other drama is just bullshit to get drug money. Either, you're not very bright, or you left yourself 2 reasons to go help with her "drama. " Either to give her the drugs, or to give her the money for drugs. You don't come across as the world's biggest philanthropist, so I don't see you handing over money for nothing. Did you go for fucking, or to deliver pharms?

I guess I was stupid to assume you wouldn't admit to bringing drugs to a known addict.

You do this to yourself every time. You post some garbage and get called on it. Then you change the story to try and cover the flaws in the original story and get called on it again. Repeat ad nauseum.

Here's a simple solution: KISS. Keep it Simple, Stupid.

If you want to warn the board that a provider is an active addict, that's all you need to say. If you want to say a provider lives in a nasty environment, that's all you need to say. There's no need to dress up like Superman and claim to be Mother Theresa. If you want to elaborate, tell the board she lives, with her kids, in an unhealthy environment and she's an active addict. Simple. To the point. All the information the board needs.

The best part, you don't have everyone pointing out that your post is fucked up.

[AaaGabriel812]

The only 3 DI girls I've seen have an illegal medication issue, there's one I have not seen I know has a illegal medication issue, so that's 4 known out of like 13, known, like I have personal knowledge, not making stupid accusations like you. I wouldn't roll the dice on the other 9. You made a statement as a fact that 99.9 percent of them did not have this issue, shows your credibility, I know and can prove you're way wrong.

Well you must have seen past DI chicks (some of the past ones had illegal med issues), because all of the current 13 chicks on the site do not take medication or are on legal medication. By legal, I mean that even if they are going to a clinic for past substance abuse or prescribed medication by a doctor, that is legal and they aren't buying illegal pharms off the street. Now I freely admit that this is based on my current knowledge and assumptions. You are very good at making assumptions also, especially about the one you admit you haven't seen which goes to your credibility. So I will once again state that out of the current 13 chicks on the site, to the best of my knowledge, all 13 do not have ILLEGAL medication issues. I doubt that you have seen 3 of the 13 because as you said they are, your words not mine, "Fat and 40 or over" thus not being your type. Only 3 of the remaining 10 worked elsewhere before joining DI, only one of those fits your body type, so I doubt you have seen the other two. So you said you can "prove that I am way wrong" but, unless you are supplying them with the medication or in the room when they take the medication then your proof is not factual only an assumption. Personally I will believe my assumptions before I would ever believe your assumptions based on your long history of mainly seeing addict providers that fit the type of body you prefer.

[Bob0324]

I hate to be piling on here, but you may want to raise the bar just a bit on "taking a decent human being stance. ".

You know her money priorities, have known them for months. You know she has 2 kids living with her. I'm going to make an assumption that you went to her place because she couldn't come to you. Curious. Was it because she had no transportation, or nobody to watch her kids?

The picture I'm getting is that you went to a known (to you) addict's house to session, knowing 1 or 2 children would be in the house. That's not too high on the DHB (Decent Human Being) scale. You've been helping a known (to you) addict with children feed her addiction for months. Another negative. You walk in, and apparently walk through the place, see children living in unlivable conditions, see an infant doing something that could kill the kid and you just threaten to call CPS? Where's the DHB stance come into play? Was it when you decided not to go ahead with the session, with a woman who hasn't showered and didn't even have a bed for the deed? I'm not sure there's a trophy for that.

Going off on her doesn't win the DHB award. She has problems. She has an addiction. You knew she has an addiction. You knew she was spending the money you gave her on her addiction and when faced with the reality of addiction, you yell at her and threaten her? Do you think that's going to change the situation? Think she's going to go spend $50 on cleaning supplies and start trying to make a livable home, because you yelled at her?

She needs help, not screamed at by some guy who's pissed off because there's no place to fuck. Her children need out of that environment. They don't need to be left there with a mother who might now blame them because she doesn't have the money to feed her addiction.

An addict's first priority is feeding the addiction. An addict's second priority is getting money to feed the addiction. There are no other priorities. She has continually messaged you for 9 months to get money to feed the addiction, not because she's bored, or for your charming demeanor. She doesn't have time to clean or care for her kids. As long as she's an active addict, they aren't a priority. They're lucky if she takes the time to feed them.

Something just clicked. You've been seeing her for 9 months and probably known she was an addict for 9 months. Yet you don't know whether her infant is 8 or 9 months old? You were either doing a 9 month pregnant addict, or doing an addict within a few weeks after she gave birth. I'm sure the DHB award committee will take that into consideration.

". I find myself taking a decent human being stance. " If that's your decent human being stance, I'd hate to see what you're like the rest of the time.

I Never go to anyone's place for a session unless it's a first meet and my pants don't come unzipped, been that way fore about 3 years. I insist on the home court advantage. I stopped by her place bc I was out and she claimed to have drama that she needed immediate help with. You made a lot of stupid assumptions.