Rubrankings.com
click for FREE hookups
Click here for the best sugar babies
click for FREE hookups
Sex Vacation
Best Escorts

Thread: The Prickyard

+ Add Report
Page 46 of 221 FirstFirst ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 96 146 ... LastLast
Results 676 to 690 of 3310
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #2635
    Quote Originally Posted by Candace38G  [View Original Post]
    Hope this is allowed.

    Rest assure with big titles come big responsibility. I am happy to say that the ladies from AMB and DI are not the same and no shape affiliated except using common posting platforms.

    Only I, face my storm alone. Nothing nor anyone is to blame. One monger and Two provider references were used as a form of references (not able to post names due to rules on forum). That clearly failed. In my 10 years This is my first and only issue. I'm not the only lady or the last lady to have a charge. Just a few months shy of my retirement LEO got who they wanted. All ladies are not charged or harmed. No drugs were found. And no clients were compromised.
    Screw the rules. If we have providers or well known mongers giving references for cops, they should be called out and in the least should explain themselves. Even if they were fooled, it would be useful to know what the fuzz did to fool them.

  2. #2634
    Quote Originally Posted by Candace38G  [View Original Post]
    Hope this is allowed.

    Rest assure with big titles come big responsibility. I am happy to say that the ladies from AMB and DI are not the same and no shape affiliated except using common posting platforms.

    Only I, face my storm alone. Nothing nor anyone is to blame. One monger and Two provider references were used as a form of references (not able to post names due to rules on forum). That clearly failed. In my 10 years This is my first and only issue. I'm not the only lady or the last lady to have a charge. Just a few months shy of my retirement LEO got who they wanted. All ladies are not charged or harmed. No drugs were found. And no clients were compromised.

    Be safe and don't depend on refeneces. Do your homework is all I can say. If you have to use a refenece make sure its someone in the hobby you trust and know well.

    Through the years, Indiana has treated me well. I have no complaints nor will I participate with LEO. My attorney is handling all issues going forward. It has been good Indiana. Be safe out there.

    Farwell,

    C38.
    Best of luck and although we never met, I applaud the class it took to post this!

  3. #2633
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1395

    I agree with you Illap and have recanted my earlier misinformation

    Quote Originally Posted by Ilapp  [View Original Post]
    I know you mean well, and I was a proponent of getting as much information out quickly as possible and facilitated through others since I'm on moderation apparently forever and cannot put up what information I had which was almost immediate by the way and have it aired in a timely fashion to do any good. I have to say though that it would be best if you could verify your information or have it correct before you put it out there, dissemination of incorrect information creates an aura of paranoia and confusion, which may very well be one of the intents of the lovely Brotherhood causing all of our strife. Some of your information was incorrect unless sort of tarnished reputation or reliability of some people that didn't deserve it. Let's also take a quick breath and remember, that unless You Were Somehow connected to the business end of this business, that the crime is a misdemeanor and there are a number of limitations that can make an arrest for a misdemeanor occur, and that the parameters of those limitations makes the likelihood of anyone not caught in mid Act both unlikely to happen and hardly worth the effort it would require.
    I apologize to those involved but would respectfully encourage those who are still on other sites using the lady as a vouch be careful in doing so. Our local constables have a way of overseeing people with issues and have since I have been in this for over two decades. I know who informed me but will not put that out in public although two have already come forward and posted. I am sorry what happened to C38 happened and that is why I asked for verification of who was involved. I did jump the gun but with good intentions. No lady or guy should have to worry about a loose cannon / cannons compromising either the ladies or the men. They should be known so that both sides never contact them for references or have to worry about being compromised themselves. No matter what is thought of me running into a rogue male or female in this is not where any of us should want to go. Again my apologies for putting DI into this My error but again I would encourage C38 to take the vouch off her ladies she works with and have them use her or any other provider BChannel after what happened It would server her and the ladies who use her as a vouch well to do so. JMO Thanks for the scolding it was deserved but meant well. My apologies again to DI and to the forum. Flipping is as disgusting as rolling over on the ladies and gents who depend on good intel. Have a good day.

  4. #2632
    Advertiser-Escort


    Posts: 36

    One hell of a way to Retire.

    Hope this is allowed.

    Rest assure with big titles come big responsibility. I am happy to say that the ladies from AMB and DI are not the same and no shape affiliated except using common posting platforms.

    Only I, face my storm alone. Nothing nor anyone is to blame. One monger and Two provider references were used as a form of references (not able to post names due to rules on forum). That clearly failed. In my 10 years This is my first and only issue. I'm not the only lady or the last lady to have a charge. Just a few months shy of my retirement LEO got who they wanted. All ladies are not charged or harmed. No drugs were found. And no clients were compromised.

    Be safe and don't depend on refeneces. Do your homework is all I can say. If you have to use a refenece make sure its someone in the hobby you trust and know well.

    Through the years, Indiana has treated me well. I have no complaints nor will I participate with LEO. My attorney is handling all issues going forward. It has been good Indiana. Be safe out there.

    Farwell,

    C38.

  5. #2631
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1822

    Mac

    Quote Originally Posted by BigMack  [View Original Post]
    DIs screener was not the problem AMBs was. Also was told however that ladies from AMB and DI worked both sides of the isle along with USASG. Who do you trust except those you know are quality and trustworthy. I hope this works out for those ladies and gents who do NOT flip on their brothers and sisters. As for me no agencies for me just sticking with the quality trustworthy independents and hope I make the right decisions. Just an encouragement to both watch your backs on both sides. We need to help each other.
    I know you mean well, and I was a proponent of getting as much information out quickly as possible and facilitated through others since I'm on moderation apparently forever and cannot put up what information I had which was almost immediate by the way and have it aired in a timely fashion to do any good. I have to say though that it would be best if you could verify your information or have it correct before you put it out there, dissemination of incorrect information creates an aura of paranoia and confusion, which may very well be one of the intents of the lovely Brotherhood causing all of our strife. Some of your information was incorrect unless sort of tarnished reputation or reliability of some people that didn't deserve it. Let's also take a quick breath and remember, that unless You Were Somehow connected to the business end of this business, that the crime is a misdemeanor and there are a number of limitations that can make an arrest for a misdemeanor occur, and that the parameters of those limitations makes the likelihood of anyone not caught in mid Act both unlikely to happen and hardly worth the effort it would require.

  6. #2630

    So Milfy flipped?

    Quote Originally Posted by PowerTool  [View Original Post]
    I hope this is the proper forum to post in. A lot of assumptions have been made, having seen ladies from both AMB and DI, talking to friends in the know, clarity seems to be returning now that the dust is settling.

    AMB, AdultMutualBenefits, and DI, Discreetinfo, are separate internet platforms, some models from both sites advertised on each others site, there were even some independents on both sites. Neither AMB or DI are affiliated with each other they just allowed each other to use their internet platform to advertise their models to increase exposure. Some ladies from both sites advertised on other other platforms as well like the sister site, onebackpage as well as others.

    AMB ladies had to be contacted via e-mail to set up an appointment. Once verified a contact phone number was provided to arrange the appointment. Only one phone number was used to contact any AMB lady.

    DI models have a phone number to contact them, each model has different phone number, each customer contacting the models are screened before an appointment is established.

    All of this was pretty simple to figure out if you had seen ladies from both sites, like I had. The screening method by both sites was also different in my experience..
    Are we talking about MILFy, aka Shannon, aka Hard Worker? This one?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 17dc3d642aaf3af8a78ce875c45e563a-640.jpg‎   cf1a03a08b24152aeaf252da29f42d68-640.jpg‎   ef6698fe8f91e5b0a5d25c1e30bc3ed1-640.jpg‎  

  7. #2629
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1395

    What I would really like to know and so would the ladies and gents I would think.

    Are the names of the two ladies Milfy and CMT and the monger who flipped on those concerned. Back channel of course but for those of us who use both providers and depend on them and guys it would help to know so we don't make a mistake and contact any of the three for services or information. Hope to hear from you back channel if you wish to do a public service.

  8. #2628

    Assumptions and the Dust Settles

    I hope this is the proper forum to post in. A lot of assumptions have been made, having seen ladies from both AMB and DI, talking to friends in the know, clarity seems to be returning now that the dust is settling.

    AMB, AdultMutualBenefits, and DI, Discreetinfo, are separate internet platforms, some models from both sites advertised on each others site, there were even some independents on both sites. Neither AMB or DI are affiliated with each other they just allowed each other to use their internet platform to advertise their models to increase exposure. Some ladies from both sites advertised on other other platforms as well like the sister site, onebackpage as well as others.

    AMB ladies had to be contacted via e-mail to set up an appointment. Once verified a contact phone number was provided to arrange the appointment. Only one phone number was used to contact any AMB lady.

    DI models have a phone number to contact them, each model has different phone number, each customer contacting the models are screened before an appointment is established.

    All of this was pretty simple to figure out if you had seen ladies from both sites, like I had. The screening method by both sites was also different in my experience.

    As far as the circumstances that occurred at the south side location last week, only one provider was arrested, all other models and hobbyist's at the location were released with no charges. The screening process failed because an independent Milfy and a small time CMT flipped, as well as a hobbyist that had seen ladies from AMB in the past. When people in the biz flip then it's very difficult for any screening process to be accurate.

    AMB is now shut down, won't be back, the provider arrested is out of the business for good, anyone contacted from AMB by e-mail or by the phone number used to set up appointments should ignore them.

    No models from DI were involved, all models are safe, business should continue as usual.

    Don't PM me asking for more info because this is all I know, there are other more senior members on the board that know more than me, however silence is golden.

  9. #2627
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1395

    Talked again with two people who assured me that

    Quote Originally Posted by BigMack  [View Original Post]
    The head screener from DI was allegedly compromised by LE. If true how does the head vetter get in that position? Why did Darsi come on if it was her and say no other girls from DI were on any other sites but DI when that was not true. Most people who prevaricate do so because they feel they have to cover up a bad thing. We should all be together and most of all aware of what went down. If DI was involved or one of it's members or more then being an agency all the girls working their could become objects of scrutiny by those we would not want to oversee them. Your idea of having services to screen for you is a good one but begs the question of why did the screener for DI fail What went wrong. If it had nothing to do with screening then how did they get found out or she? Not sure if there was more than one. I have heard anywhere from one to three. Who knows but obviously the vetting process did not work if there was an issue with Uncle. Discuss this back channel not out in the open When a straight story is offered let us all know for our own edification. Stops rumors. Have a happy 4th and enjoy.
    DIs screener was not the problem AMBs was. Also was told however that ladies from AMB and DI worked both sides of the isle along with USASG. Who do you trust except those you know are quality and trustworthy. I hope this works out for those ladies and gents who do NOT flip on their brothers and sisters. As for me no agencies for me just sticking with the quality trustworthy independents and hope I make the right decisions. Just an encouragement to both watch your backs on both sides. We need to help each other.

  10. #2626
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1395

    Yes screening was involved. From my information

    Quote Originally Posted by Mmgeg  [View Original Post]
    Of what has transpired this past week. It had nothing to do with screening. Let's say that again. It had nothing to do with screening. Now has things been compromised? Perhaps and perhaps not. Were Discreet girls on AMB and the Sister Site? Yes they were. Does having a screener make you safer? No it doesn't. Screeners make mistakes and sometimes do not even do their job correctly and there has been instances where that statement is very true. The providers that are reputable and have made a name for themselves and have been reviewed on the Sister Site are still safe. Being on a website advertising does not make anyone safe. That's why we screen. That's why we ask the questions we do. That's why we do not accept certain things like text apps and burners or voip services. That's why most of us have a services we pay monthly that we are able to ensure our safety as well as our clients. Most importantly you make yourself aware of your surroundings and make sure that if you are indeed seeing 5 plus clients a day that you are at least being discreet about it. Those things have nothing to do with any website that you are advertising on. It's called common sense.
    The head screener from DI was allegedly compromised by LE. If true how does the head vetter get in that position? Why did Darsi come on if it was her and say no other girls from DI were on any other sites but DI when that was not true. Most people who prevaricate do so because they feel they have to cover up a bad thing. We should all be together and most of all aware of what went down. If DI was involved or one of it's members or more then being an agency all the girls working their could become objects of scrutiny by those we would not want to oversee them. Your idea of having services to screen for you is a good one but begs the question of why did the screener for DI fail What went wrong. If it had nothing to do with screening then how did they get found out or she? Not sure if there was more than one. I have heard anywhere from one to three. Who knows but obviously the vetting process did not work if there was an issue with Uncle. Discuss this back channel not out in the open When a straight story is offered let us all know for our own edification. Stops rumors. Have a happy 4th and enjoy.

  11. #2625
    Banned Member


    Posts: 253

    I think we got off topic in general reports.

    Of what has transpired this past week. It had nothing to do with screening. Let's say that again. It had nothing to do with screening. Now has things been compromised? Perhaps and perhaps not. Were Discreet girls on AMB and the Sister Site? Yes they were. Does having a screener make you safer? No it doesn't. Screeners make mistakes and sometimes do not even do their job correctly and there has been instances where that statement is very true. The providers that are reputable and have made a name for themselves and have been reviewed on the Sister Site are still safe. Being on a website advertising does not make anyone safe. That's why we screen. That's why we ask the questions we do. That's why we do not accept certain things like text apps and burners or voip services. That's why most of us have a services we pay monthly that we are able to ensure our safety as well as our clients. Most importantly you make yourself aware of your surroundings and make sure that if you are indeed seeing 5 plus clients a day that you are at least being discreet about it. Those things have nothing to do with any website that you are advertising on. It's called common sense.

  12. #2624

    He has gotten soft

    In more ways than one I think.

    Quote Originally Posted by IndyGuy123  [View Original Post]
    Welcome back bitches!

    Sincerely Signed,

    Still a big ol prick.

  13. #2623
    Quote Originally Posted by IndyGuy123  [View Original Post]
    Welcome back bitches!

    Sincerely Signed,

    Still a big ol prick.
    Nope I have to say the luckiest prick in the yard.

  14. #2622
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1822

    You still are

    Quote Originally Posted by IndyGuy123  [View Original Post]
    Welcome back bitches!

    Sincerely Signed,

    Still a big ol prick.
    And always will be I think.

  15. #2621
    Welcome back bitches!

    Sincerely Signed,

    Still a big ol prick.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best sugar babies
Ava Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory





Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape