Sugarbabies?

[JoeThighsMan]

In the current Seeking database within 60 miles of Cincinnati there are:
3558= Sugar baby's total of which
676= Average girls.
1245= Slim and Athletic girls.
1637= Curvy, Full figure, and Heavy Set girls.
With ages of
18-20= 267.
21-25= 1317.
26-30= 901.
31-35= 512.
36-40= 249.
41-50= 249.
50+= 100.
There's a +37 in age results over weight for some reason lol

God damn! Nearly 50% are overweight / BBW?

I love America 🤮.

[WanderingAbout]

In the current Seeking database within 60 miles of Cincinnati there are:
3558= Sugar baby's total of which
676= Average girls.
1245= Slim and Athletic girls.
1637= Curvy, Full figure, and Heavy Set girls.
With ages of
18-20= 267.
21-25= 1317.
26-30= 901.
31-35= 512.
36-40= 249.
41-50= 249.
50+= 100.
There's a +37 in age results over weight for some reason lol

[BamBam]

She shares that her name is Kate. She was also on SA as Sweetcheeksoxox several years ago. She claims she is willing to do PPM for $500 but wants $200 at the first MnG. She will not go directly to a private meeting. I chatted with her a few years ago when she was using the Sweetcheeks profile. She was asking the same then. I am pretty certain she is just a rinser and will never meet for intimacy.

I think she has blocked me on SA but I will include a link there even though it no longer works for me. Has anyone had any contact with her? Results? I have PII / SM to share for contributing seniors.

https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...9febaa89650633

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...b-e30ea6e380a2

BAM.

[Todd Cincy]

Birthrates started dropping off big time in the late 90's and early 2000's. Th reason why Seeking was such a gold mine from 2010-2017 was because there were alot more millenial women than there are gen Z girls.

The millenials are aging out of their looks / settling down (to some extent) so that is why things are kind of simmering off. Seeking is essentially a MILF hunter site now and going forward things are going to be even worse due to the massive drop off in birthrates.

Its depressing but if you were an older gen X or a boomer who was in this sport in the 90's, 00's and 10's consider yourself lucky. Its legit going to be a barren wasteland by the end of this decade and your only real hope of having any sort of decent variety is to expand your search radius or be able to travel.

The only way Gen Z girls are going come to reality is when they age out of their cam girl looks or we have a systemic societal collapse. I dont think a depression is enough to shake it

I'm an older GenXer (born in the late 1960's). I agree that the Millennial SBs (aka "Generation Why Not") made the best SBs.

Between 2010 and 2017, there were a lot of quality young women on Seeking, most born between 1985 and 1996.

In 2024, though, most of the good ones from that crowd have married and settled down, or simply found careers that got them out of sugaring.

But there was more to the 2010's boom than birthrates. The whole sugar dating concept got a big boost in the media between 2009 and 2014 or so, much like that horrible Only Fools site is getting boosted in the media now.

Also, the unemployment rate hit 9. 9 percent in 2009. I was meeting a lot of college seniors from UC, Miami, and NKU who weren't getting jobs. For the past few years, the big companies have been swooping up those same students. (The unemployment rate is currently 3. 7 percent.).

Like so many of you, I don't like the Gen Z girls nearly as much.

In my experience, they are hyper-cautious and like to stay in their rooms.

Some of this can be blamed on the lockdowns of the pandemic period, which were so much of their formative years. But the blame can also be placed on their uptight Gen X parents (many of my friends) who helicopter-parented them.

The Millennials, by contrast, were largely raised by devil-may-care Boomers.

The Gen Z girls (at least the ones on Seeking) are a lot fatter as a group.

That all said, I want to leave you guys with a ray of hope. So here goes.

I used to dabble in the hobby in the early 2000's. I was in my 30's then. Most of the providers in those days were younger Gen Xers, often just a few years younger than me.

The girl market of the early 00's was not so great. At that time, the market looked a lot like it does now: all of the offerings were fat, rough, or way too expensive.

But in mid-2008, things took off, when the cash-hungry Millennial girls came on board. At first, that meant more high-quality, reasonably priced escorts. Then Seeking Arrangement exploded a few years later, between 2010 and 2012.

That's why I'm mostly holding on to my money until the supply situation changes. (The big problem now, on Seeking and elsewhere, is too many thirsty guys chasing too few quality girls.).

But what goes around, comes around. I've seen it happen before.

[Ginzo666]

Birthrates started dropping off big time in the late 90's and early 2000's. Th reason why Seeking was such a gold mine from 2010-2017 was because there were alot more millenial women than there are gen Z girls.

It looks like birthrates hit peaks in 1990 and 2007. So, maybe we'll get another spike in SBs around 2027 or so! Overall, the trendline is gradually moving down tho, which is exactly what you get when you live in a gerontocracy like the US.

[LolBoat]

Before Covid and the rate inflation, I used to have a lot of success with coeds in the 21-24 age range. Lately, the coeds seemed to have dried up. Could be me, could be the effect of O-F or or it could be natural evolution. In any case, I now search 18-35 while being serious about working those between 20-30 and having the most success in the 24-28 range. I deviate from time-to-time if the woman looks interesting but those often end up as one-off. My allowance offer is in the 200-400/ week range but I will deviate up to 500 for someone special.

BAM.

Birthrates started dropping off big time in the late 90's and early 2000's. Th reason why Seeking was such a gold mine from 2010-2017 was because there were alot more millenial women than there are gen Z girls.

The millenials are aging out of their looks / settling down (to some extent) so that is why things are kind of simmering off. Seeking is essentially a MILF hunter site now and going forward things are going to be even worse due to the massive drop off in birthrates.

Its depressing but if you were an older gen X or a boomer who was in this sport in the 90's, 00's and 10's consider yourself lucky. Its legit going to be a barren wasteland by the end of this decade and your only real hope of having any sort of decent variety is to expand your search radius or be able to travel.

The only way Gen Z girls are going come to reality is when they age out of their cam girl looks or we have a systemic societal collapse. I dont think a depression is enough to shake it

[SixtyNineX10]

Good observations and I am in a similar spot to you, surf often and partake less. I am very picky and as we all know, things are very different than 5 or 6 years ago. And I am guessing the site has probably saved more marriages than it has destroyed?

I once had a SB I met on the road post a similar sentiment in her profile about not wanting to meet with married SD's. So we met for a drink one thing led to another and we wound up having a wonderful time together. It actually turned out to be maybe my best encounter ever from the site. Moral of the story, ignore what they say in their profile. They are all crazy in some way. If they need sugar and you hit them up at the right time, your in!

And if "cheaters disgust her" why the hell is she on the site? The last thing I need is a SB lecturing me on who I should sleep with. And no worries, you are not going to break up my marriage!!

Long time lurker on this thread (participate in others) and don't have the cashflow to provide a monthly allowance, maybe a ppm, but I love to windowshop.

I do love her profile though: "I have no interest on being the basis of a marriage ending. Cheaters absolutely disgust me. So if your (sic) married or currently in a relationship then don't waste your time. ".

I'd guestimate that 95% of us are in a relationship and are here looking to get what we don't at home. I don't consider it cheating when my SO won't do something I want or even go out and have fun. I'm basically in a business relationship raising our family, and I get some benefits here and there, but nothing like I want so I go get it somewhere else. I love it when a chick selling her pussy on the internet judges us for buying it.

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...dWlkZS5ubC8%3D

[Zeotch2]

Her tits are enormous!

Her profile is gone.

[AlphaTek1]

A lot of conversation starts and stops, PMs on the sites that die off and then start back up a month of so later.

My guess is she gets one on the line and then goes looking again when he moves on.

Never been able to get her to text.

Long time lurker on this thread (participate in others) and don't have the cashflow to provide a monthly allowance, maybe a ppm, but I love to windowshop.

I do love her profile though: "I have no interest on being the basis of a marriage ending. Cheaters absolutely disgust me. So if your (sic) married or currently in a relationship then don't waste your time. ".

I'd guestimate that 95% of us are in a relationship and are here looking to get what we don't at home. I don't consider it cheating when my SO won't do something I want or even go out and have fun. I'm basically in a business relationship raising our family, and I get some benefits here and there, but nothing like I want so I go get it somewhere else. I love it when a chick selling her pussy on the internet judges us for buying it.

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...dWlkZS5ubC8%3D

[Ginzo666]

Maybe she was in love with you? Haha!

She looks to have fun tits-are they as big as they seem to be in pictures?

Her tits are enormous!

[JoeThighsMan]

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...9-0a7fa1e38633

If you honestly believe this chick doesn't fuck on the first meet, I got a bridge to sell you. I met this girl 2 x in 2022. Although the "performances" were good, she got nasty with me for no reason at all. I don't recommend.

Maybe she was in love with you? Haha!

She looks to have fun tits-are they as big as they seem to be in pictures?

[Ginzo666]

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...9-0a7fa1e38633

If you honestly believe this chick doesn't fuck on the first meet, I got a bridge to sell you. I met this girl 2 x in 2022. Although the "performances" were good, she got nasty with me for no reason at all. I don't recommend.

[BaddenBoy2020]

Any feedback on these would be great. Feel free to PM.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...4-f8b63b18f5a4

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...5-78f2f9aaa64d

Thanks.

Zoey escorts. You can find her ad on Tryst.

[SixtyNineX10]

Any feedback on these would be great. Feel free to PM.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...4-f8b63b18f5a4

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...5-78f2f9aaa64d

Thanks.

[Ginzo666]

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...8-8ac2e5b47843

Any intel on this one? Seems I saw her on the site before, but was under a different profile. Feel free to dm me.

Those pictures are of "Veronica. " If that really is the same girl and not someone using her pictures, then she really does look good IRL. But, she's not recommended. Kind of a dud when you meet her, and she's very annoying and aggressive on text.