Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 35,731 to 35,745 of 39753
-
06-08-08 19:15 #4023
Posts: 1489Originally Posted by Poi Dog
-
06-08-08 13:48 #4022
Posts: 231Excel
Any new happenings with Excel? I've noticed on Sundays, when I'm driving past there in the late afternoon, the "open" light was off around 6:00 and 6:30 p.m. Is business that slow, or is business for them relegated to certain nights?
Any update info is appreciated as my next mongering session will be with Mimiko...
Stay safe gentlemen,
PD
-
06-07-08 19:39 #4021
Posts: 4Spa Hawaii
Ok, this is a long shot. Has anyone tried out or any info on Spa Hawaii in Yacht Harbor Towers? The address listed is 1600 Ala Moana blvd across from the shopping center.
I got quoted at $75 for an hour of lomi lomi from a Kristina who looked to be about 40 and Korean.
Thanks much in advance.
Silverz
-
06-07-08 15:35 #4020
Posts: 4Similar experience
Originally Posted by Wulfen
-
06-07-08 06:43 #4019
Posts: 243Originally Posted by Asian0255
-
06-07-08 02:54 #4018
Posts: 18Nirvana
Tried Pearl, not going to guess her age since I got laughed at the last time I did, but she said she is 29, wouldn't doubt it, pretty good experience, korean, nice natural B's, soft skin, completely shaved so if you like that, shes for you, tight pussy, pretty though I think she would look better with less makeup, seemed a little cautious at first but after, had good personality.
On the way out, Skye looked hot in pink, Miki brushing her teeth. Don't know why I don't go with Miki more because she really has the look and petite body I like. Three other girls on the couch. Went around 7pm, parking no problem.
Earlier in the week, think Monday, saw Ruby at Lavender. The only thing I don't like about the place is all the noise you can hear outside the rooms, especially the heels on the wooden floor. Place seems to have more local type girls along with the K girls.
Last night went to RoseMarri, late, pretty drunk, had Miki who was working at Lavender. For some reason I really click with this girl, very petite, tanned. Asked about Thai girls, Tasha and Apple, told they coming back on the 17th. Couch was full on the way out, including Joy, who looked good but always looks pissed.
Yeah, three times this week and not even over, gotta slow down. That hapa chick someone posted on the escort section is smoking hot, kinda pricey but if her pics are true might have to try some. Anyone sampled?
-
06-06-08 22:19 #4017
Posts: 40Originally Posted by Mongerboy
-
06-06-08 22:06 #4016
Posts: 623Sisi cont.
Yeah figured it was. Only went there once but had that older japanese lady (I believe she was mentioned here somewhere) though I remembered she gave me a different name, at that time it was a light. Practically feather massage, got all hard, felt her up her skirt to her butt. On the flip got her into 69 position and removed her pink panties. LOL wasnt expecting that, but nice eating her out.
$
So anyway, I doubted she was gonna be there again so I passed.
-
06-06-08 18:49 #4015
Posts: 30Rub and Tug
I really like the great massage and HE. I also like to touch during the process. Have any of you had more than average success with a skilled MT? I know that some will say to go to an AMP, but I rather have HE than FS and great massage too. I have enjoyed Jean, Tasha, Kim, Mei Ling, Maria, Nancy and Jenny. All of these women have given me great massage IMHO. I have had fun with some of them, and continue to patronize them, but as a horny bastard, always want more. My ideal session would be awesome massage, good looker and talker, HE and alot of play. I think $. 2 would be fair for compensation. Is this the impossible dream? Any suggestions? I know I am not alone, I have RTFF, you guys are sick too. LOL
TNR
-
06-06-08 13:59 #4014
Posts: 1628Thank you, Jackson.
Thank you so much for posting that.
I would also like to thank all the brothers (the few who caught that post I posted but got deleted) in your support about me, and my detailed reports when I monger. I did not think it was fair to be flamed/criticized by another member who after reading his such said reports, does nothing but PREACH about having safe sex. I did nothing to him personally nor have I ever critiqued him on his posts. I felt this was unjust, and unfair.
Thank you once again Jackson for stepping in and rectifying this situation. It not only makes me feel a whole lot better, but we all know this is a top notch web site with FAIR and truthful admin/moderators who do their best to follow and enforce the rules.
Hinode
-
06-06-08 13:50 #4013
Posts: 5308Greetings everyone,
Per the Forum's Posting Guidelines, Safe Sex Complaints may only be posted in the Safe Sex thread.
Members may also use the Forum's PM system to voice their Safe Complaints towards individual Forum Members.
Here's the full text of the reasoning behind this policy:
Effective immediately, Forum Members wishing to criticize other Members for not following what they consider to be safe sex procedures may do so only in the Safe Sex Thread. Members may not comment upon, criticize or confront other members on this subject in the general discussion threads. Any such "safe sex complaints" posted in the general discussion threads will be deleted without comment. However...
In addition, Members may not repeatedly post or otherwise taunt other Members regarding their refusal to follow safe sex procedures. Specifically, references to having sex without a condom may be made only by incidental reference and shall not be the focus of any report. Such "safe sex taunting" reports will be deleted without comment.
If you want to criticize another member for not following what you consider to be safe sex practices, then send him a PM.
It does no good to criticize members for not following what other members may consider to be safe sex practices for the following reasons:
1. It's a disincentive for members to contribute.
2. It never serves to change any one's behavior.
3. It almost always leads to arguments.
4. It provides a "cover" for Serial Antagonists to provoke other members.
To address the usual arguments:
1. If a guy wants to engage in sex without using a condom, that's his risk and his business.
2. If a girl wants to engage in sex without using a condom, that's her risk and her business.
3. If YOU want to protect yourself from either or both of the aforementioned parties, then YOU should use a condom for sex all the time and thus YOU will be protected from the allegedly unsafe sex practices of the other parties.
Jackson
-
06-06-08 11:02 #4012
Posts: 200Originally Posted by Member#3973
On a partially related note, I was at Nirvana 1- 1.5 weeks ago and was waiting in a room for the girl. Now this was not the girl's room, just one that I was waiting in. It was towards the end of the hall on the left. Not sure if it was the last door or the second to last. I hate waiting. I started looking around and noticed a small tube on the nightstand. It was a cream for a yeast infection. Yeah, big deal right? I also noticed that it contained benzocaine, a topical anesthetic. I thought it was interesting as it will numb up the sensation down there and may be how girls can last through a busy night. Obviously no DATY or your tongue will go numb! I thought this was an interesting tidbit to share.
Be extra safe!
VS
-
06-06-08 08:55 #4011
Posts: 2178Legit
I went to see her and she is NOT LE.
Originally Posted by Kapalua
-
06-06-08 06:54 #4010
Posts: 380Originally Posted by Virtua Stick
While it may be unpleasant, herpes of either type is not a big deal for most people. Condoms only provide limited protection for HSV-2. The risk should be considered, particularly for hobbyist with SOs.
If a woman has a cold sore don't kiss her unless you know you already get cold sores. BBBJ is not completely safe, but CBJ is. If she has active blisters on her genitals I probably would not give her daty, but the chance of getting HSV-2 around your mouth is low. Having sex with her would be high risk, condom or not. Not too complicated.
-
06-06-08 05:30 #4009
Posts: 1489Originally Posted by Ron Weasley