Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 1,606 to 1,620 of 3679
-
05-12-22 15:56 #2074
Posts: 2Sweet
What's the consensus on Sweet at CGLA (among other places)? Only have time to see one k-girl on this trip. Open to other refs with similar body.
-
05-12-22 15:50 #2073
Posts: 84Originally Posted by HornyToad75 [View Original Post]
The issue is that most of the 20 year olds are only here for Vacation or to make a quick buck and then leave and never come back. As hot as some of them are, the service is just not there.
If you means there are no "good service" providers in their 20's, then yes, I would agree with you.
You can also never trust the booker to give real exact age. One booker I was friendly enough with to state young and not young truthfully. But young was under 40's.
-
05-12-22 13:41 #2072
Posts: 198There are no K providers in their 20's
Originally Posted by MisterBox [View Original Post]
-
05-12-22 13:27 #2071
Posts: 41Originally Posted by OcHobby949 [View Original Post]
I have yet to walk out, and this one was really the only time I was heavily disappointed. Overall LAK has been good to me but I dunno if I'd go back to their services anytime soon.
-
05-12-22 13:07 #2070
Posts: 76I feel your pain bru
Originally Posted by MisterBox [View Original Post]
Everyone's got a right to make a living. I'm sure that provider was a 10 for someone, just not for me. I'm a realist. Saying someone is in their 20's likely means they're in their 30's. Fine. But 40's?! Nope. I hate false advertising.
-
05-12-22 12:57 #2069
Posts: 41Originally Posted by BladeRunner09 [View Original Post]
Photos are not her. The only accurate description is her height. She is small and petite, no where even close to C cups and she is definitely not young, she looks at least 40 in the face.
She probably saw the disappointed look in my face as I walked through the door and try to be more personable but man, definitely not a looker.
Good thing is I only booked a half hour, was gonna go for bbfs but I only paid for cover. The funny thing is the booker recommended Asia to me but my dumb ass had my doubts about it.
-
05-11-22 22:41 #2068
Posts: 166Originally Posted by BladeRunner09 [View Original Post]
-
05-11-22 20:25 #2067
Posts: 66New girls
Has anyone seen either Emily, Nine, or Maxim? They're all currently on La K-angels and a few other sites.
-
05-11-22 18:16 #2066
Posts: 203Jazmin
I was replied because there was already discussion about her, as well. But I will tell you, the few times I saw her she did a wild p2 p with a few careful slips. Nice to see she is back. All of my atf's are currently active so it is a "hard" choice!
Hopefully she sticks around.
Originally Posted by OCGent [View Original Post]
-
05-11-22 17:23 #2065
Posts: 198Josey at KStars
A taller Milfy provider around 5'7", probably in her early 40's. Dark skin tone with flat B-cup and butt. Face is couple ticks above plain. I would describe her a fairly attractive middle-age lady that you see in Korean market.
I thought she was service-oriented and accommodating. She just did not seem to have a routine and preferred to be submissive and go with the flow. She seemed to be really into sex and may give repeat clients a greater leeway with her menu.
I believe she is currently one of the best-valued BB providers in OC. She's fairly tight and easy CIP.
-
05-11-22 01:38 #2064
Posts: 125Mango OC experiences
Has anybody tried Mango OC recently?
Their current busty Taiwanese Clara looks like a good fuck, provided the pics are somewhat accurate.
Booker texted back that they don't do BBFS.
But are the providers usually open to it with standard up charge of one benji?
-
05-10-22 22:33 #2063
Posts: 632My bad.
Originally Posted by OCGent [View Original Post]
-
05-10-22 18:49 #2062
Posts: 25Rebrand?
Originally Posted by Pand25 [View Original Post]
-
05-09-22 23:07 #2061
Posts: 283Rim
Originally Posted by Sonicus [View Original Post]
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...30644-Rim-Jobs
-
05-09-22 12:14 #2060
Posts: 142Yoji
Originally Posted by ModernHouseFan [View Original Post]