Rants and Raves

[RogerOver]

Never was a good speller. I employed an excellent secretary. That way I could do the advanced math and be sure stuff worked.

You can bet the guy who developed Spell Check was an Engineer. Besides it is a very poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word.

Sir if I ever was to meet the man who invented spell check I'd kiss him dead on the mouth. With all the things that I can say I'm good at spelling is not one of them and four years of college and didn't help me any at all.

Completely unsurprising that you'd manage to find some internal pride and brag about being an ignorant fuck. Guess that's been what worked for you all this time, eh? Keep leading with it; it creates lots of funny time for the rest of us.

[ComTech42]

Sir if I ever was to meet the man who invented spell check I'd kiss him dead on the mouth. With all the things that I can say I'm good at spelling is not one of them and four years of college and didn't help me any at all.

You can bet the guy who developed Spell Check was an Engineer. Besides it is a very poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word.

[Niteluvr]

Sir if I ever was to meet the man who invented spell check I'd kiss him dead on the mouth. With all the things that I can say I'm good at spelling is not one of them and four years of college and didn't help me any at all.

Personally, I'd punch Mr. Spell checker in the mouth. For me it causes more harm than good because, if it isn't configured correctly, it can wreak havoc on an otherwise well-written document. I write a lot of technical documents as a side gig, so don't ask me how I know.

[CrestWood87]

Never was a good speller. I employed an excellent secretary. That way I could do the advanced math and be sure stuff worked.

Sir if I ever was to meet the man who invented spell check I'd kiss him dead on the mouth. With all the things that I can say I'm good at spelling is not one of them and four years of college and didn't help me any at all.

[ComTech42]

You can't even spell egregious, can you? LOL.

Never was a good speller. I employed an excellent secretary. That way I could do the advanced math and be sure stuff worked.

[RogerOver]

How many have been convicted of insurrection? ZERO. This country has been holding American Citizens political prisoners and I bet you are OK with that. They are being forced to read certain politically slanted material and agree to specific political statements before their case is even heard. The vast majority are being convicted of nothing more than a trespassing type charge.

"According to the USA Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, 31 defendants were sentenced to periods of incarceration, with longer prison terms for those who engaged in violence or threats. So far, the median prison sentence for the Jan. 6 rioters is 45 days. An additional 18 rioters have been sentenced to periods of home detention, while most sentences have included fines, community service and probation for low-level offenses like illegally parading or demonstrating in the Capitol, which is a misdemeanor. ".

1 for assaulting a law enforcement officer.

1 for obstruction of an official proceeding.

Fairlamb, age 44 at his sentencing, pleaded guilty in August to assaulting an officer and obstructing an official proceeding of Congress. He was sentenced to 41 months in prison, with credit for time served, and ordered to pay $2,000 in restitution for damages to the building.

Meredith, age 53 at his sentencing, pleaded guilty to communicating a threat across state lines. In December, he received a sentence of 28 months in prison with credit for time served.

Are you beginning to see a pattern. There was no freaking insurrection and there will not be a single conviction for such. Get over it.

You are just a fucking idiot. That's all. I've attached your dumbshit badge. You must be exhausted from being stupid for so fucking long.

[Sgt Soros]

How many have been convicted of insurrection? ZERO. This country has been holding American Citizens political prisoners and I bet you are OK with that. They are being forced to read certain politically slanted material and agree to specific political statements before their case is even heard. The vast majority are being convicted of nothing more than a trespassing type charge.

"According to the USA Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, 31 defendants were sentenced to periods of incarceration, with longer prison terms for those who engaged in violence or threats. So far, the median prison sentence for the Jan. 6 rioters is 45 days. An additional 18 rioters have been sentenced to periods of home detention, while most sentences have included fines, community service and probation for low-level offenses like illegally parading or demonstrating in the Capitol, which is a misdemeanor. ".

1 for assaulting a law enforcement officer.

1 for obstruction of an official proceeding.

Fairlamb, age 44 at his sentencing, pleaded guilty in August to assaulting an officer and obstructing an official proceeding of Congress. He was sentenced to 41 months in prison, with credit for time served, and ordered to pay $2,000 in restitution for damages to the building.

Meredith, age 53 at his sentencing, pleaded guilty to communicating a threat across state lines. In December, he received a sentence of 28 months in prison with credit for time served.

Are you beginning to see a pattern. There was no freaking insurrection and there will not be a single conviction for such. Get over it.

Sarge, you state there was no freaking insurrection and there will not be a single conviction for such. Are you sure? This is the first of many, Oath Keeper is 1st to plead guilty to seditious conspiracy for Jan. 6 attack. The seditious conspiracy charge carries a maximum sentence of 20 years.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/oath...l_twitter_abcn

[TheRabbit]

It's hard to understand how people can't grasp the most basic concepts, no matter how many times it's explained. And it's ironic they're always the ones claiming "disinformation" and a "lack of understanding", when they should be looking in the mirror.

It also sad people will so readily dismiss a standard that's been used for more than 40 years in order to try to cover up problems that the very system was designed to raise attention to.

That's because (one more time) the CDC, uses available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsies, and medical records, the CDC NEVER used VAERS data due to unreliable it is.

As has been shown here by Aaron and others, VAERS is not the only warning signal that's been given out on these vaccines. There have been many others. For each one, we hear, "oh, that's not a credible source", or "that's not reliable", or "that was a glitch in the system", or "that was due to some other factor", or some other hand waving.

That's not hand waving it's the truth you don't want to accept.

[BeaRemy84]

Reported same as all the preceding years where there was a flat line until 2021. What is it that you don't understand? I mean, it's obviously alot, but pertaining solely to this example what is it that you don't understand? Do you know what VAERS is an acronym for? Do you know what an acronym is?

The dataset for the Pfizer vaccine is now public. Why don't you take a look instead of listening to some quacks?.

[RogerOver]

It's hard to understand how people can't grasp the most basic concepts, no matter how many times it's explained. And it's ironic they're always the ones claiming "disinformation" and a "lack of understanding", when they should be looking in the mirror.

It also sad people will so readily dismiss a standard that's been used for more than 40 years in order to try to cover up problems that the very system was designed to raise attention to. As has been shown here by Aaron and others, VAERS is not the only warning signal that's been given out on these vaccines. There have been many others. For each one, we hear, "oh, that's not a credible source", or "that's not reliable", or "that was a glitch in the system", or "that was due to some other factor", or some other hand waving. The facts are coming out too fast now to close the flood gates. It's only a matter of time before the heads start rolling.

It's harder to understand why you anti-vaxxers spend sooo much time trying to convince other people that you know more than anyone else. I'm surprised you are all still going on about this shit since it's over. People that want to get vaccinated and boosters will, and the rest of you will do whatever makes you happy.

Frankly, I've been waiting for Aarondipshit, Slobbyboy, and Cumsuckertech to start posting how they're forming a love triangle and running off the UKR to fight the commies.

[I Luv Emall]

Reported same as all the preceding years where there was a flat line until 2021. What is it that you don't understand? I mean, it's obviously alot, but pertaining solely to this example what is it that you don't understand?

It's hard to understand how people can't grasp the most basic concepts, no matter how many times it's explained. And it's ironic they're always the ones claiming "disinformation" and a "lack of understanding", when they should be looking in the mirror.

It also sad people will so readily dismiss a standard that's been used for more than 40 years in order to try to cover up problems that the very system was designed to raise attention to. As has been shown here by Aaron and others, VAERS is not the only warning signal that's been given out on these vaccines. There have been many others. For each one, we hear, "oh, that's not a credible source", or "that's not reliable", or "that was a glitch in the system", or "that was due to some other factor", or some other hand waving. The facts are coming out too fast now to close the flood gates. It's only a matter of time before the heads start rolling.

[Aaron Hamlet]

Do you consider the insurance company themselves a "reputable" source?

https://rmx.news/article/large-germa...-side-effects/

Seriously...

Of course Welt is a reputable source. As soon as that ins co actuary put out that data, he was fired.

[Aaron Hamlet]

That graph and stats means only that people died after getting the vaccine not that they died because of the vaccine! Before the vaccine people were not able to die "after getting the vaccine". Get it?

The causes of death are cancer, heart attacks, accidents, and all usual stuff that cause people to die.

ARG.

Reported same as all the preceding years where there was a flat line until 2021. What is it that you don't understand? I mean, it's obviously alot, but pertaining solely to this example what is it that you don't understand? Do you know what VAERS is an acronym for? Do you know what an acronym is?

[Clicker]

You can't even spell egregious, can you? LOL.

Six months ago he couldn't spell success, today he are one.

[TreatHerWell]

Don't you really mean WHO you had for breakfast??

LOL LuvThis! Excellent point! Hard to keep girls names, body types, massage style, names of shops and where they've worked years ago all in my brain. As well as who I've had for breakfast that day Trying my best!