General Reports

**Camhole** · 11-26-21 23:22

Originally Posted by Ggwp996 [View Original Post]

I wanted to see what others think. In my experience the Asian providers provide and do much better service and experience. The communication frequency is better and also they don't suffer from GPS. But, non Asian providers are arrogant, buzz kills, average looking and are looking to scam me. I know the pictures of Asian providers are never the same but, I do enjoy the service they provide.

What do you'll think or have experienced?

Almost every encounter with an Asian provider, for me at least, has been better than a non Asian. There are a few exceptions but overall I'm much more impressed with Asians.

I also have a weakness for Asian ladies so that might cloud my judgment too.

**Ggwp996** · 11-26-21 16:29

I wanted to see what others think. In my experience the Asian providers provide and do much better service and experience. The communication frequency is better and also they don't suffer from GPS. But, non Asian providers are arrogant, buzz kills, average looking and are looking to scam me. I know the pictures of Asian providers are never the same but, I do enjoy the service they provide.

What do you'll think or have experienced?

**Duke Stalin** · 11-14-21 23:19

Hi all,

This is not a recent report, I must have seen her in August 2021 but I was inspired by seeing that Dxxxx is back in the menu at Kangels. Here's my report, her pictures are really nice imo and this attracted me to finally make the call to see her as I had wondered what it would be like. To my surprise when I arrived it was the same girl as the pictures but with short hair, the kind that is super short on the back, I was a bit disappointed to be honest, nonetheless continued with my appointment. Shower was okay nothing extraordinary just the usual BBBJ and making sure I was cleaned up good. I'm not into FK so I don't really go for that so I can't comment on whether she does that or not. Once in the bedroom, she started with BBBJ and I felt she pulled back way too much for my liking, the actual BJ was okay no DT, no rimming there was some BLS but minimal. We started with mish, switched to cow girl, ended with doggy. I'm a one punch man, don't really feel like sticking around afterwards so I didn't stay for seconds despite paying the full hour, I'm probably on the minority on that front. It was a good session, but on 5 star rating I'd say a 3 for me. Total damage was standard $$$5 for this place, I did not partake on BBFS but is available on the menu for an additional $.

P.S.

Not really sure if I'm allowed to post a first name hence the xxx stuff.

**Mister Blister** · 10-31-21 07:08

Originally Posted by StreetTroller [View Original Post]

Wasn't sure where this post belongs so trying here. Admin, let me know if you'd prefer I post this kind of content in a different forum.

I sometimes watch this channel on YouTube called Soft White Underbelly. The channel's creator is a photographer in Los Angeles and he set-up shop on skid row and does photography and interviews with people in and around the street life. He features interviews with addicts, prostitutes, pimps, mentally-ill, gang members, etc. I find some of his content to be very interesting..

I watched that and wasn't aware of this Youtube Channel. I looked around and saw this.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nkGiFpJC9LM

Follow up.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l4aAIF-iW9U

The Whittakers Inbred Family. This seems unbelievable. Especially Ray The Dog Boy. I grew up down South and have seen some messed up stuff and people in Arkansas and Kentucky but never nothing like that. Makes me wonder can it be true. A lot of White Trailer Trash and Hillbilly stereotypes are true [Deleted by Admin]

I once bought a puppy from what I found out later was a puppy mill and the poor thing was probably inbred and only lived 5 years. If The Whittakers are that inbred do they even have 23 pairs of chromosomes and I hope they all have been sterilized so it can't passed on.

**Street Troller** · 10-31-21 06:17

Wasn't sure where this post belongs so trying here. Admin, let me know if you'd prefer I post this kind of content in a different forum.

I sometimes watch this channel on YouTube called Soft White Underbelly. The channel's creator is a photographer in Los Angeles and he set-up shop on skid row and does photography and interviews with people in and around the street life. He features interviews with addicts, prostitutes, pimps, mentally-ill, gang members, etc. I find some of his content to be very interesting.

Today he posted this half-hour interview with an SW who walks Figueroa Street which is one of the main tracks in LA. She's 23 and started when she was 13. Said she sometimes travels, wonder if she comes up this way. I think it's a good watch in case you're interested -.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItUUmukrKM0

Some of his interviews with pimps are pretty interesting as well. Perhaps I'll post some of those, too.

**TomaIn** · 10-21-21 20:30

Originally Posted by Dxddxd [View Original Post]

Fed and Treasurer said it's a short term and it will come back down. Let's hope.

There vision of Short Term and our vision of it are years apart. I only see it continue to rise up to around 15%. All these stimulus checks and the FREE vaccines have to get paid for. Businesses are having to ay a lot more to get workers.

**Dxddxd** · 10-21-21 17:55

Originally Posted by Jibble1 [View Original Post]

Seeing multiple providers increase their prices from 250 - 350 with more increases coming soon in the next couple months they said. I might as well book a trip to Asia at this point jfc.

Fed and Treasurer said it's a short term and it will come back down. Let's hope.

**Jibble1** · 10-21-21 15:46

Seeing multiple providers increase their prices from 250 - 350 with more increases coming soon in the next couple months they said. I might as well book a trip to Asia at this point jfc.

**Street Troller** · 10-14-21 00:49

But what is "reduction" as it stands in the system right now? If someone calls for a mental health disturbance, cops are being sent. There is no one else to send, so I'm not sure how they'd determine which calls aren't for police when there is nobody else to send.

Ugh, last thing I wanted to do was argue politics on a pussy board, LOL. Do some research, find what speaks to you and vote for it. I can't change any of your minds, just look at the options and decide for yourselves. I'll be very interested to see how this race turns-out.

Originally Posted by Michael1967 [View Original Post]

If the number of calls to the police are reduced THEN defund the police.

**Michael1967** · 10-14-21 00:41

Originally Posted by StreetTroller [View Original Post]

There has been a lot of misinformation around the term "defund the police". What that means is to hire more social workers and other professionals so that they are available to certain situations and people such as sex workers, homeless and issues with the mentally-ill. This actually frees police officers to go to calls regarding actual crime. Right now in most American cities, cops are called for all kinds of social issues and not necessarily criminal situations. There have been times when they are tied-up on those calls and not responding quickly to very serious calls. That what that means.

All I know is this. We've had homeless for years, we've had drug and addiction issues for years, we've have issues with mentally-ill on our streets and of course issues with prostitution. It's safe to say here that for all of our lives these issues have all essentially been handled via law enforcement. Here's the thing - we still have issues and none of these things have declined. Law enforcement hasn't resolved any of it. I'm to the point of trying something different. I don't see a lot of the same issues we have here in other western nations. We need to take a look at other methods. It's time.

I think the people that want to "defund the police" have it all wrong. If you want to send out all of these great social workers and other professionals to try and help, then do it this way.

Find some money; hire those people put them to work.

If the number of calls to the police are reduced THEN defund the police.

We have a system that works somewhat. Defunding the police would dismantle that system and start a new one with no guarantee of success. When all hell breaks loose and the system fails, we will have no recourse (except vigilante justice, which we are pretty close to right now).

**Street Troller** · 10-14-21 00:31

Speaking of digging deeper, there has been a lot of misinformation around the term "defund the police". What that means is to hire more social workers and other professionals so that they are available to certain situations and people such as sex workers, homeless and issues with the mentally-ill. This actually frees police officers to go to calls regarding actual crime. Right now in most American cities, cops are sent on calls for all kinds of social issues and not necessarily criminal situations. There have been times when they are tied-up on those calls and not responding quickly to very serious calls. That's what that means. If your concern, as you stated in your post, is that you want police to be available when you call then this proposed method is actually what you should be looking at.

All I know is this. We've had homeless for years, we've had drug and addiction issues for years, we've have issues with mentally-ill on our streets and of course issues with prostitution. It's safe to say here that for all of our lives these issues have all essentially been handled via law enforcement. Here's the thing - we still have issues and none of these things have declined over the years. Law enforcement and criminalization hasn't resolved any of it. I'm to the point of trying something different. I don't see a lot of the same issues we have here in other western nations. We need to take a look at other methods. It's time.

But either way, vote your conscience. I'm but one person. This has been an interesting race and i'm starting to follow it closely and very interested to see how it turns out.

Originally Posted by DrtyHarry [View Original Post]

You and everybody that is voting should dig deeper and then make up your mind. She is ultra liberal and wants to decriminalize everything not just sex work. She also wants to defund the police by 50%. That sounds good in theory and is very good for story books. But the stark reality is that Seattle today is bursting at the seams with violet crimes. Seattle always had the reputation of a safe city to grow up in and raise your kids. That is not true today. I am all for police education, reform and accountability. But I am definitely not in favor of defunding the police in anyway shape or form. I am a common man. That wants to live in a safe neighborhood and call the cops when I need them. Defunding the police is counter-intuitive for me. I do not want to turn this into a political discussion. But since you brought it up, I want to urge all voters to PLEASE read up and dig deep on the candidates and do not vote based on color (blue / red). Please read the issues and policies of each candidate, then make the best decision for yourself, family and community. Just my 2 cents.

**DrtyHarry** · 10-13-21 10:36

Originally Posted by BKAllday [View Original Post]

Nicole Thomas-Kennedy wants to decriminalize sex work. Full stop. All of us who live in Seattle should be voting for her.

You and everybody that is voting should dig deeper and then make up your mind. She is ultra liberal and wants to decriminalize everything not just sex work. She also wants to defund the police by 50%. That sounds good in theory and is very good for story books. But the stark reality is that Seattle today is bursting at the seams with violet crimes. Seattle always had the reputation of a safe city to grow up in and raise your kids. That is not true today. I am all for police education, reform and accountability. But I am definitely not in favor of defunding the police in anyway shape or form. I am a common man. That wants to live in a safe neighborhood and call the cops when I need them. Defunding the police is counter-intuitive for me. I do not want to turn this into a political discussion. But since you brought it up, I want to urge all voters to PLEASE read up and dig deep on the candidates and do not vote based on color (blue / red). Please read the issues and policies of each candidate, then make the best decision for yourself, family and community. Just my 2 cents.

**Street Troller** · 10-12-21 18:24

It's actually her opponent who wants to target buyers. That means you and I. She, like Kennedy, is still less-likely to target the SWs, so I'm not sure how they will differ in terms of pimps. One thing Kennedy stated is that it's the SWs out there who know who is trafficked but they never report because they are afraid of dealing with the criminal justice system. She wants to make that type of reporting easier for them to do. How, I have no idea, and we all know that a lot of SWs really do prefer their pimps, so I guess we'll see on that. But I honestly think that if Davison is elected, the stings will start back-up again and SPD will be going after all of us. With all of the talking through the window these girls out there right now have the guys conditioned to do, that will potentially be crazy.

I guess we'll see how that turns out. One thing that seems odd is that de-criminalization will embolden the girls out there and they'll continue to act wild. That's one of the biggest complaints from around that area, soccer moms and their kids having to see hookers standing out there in their thongs, LOL. Just seems as though if de-criminalization happens, there should be some sort of zone where the girls can walk. I don't know, just a thought.

Originally Posted by EngrJoe [View Original Post]

Not a fucking chance. She wants to decriminalize everything. It's bad enough with the T-rones chasing off the independents and small operators, and then driving around in their new Maserati's with hyper tinted windows to show their girls how successful they are.

**EngrJoe** · 10-12-21 16:46

Originally Posted by BKAllday [View Original Post]

Nicole Thomas-Kennedy wants to decriminalize sex work. Full stop. All of us who live in Seattle should be voting for her.

Not a fucking chance. She wants to decriminalize everything. It's bad enough with the T-rones chasing off the independents and small operators, and then driving around in their new Maserati's with hyper tinted windows to show their girls how successful they are.

**CookieGuy** · 10-12-21 15:08

Originally Posted by StreetTroller [View Original Post]

I've been watching police step-up on stopping men. That mostly hasn't been happening over this past summer. I've been seeing two girls who've been my regulars over the past month, they've both told me that money is coming much slower than it used to. One just bailed to Miami and the other said she'll leave in November. Not worth it to stand in the rain for limited return. They've both said that they'll relocate here "more permanently" depending upon how the City Attorney race turns-out. If Kennedy is elected, there could be some interesting changes out there.

Why? Simple. They can't arrest minorities or druggies or homeless or anyone fleeing a crime scene. That leaves spousal abuse claims, speeding and prostitution. The prostitution looks good in the papers so it is "Game On" regarding erection based crimes.