Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 6,886 to 6,900 of 28395
-
09-14-21 18:30 #21510
Posts: 170Exposed
Wouldn't it be a shame if a couple of people with burner numbers sent photos of some local lawyers, politicians and music executives with deep pockets who once their photos get posted there would take legal action and a defamation case up with the owner of that page?
There has to be some due diligence for someone to be able to post this type of defaming content and legally get away with it.
Originally Posted by BlackCandleJon [View Original Post]
-
09-14-21 17:26 #21509
Posts: 57Originally Posted by DomDraper [View Original Post]
-
09-14-21 17:10 #21508
Posts: 234Exposed on Facebook
Originally Posted by IsJustMe818 [View Original Post]
I counted 15 men on that Facebook page with their names, face pictures, home address and workplace name and location shown along with the texts they used to communicate with the supposed provider.
While I totally agree with the intent of eradicating human trafficking whoever is doing this is not considering that some people might use a fake picture, name or address with a provider and the wrong John is going to go down.
Also, some providers genuinely like doing this! They are actually against the stings and legislation than bans it.
Again the intent is good; the execution I doubt its really meeting it’s goal.
Definitely Think twice about sending a face pic and doing outcalls to your home.
-
09-14-21 16:48 #21507
Posts: 554No reviews probably fake
Originally Posted by SensitiveGuy82 [View Original Post]
-
09-14-21 16:04 #21506
Posts: 299So what we're saying is
Originally Posted by RogueReviewer1 [View Original Post]
-
09-14-21 14:54 #21505
Posts: 1235My 2 cents
Originally Posted by SensitiveGuy82 [View Original Post]
-
09-14-21 14:28 #21504
Posts: 555Agreed
Originally Posted by RogueReviewer1 [View Original Post]
-
09-14-21 14:28 #21503
Posts: 1534Rouge comments
Originally Posted by RogueReviewer1 [View Original Post]
-
09-14-21 14:22 #21502
Posts: 405Black mail
Originally Posted by BlackCandleJon [View Original Post]
-
09-14-21 13:02 #21501
Posts: 152Kara
Originally Posted by DomDraper [View Original Post]
E.
-
09-14-21 12:39 #21500
Posts: 301Jessica Rockefeller?
Originally Posted by BlackCandleJon [View Original Post]
-
09-14-21 12:34 #21499
Posts: 301Deposit Chicks
On Snapchat I've met some beauties. They all claim to be internet models and want you yo pay for their videos etc. However the claim to offer in call and out call with a deposit of $100. The one who has caught my attention goes by Kimberly Horney. Probably ces sound right but worried about that large of a deposit. Has anyone tried any Snapchat Beauties?
-
09-14-21 12:27 #21498
Posts: 152Jessica Rockefeller cameras
Originally Posted by BlackCandleJon [View Original Post]
As for HD's post below about readyteddy7's post. I'll just add this. Take a look at the photo from Readyteddys post that I have attached below of the "dog room" camera. Then take a look at the other photo of Jess that I took of her laying on the bed in the "work room" after a session. Are they the same room? No you can clearly see that the work room has a dresser to the right of the door and the "dog room" has another door that leads to the bathroom and can't have dresser along that wall. So yes she has cameras but none in the work area where the business takes place. I've added another photo of that rock solid ass that I took for those who she won't see just to give you all a peak of what it looks like. Stay safe.
E.
-
09-14-21 11:18 #21497
Posts: 234Insane screening by providers
Originally Posted by HarryDick [View Original Post]
She could easily send to my work a video of me doing her at her place. Or to whoever she wants.
Really need to stop thinking with the little head.
-
09-14-21 11:05 #21496
Posts: 65Fake
Originally Posted by SensitiveGuy82 [View Original Post]
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100068653905867