Sugarbabies?

[JimBobLarry69]

Well whomever this person is... friend of JimBobLarry69, real deal model, or a fake ... he/she/it is also on WYP under the name of Kb0430. Kb being the first and last letter of the person in the profile pics real name. Maybe she really IS doing the Sugar Baby, Dating for Money thing? Maybe not?

Have you ever considered it is someone using her picture and creating a profile for her without her permission?.

[WanderingAbout]

I know her personally and know that she is not doing sugar baby and has certainly never been an escort. It doesn't really matter at this point whether the profile DID exist, it does NOT exist now. And whether it was the persons first profile on seeking is completely irrelevant.

Well whomever this person is... friend of JimBobLarry69, real deal model, or a fake ... he/she/it is also on WYP under the name of Kb0430. Kb being the first and last letter of the person in the profile pics real name. Maybe she really IS doing the Sugar Baby, Dating for Money thing? Maybe not?

[JimBobLarry69]

There is an on-going online competition to select a Maxim cover girl. Its open to the public. If anyone wants to vote for this standard model to be the next Maxim cover girl here is the link to do so:

If you are curious, just scroll down on the voting page to see more photos of this model. This linked to pic was one of the private pics used in the former Seeking profile and was without the watermark shown on the Maxim site.

So what I hear is that you guys don't care that someone who is NOT doing sugar baby or escorting gets harassed. We'll just let the investigation that has begun run its course. We've been trying to give you a chance to self correct but can see that is not going to happen.

Bottom line is that if that is all the more it takes to be a public figure, then nearly every single person is a public figure as I can easily find public information online about anyone. Just because a contest is public doesn't make the people involved public figures.

[D Nut]

There is an on-going online competition to select a Maxim cover girl. Its open to the public. If anyone wants to vote for this standard model to be the next Maxim cover girl here is the link to do so:

https://maximcovergirl.com/2020/kindsay-brandt

You can vote once a day for free, or you can buy votes. Sounds like Maxim found a way to tap into the money that sugar daddies are shelling out for their sugar babies. "Daddy, will you buy me enough votes to win? That way, you can say your baby is a Maxim cover girl. Please? If I win, I will do all those things you like. ". It's really a great fund raising scheme that they have setup to cash in on the magazine's fame; essentially auction off their cover.

[WanderingAbout]

There is an on-going online competition to select a Maxim cover girl. Its open to the public. If anyone wants to vote for this standard model to be the next Maxim cover girl here is the link to do so:

https://maximcovergirl.com/2020/kindsay-brandt

If you are curious, just scroll down on the voting page to see more photos of this model. This linked to pic was one of the private pics used in the former Seeking profile and was without the watermark shown on the Maxim site. https://cdn.maximcovergirl.com/60bfd...25e4c2a222.jpg

She is not a super model, celebrity or public figure. She is a standard model but does publicize her name.

[SteveTimder]

I tried it before. Maybe it was just bad luck for me, but the money spent lead to zero real life meets. SA is just an easier pond to fish in.

Secret benefits is more work and lower choices as a rule. I have had 5 success stories at the cost of a lot of effort and weeding. Just my humble opinion. Stay safe.

[JimBobLarry69]

Not sure what your intent was with this post, but yes, in fact that seeking profile DID exist but has apparently since been deleted. I would add, that it was not the persons first profile on seeking.

CFG.

I know her personally and know that she is not doing sugar baby and has certainly never been an escort. It doesn't really matter at this point whether the profile DID exist, it does NOT exist now. And whether it was the persons first profile on seeking is completely irrelevant.

[JimBobLarry69]

If she is a super model, celebrity, or public figure, I am pretty sure the "real last name" rule does not apply because she would be part of the public domain, if that is what you are referring to

She is not a super model, celebrity or public figure. She is a standard model but does publicize her name.

[JizMan]

This girl is neither an escort nor a sugar baby. The seeking.com profile does not even exist. This post also violates forum rules by posting a real last name of a person

If she is a super model, celebrity, or public figure, I am pretty sure the "real last name" rule does not apply because she would be part of the public domain, if that is what you are referring to?

[Cincyfunguy]

This girl is neither an escort nor a sugar baby. The seeking.com profile does not even exist. This post also violates forum rules by posting a real last name of a person.

Not sure what your intent was with this post, but yes, in fact that seeking profile DID exist but has apparently since been deleted. I would add, that it was not the persons first profile on seeking.

CFG.

[JimBobLarry69]

Is she a super model or ???Hmmmm. Private pictures are showing the super model XXXXXX XXXXXX who happens to live in Mason per her social media.

https://www.seeking.com/member/5c76a...1-b34f696122a7

This girl is neither an escort nor a sugar baby. The seeking.com profile does not even exist. This post also violates forum rules by posting a real last name of a person.

[JimBobLarry69]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because it contributed nothing of value and in fact constituted a complete waste of bandwidth.

The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange if information between men on the subject of finding women for sex. Let's stick to the subject.

[WanderingAbout]

Secret Benefits, like Whats Your Price, is a pay to message site. You buy credits upfront that are then used to unlock conversations and / or pay to message a SB. Never worth it as you will be messaging a bunch of time wasters, people that seem interested but ghost and picture / video sellers. Maybe you will connect with a real SB and arrange a meet. By the time you score a meet your credits will be gone forcing you to buy more to talk to more potential SB's. WYP costs $100 at lowest end. You may be able to message 10 SB before the credits are gone (maybe more). While Seeking is approx $90 with unlimited messaging. Hope that helps.

I signed up for secret benefits and am getting many of the ladies messaging me if I have biewed their profile. How do I figure out the real ones vs. The nots just looking to such my credits.

I also noticed that most of the links posted for babies are from seeking.com. Is that site better than SB and why?

[Herr Doktor]

I signed up for secret benefits and am getting many of the ladies messaging me if I have biewed their profile. How do I figure out the real ones vs. The nots just looking to such my credits.

I also noticed that most of the links posted for babies are from seeking.com. Is that site better than SB and why?

I tried it before. Maybe it was just bad luck for me, but the money spent lead to zero real life meets. SA is just an easier pond to fish in.

[Kc148]

Thanks for your info. I do not see druggies. Or should I say, if I think they are druggies I do not see them. But then I could have been fooled in the past. Too much risk.

KC.

Her teeth weren't great but I've seen worse. As for your other question, all I saw was crack. She was like a vampire on it, hungry for her high. Def nothing I wanted to be around. Maybe she's changed, who knows? I just figured you guys oughta know before making your decision.