Organized German FKK Club Tours since 1995
click for FREE hookups
Click here for the best Sugarbabies
Sex Vacation
The Velvet Rooms
click for FREE hookups
This blog is moderated by Christophe1
  1. #3416

    Sinvee

    God damn this kgirl got ass!

    Unfortunately she cannot twerk her massive ass of hers and lacks in service.

    Oh well back again in search for Janet like booty and skills.

  2. #3415

    Here's site for Kitty

    Quote Originally Posted by Humyiy  [View Original Post]
    Post the site so we can see pics of who you're talking about. Girls move around so much these days and many use overlapping or similar names.
    Sorry I didn't post the site for Kitty. Here it is:

    http://january.escorts.biz/kitty78/

  3. #3414
    Quote Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty  [View Original Post]
    https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/kitty-es...angeles-453015

    I haven't contacted January yet. If pic is not stolen then Kitty was the girl in the pic I saw a couple years ago. She was natural B cup then, very tight pussy. I still remember her so she was better than average for me.
    OKay, thanks. After googling the # in the them. Saw this site.

    http://january.escorts.biz/companions/

  4. #3413

    Roxi?

    I thought she was still in the East. You don't give last 4 digits so I have no clue. Not like I ask all bookers what their name are and they also lie too.

    Quote Originally Posted by ThePartyGuy  [View Original Post]
    So I don't save booker #s. But occasionally I get texts about new rosters, etc. I just got 1 recently and since they sometimes change #s, I honestly don't know if I booked or who I booked with said booker. This booker text saying she was a new booker by the name of Tina. She provided pics of some girls: Sugar, Sharon, Hannah, Coco, and Sua. Can anyone confirm if this booker is legit? What made me wonder was the fact that the 2 pics used for Sugar are pics that were used for Roxi. When I asked if she went by a different name cause the pics looked familiar, she said she is new and just came from Korea. Anyone know if this is the Roxi that is being spoken about just using a new name and new booker?

  5. #3412

    Sinvee

    I saw her before in LA before she came back to SAG. She can pass for late 20. I thought she was the girl in the pic, but pic is better and more glammed up. I still thought she was attractive enough and even recommended her in OC.

    Quote Originally Posted by TomKeen  [View Original Post]
    Ad mentioned she's like 20 years old, did you think that was accurate or moreso "can pass for 20-21"?

  6. #3411

    January's girls Kitty

    https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/kitty-es...angeles-453015

    I haven't contacted January yet. If pic is not stolen then Kitty was the girl in the pic I saw a couple years ago. She was natural B cup then, very tight pussy. I still remember her so she was better than average for me.

    Quote Originally Posted by HapaBoy86  [View Original Post]
    Have link for January's girls?

  7. #3410

    Poof! Gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Discreetmale68  [View Original Post]
    I wonder if it's the same Luna they had a couple of years ago. She was about 5. 3 very cute looking in early 20's for sure. I remember her P2 P and kaegel skills were really good. Someone actually describes her as college girl gone bad. But was one of the best I thought.
    Not even 24 hours, there is no "Luna" on sweetasiangem com.

  8. #3409

    Post the site

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex60  [View Original Post]
    Gents -- does anyone have any intel on Kitty from January's Girls? I'm interested in whether she looks like her pics, and how her service was. (And her stats say 34 C, but the pics. Hmmm.).

    Thanks in advance!
    Post the site so we can see pics of who you're talking about. Girls move around so much these days and many use overlapping or similar names.

  9. #3408
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex60  [View Original Post]
    Gents -- does anyone have any intel on Kitty from January's Girls? I'm interested in whether she looks like her pics, and how her service was. (And her stats say 34 C, but the pics. Hmmm.).

    Thanks in advance!
    Have link for January's girls?

  10. #3407

    Jenny at Sexy Angels

    Got to catch Jenny at Sexy Angels on one of her first days here in LA. Pictures are accurate, though she is slightly more tan in person. Natural and slender body, cute face, and this is one of the rare cases where the provider is actually under 30. Great service with extensive menu, though rimming was not offered or requested. I will say that this is the first time in a long time where I am already planning to repeat. I have not seen Nina yet, but the agency appears to be the real deal. Recommended.

  11. #3406
    Quote Originally Posted by Discreetmale68  [View Original Post]
    I wonder if it's the same Luna they had a couple of years ago. She was about 5. 3 very cute looking in early 20's for sure. I remember her P2 P and kaegel skills were really good. Someone actually describes her as college girl gone bad. But was one of the best I thought.
    No, the pictures don't even look close. She was great BBFS action, possibly one of the youngest K-girls I had the pleasure of creaming inside.

  12. #3405

    Luna at SAG

    I wonder if it's the same Luna they had a couple of years ago. She was about 5. 3 very cute looking in early 20's for sure. I remember her P2 P and kaegel skills were really good. Someone actually describes her as college girl gone bad. But was one of the best I thought.

  13. #3404
    Quote Originally Posted by TomKeen  [View Original Post]
    Ad mentioned she's like 20 years old, did you think that was accurate or moreso "can pass for 20-21"?
    She looked like late 20's, maybe early 30's to me.

  14. #3403

    Info on Kitty?

    Gents -- does anyone have any intel on Kitty from January's Girls? I'm interested in whether she looks like her pics, and how her service was. (And her stats say 34 C, but the pics. Hmmm.).

    Thanks in advance!

  15. #3402

    Age

    Quote Originally Posted by PlutoKiller  [View Original Post]
    My regulars were not available. Haven't TOFFT for a while, so took my chances with SinVee on her first day.

    P Not her, but not really surprising. I don't even look at the pics anymore as they are fake anyway.

    L She is maybe 5'2", has some meat on her bones (but not chubby by any means), decent looking, flashing a nice smile and natural body with maybe C's. Her best asset must be her butt, even larger and firmer than Chanel. Would have given her a 7 on the old defunct board.

    E English is surprisingly good. Seems to have been around for a couple of months traveling and alternating between the East and West Coat. Mentioned that she was here in LA before a couple of months ago.

    A Very nice smile, positive attitude. Provided a soft GFE experience.

    S Sweet soft GFE, hug and DFK at the door, blue toast, shower with no preview, back to the room, cat-bath with a hint of rimming, soft and unique style of giving a BBBJ with sucking the head and swirling her tongue but no DT, not even half DT but I somehow liked her BBBJ style. She doesn't like to do camel slides and having an uncovered dick near her pussy which is a major bummer as it should be part of the play of every Kgal. Covered CFS in any position I wanted and I of course enjoyed doggy the most. What a view of her cute butt. Did not offer a second shot. Would have given her a 6.

    E 260.

    Are She is leaving soon, so probably not. I normally prefer a bit more aggressive PSE style, but somehow really enjoyed my time with her. Everybody that likes a soft GFE style, and can accept her limits.
    Ad mentioned she's like 20 years old, did you think that was accurate or moreso "can pass for 20-21"?

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best sugar babies
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Meet and Fuck Today!
Best Escorts
Ava Escorts




click for FREE hookups

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape