This blog is moderated by Admin
-
Senior Member
Posts: 112
M's girls
Originally Posted by
TheAbc
[View Original Post]
I just posted yesterday about in very recent memory about the new girls being bad. (According to some posters here). I try my best to post good and bad reviews when I do go. There hasn't been too memorable ones for awhile now. I still miss my experience with Rain when I saw her awhile ago. I'm curious as to the criteria M uses to get girls.
I totally agree! When We review these girls, we're not trying to slam M and her girls because all of us have had a blast there at some point. Cona has lost a big step! Lucia is hit or miss and IMO isn't very attractive and Nikki, who I just saw last weekend was a complete dud. I don't know why we continue to spend our $$ here.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 3480
Originally Posted by
TheAbc
[View Original Post]
I just posted yesterday about in very recent memory about the new girls being bad. (According to some posters here). I try my best to post good and bad reviews when I do go. There hasn't been too memorable ones for awhile now. I still miss my experience with Rain when I saw her awhile ago. I'm curious as to the criteria M uses to get girls.
Do you really find Cona, Lucia, Sasha and now Nikki, who I haven't seen but who has some pretty good reviews, to be very bad? We're here for the sex and those girls give some of the best sex that you will get including BBFS which you won't get from most of those who you consider to be "HOT". They offer great sex and are somewhere between cute, exotic and pretty with personalities that make for a good connection. What more are we looking for? I saw Rain when she came here with Cona, Grace and Kiss a few years ago and she was my least favorite in that group. Yes she was a sex machine but with absolutely no English skills that was all it was. Banging away for an hour with no real sensuality or connection. I've said it before and I'll say it again it's always YMMV. Don't know what you're not getting from the current crop but it has been pretty damn good for me.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 459
Rain.
Originally Posted by
TheAbc
[View Original Post]
I just posted yesterday about in very recent memory about the new girls being bad. (According to some posters here). I try my best to post good and bad reviews when I do go. There hasn't been too memorable ones for awhile now. I still miss my experience with Rain when I saw her awhile ago. I'm curious as to the criteria M uses to get girls.
I miss her. She was so fun. We laughed and banged fir 59 minutes straight every time.
Haven't seen her in years. I wonder if she changed her name and moved to bay area or another city.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 894
Originally Posted by
JohnnyEm
[View Original Post]
Just to say out loud, M's girls have been disappointing for months. Not to name names but I know some of you advocate for M (possibly even working for?) and she's historically been great but let's be honest, they've been pretty bad of late. I think the only way she'll bring in better talent is if we go elsewhere until she brings in the level of talent we're accustomed to. I probably won't go back until Victoria is back, at least!
I just posted yesterday about in very recent memory about the new girls being bad. (According to some posters here). I try my best to post good and bad reviews when I do go. There hasn't been too memorable ones for awhile now. I still miss my experience with Rain when I saw her awhile ago. I'm curious as to the criteria M uses to get girls.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 6834
Originally Posted by
Toungsten
[View Original Post]
I know you guys are seeing a lot of the girls that we talk about but I don't see many reviews or even mention of whether they are good looking or are all star performers. Sometimes I see remarks like worth seeing or not worth seeing. Come on guys. We need more than that. If we're going to make this board worthwhile then we need feedback from all of us.
Come on T.
Being this is a bareback thread the guys only care about if they can jizz inside her with "no condom"! Not looks! LOL.
This isn't kstyleblog. .
-
Senior Member
Posts: 3480
Reviews
I know you guys are seeing a lot of the girls that we talk about but I don't see many reviews or even mention of whether they are good looking or are all star performers. Sometimes I see remarks like worth seeing or not worth seeing. Come on guys. We need more than that. If we're going to make this board worthwhile then we need feedback from all of us.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 3480
Originally Posted by
TheAbc
[View Original Post]
Is still BBFS still or not? Recent reports suggests no, but makes up for it in a fantastic CFS session?
It's always YMMV. Just be charming and make her cum a lot.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 894
Originally Posted by
NintyNine
[View Original Post]
Chanel didn't seem to have that much business. Dunno how she's worn out.
I saw her 2 months ago and she seemed tired and didn't feel like working that day. She went on break shortly after for a few weeks. Came back, she was good again but only worked for a short amount of time. I would say 1-3 weeks at most. Again, she's on some break for who knows how long. I haven't found much repeats with whoever works at M. Whoever I liked ended up being there for a very short amount of time.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 894
Originally Posted by
Toungsten
[View Original Post]
She's back with M and in PV for another week before she goes on a few weeks tour up north. If you want cute and natural and someone who once fired up will give you the time of your life then see her before she leaves next week. I got a sneak peek of her friend she'll be visiting and possibly bringing back to L. A. With her. DAMN. Very good looking and hot.
https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/sasha-es...angeles-523557
Is still BBFS still or not? Recent reports suggests no, but makes up for it in a fantastic CFS session?
-
Senior Member
Posts: 3480
Sasha
She's back with M and in PV for another week before she goes on a few weeks tour up north. If you want cute and natural and someone who once fired up will give you the time of your life then see her before she leaves next week. I got a sneak peek of her friend she'll be visiting and possibly bringing back to L. A. With her. DAMN. Very good looking and hot.
https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/sasha-es...angeles-523557
-
Senior Member
Posts: 112
M gals
Just to say out loud, M's girls have been disappointing for months. Not to name names but I know some of you advocate for M (possibly even working for?) and she's historically been great but let's be honest, they've been pretty bad of late. I think the only way she'll bring in better talent is if we go elsewhere until she brings in the level of talent we're accustomed to. I probably won't go back until Victoria is back, at least!
-
Senior Member
Posts: 3480
Originally Posted by
Vulcan1009
[View Original Post]
If you like PSE, Lucia is the one. Sasha is too GFE and too sensual and a bit slow + no more BBFS, Cona. Right at the mid. Bit GFE bit PSE.
Give Sasha a good tongue lashing on her clit and some heavy finger stroking of her G-spot and then see if she is too sensual and slow. That's what sets her off and puts her in that same category as Lucia and Cona. They are the holy triumverate.
-
Regular Member
Posts: 23
Originally Posted by
Toungsten
[View Original Post]
You haven't seen Sasha yet? She's back with M in PV but leaving for a vacation next week. Still time to experience a beautiful and VERY wet pussy. You won't be disappointed.
Almost forgot. Yea I saw her the first time around. She does a body good.
-
Posts: 904
Originally Posted by
NintyNine
[View Original Post]
J's agency used to have bb girls. And they were among the hottest.
I got tired of trying the 2nd /3rd tier agencies, and I'm not willing to gamble to find out whether a hot young girl does bb.
If a $50 tip 99% guaranteed bb, I'd do it more often. But at $260 a pop, no thanks. Most girls end up giving plain mediocre service.
Plus, with so many fake photos being circulated by these lower tier agencies, I have no idea what the fuck I'll be fucking.
I've had mediocre service at one of J's girls, I went back a second time with the same girl, it went x100 better. I noticed for some girls, if they see you come back again, the service ends up being much better, well that's how it was for me at least.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 3480
Originally Posted by
StarfishPrime
[View Original Post]
Since I blindly went to see Nikki and had a great experience I felt confident for another blind meet. I saw Heidi yesterday. Will not repeat. No BBFS. She is attractive. Small petite with a nice body and naturals. Her performance was not what I expected after seeing Nikki a couple days ago. I see Ms girls for the same reason we all do. I repeatedly have seen Chanel and Lucia. I plan on going back to see Nikki now to neutralize my satisfaction. Will not repeat and I do not recommend. YMMV.
You haven't seen Sasha yet? She's back with M in PV but leaving for a vacation next week. Still time to experience a beautiful and VERY wet pussy. You won't be disappointed.