Seeking Arrangements

**Lozo43** · 01-14-19 14:45

Originally Posted by BenignNine [View Original Post]

I seem to remember someone posting, but not getting hits on any searches I've tried. Thanks in advance.

https://www.seeking.com/member/f2186...a-bc71727a21ad

I spoke with her, but she was trying to say 300 for a meet, just didn't care to try to get anything else. Pm me for more details if youd like.

**RandomFragment** · 01-14-19 11:05

I seem to remember someone posting, but not getting hits on any searches I've tried. Thanks in advance.

https://www.seeking.com/member/f2186...a-bc71727a21ad

**Longjblues** · 01-14-19 09:27

Just mesg the moderator. I suppose you could just indicate the reason that you want it removed. Such as private info or too much info or violation of a rule.

I am assuming you are referring to a post that you posted and it's past the editing time frame.

I would just report the post, as you would someone else's post. Plead your case for removal with the moderator. (See lower left corner of post)

Originally Posted by CandyMan555 [View Original Post]

How can you delete a post?

**CandyMan555** · 01-14-19 08:29

How can you delete a post?

**Sitteb36** · 01-13-19 22:14

I had been chatting with her on the site and was close to meeting. Her profile was gone before I was able to get her contact information. If any one has it and is willing to provide it please PM me. Thank you!!

Originally Posted by Oscar13 [View Original Post]

https://www.seeking.com/member/87f96...8-d73184f76394

Saw this one over the summer. $$ per meet. BBFSCIP no hint of asking for a cover. Spent 3 hrs each time with msog. Major squirter. Not athletic as she professes, but a small bbw imo. Maybe some would say curvy. Definitely a law student. 2 cats that liked to watch. She hosted out of Quincy. Decent place, felt totally safe. If curvy / sbbw is your thing, definitely worth the price of admission. That's not my thing, and yet I went back for seconds.

**CandyMan555** · 01-13-19 21:38

Met this one for dinner, fairly attractive, talked a good game, then wanted money for gas, gave her 50,then needed more another 50 . I am thinking this is a good investment.

WRONG.

She ghosted me, 3 days later, asked her to meet for brunch, and send me a photo, she wanted money for the photo and would not meet for a hotel visit but just wants to string you along to extract more money from you.

I am banned on S A for no reason, so I cannot show her profile.

LIVE AND LEARN! CM.

**Oscar13** · 01-13-19 21:18

Originally Posted by Jack617 [View Original Post]

So, we all ***** and moan, with good reason, about all these girls that mention platonic in their profiles. Like most of you I generally move on but was curious if any of you have actually fucked a girl with a profile like that? Of course this post is not coming out of left field as I ran into one that I would give my left nut to fuck, LOL.

https://www.seeking.com/member/2c537...5-daed7caf05f9

I've gotten some discussion of FS from some with the platonic marker checked off, but their allowance wants have been outrageous. But this one has the marker, says strictly platonic in what she is looking for, and says if you're looking for sex look elsewhere I wouldn't waste my time there, 3 strikes.

**Garretts65** · 01-13-19 20:16

Originally Posted by Aardvarks [View Original Post]

I have yet to even meet one with the platonic declaration. But who knows. The one you posted has a pic of herself in a bra with her boobs hanging out so I don't get it. Why post that pic if you're not going to put out? Maybe get her over to text and ask WTF is the platonic thing with such sultry pics.

I met a woman from CT that is married and said that she only wanted platonic. We ended up meeting for a public lunch and it became clear that more than platonic was available. She wasn't really my thing so I passed, but platonic is certainly not only platonic.

**Aardvarks** · 01-13-19 19:52

Originally Posted by Jack617 [View Original Post]

So, we all ***** and moan, with good reason, about all these girls that mention platonic in their profiles. Like most of you I generally move on but was curious if any of you have actually fucked a girl with a profile like that? Of course this post is not coming out of left field as I ran into one that I would give my left nut to fuck, LOL.

https://www.seeking.com/member/2c537...5-daed7caf05f9

I have yet to even meet one with the platonic declaration. But who knows. The one you posted has a pic of herself in a bra with her boobs hanging out so I don't get it. Why post that pic if you're not going to put out? Maybe get her over to text and ask WTF is the platonic thing with such sultry pics.

**Jack617** · 01-13-19 12:53

So, we all ***** and moan, with good reason, about all these girls that mention platonic in their profiles. Like most of you I generally move on but was curious if any of you have actually fucked a girl with a profile like that? Of course this post is not coming out of left field as I ran into one that I would give my left nut to fuck, LOL.

https://www.seeking.com/member/2c537...5-daed7caf05f9

**Walruscl** · 01-11-19 23:08

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

Moving onto a sister topic, considering how much of the stabilizing factor they are in our lives, many providers should be looked at as mental health professionals and in more advanced societies would be covered by health insurance or at least under European health care model should be provider with an elective upgrade, allowing one to upgrade his (or her) mental care coverage to include such services. Also, considering how many families they keep together, how many divorces they keep from happening, in fact how many women and children they keep from turning into single (I. E. Divorced) mothers, they should be able to fall under family counseling, and that too should be covered by an elective mental health rider.

Just saying.

Can't say that my 5-year SB could have prevented my divorce (though that was the idea at the time), nor was she the reason for it. More like a persistent cognitive dissonance, and a canary-in-the-coal-mine wakeup call to what was an untenable marriage. Even though in the end (inevitably), that SB is out of my life, the divorce was a necessary pain. So I suppose the logic applies, even if the stated outcome doesn't align with my experience.

My current SB is certainly salving the wounds of post-divorce life, that's for sure.

**PaulRew** · 01-11-19 19:50

Has anyone here seen her?

https://www.seeking.com/member/6db55...5-8515985ba09a

**Lozo43** · 01-11-19 17:29

Anyone ever seen her? Or any info to report on?

https://www.seeking.com/member/7ab8d...2-7b3b8d0433ed

**Spill** · 01-11-19 16:11

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

Moreover, don't forget that it's not sex that you're paying for but for the companionship. Kind of like hiring a Home Health Aid privately you know.

Moving onto a sister topic, considering how much of the stabilizing factor they are in our lives, many providers should be looked at as mental health professionals and in more advanced societies would be covered by health insurance or at least under European health care model should be provider with an elective upgrade, allowing one to upgrade his (or her) mental care coverage to include such services. Also, considering how many families they keep together, how many divorces they keep from happening, in fact how many women and children they keep from turning into single (I. E. Divorced) mothers, they should be able to fall under family counseling, and that too should be covered by an elective mental health rider.

Just saying.

Sounds like a good opportunity for President Pence.

**Spill** · 01-11-19 16:09

Originally Posted by Longjblues [View Original Post]

How can it get back to "them"? How exactly does it "get back" to "them". Oh, "ten ladies out of all the ladies with profiles on the Massachusetts/NH SA site are reported on an obscure Escort review site as taking money for sex"?? I think you are overly cautious. And besides, the feds would go after SA's sister site, "WhatsYourPrice" first, since that is more clearly a gray area of the law.

Yes, I agree that everyone should be discreet, but certainly reporting on what a lady is requiring for her allowance is fine. The element of SD / SB is that the relationship is more than just a one time thing. The majority of the SA ladies are not "professionals". In fact, I would say that very few are professionals. If they take down SA, they, being the feds, will be required to take down traditional dating sites. Not going to happen.

I do not know that USASG would be considered an "obscure Escort review site", but that does not matter. The "get back to them" only needs to provide SA with the idea that there is a potential hole and they will tighten things further to avoid FOSTA. I'm not worrying about the feds shutting down SA, I am more worried about SA changing their business model away from how we like it.