K-Girl Photo Accuracy. Real or Fake

[Christophe1]

All good points from everyone. Thanks for everyone's contribution so far. Just refreshing the opening thread for everyone to continue rating photo accuracy.

K-Girl Photo Accuracy. Real or Fake.

Making this thread specifically to rate accuracy of pictures used by our favorite K-agencies. It would be ideal to rank it into 5 tiers below:

Tier 1- Current real life photo. Minimal to no photoshop.

Tier 2 - Real life photo but from a few or couple years ago.

Tier 3 - Real life photo is highly photoshopped but still recognizable in person.

Tier 4 - Fake picture but representative or similar.

Tier 5 - Fake picture and not even close.

This thread may seem pointless as we all know most use fake pictures. In order to counter that, it is encouraged for everyone to mention a girl you know from social media or adult films or other platforms that is as close as it can get to their looks in person.

Below is an example of what a post should look like:

Example one.

Title: Baby Sugar (Put down their name) CGLA (Agency name).

Tier 1- Current real life photo. Minimal to no photoshop.

Example two.

Title: Ina / Kbliss.

Tier 5 - Fake picture and not even close (I know it's real pictures of her but let's pretend it's not. If picture is completely fake, mention the name of someone similar we can search on google or attach a picture to your post).

Person similar to Ina: yekooooong from IG.

*Since beauty is subjective, please refrain from mentioning if you think they looked better than fake photos if rating in tier 5. All full reviews should go to the other threads.

I will throw a couple more out there.

Becky Tier 1.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/becky/

She is tallish, has braces, is really tan.

Bomi Tier 1 at least on some advertising websites. On a couple others she is photoshopped. Most women are usually wearing the same jewelry they are pictured in.

I am actually sad I didn't get to see her again. Bad blow job no problem. Her cuteness, and English made up for it. I would skip that part and move to banging shorty positions.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/bomi2/

Celine Tier 1 with P.S. To beautify her looks.

Bunny deserves an LA residency as a tier 1 provider with Tier 1 level service.

Celine Tier 1 with P.S. To beautify her looks.

[CreamFire]

All good points from everyone. Thanks for everyone's contribution so far. Just refreshing the opening thread for everyone to continue rating photo accuracy.

K-Girl Photo Accuracy. Real or Fake.

Making this thread specifically to rate accuracy of pictures used by our favorite K-agencies. It would be ideal to rank it into 5 tiers below:

Tier 1- Current real life photo. Minimal to no photoshop.

Tier 2 - Real life photo but from a few or couple years ago.

Tier 3 - Real life photo is highly photoshopped but still recognizable in person.

Tier 4 - Fake picture but representative or similar.

Tier 5 - Fake picture and not even close.

This thread may seem pointless as we all know most use fake pictures. In order to counter that, it is encouraged for everyone to mention a girl you know from social media or adult films or other platforms that is as close as it can get to their looks in person.

Below is an example of what a post should look like:

Example one.

Title: Baby Sugar (Put down their name) CGLA (Agency name).

Tier 1- Current real life photo. Minimal to no photoshop.

Example two.

Title: Ina / Kbliss.

Tier 5 - Fake picture and not even close (I know it's real pictures of her but let's pretend it's not. If picture is completely fake, mention the name of someone similar we can search on google or attach a picture to your post).

Person similar to Ina: yekooooong from IG.

*Since beauty is subjective, please refrain from mentioning if you think they looked better than fake photos if rating in tier 5. All full reviews should go to the other threads.

[Taliesin92]

Also, anytime you make it easy for the hobbyist, you make it easy for LE to target.

That is certainly true. ********'s greatest achievement, and its biggest weakness, was that it made things so simple and easy and fun. Oh well. RIP CV.

[FiatVoluptas]

The combination of fake pics and unreasonable price hikes has all but destroyed the kgirl industry for me. I am just not willing to TOFTT at 350/ hr and risk being pissed off and disappointed. Every time that happens, I end up going to an ATF within the next few days to make up for it and in the end, I spend double. That is why when it comes to kgirls, I only see girls I already know, or girls who have been highly vetted by reliable people here. The last "new" kgirl I saw was Elle. I say new because it was my first time with her. She did not disappoint and I hope she comes back.

It's a sad situation. The days of real pics and 260/ hr rates were amazing, but now only seem a distant memory.

[BuddhaHead]

...there are web sites that provide essentially the same service... it was a giant cash cow back in the day.

That's why there isn't another CV. There are other established web sites (e. G, HX), so why create another one? Also, they were charging a lot per ad because they were pretty much the only game in town. But, now, one cannot charge that much because of competition and bookers' ability to create & control their own websites. Also, anytime you make it easy for the hobbyist, you make it easy for LE to target.

[Taliesin92]

It was taken down due to the passing of the FOSTA law, which puts adult services "ad" websites at risk for prosecution (E. G, Backpage). Also, bookers can put up and manage their own websites more easily and cheaply.

Yes, I remember those dark days. But still, there are web sites that provide essentially the same service. An aggregated listing of working girls in various cities. They are probably just headquartered outside the USA (because, of course, this isn't a free country anymore). You'd think someone would come along and replicate CV in the same way. Afterall, it was a giant cash cow back in the day.

Just change the name slightly. Call it CitiVibe or something.

[BuddhaHead]

I'm surprised no one has revived that web site...

It was taken down due to the passing of the FOSTA law, which puts adult services "ad" websites at risk for prosecution (E. G, Backpage). Also, bookers can put up and manage their own websites more easily and cheaply.

[Taliesin92]

Same. Whenever I see an AI pic I don't even bother. But the ones that post real selfies or body pics (like Spring) got me seriously interested.

Right. Spring's professional photos are a throw-back to the good ol' days when those CV pics were almost always real. Damn, I miss those days. Seeing that little green dot glowing at the top of a k-girl's CV ad was like heroin to me. I'm surprised no one has revived that web site. It was the first thing I would look at every morning. LOL!

[Chancas]

Yes, I wish the agency owners, bookers and even the k-girls themselves would understand the power of using real pics. Back in the CV days, I felt compelled to see new girls with hot pics, because there was a very good chance those pics were real. Using fake pics was frowned upon and certain agencies simply would not allow them.

Today, fake pics are rampant. They've become the norm. So, consequently, I no longer get real excited when I see pics of a new k-girl. I assume she looks nothing like that. And sometimes I will decide to stay home and watch the Dodgers or Lakers instead. These fake pics are not a very effective advertising tool. They no longer compel customers to show up.

Maybe this is the heart of why so many k-girls keep complaining that "business is slow. " If they try going back to real pics, maybe that would change. Slightly blurred face is fine. But show us that killer body please!

Many truly were hot 20 somethings in the CV days though.

[ZebraZebra]

Yes, I wish the agency owners, bookers and even the k-girls themselves would understand the power of using real pics. Back in the CV days, I felt compelled to see new girls with hot pics, because there was a very good chance those pics were real. Using fake pics was frowned upon and certain agencies simply would not allow them.

Today, fake pics are rampant. They've become the norm. So, consequently, I no longer get real excited when I see pics of a new k-girl. I assume she looks nothing like that. And sometimes I will decide to stay home and watch the Dodgers or Lakers instead. These fake pics are not a very effective advertising tool. They no longer compel customers to show up.

Maybe this is the heart of why so many k-girls keep complaining that "business is slow. " If they try going back to real pics, maybe that would change. Slightly blurred face is fine. But show us that killer body please!

Same. Whenever I see an AI pic I don't even bother. But the ones that post real selfies or body pics (like Spring) got me seriously interested.

[Taliesin92]

Made this thread in hopes that agency uses real pictures more often like they used to. In the CV days...

Yes, I wish the agency owners, bookers and even the k-girls themselves would understand the power of using real pics. Back in the CV days, I felt compelled to see new girls with hot pics, because there was a very good chance those pics were real. Using fake pics was frowned upon and certain agencies simply would not allow them.

Today, fake pics are rampant. They've become the norm. So, consequently, I no longer get real excited when I see pics of a new k-girl. I assume she looks nothing like that. And sometimes I will decide to stay home and watch the Dodgers or Lakers instead. These fake pics are not a very effective advertising tool. They no longer compel customers to show up.

Maybe this is the heart of why so many k-girls keep complaining that "business is slow. " If they try going back to real pics, maybe that would change. Slightly blurred face is fine. But show us that killer body please!

[Christophe1]

Here is my 2 mud pie sandwich.

Chu.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/chu/

Chu really is displaying herself on front street. I am kind of interested in that she has so many modelesque pictures. She has big round eyes.

Boa.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/boa/

These are her pictures. Her pose is to display her ass, like come hitherto. The pictures display her at the best and once in, she will wow you with her service. Or not?

Baby Sugar.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/sugar/

She really puts herself on front street. If you are pulled to her pixyesque facial features, then you won't be suprised by her leg injury in a motorcycle accident. A foodie. And her pictures are what all of us would expect. Kudos!

Sofi.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/sofi/

I saw her last year as a Sunny roommate. She has toured the continent and is replacing some of the best. Pretty close representation, maybe should get new pictures.

Phoebe.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/phoebe/

She is a hard one, the pictures are glammed up. The most important part about her journey trip is she will play it off and introduce seduce you to the journey. Kind of seductive, and when you stop asking silly questions about pictures you will be deep diving in her caves.

Bunny.

https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/bunny

The profile picture capture her pure essence. The others beside the black and white one are also true. She has a remarkable way of shape shifting, my kryptonight. Fro. Above or below, you will get a different version. Pictures are accurate.

Shelly.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/shelly/

Photos are accurate. There is lack of prospective so she may surprise you as being more than a handful. And those dimples!

Baby Moon.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/baby-moon/

Fake pictures.

Looks similar without the fake blown up lips or the eye surgery. She pulls it off well with her Korean eyes. Body is tall and natural.

Miko.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/miko-yoko/

Lots of makeup and MILF body, the pictures are real.

Viki.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/viki/

Pictures are real but her face is older and more worn.

Jaehee.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/jaehee2/

Might be 10 years old or older, but she has talents that might persuade you otherwise in the darkish room.

Sunny.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/sunny/

Sunny is my weak spot. The pictures always seemed like they could of been her, but found out they're stock photos. Holding my dick and laughing on the way in, what can I say?

Ari.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/ari/

They are legit but glammed up. Don't really have enough oppinion to tell an informed decision.

Shasa.

https://topangels.ch/topangel/shasa/

Lots of photoshop. Not sure if it is her body or face. Got to reward her though because she was a cum queen.

Zut Alor. I feel like there is about 75% accuracy, not nearly as bad as the bros say.

[CreamFire]

While I appreciate the attempt, this thread just illustrates the crap shoot of visiting an Asian House.

Made this thread in hopes that agency uses real pictures more often like they used to. In the CV days, the pictures ranked between Tiers 1 - 3. Nowadays, it's mostly tiers 4 - 5 . If enough people give tiers to girls, I feel most people would more than likely visit girls with tiers 1 - 3 vs 4 - 5. When that happens, these agencies should be smart enough to see a pattern that real pictures equals more customers. And if not, then the girl just simply meant they had no business being there and should have their own lower end rates.

Sometimes, you see girls with the upcharge ratings and completely had no business in that category and should be moved to the 250 range. Sounds ridiculous but I'm sure there's an audience for them in that range. And here my logic on what current market should "realistically" look like:

$$.50 - MILF / Gilf and okay looking and bb as their only remaining appeal. MP quality looks. Yes, there have been some in these agencies that belong in a MP.

$$$.50 Young / hot GFE or Cute / BB or Hot MILF / bb.

$$$$.50 -Young / hot / bb or Young cute BB.


Preferably lower than these but we know it won:t happen since a lot are willing to give out here in LA.

[BikiniFan]

The last sentence is the most accurate statement.

Most guys cannot determine these distinctions with certainty anyway, or come to an agreement. Also, who determines whether their categorizations are "correct" because of the 1st point which are very subjective to begin with. Guys say the picture is 80% accurate or 90% accurate. WTF does that mean? Guys argue whether a girl has a D cup or C cup. Who is "correct"? Girls look like this kpop idol or that kpop idol. Really? Then, they backtrack & say there's a resemblance. Yeah, all kgirls resemble a Korean woman in their 20's /30's. The point is that guys cannot accurately describe kgirls' looks with words nor judge whether pictures are accurate depictions of their looks.

While I appreciate the attempt, this thread just illustrates the crap shoot of visiting an Asian House.

[Bbaka10]

New datapoint on Baby Arin. She dyed her hair blonde, so she no longer has black hair with blonde highlights as the website would suggest. She looks a lot more like the SKS Baby Cherry pics, but with longer hair. I'd still classify as Tier 2.

Shani. Tier 5. Pics are of some IG girl. But you still won't be disappointed in person, she's still very attractive and I think the fake pics are to conceal her identity versus her being ugly.

Baby Sugar. Tier 1. Pics are SPOT ON. What you see is what you get.

Yami / Lucia. Tier 4. Pretty sure pics are not of her. But could be wrong. At the very least, they are very photoshopped.

Ina. Tier 2 / 3. I'd actually argue that the pics are Tier 2 . But I can get behind Tier 3.

Mimi3 / Miso. Tier 5. Pics are def not her.

Baby Izzy. Tier 2. Pics are pretty representative, but she was a bit chubbier in person.

Baby Yuna. Tier 4. Pretty sure pics are not of her. But still hot in person. Fake pics are probably to conceal identity.

Baby Sky. Tier 4. Pretty sure pics are not of her. But still hot in person. Fake pics are probably to conceal identity..