Thread: Ohio Law
+
Add Report
Results 1 to 15 of 37
-
04-03-17 04:52 #37
Posts: 46Originally Posted by CincyDude1 [View Original Post]
http://dayton.backpage.com/WomenSeek...sasha/35335242
-
03-30-17 13:35 #36
Posts: 64Should be fine, but don't converse with police
Originally Posted by CinciDan [View Original Post]
Do not consent to any search. If the officer suspects you may be armed and demands to pat you down, you do have to comply with this request. However, make it clear that you do not consent to a search. Exit the car and lock it, and state clearly that you do not consent to a search of your person. If the officer asks to search the car, refuse consent. They cannot search you, your phone (s), or your car without a warrant.
If you use a burner phone keep it out of sight during a police stop. It should be in a compartment separate from where your registration / insurance papers are, or in a briefcase or something like that. I always put mine away after I've left a provider.
I doubt that you are in any kind of trouble, but you did admit to getting a massage. If you refused to answer questions, that bit of information would have been left out of the picture. Who knows, maybe you just sat in the waiting room for 30 minutes and then left without any kind of service? You see, even something as small and seemingly innocuous as sharing that you got a massage could be used against you, especially if the place gets busted. However, I don't think you'll be bothered again.
Next time this happens, and hopefully it won't, exercise those rights to which you are entitled. They were hard fought for by great citizens who came before us.
-
03-29-17 17:44 #35
Posts: 1Need some advice
Got a massage yesterday out of town and got pulled over a little after I got out onto the Main Street. He asked what I was doing in the area and I said I was on business and was just leaving. He ran my license and then asked why didn't you say anything about the massage parlor. I said I just got a massage and you followed me from there so you know I just left. I also showed him a receipt for the dinner I had gotten beforehand. He then said I had used the wrong lane to turn when I pulled out onto the road and that's why he pulled me over and not to do that again and left. Should I be worried since they ran my information if something should happen to that place? Just a little worried.
-
03-29-17 03:55 #34
Posts: 5Searching for provider blonde 5 ft 9 says she Amerasian IE Sasha
Obviously she could be under many names but she was from the Colerain area.
Any input greatly appreciated.
-
12-17-16 22:02 #33
Posts: 5The cock pic argument. Dream on. LEO does whatever they want.
I just read a few posts about the ole let's trade pics theory. First of all trading pics does nothing. It's as weak as these ignorant girls posting ridiculous stuff in their ads like no LEO. Are you serious. Then it burns my ass to see guys ask girls hi are you a member of LEO? Oh they have to tell you Ha! Gtfoh! One things for sure. LEO does whatever whenever and will testify and just leave out a few things. Don't believe all that manuer cmon. Oh he didn't read me my rights ha! To many sheethouse lawyers.
-
07-17-15 18:58 #32
Posts: 446Originally Posted by FirstHalf [View Original Post]
MM.
-
07-17-15 12:01 #31
Posts: 511If I were a cop
Reading this right now I would immediately send Marley a dock shot, then go pinch her.
Originally Posted by MisforMaster [View Original Post]
-
07-17-15 11:03 #30
Posts: 446Originally Posted by FirstHalf [View Original Post]
Does anyone remember the little strip club in Troy Ohio that got busted in 2005?
Do you remember *how* it got busted?
If your answer is, "The State impersonated a woman by making a counterfeit driver's license and identity for a cop based on a real person's information," you are absolutely correct. Cops can lie during the course of their investigation. Cops can lie while writing reports. Cops will send cock shots, they will have their buddies lie to people and use the shell companies that they already have open for employment verification, and -- push come to shove -- they will always make an arrest if you're their target.
-
07-16-15 16:23 #29
Posts: 4922Law
I resurrected this thread for this discussion.
A2.
-
07-16-15 14:52 #28
Posts: 2558Originally Posted by TheGardener1 [View Original Post]
Sending a dick pic by itself does not entice an illegal activity therefore is permisseable under law. A dick pic with a note that says, "suck this" is still legal. A dick pic with a note that says, "Suck this for $100" crossed the line because it enticed an illegal act.
-
07-16-15 11:37 #27
Posts: 59Marley24
"In the state of Ohio the police are not allowed to send genitalia photos and ladies take note. I as a provider have encountered stings head on and have sought out advice from lawyers and I'm telling you thou that is a sure fire way to weed out LEO. References mean nothing to me. I've been set up by clients who rolled on me. The system is not as secure as you might feel. You could send a pic of someone else's Dick. I wouldn't care because I know for a fact LEO is restricted. I've bumped my head a lot in this hobby by not listening. I just wish you ladies and gentlemen would take heed and not have to go through the same stuff. ".
Marley, I'm not sure what kind of lawyers have given you this info, but it is incorrect. The Ohio Revised Code (O. Are. See.) does NOT prohibit officers from doing anything of the such. In fact, there is NO restrictions for officers on how far they can take their operation with a working girl (e. G. Touching, oral, or even intercourse). I have years of law experience with cases such as these. Don't believe me? Read the O. Are. See. And show me I'm wrong. You'll be reading a long time to find nothing. And believe me, the O. Are. See. Is a boring, yet educational read. There have been cited cases where the officers have performed sexual acts with the girl, then arrested her for prostitution. See cases in Arkansas from last year and a case from Georgia 3 years ago. The problem arises with the tax payers and having to explain their actions as a law enforcement officer in court. Not many police departments want to explain to the tax payers why they did what they did. Departments MAY have policies against sending pics, touching, performing acts, or even being the actual john in a sting, BUT there is NO law that prohibits any of these.
AJ.
-
07-16-15 10:08 #26
Posts: 232Easy
Originally Posted by Marley24 [View Original Post]
I would just worry about some unknown or twistable law would make that a crime.
-
07-16-15 09:41 #25
Posts: 511I'm going to need confirmation
A quick search online doesn't point to anything that makes this appear true. Can we get a lawyer to weigh in? I know some of you dirty mongers are members of the bar.
Originally Posted by Marley24 [View Original Post]
-
07-16-15 08:36 #24
Posts: 161Originally Posted by Marley24 [View Original Post]
But on the topic I don't see a problem with sending adick picture to a provider once she sent some type of exclusive nude pictures that verify her. Honestly imo the pictures are safer then the references. Bc.
For example if the provider is indeed the LEO then giving them references is light weight confessing and putting those others in the radar of a bust.
Just my two cent.
-
07-16-15 08:05 #23
Posts: 5271Originally Posted by DNut [View Original Post]
Best quote! Just as I am not the only customer, you are not the only provider.