"Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?

[SBmidlo]

This one has been around off and on for a few years. I think these pics are a couple years old. https://www.seeking.com/member/4b7fe...d-2bdcee3bc0a2.

See post ##20592. Not from me but another reviewer with recent experience.

[Ralphie2200]

I have been a member of this forum for like forever, probably 15+ years. That all said, I don't come on here too often, maybe just when travelling.

My new profile reflects the fact that I forgot my password. Smh.

Anyways, I was in Richmond last weekend for the races and came across this gal.

https://www.seeking.com/member/947f8...1-c64dbf097bcb

I met with her, was surprised how pretty she was. Actually, was kind of shocked as I am used to pictures always being better than what shows up.

We met for drinks and appetizers but she would have came to my hotel had I insisted. She is DTF and was a good time.

She is most definitely here for the money, no doubt about that. Works two jobs and does the SA thing to boot. She is working for a good life, which her vehicle suggests it is working, also sends money home to her mother in her home country. She has been in the USA For 5 years now and does very well with the language and slang.

[Bald Eagle]

This one has been around off and on for a few years. I think these pics are a couple years old. https://www.seeking.com/member/4b7fe...d-2bdcee3bc0a2.

[SBmidlo]

https://www.seeking.com/member/d412d...f-250efeb42b99

Any info would be appreciated. Just my body type. Definitely DTF. Says she lives in the sticks outside of Richmond.

Chatted online and texted. She sent some pics, pretty great body. Never met up with her because of distance, she's down in the Prince George area. Said everything was on the menu except for CIM for 3.

[RazorGator22]

https://www.seeking.com/member/d412d...f-250efeb42b99

Any info would be appreciated. Just my body type. Definitely DTF. Says she lives in the sticks outside of Richmond.

I met her. Had other profiles. 3 oo. One thing she didn't tell me that was a DEFINITE turn off. She has a FEEDING TUBE. Still got BBBJ and CFS MSOG. She's not a stranger to meet ups.

[Geechie Dan]

https://www.seeking.com/member/d412d...f-250efeb42b99

Any info would be appreciated. Just my body type. Definitely DTF. Says she lives in the sticks outside of Richmond.

[ChrisHansen92]

You sound like an IT guy (me not). I run ExpressVPN and have noticed now using Foxfire I get the same spinning / grinding, on Seeking Windows PC. Chrome is fine. I think the key is MAC address or some fingerprint on your device. That's how Tinder shuts me down on my iPhone when I try to make a new SD profile. Seeking about 5 bans now I always use new pics, IP, email, name and payment. They caught me once using a pic from my banned profile after I had resized it, and removed info from properties from the photo. I have a solid profile about 2 years now. Not touching it changing it. Also never reporting anyone or opening a service ticket to ever bring this profile under scrutiny or review with them.

Basically no pics out there these days have EXIF info on them, the risks have been recognized.

I don't believe that simply changing IP addresses can be a flag for something. People move around all the time. There's no way to practically implement this. The constants, like your MAC Address, are more likely to be an issue in identifying you. There is a tool for MAC address spoofing. Use it. Right now, TOR doesn't work on SA for me. It appears you can log in, but the page just grinds and doesn't go anywhere. This is on an Apple Mac.

These days, I am using VPN into a large corporate server, and then out onto the web. For other web-based sugaring, I use EPIC which has a built-in VPN, you can choose among a few different exit nodes. If I switch my exit node, Google Voice will ask me to do a Captcha to verify I am a person.

A significant concern generally, but I'd bet SA isn't using, is fingerprinting based on things like browser window size etc.

There's no doubt there is a lot more scrutiny of profiles on SA these days. IT seems they can find a problem if they look. So, don't do anything to stimulate them to look. If you have a 'seasoned' profile, leave it alone, even if it seems outdated. That will just get them to re-evaluate it. I got a profile suspended based on this. They said my photos weren't of me and wanted me to verify myself with a selfie holding a got-issued photo I'd. Obviously, I couldn't do this, I just asked them to delete the profile totally. Interestingly, they never responded to this, but IK that I can't log in to that account.

[WhatsBreakfast]

https://www.seeking.com/member/8b0a1...6-f7ce8c63563f

I've been texting with this one. Sent me a nice pic. The body is smoking hot. She seems very open minded as far as the bedroom is concerned. Asking 400, and says we can spend up to 5 hrs together.

Snag: she wants 100 for travel to the Meet and greet, as she lives in Hopewell and I'm in Richmond. Please someone tell me she's real!

I am not into SB, it seems like too much drama for me LOL.

From a mongering perspective money up front is a no go. If she wants to do a meet and greet then you should offer to go and see her.

If she refuses to meet with you without you just flat giving her money upfront, then its adios.

[Ernest Ll]

https://www.seeking.com/member/8b0a1...6-f7ce8c63563f

I've been texting with this one. Sent me a nice pic. The body is smoking hot. She seems very open minded as far as the bedroom is concerned. Asking 400, and says we can spend up to 5 hrs together.

Snag: she wants 100 for travel to the Meet and greet, as she lives in Hopewell and I'm in Richmond. Please someone tell me she's real!

You say smoking hot body, her profile says average.

I get that women on Seeking probably lack in self esteem, but since they are selling their bodies, they probably aren't going to under sell you on that aspect.

[RedBaron69]

https://www.seeking.com/member/8b0a1...6-f7ce8c63563f

I've been texting with this one. Sent me a nice pic. The body is smoking hot. She seems very open minded as far as the bedroom is concerned. Asking 400, and says we can spend up to 5 hrs together.

Snag: she wants 100 for travel to the Meet and greet, as she lives in Hopewell and I'm in Richmond. Please someone tell me she's real!

She is a scammer, told me the same thing. Told me she lives in Richmond. Wants pictures of recently purchased eBay cards upfront. LOL.

This trash needs to be dumped.

Cheers.

[ChiefQueef]

Basically no pics out there these days have EXIF info on them, the risks have been recognized.

I don't believe that simply changing IP addresses can be a flag for something. People move around all the time. There's no way to practically implement this. The constants, like your MAC Address, are more likely to be an issue in identifying you. There is a tool for MAC address spoofing. Use it. Right now, TOR doesn't work on SA for me. It appears you can log in, but the page just grinds and doesn't go anywhere. This is on an Apple Mac.

These days, I am using VPN into a large corporate server, and then out onto the web. For other web-based sugaring, I use EPIC which has a built-in VPN, you can choose among a few different exit nodes. If I switch my exit node, Google Voice will ask me to do a Captcha to verify I am a person.

A significant concern generally, but I'd bet SA isn't using, is fingerprinting based on things like browser window size etc.

There's no doubt there is a lot more scrutiny of profiles on SA these days. IT seems they can find a problem if they look. So, don't do anything to stimulate them to look. If you have a 'seasoned' profile, leave it alone, even if it seems outdated. That will just get them to re-evaluate it. I got a profile suspended based on this. They said my photos weren't of me and wanted me to verify myself with a selfie holding a got-issued photo I'd. Obviously, I couldn't do this, I just asked them to delete the profile totally. Interestingly, they never responded to this, but IK that I can't log in to that account.

Awesome advice and critique, thanks. I'll pass this on to my buddy in need.

Cheers,

CQueefs.

[Geechie Dan]

https://www.seeking.com/member/8b0a1...6-f7ce8c63563f

I've been texting with this one. Sent me a nice pic. The body is smoking hot. She seems very open minded as far as the bedroom is concerned. Asking 400, and says we can spend up to 5 hrs together.

Snag: she wants 100 for travel to the Meet and greet, as she lives in Hopewell and I'm in Richmond. Please someone tell me she's real!

[FarFarAway]

It is an assumption of mine that now SA does indeed have a database of site content and run some algorithm to recognize pictures that have been used before. Easy solution would be new / fake pics that are EXIF wiped.

Regarding VPNS / proxies this is what flags accounts. SA matches IP addresses with devices. If a user were to switch IPs on the VPN (lost of connection, DNS leak, etc.) then this would cause an automated flag in SA's system. They log each device and IP, so if a device is switching IPs then that is deemed suspicious. So the solution is to use a dedicated IP (public computer, dedicated machine, etc). ToR also flags in SA -- it takes obfuscation to another level.

Basically no pics out there these days have EXIF info on them, the risks have been recognized.

I don't believe that simply changing IP addresses can be a flag for something. People move around all the time. There's no way to practically implement this. The constants, like your MAC Address, are more likely to be an issue in identifying you. There is a tool for MAC address spoofing. Use it. Right now, TOR doesn't work on SA for me. It appears you can log in, but the page just grinds and doesn't go anywhere. This is on an Apple Mac.

These days, I am using VPN into a large corporate server, and then out onto the web. For other web-based sugaring, I use EPIC which has a built-in VPN, you can choose among a few different exit nodes. If I switch my exit node, Google Voice will ask me to do a Captcha to verify I am a person.

A significant concern generally, but I'd bet SA isn't using, is fingerprinting based on things like browser window size etc.

There's no doubt there is a lot more scrutiny of profiles on SA these days. IT seems they can find a problem if they look. So, don't do anything to stimulate them to look. If you have a 'seasoned' profile, leave it alone, even if it seems outdated. That will just get them to re-evaluate it. I got a profile suspended based on this. They said my photos weren't of me and wanted me to verify myself with a selfie holding a got-issued photo I'd. Obviously, I couldn't do this, I just asked them to delete the profile totally. Interestingly, they never responded to this, but IK that I can't log in to that account.

[EasyeOne]

https://www.seeking.com/member/2ac64...3-9f7eb9fcab28

I connected again with her, was about to text her until I realized we had talked before (her profile from last year), still had the old messages. She will ask you for money upfront or pull the I need to a babysitter or I need baby formula excuse. Either her man or pimp controls it because the cash up profile was a guy.

If anyone has actually met her, would love to hear about it! She does send a lot of nudes while trying to get you to cashup her some funds. She / he got $10 out of me for baby formula she was picking up before driving to me. She / he worked hard for those 10!

[Geechie Dan]

Gave cell number in 2nd message and was asking for $85 to be sent to her to cover a bill, all pretty quick. Smelling a fake / scammer here.

Ok, that explains it. She gave me the digits, and when I tried to text, my phone said the number was blocked. I figured I'd communicated with her before and had a good reason for blocking the number. Thanks.