Rubrankings.com
Organized German FKK Club Tours since 1995
Click here for the best Sugarbabies
Ava Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory

Thread: BackPage Advertiser Reviews

+ Add Report
Page 101 of 291 FirstFirst ... 51 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 151 201 ... LastLast
Results 1,501 to 1,515 of 4358
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #2858
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1650

    Re

    Quote Originally Posted by Dsrtp1  [View Original Post]
    I'm pretty sure the third pic is fairly accurate. I don't know maybe it was someone else. I've been fucking 2-3 providers daily and haven't had a chance to post reviews in a while. Maybe I'm confused but still want to say that she resembles pics.
    No, your confused. Maybe you wanted her to look like the pics. Again, she is at least 25 to 30 lbs heavier and nowhere near that good looking or that age that appears in the pics and about as sensual as a blow up doll. She has more conversation with herself than you.

  2. #2857

    Heads up

    http://m.wect.com/wect/db/330750/content

    Was reading this and since providers use these as a place, just wanted to give a heads up for us fellow hobbyists.

  3. #2856

    Pics

    Quote Originally Posted by Pubb69  [View Original Post]
    Man, those pics are not her and not even close. She is not 25 but more likely 35 and has about 30 lbs on those pics.

    Her face is somewhat attractive but not really close to the girl in those pics. She is crazy but so isn't anyone that would ever go back to see her again. Other than being held up at gunpoint she would qualify as an all time disaster. Amazing that she has been able to pull this off for so long as three years ago she was using another name and posting as 26.
    I am assuming your talking about Angel because you replied to a post about her?
    I'm pretty sure the third pic is fairly accurate. I don't know maybe it was someone else. I've been fucking 2-3 providers daily and haven't had a chance to post reviews in a while. Maybe I'm confused but still want to say that she resembles pics.

  4. #2855

    Rose

    I tried your local agency and requested Rose. I was told only outcall was available which was fine by me and the damage would be $ . 80. She arrived on time and was cute. Pics are a bit airbrushed and has a few more curves in person but I was okay with her appearance. She told me she's only been doing this for about a month. Fresh daty, nice pierced nipples, msog, bbbjcimnqns, cowgirl and reverse cowgirl weren't her strongest positions but when I took it to her doggy and mish she accepted a good pounding happily. I'd recommend and look forward to trying the agency's other girls when I return for my next visit. I thought it's a good value. Good responsive agency.

    http://wilmington.backpage.com/Femal...-time/28284589

  5. #2854

    Saw her last year

    Quote Originally Posted by Dsrtp1  [View Original Post]
    Visiting the beach for the weekend. Anyone have Intel on Angel?

    http://wilmington.backpage.com/Femal...t-now/10819127
    I spent time with her last year. Everyone, that has responded is pretty accurate. She is about ten year older than the pictures. I was thinking with my little head and didn't leave right away. She has skills, but in the process, she revealed a side that was damn scary. I found my way out of there, quickly after the deed.

    Stay safe friends.

  6. #2853
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1650

    Re

    Quote Originally Posted by Dsrtp1  [View Original Post]
    By the way, the pics are real. Pretty girl but definitely a bit nuts with all her rules. Kept telling me she has these rules because of her girlfriend. She has to be careful and be considerate of her. But she had no condoms?
    Man, those pics are not her and not even close. She is not 25 but more likely 35 and has about 30 lbs on those pics.

    Her face is somewhat attractive but not really close to the girl in those pics. She is crazy but so isn't anyone that would ever go back to see her again. Other than being held up at gunpoint she would qualify as an all time disaster. Amazing that she has been able to pull this off for so long as three years ago she was using another name and posting as 26.
    I am assuming your talking about Angel because you replied to a post about her?

  7. #2852

    Nut Job

    I saw her a couple of times years ago when I lived in Wilmington. She was a nut job then. I'm in town for the 4th and decided to see her crazy ass hoping for the best with that extremely little tight kitty. Kitty still gotts the grip, problem is she is even crazier than she was years ago! She mumbled weird stuff back then. It was an ongoing stream of nonsense the entire visit now. I blew, got up, clothed myself and left without a word.

    Good luck!

    G.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dsrtp1  [View Original Post]
    Visiting the beach for the weekend. Anyone have Intel on Angel?

    http://wilmington.backpage.com/Femal...t-now/10819127

  8. #2851

    Angel

    Quote Originally Posted by DT2112  [View Original Post]
    She is too pricey for me. I have read here that those are not her real pics. I have no first hand knowledge of that. Maybe Wilm Guy may know? You may want to heed his warning. But, let us know if you see her.
    By the way, the pics are real. Pretty girl but definitely a bit nuts with all her rules. Kept telling me she has these rules because of her girlfriend. She has to be careful and be considerate of her. But she had no condoms?

  9. #2850

    I have texted with her

    She is too pricey for me. I have read here that those are not her real pics. I have no first hand knowledge of that. Maybe Wilm Guy may know? You may want to heed his warning. But, let us know if you see her.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dsrtp1  [View Original Post]
    Visiting the beach for the weekend. Anyone have Intel on Angel?

    http://wilmington.backpage.com/Femal...t-now/10819127

  10. #2849

    Amy

    After seeing Angel and not getting a blowjob I really just wanted a blow job. Called Amy and agreed to. 60 for BBBJCIM. I went to a rough motel where her boyfriend left us alone. Highly skilled and she got into it. Worth. 60 for a qv as long as you don't mind the rough motel. I'm sure full service was an option but I only wanted the BBBJ.

    http://wilmington.backpage.com/Femal...-call/24279989

  11. #2848

    Angel

    Quote Originally Posted by WilmGuy  [View Original Post]
    Nutjob.

    Would not recommend, sketchy nut job.
    I took the plunge anyway because I like nut jobs. I see what you mean because she had no condoms but luckily I did. No kissing, no daty, no oral on me at all. She jerked me off and I put on a condom and stuck it her tight little pussy. I must say her pussy is super tight and I blew pretty fast. She told me no msog but I convinced her to allow one more pop because of how quick I came. She reluctantly agreed. I started playing with her pussy and she allowed fiv. She was getting very wet and the thought of that tight little pussy was turning me on. I got hard, put on another rubber and really punished that little pussy. I held off until I felt her tight pussy gripping my cock while she was orgasming. I finally let go and blew round two in the cover. Total damage $ $ for the hour. I love punishing nut jobs.

    http://wilmington.backpage.com/Femal...t-now/10819127

  12. #2847

    Concur!

    She's a utter fruit loop. Fake pictures. Fake experience. An absolute bore to be with. One of the worst decisions I've made in the hobby, was seeing her before I knew anything about this site. Various hobbiest have said the same.

    Quote Originally Posted by WilmGuy  [View Original Post]
    Nutjob.

    Would not recommend, sketchy nut job.

  13. #2846

    Angel aka nutjob

    Quote Originally Posted by Dsrtp1  [View Original Post]
    Visiting the beach for the weekend. Anyone have Intel on Angel?

    http://wilmington.backpage.com/Femal...t-now/10819127
    Nutjob.

    Would not recommend, sketchy nut job.

  14. #2845

    All I'm saying.

    I respect your position. But:

    1). She might be the greatest thing since sliced bread. I've never seen her, but a few friends have and they haven't repeated for various reasons. Mostly the price doesn't match the experience.

    2). Most importantly none of us should be discussing this review site with any provider. If they find it, so be it. But they shouldn't be allowed out here. They shouldn't be able to dispute a review or even counter it. I'd take the input from any Senior Member over any provider. There's a specific thread for them to post their availability.

    My last two cents.

    Quote Originally Posted by Wilmncguy  [View Original Post]
    Knowing and participating on this board. Not that I'm right or your wrong, just a difference of opinion (you know the old disclaimer YMMV) same deal here I guess.

    Personal, I would never say anything about a provider "behind their back" that I wouldn't say to their face. In addition, I can promise you any providers that have lasted in the business for any length of time know more about it all of us put together will ever know (except maybe Roush, just kidding him too). Providers could also give mongers a complete different prospective that I think could be very helpful.

    That being said I haven't ever told a provider about this site, its never come up. But I'm certainly not bothered she here, especially when she "exposed" herself as opposed to "lurking" and identified herself. I haven't had the pleasure of meeting her, but she seems to conduct herself in a honest and straight forward manner, which is a rare gem to find.

    Just my two cents worth!

  15. #2844

    Angel

    Visiting the beach for the weekend. Anyone have Intel on Angel?

    http://wilmington.backpage.com/Femal...t-now/10819127

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best sugar babies
click for FREE hookups
Best Escorts
Sex Vacation




click for FREE hookups

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape