Meet and Fuck Today!
Click here for the best sugar babies
Ava Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Best Escorts
Meet and Fuck Today!

Thread: Escort Reports

+ Add Report
Page 123 of 169 FirstFirst ... 23 73 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 ... LastLast
Results 1,831 to 1,845 of 2530
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #700
    Quote Originally Posted by JBenny1  [View Original Post]
    Recently a fellow hobbyist reviewed a provider on another board. Gave her a 4/5. He didn't give an explanation as to why he gave her that review. To me that was his choice. Now the question is, is a 4/5 a bad review. A fellow provider kind of came to her rescue. I have never seen either of these women but I assume they are worth it from their pictures. I know the provider the review was given on is new to the hobby and the other one has been helping her along the way. I know this because I reached out to set something up with her and all I was offered was a duo with both of them. It didn't work out time wise for me so I declined. The issue I am having is why is a 4/5 a bad review? Is it because hobbyists are afraid to give an accurate review based on past expierences with providers ganging up on them? That board should be one of the better ones but it seems like if you don't follow the providers rules you get bad marks. Now she is trashing him on the thread. He hasn't replied to the thread probably because he knows he will get beat down from every provider that reads it.

    I recently saw a provider out if the tri- cities area that was up here. When I saw her she looked nothing like her pictures and certain things just didn't smell right. If you go off her pics online she's about a 7. When I saw her in person she's about a 3. When I looked at her reviews they were all outstanding. I chalked it up to a lesson learned and not to go off reviews on that board again.
    Can I ask who the lady was? Maybe KassieK?

  2. #699
    Quote Originally Posted by JBenny1  [View Original Post]
    The issue I am having is why is a 4/5 a bad review? Is it because hobbyists are afraid to give an accurate review based on past experiences with providers ganging up on them? That board should be one of the better ones but it seems like if you don't follow the providers rules you get bad marks. Now she is trashing him on the thread. He hasn't replied to the thread probably because he knows he will get beat down from every provider that reads it.
    I knew right away you were talking about T&A, Rachel, and Michelle. The answer to your query is simply this: T&A is all about women with GPS and white knight hobbyists, a majority of the reviews on there are just puff pieces for the women. Many will offer discounts if you review them, and like you said, if anyone gives less then a 5 star review the person leaving the review gets ostracized and ganged up on by providers and hobbyists alike. If you want a real review don't go to that site. I did a duo with those two back in May, and according to Rachel I was the first one to do a duo with them, interacting with Michelle led me to believe this was true. If I were being honest in reviewing the experience I would have given it a 3/5 at best. Had I left a review like that on T&A it could have very easily led to me being blocked from the site, I say this based off of reading other reviews / alerts on that site and the ensuing actions taken against the original poster.

    If you are curious about my experience with those two DM me and I will fill you in.

  3. #698

    Reviews on other board

    Recently a fellow hobbyist reviewed a provider on another board. Gave her a 4/5. He didn't give an explanation as to why he gave her that review. To me that was his choice. Now the question is, is a 4/5 a bad review. A fellow provider kind of came to her rescue. I have never seen either of these women but I assume they are worth it from their pictures. I know the provider the review was given on is new to the hobby and the other one has been helping her along the way. I know this because I reached out to set something up with her and all I was offered was a duo with both of them. It didn't work out time wise for me so I declined. The issue I am having is why is a 4/5 a bad review? Is it because hobbyists are afraid to give an accurate review based on past expierences with providers ganging up on them? That board should be one of the better ones but it seems like if you don't follow the providers rules you get bad marks. Now she is trashing him on the thread. He hasn't replied to the thread probably because he knows he will get beat down from every provider that reads it.

    I recently saw a provider out if the tri- cities area that was up here. When I saw her she looked nothing like her pictures and certain things just didn't smell right. If you go off her pics online she's about a 7. When I saw her in person she's about a 3. When I looked at her reviews they were all outstanding. I chalked it up to a lesson learned and not to go off reviews on that board again.

  4. #697
    Quote Originally Posted by PriceIsRight39  [View Original Post]
    Thanks! I'm having a hard time believing that a pic in her current ad (outside with blue thong) is legit. Why would she use fake pics?? Anyway, sounds fun! Maybe I give a try. Good rates!
    Keep in mind that the pics are dolled up. When I saw her, she was in a tank top and boyshorts and wasn't wearing a bunch of makeup.

    I'm sure if you asked and she's seen you before, she would doll up before an appointment (for a price, I'm sure.

  5. #696
    Quote Originally Posted by Rktshp  [View Original Post]
    Let's get one thing straight. Jacki is not your "high dollar high class escort. " She is a provider with very reasonable rates, a little down and dirty, and either really enjoys what she does or is a great faker.

    She's the kind of girl that looks a little rough around the edges but you keep visiting since she enthusiastically does all the things that your girl does begrudgingly, if at all.

    Texting was a little hit and miss at first, I wanted her to verify by sending a photo of her hand making the OK sign. There's been plenty of ads where the person in the ad is a real person, but the person you're texting is not that person. She eventually agreed to it, which I wouldn't have faulted her if she didn't.

    These providers get plenty of BS on the regular and she had no idea who I was, whether I'd even show etc.

    Pics are a match, her boobs certainly benefitted from being in a bra. I'm in to hangers too, so not a surprise or disappointment. I'd guess a b cup.

    She's tiny, five foot nothing.

    Very personable, seems to enjoy what she does. We chatted a bit about ourselves, she asked me what sorts of things I was in to etc.

    As we're chatting about what things I'm looking for, she turns around and grinds a very soft ass into my crotch. Before we get completely undressed, she asks me to put the donation on the table. 120 for hh plus 20 for humoring me on the verification. (I volunteered the 20 as a sort of rigmarole / asshole tax).

    I paid for a half hour but I honestly have no idea how long I was there. I don't know if she did either, certainly not a clock watcher.

    So at this point I'm hard as a rock and she pulls out a Magnum. Here I'm thinking bold of you to assume that a regular wouldn't do.

    She put it on and starts giving me the best CBJ I've ever had. At one point I'm questioning whether there's a cover in the first place. There was. Move to cowgirl, doggy, then she finishes me off with a handy (my request).

    Dirty talk on point, she's either having a good time or faking it, but in either case she was making sure I was having a good time.

    Her don'ts: no fingers inside because some people don't cut their nails. Cool with playing with her clit though.

    I think that was it? I'm sure there's more but that was the only thing she mentioned when I asked. Cover on so she may not offer bare services.

    Anything beyond "regular" is an extra 50. E. g. Anal, prostate massage, pegging etc. NGL, I'm going to go back and see what her prostate massage is like.

    100 qv, 120 hh, 140 hr.

    https://spokane-coeurdalene.skiptheg...l/978059347341
    Thanks! I'm having a hard time believing that a pic in her current ad (outside with blue thong) is legit. Why would she use fake pics?? Anyway, sounds fun! Maybe I give a try. Good rates!

  6. #695

    Jacki. Everything her ad promised. I will definitely return

    Let's get one thing straight. Jacki is not your "high dollar high class escort. " She is a provider with very reasonable rates, a little down and dirty, and either really enjoys what she does or is a great faker.

    She's the kind of girl that looks a little rough around the edges but you keep visiting since she enthusiastically does all the things that your girl does begrudgingly, if at all.

    Texting was a little hit and miss at first, I wanted her to verify by sending a photo of her hand making the OK sign. There's been plenty of ads where the person in the ad is a real person, but the person you're texting is not that person. She eventually agreed to it, which I wouldn't have faulted her if she didn't.

    These providers get plenty of BS on the regular and she had no idea who I was, whether I'd even show etc.

    Pics are a match, her boobs certainly benefitted from being in a bra. I'm in to hangers too, so not a surprise or disappointment. I'd guess a b cup.

    She's tiny, five foot nothing.

    Very personable, seems to enjoy what she does. We chatted a bit about ourselves, she asked me what sorts of things I was in to etc.

    As we're chatting about what things I'm looking for, she turns around and grinds a very soft ass into my crotch. Before we get completely undressed, she asks me to put the donation on the table. 120 for hh plus 20 for humoring me on the verification. (I volunteered the 20 as a sort of rigmarole / asshole tax).

    I paid for a half hour but I honestly have no idea how long I was there. I don't know if she did either, certainly not a clock watcher.

    So at this point I'm hard as a rock and she pulls out a Magnum. Here I'm thinking bold of you to assume that a regular wouldn't do.

    She put it on and starts giving me the best CBJ I've ever had. At one point I'm questioning whether there's a cover in the first place. There was. Move to cowgirl, doggy, then she finishes me off with a handy (my request).

    Dirty talk on point, she's either having a good time or faking it, but in either case she was making sure I was having a good time.

    Her don'ts: no fingers inside because some people don't cut their nails. Cool with playing with her clit though.

    I think that was it? I'm sure there's more but that was the only thing she mentioned when I asked. Cover on so she may not offer bare services.

    Anything beyond "regular" is an extra 50. E. g. Anal, prostate massage, pegging etc. NGL, I'm going to go back and see what her prostate massage is like.

    100 qv, 120 hh, 140 hr.

    https://spokane-coeurdalene.skiptheg...l/978059347341

  7. #694

    Lizzy

    Quote Originally Posted by Rktshp  [View Original Post]
    Has a bit more paunch than the photos would suggest, but they're largely accurate. I would guess that they're older photos.

    First contact so I opted for a quick visit. She didn't have condoms on hand but offered 15% off a future visit. In this particular case, condoms would've been moot since the nexus of being on edge, not being in the right headspace, and SSRIs led to a non mission capable dick. She still gave it the old college try on the beej.

    If I was interested in a repeat visit, I would not have qualms from a safety perspective. Also she has a cat that's personable AF. She was very open. We chatted a bit about her life, circumstances that she got in to the business etc.

    This was my first incall and I was nervous AF, which I told her. She was chill and offered her two cents on how to avoid getting robbed / scammed (wait until they're half undressed before handing over the cash).

    Before we got "started" she was on her phone a bit, which made me more nervous. Afterwards I asked her who she was texting. She said it was her roommate, telling him that she was "working" and to stay out of the apartment.

    Won't be going back because of the drive time (valley) and I just was not very in to her physically. Not at that price point, at least.

    QV 100 HH 150 1 HR 200.

    https://spokane-coeurdalene.skiptheg...e/385771315191
    Thanks for the report. I have been interested myself. Has anyone else?

  8. #693

    Lizzy. Incall

    Has a bit more paunch than the photos would suggest, but they're largely accurate. I would guess that they're older photos.

    First contact so I opted for a quick visit. She didn't have condoms on hand but offered 15% off a future visit. In this particular case, condoms would've been moot since the nexus of being on edge, not being in the right headspace, and SSRIs led to a non mission capable dick. She still gave it the old college try on the beej.

    If I was interested in a repeat visit, I would not have qualms from a safety perspective. Also she has a cat that's personable AF. She was very open. We chatted a bit about her life, circumstances that she got in to the business etc.

    This was my first incall and I was nervous AF, which I told her. She was chill and offered her two cents on how to avoid getting robbed / scammed (wait until they're half undressed before handing over the cash).

    Before we got "started" she was on her phone a bit, which made me more nervous. Afterwards I asked her who she was texting. She said it was her roommate, telling him that she was "working" and to stay out of the apartment.

    Won't be going back because of the drive time (valley) and I just was not very in to her physically. Not at that price point, at least.

    QV 100 HH 150 1 HR 200.

    https://spokane-coeurdalene.skiptheg...e/385771315191

  9. #692
    Quote Originally Posted by Rktshp  [View Original Post]
    22 y / o, saw her last week. She's 20 weeks pregnant if you are in to that. Suck on her tits for a surprise.

    Pictures match and her posting is otherwise accurate. She mentioned she's pregnant when she posted in August but it's not here.

    She said that doggy and cowgirl hurt.

    HH car date, FS with cover, finished with BBBJCIM. Rates are kind of high relatively speaking, but I thing pregnant is a turn on.

    Outcall and car date only, sadly.

    120 BBBJ 130 qv 170 hh 260 hr.

    Met her at the Safeway on Market. She seems like a nice girl that is not the best at making decisions. Her ad exudes more confidence than she does.
    Last time I texted her she said BBFS was an option. Hopefully that's not a mongers offspring.

    CW.

  10. #691

    Anna. Will see again because I'm in to preggo

    22 y / o, saw her last week. She's 20 weeks pregnant if you are in to that. Suck on her tits for a surprise.

    Pictures match and her posting is otherwise accurate. She mentioned she's pregnant when she posted in August but it's not here.

    She said that doggy and cowgirl hurt, but that may not be an issue in a bed rather than the back seat of a sedan.

    I texted her a few days prior asking for some info. When it came to the actual meet, 45 minutes between asking if she was available and picking her up. Asked for a photo and sent one back when I asked.

    HH car date, FS with cover, finished with BBBJCIM. Rates are kind of high relatively speaking, but I thing pregnant is a turn on.

    Outcall and car date only, sadly.

    120 BBBJ 130 qv 170 hh 260 hr.

    Met her at the Safeway on Market. She seems like a nice girl that is not the best at making decisions. Her ad exudes more confidence than she does.

    https://spokane-coeurdalene.skiptheg...t/993892164292

  11. #690

    How about Holly

    https://spokane-coeurdalene.skiptheg...y/675456081793

    Any reports about Holly. Seems to communicate well so far.

  12. #689

    How about Holly

    https://spokane-coeurdalene.skiptheg...y/675456081793

    Any reports about Holly. Seems to communicate well so far.

  13. #688

    Any news about Linsey?

    https://spokane-coeurdalene.skiptheg...r/571443629848

    She has been posting for a long time. Anyone have any thing to report about her?

  14. #687

    Luray

    Quote Originally Posted by Adventurous112  [View Original Post]
    I reached out but haven't heard back. She listed all the possible activities which is generally a red flag for bait and switch services. I've never met a girl who is into severely dominating a guy and getting pissed on. She could be the first though.
    I also reached out and she quoted me for 250/400, seemed real through texting but eventually ghosted me when I was ready to get together.

  15. #686

    Luray

    Quote Originally Posted by TooLad  [View Original Post]
    I reached out but haven't heard back. She listed all the possible activities which is generally a red flag for bait and switch services. I've never met a girl who is into severely dominating a guy and getting pissed on. She could be the first though.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best Sugarbabies
click for FREE hookups
Sex Vacation
The Velvet Rooms





Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape