This forum thread is moderated by Admin
-
Senior Member
Posts: 422
What's with you guys lately? What about this ad would indicate that its a cop? And don't give me vague answers. You guys are getting pretty bizarre here.
The only possible red flag in this ad would be the location. Non-specific locations that could work in an any city are either scammers, or the person posting the ad doesn't know what they are doing. Examples of possible locations scammers use include: incall, outcall, your place place or mine, downtown, airport, north, south, east, west, hotel. A real person uses specific locations. For example / Worthington or 161 and 71, or Hollywood Casino. Places specific to the city in which they are posting.
I just texted the ad. The person texting back is not American. So this ad is a scammer, but not a cop.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Scam not sting
Fairly sure that is a scam ad not a sting ad, though Columbus could have downloaded her pictures I suppose is plausible. Its been posted all around the state, here's one from Akron. No Akron good guy stings have occurred since 4/24/21.
https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/s...-town/47041162
-
Senior Member
Posts: 95
The ad is back
Originally Posted by
Chunks92
[View Original Post]
Thanks brother! Yea in the sting ads they will take any offer. Thats why you have these dumbasses get arrested and offer 20 bucks LOL. But they end up being smarter then the guys offering $200, because every red cent gets seized and a motion for destruction of evidence gets filed so I suppose better to lose 20 then 200 LMAO.
C92.
https://columbus.skipthegames.com/fe...n/569263406434
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Thanks Humpty
Originally Posted by
RayPugh
[View Original Post]
The point here is the facts of the case. Which don't seem to matter to some. Reading a misleading article that omits important information thankfully is not admissible evidence in a court of law. The facts of the case strongly indicate self defense. The truth came out during the trial, and the truth definitely wasn't what most people wanted to hear.
Sure, Mitchell may be guilty of other crimes. But that has nothing to do with this murder trial. The truth about that stuff will come out later and future trials. How does Mitchell have the money to cover all these legal cases? How many houses does (did?) he own? He's probably had to sell them all by now.
Good looking out brother, its amazing how much people don't know because it is hidden from us unless we go looking for it. The docket sheets tell all! Far as what he said he is right people allow to get away with it, but that's partially because people don't research just how fucked up the system is in the first place.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 422
Originally Posted by
LiveMonger
[View Original Post]
Can you point me in the direction of what you read that led you to this conclusion. I disagree, but maybe you read something I failed to find.
Thanks.
www.fccourts.org
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1066
Where?
Originally Posted by
RayPugh
[View Original Post]
The point here is the facts of the case. Which don't seem to matter to some. Reading a misleading article that omits important information thankfully is not admissible evidence in a court of law. The facts of the case strongly indicate self defense. The truth came out during the trial, and the truth definitely wasn't what most people wanted to hear.
Sure, Mitchell may be guilty of other crimes. But that has nothing to do with this murder trial. The truth about that stuff will come out later and future trials. How does Mitchell have the money to cover all these legal cases? How many houses does (did?) he own? He's probably had to sell them all by now.
Can you point me in the direction of what you read that led you to this conclusion. I disagree, but maybe you read something I failed to find.
Thanks.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 422
Originally Posted by
ThirdManAlive
[View Original Post]
Seems like you made the opposite point you were going for. Cops, prosecutors, electeds, all get away with stuff and people blindly allow it to happen.
The point here is the facts of the case. Which don't seem to matter to some. Reading a misleading article that omits important information thankfully is not admissible evidence in a court of law. The facts of the case strongly indicate self defense. The truth came out during the trial, and the truth definitely wasn't what most people wanted to hear.
Sure, Mitchell may be guilty of other crimes. But that has nothing to do with this murder trial. The truth about that stuff will come out later and future trials. How does Mitchell have the money to cover all these legal cases? How many houses does (did?) he own? He's probably had to sell them all by now.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 73
Originally Posted by
Chunks92
[View Original Post]
Nah, hes just a guy, like myself, who gets his news from the docket sheets instead of the mainstream news. Following the docket sheets whenever a high ranking official is arrested is a good practice, you can see what's truly going on in our state's fucked up court system. For example, a prosecutor was arrested and he got heinous disgusting charges reduced in court with no jail time, yet a guy caught in a hooker sting got 60 days for misdemeanors. Its fucked up beyond belief and I implore everyone to start researching stuff you see in the news on court websites.
C92.
Seems like you made the opposite point you were going for. Cops, prosecutors, electeds, all get away with stuff and people blindly allow it to happen.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Originally Posted by
BigBibble
[View Original Post]
Is 937.303. 1979. The add was suspect and so were the fast answers / low quote.
Thanks brother! Yea in the sting ads they will take any offer. Thats why you have these dumbasses get arrested and offer 20 bucks LOL. But they end up being smarter then the guys offering $200, because every red cent gets seized and a motion for destruction of evidence gets filed so I suppose better to lose 20 then 200 LMAO.
C92.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 95
Ad is gone but the number
Originally Posted by
Chunks92
[View Original Post]
Curious if you have the ad or the number to it, or if columbus let it leak to sumosearch. Let me know, I want to run research on the number. I research the sting ads for my personal knowledge. TIA.
C92.
Is 937.303. 1979. The add was suspect and so were the fast answers / low quote.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Got the ad?
Originally Posted by
BigBibble
[View Original Post]
But I didn't put two & two together. There was a very suspect starlet who claimed she "was" new on STG last night and was very responsive. I got an offer for OC at $. 0. I knew it was suspect and my spidey senses said run fast. Later I saw this specific hotel with people being escorted out, one-by-one.
Curious if you have the ad or the number to it, or if columbus let it leak to sumosearch. Let me know, I want to run research on the number. I research the sting ads for my personal knowledge. TIA.
C92.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 184
Originally Posted by
BigBibble
[View Original Post]
But I didn't put two & two together. There was a very suspect starlet who claimed she "was" new on STG last night and was very responsive. I got an offer for OC at $. 0. I knew it was suspect and my spidey senses said run fast. Later I saw this specific hotel with people being escorted out, one-by-one.
I went to this location about a 2 month ago, and notice.
A few thing that set off a bunch of red flags. So I never did the deed.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 95
I Saw This Happening
Originally Posted by
GrumpyMan
[View Original Post]
CPD was at it again running a sting at the Downtown Holiday Inn (across from the old Greyhound station).
A lot of johns in court today (6/17).
But I didn't put two & two together. There was a very suspect starlet who claimed she "was" new on STG last night and was very responsive. I got an offer for OC at $. 0. I knew it was suspect and my spidey senses said run fast. Later I saw this specific hotel with people being escorted out, one-by-one.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 77
Another CPD Bust
CPD was at it again running a sting at the Downtown Holiday Inn (across from the old Greyhound station).
A lot of johns in court today (6/17).
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Nah
Nah, hes just a guy, like myself, who gets his news from the docket sheets instead of the mainstream news. Following the docket sheets whenever a high ranking official is arrested is a good practice, you can see what's truly going on in our state's fucked up court system. For example, a prosecutor was arrested and he got heinous disgusting charges reduced in court with no jail time, yet a guy caught in a hooker sting got 60 days for misdemeanors. Its fucked up beyond belief and I implore everyone to start researching stuff you see in the news on court websites.
C92.