Rubrankings.com
click for FREE hookups
Click here for the best Sugarbabies
click for FREE hookups
Sex Vacation
Best Escorts

Thread: BackPage Advertiser Reviews

+ Add Report
Page 51 of 126 FirstFirst ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 101 ... LastLast
Results 751 to 765 of 1887
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #1137
    Quote Originally Posted by UncoveredCarl  [View Original Post]
    Will the Real Star please stand up?

    http://columbia-jeff-city.skipthegam...e/169574741804

    http://columbia-jeff-city.skipthegam...e/627721786417

    I'm not so adventurous anymore to just reach out to someone when they have conflicting ads. Does anyone have any insight? I'd like to try Star or Allie but not sure which one is the true provider. Hmmmmm.
    It's always smart to be wary.

    Personally, I find skip ads that don't have the big red button at the bottom that says "Call Me" very suspect because that's the number they have registered with the site. The clowns playing this game do it with a bunch of girls on that site, and they hardly ever make their fake ad registration number available on that button. It's even more questionable when there's a number in the ad title or body, and it's different from the number on that button. I usually go through that baseline process, along with some google searches, before I ever dial a number. Even then, you're always rolling the dice, but I've seen the girl in these pics, and she would likely respond to calls as opposed to texts.

    If I were in your shoes, I'd ask for a verification pic, with a name / date / time written on a piece of paper, especially since there's more recent ads on there that specifically state she'll do this. Just make sure she sends the pic first, if she demands one from you before she'll send one, abort and don't try that number again.

    Word has been floating around for a while now about these doppelganger ads in our fair city. Don't know if it's LE or butthurt competition who can't handle new faces threatening what dwindling business they have left, but the pattern is the same. They latch on to newer girls, or ones passing through, and if they aren't chased off within a week or so, they find a new target and try the game on them. Just do the due diligence, verify as much as you can online with past ads. Cross reference with Escortfish if you can, it archives a lot of what is posted on skip, but only if the creator clicks to share them with search engines, and if you see numbers on that site with photo galleries showcasing like seven different faces, or they've posted in like 130 cities, sometimes hitting up coast to coast and a couple states in between in the span of a single day, you'll know they're garbage. But if the number has one girl in all the pics, and the ad locations all stay relatively within reason, and she doesn't appear to exist in a dozen quantum instances allowing her to visit that many places in a span of hours, you'll have a better sense of who's real and who is just a bunch of stolen pics.

    Best of luck.

  2. #1136

    Star (

    Will the Real Star please stand up?

    http://columbia-jeff-city.skipthegam...e/169574741804

    http://columbia-jeff-city.skipthegam...e/627721786417

    I'm not so adventurous anymore to just reach out to someone when they have conflicting ads. Does anyone have any insight? I'd like to try Star or Allie but not sure which one is the true provider. Hmmmmm.

  3. #1135

    Yup

    Quote Originally Posted by WoodsMo54  [View Original Post]
    I never have seen her, but after seeing her mugshot I want too. She's hot. Hope she gets out soon.
    Same here Woods, hopefully she'll come out with some good deals. Looks like a parole violation though, may be a while.

    I actually tried to see her several years ago when she was first started to advertise sporadically on Craigslist, she called herself Princess Peach IIRC. She ended up ghosting me in the Mexico Wallgreens parking lot one Saturday evening and I never tried again.

  4. #1134
    Quote Originally Posted by FunTimeSu26  [View Original Post]
    Ah. Shame her reviews are so negative. I remember reading them in the past. Looks good in the pics though.

  5. #1133
    I never have seen her, but after seeing her mugshot I want too. She's hot. Hope she gets out soon.

  6. #1132
    Quote Originally Posted by Salmirabilis  [View Original Post]
    Wasn't an arrest report. The 573-999-XXXX number came back tied to a female CPD officer in some documents. This was from the official como. Gov website.
    She was on the 700 report look like parole violation.

  7. #1131
    Quote Originally Posted by Paces  [View Original Post]
    I have been seeing Keely the last 2-3 weeks. We txted yesterday but I did not have time to see her.

    She has had problems in the past with poor judgement as it relates to the law.

    What is the date of the report?

    Be safe.

    Paces.
    Wasn't an arrest report. The 573-999-XXXX number came back tied to a female CPD officer in some documents. This was from the official como. Gov website.

  8. #1130

    Keely

    I have been seeing Keely the last 2-3 weeks. We txted yesterday but I did not have time to see her.

    She has had problems in the past with poor judgement as it relates to the law.

    What is the date of the report?

    Be safe.

    Paces.

  9. #1129
    Quote Originally Posted by Salmirabilis  [View Original Post]
    Has anyone seen Keely recently? Oddly enough, a Google search of the phone number from STG turns up some CPD references from Como.gov. That's a little disturbing.
    Looks like she hit the 700 report this morning.

  10. #1128
    Quote Originally Posted by Salmirabilis  [View Original Post]
    Has anyone seen Keely recently? Oddly enough, a Google search of the phone number from STG turns up some CPD references from Como.gov. That's a little disturbing.
    You might want to make sure it is her number. A provider I see says that there is someone posting other providers ads with using CPD numbers to drive clients away. Someone doesn't like competition. I haven't seen Keely personally.

  11. #1127
    Texted the first one this morning about rates and received an auto-reply saying "I am" and nothing later. Second one saw several years ago and she was non-GFE and service was meh. Didn't return.

  12. #1126

    Keely

    Has anyone seen Keely recently? Oddly enough, a Google search of the phone number from STG turns up some CPD references from Como.gov. That's a little disturbing.

  13. #1125
    Quote Originally Posted by Griffm2007  [View Original Post]
    Anybody seen these 2 or have any info?

    ...

    http://columbia-jeff-city.skipthegam...h/727499909446
    The pics are a little old and she's added a few pounds, but it is her. Not too restrictive. I'd recommend.

  14. #1124

  15. #1123

    STG ad

    Quote Originally Posted by WoodsMo54  [View Original Post]
    All those ads are gone. No idea who you guys are talking about.
    They mean this one:

    http://columbia-jeff-city.skipthegam...u/987454322217

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best sugar babies
Ava Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory




click for FREE hookups

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape