Massage Parlor Reports

[LarryJay]

I have not seen this anywhere. Found it on CxG / WORC. Small strip mall. Clean, decent room. Led to room by small, 40 ish. Decent body 5/7 tight yoga pants. Very little English Tease started as soon as she re-entered and I was face down. Medium pressure oil massage with occasional tease. Rubbed legs and OTC between. Hot towel, flip. Ask how much? Offered $ to see what it would get. Girls came out. Thought they were C but actually nice B's due to padding. FIV, LFK. Good technique. She was quite wet. Clean up and more massage on legs & feet to complete the hr+. Saw another cute one on the way out. Will return when in the area. . 6 / $.

[Street Seeker]

Tried to visit a couple of other places but everyone was busy so I Went back to Elite Touch Massage in Framingham And got Coco again. Again, a solid medium pressure massage, better teasing, some light kisses and On the flip another wonderful end to the massage. She is a sweet lady and works hard to please.

Went to Red Rose Reflexology & Bodywork and got Amy who was dressed like a 1970's Go Go girl with a halter top and cutoff denim shorts. She's older and a bit curvy with large naturals. Her massage was ok but her teasing was pretty good, especially when she used her fingernails. I'm believing that more than a HJ is available, and she wanted her tip up front and I said no. She wanted to know how much I would tip at the end and I told her it depends on her. She took the hint and did a great job making me happy while proudly displaying her large naturals. She would be a 30 minute deal versus an hour, but I would repeat.

[Street Seeker]

I love AMP's and enjoy a really great massage and leaving happy. So far I have visited two spots:

At Elite Touch Massage in Framingham I met Coco who provided a solid medium pressure massage, some teasing, and a wonderful end to the massage. I'm going to try and see her again before I leave.

At Rose Day Spa in Hopedale I met Natasha (and yes she is Chinese) who is very pretty with a nice body. Massage was OK with a little bit of teasing, some sweet little kisses, and a little mutual touch. I knew fun was to be had here when as soon as I walked in the door, both ladies there were grabbing my ass. The menu there goes from HE to FS. Just depends on how deep your pockets are. I'm not a fan of negotiations but I sprung for a bit of B2 B, Russian, a Saran Wrap BJ, and a HE finish. Was an interesting session, but not one I would repeat. The SWBJ was interesting, felt good, but just kinda weirded me out.

[NhSteve]

Went last week, real good massage. She made the ending last a while. Sweet little girl 60/40.
Methuen

[Zimmm33]

I almost headed over that way Tuesday. I hope you are well on the mend. Z.

https://bodyrubshop.com/ads/best-ser...5068-12914058. After the last two trips, I had a "reaction" and there was no FS. 1st trip; I was scratching, 2nd trip; hospital for Staph or Strep infection. Had good time but I think I'll go elsewhere from now on.

[Barry136]

https://bodyrubshop.com/ads/best-ser...5068-12914058. After the last two trips, I had a "reaction" and there was no FS. 1st trip; I was scratching, 2nd trip; hospital for Staph or Strep infection. Had good time but I think I'll go elsewhere from now on.

[Victorth]

Went here today, had a good time. Place is very quiet and the parking area near their door has a high retaining wall so it felt like a pretty good parking setup.

Walked in and met "sunny" from Taiwan. .6 for the hour, so-so massage, not much teasing, but full access top and bottom on flip.

Received standard finish (with the UTC roaming) I did not ask if more was available, but will likely repeat to find out. Left. 6 on the way out. No haggle at all, and TBH I don't think she even looked at how much I left.

Thanks for trying it out and reporting. I was going to venture there tomorrow, but your indication of just a so-so massage will keep me away. I have serious pain that requires a good quality hard massage for relief, and that's much more important than any other services.

[Goose7334]

Just saw a new massage place in the Great Road Associates plaza, 481 Great Rd, Acton. It's on the Nonset path side. Does anyone have any info?

(Cross posted in the Lowell forum.).

Went here today, had a good time. Place is very quiet and the parking area near their door has a high retaining wall so it felt like a pretty good parking setup.

Walked in and met "sunny" from Taiwan. .6 for the hour, so-so massage, not much teasing, but full access top and bottom on flip.

Received standard finish (with the UTC roaming) I did not ask if more was available, but will likely repeat to find out. Left. 6 on the way out. No haggle at all, and TBH I don't think she even looked at how much I left.

[Victorth]

Just saw a new massage place in the Great Road Associates plaza, 481 Great Rd, Acton. It's on the Nonset path side. Does anyone have any info?

(Cross posted in the Lowell forum.).

[MedJohnson]

Any AMP therapy available in WMass? Usually go to Bennington but Place was raided.

Med.

[Zimmm33]

I don't disagree with your points, and it's definitely the way it all could play out. My point was, IF they want convictions, they have to have males and / or owners.

It is easier to get a conviction against the ladies. That is the simple reason for only charging the ladies. Not sure what evidence they got on ladies. Generally, you send in undercover, and have the ladies offer to do sexual favors for fee. Much harder to convict the guys unless you get masseuses to testify against them, and given the speech difficulties (wink. Wink.), they can never get a conviction based on testimony alone. Competent defense attorney would shred their testimony. Thus, they would need video and testimony, IMHO.

Not crime to go into massage parlor to get massage. Of course, charging someone results in public shaming and their legal cost of fighting criminal charges, even if not found guilty.

This female judge is basically telling the District Attorney who to charge and for what, by dismissing the ladies charges for unequal application of the law. LOL. Undoubtibly, McCabe won't face judicial inquiry. (See Judge (male) Sinnott)

Contrary to what you think, this will DISCOURAGE the POLICE from pursuing these cases, since they won't end in convictions, even if heard by Judge (I am a feminist & Progressive Resistance Fighter) Mary McCabe, ex-criminal defense attorney and appointed by Deval Patrick to the bench. McCabe is married to an ex-judge.

In fact, if police just bring charges against the guys, McCabe has set precedent in her own court to dismiss for unequal application of the law, which of course she won't follow in regards to charging males with. What a farce.

Thank you Judge McCabe for discouraging the police from enforcing these law. Progressives always think their actions have no unintended consequences.

McCabe may be overturned on appeal, since the actual charges are "providing sex for a fee". The male customers would have been charges with solicitation, etc. Not sure if its the same statute or different one, and not inclined to research. If same statute, then I think, strictly construed, unequal application would apply, but if different statute and thus different criminal offense, unequal application theory would fail.

[Longjblues]

It is easier to get a conviction against the ladies. That is the simple reason for only charging the ladies. Not sure what evidence they got on ladies. Generally, you send in undercover, and have the ladies offer to do sexual favors for fee. Much harder to convict the guys unless you get masseuses to testify against them, and given the speech difficulties (wink. Wink.), they can never get a conviction based on testimony alone. Competent defense attorney would shred their testimony. Thus, they would need video and testimony, IMHO.

Not crime to go into massage parlor to get massage. Of course, charging someone results in public shaming and their legal cost of fighting criminal charges, even if not found guilty.

This female judge is basically telling the District Attorney who to charge and for what, by dismissing the ladies charges for unequal application of the law. LOL. Undoubtibly, McCabe won't face judicial inquiry. (See Judge (male) Sinnott)

Contrary to what you think, this will DISCOURAGE the POLICE from pursuing these cases, since they won't end in convictions, even if heard by Judge (I am a feminist & Progressive Resistance Fighter) Mary McCabe, ex-criminal defense attorney and appointed by Deval Patrick to the bench. McCabe is married to an ex-judge.

In fact, if police just bring charges against the guys, McCabe has set precedent in her own court to dismiss for unequal application of the law, which of course she won't follow in regards to charging males with. What a farce.

Thank you Judge McCabe for discouraging the police from enforcing these law. Progressives always think their actions have no unintended consequences.

McCabe may be overturned on appeal, since the actual charges are "providing sex for a fee". The male customers would have been charges with solicitation, etc. Not sure if its the same statute or different one, and not inclined to research. If same statute, then I think, strictly construed, unequal application would apply, but if different statute and thus different criminal offense, unequal application theory would fail.

The good news is the ladies charges are dismissed. (Though a DA motion will be filed Oct 3rd.) The bad news is the message is out there you have to include and take down male customers when doing an investigation like this.

From Newburyport paper.

SALISBURY A judge dismissed charges last month against two women accused of offering sex for a fee at a local spa and questioned why seven police departments and the USA Homeland Security Department "were unable to investigate" and charge customers or the business owner, according to court records.

Newburyport District Court Judge Mary McCabe ruled in favor of motions to dismiss charges against Fudi Fan, 50, and Yuhua Li, 62 Chinese nationals living in Salisbury who were charged in June 2018 after police raided Yoga Spa at 111 Lafayette Road, No. 2, in Salisbury.

Police said the raid followed a three-month undercover operation involving seven police departments and the federal Department of Homeland Security.

In her ruling, McCabe questioned the actions of law enforcement officials for not investigating or charging anyone but the women.

"To suggest that seven police departments and a federal agency were unable to further investigate the customers who were supporting this business is not credible or is an indication of discriminatory choices and selective prosecution of these women," McCabe wrote. "The complaints brought against the two female defendants were the product of an arbitrary or unequal application of the law, based upon the sex (gender) of the defendants. ".

Salisbury police were tipped off in April 2018 by a concerned citizen regarding young Asian workers at the spa providing sex for a fee and living inside the business, according to court records.

In the weeks to follow, police posed as customers and were offered sex acts for a fee.

A Salisbury police detective obtained a warrant and organized a raid of the business with help from Seabrook, Amesbury, Newbury, Georgetown and Newburyport officers and detectives. When police entered the building, there was one customer inside but he said he wasn't receiving illegal sexual services.

When Li and Fan were asked by a Homeland Security agent whether they were being forced to work there or forced to perform sexual acts on customers, both said no.

The dismissals by McCabe came after the two women nearly reached a plea deal with an Essex County prosecutor in April. At the last moment, they changed their minds when they were told their pleas could lead to them being deported.

Attorneys Jack Humphries and John Bjorlie, however, are not done with the cases.

During the women's appearances in court Wednesday for a final status hearing, Essex County prosecutor Michelle Belmonte told Judge Allen Swan she had filed a motion to amend McCabe's decision. That prompted Swan to schedule a motion hearing in the same courthouse Oct. 3.

When asked what she hoped to accomplish by filing the motion, Belmonte referred a reporter to the Essex County District Attorney's Office.

The spokeswoman Carrie Kimball said she couldn't comment.

"Until the motion is filed, I cannot speak to its purpose," Kimball said in an email.

In their motions to dismiss, Humphries and Bjorlie successfully argued that police officers charged only Fan and Li and not the male customer discovered there during the raid nor the owner of Yoga Spa. They argued that such selective targeting ran contrary to established precedent dating back to the 1970's.

McCabe agreed with their interpretation, writing, "To allow one male customer found in the massage room with money displayed to go uncharged, or it appears investigated, and according to the untested-to assertion of the Commonwealth, multiple other customers not to be charged, and to allow the male owner of the business which employed the two defendants, to go uncharged, leads the court only to believe that the target of the police was only the two female masseuses who performed the prostitution or sex work, and not the customers who kept them in business nor the business owner who employed them. ".

[ARegularGuy]

I stopped in once this summer, forget her name, late 40's woman, okay massage, decent shape, accessed her nice sized tits, left happy. Didn't ask for extras beyond HJ. I would repeat if in the area again.

ARG.

Just saw that the AMP in Greenfield is advertising again. Before they shut down the reports were of a 1 older lady show. Has anyone been back since they've re-opened?

https://cityxguide.com/ads/asian-bea...ening-23065310

[Amppro95]

The good news is the ladies charges are dismissed. (Though a DA motion will be filed Oct 3rd.) The bad news is the message is out there you have to include and take down male customers when doing an investigation like this.

From Newburyport paper.

SALISBURY A judge dismissed charges last month against two women accused of offering sex for a fee at a local spa and questioned why seven police departments and the USA Homeland Security Department "were unable to investigate" and charge customers or the business owner, according to court records.

Newburyport District Court Judge Mary McCabe ruled in favor of motions to dismiss charges against Fudi Fan, 50, and Yuhua Li, 62 Chinese nationals living in Salisbury who were charged in June 2018 after police raided Yoga Spa at 111 Lafayette Road, No. 2, in Salisbury.

Police said the raid followed a three-month undercover operation involving seven police departments and the federal Department of Homeland Security.

In her ruling, McCabe questioned the actions of law enforcement officials for not investigating or charging anyone but the women.

"To suggest that seven police departments and a federal agency were unable to further investigate the customers who were supporting this business is not credible or is an indication of discriminatory choices and selective prosecution of these women," McCabe wrote. "The complaints brought against the two female defendants were the product of an arbitrary or unequal application of the law, based upon the sex (gender) of the defendants. ".

Salisbury police were tipped off in April 2018 by a concerned citizen regarding young Asian workers at the spa providing sex for a fee and living inside the business, according to court records.

In the weeks to follow, police posed as customers and were offered sex acts for a fee.

A Salisbury police detective obtained a warrant and organized a raid of the business with help from Seabrook, Amesbury, Newbury, Georgetown and Newburyport officers and detectives. When police entered the building, there was one customer inside but he said he wasn't receiving illegal sexual services.

When Li and Fan were asked by a Homeland Security agent whether they were being forced to work there or forced to perform sexual acts on customers, both said no.

The dismissals by McCabe came after the two women nearly reached a plea deal with an Essex County prosecutor in April. At the last moment, they changed their minds when they were told their pleas could lead to them being deported.

Attorneys Jack Humphries and John Bjorlie, however, are not done with the cases.

During the women's appearances in court Wednesday for a final status hearing, Essex County prosecutor Michelle Belmonte told Judge Allen Swan she had filed a motion to amend McCabe's decision. That prompted Swan to schedule a motion hearing in the same courthouse Oct. 3.

When asked what she hoped to accomplish by filing the motion, Belmonte referred a reporter to the Essex County District Attorney's Office.

The spokeswoman Carrie Kimball said she couldn't comment.

"Until the motion is filed, I cannot speak to its purpose," Kimball said in an email.

In their motions to dismiss, Humphries and Bjorlie successfully argued that police officers charged only Fan and Li and not the male customer discovered there during the raid nor the owner of Yoga Spa. They argued that such selective targeting ran contrary to established precedent dating back to the 1970's.

McCabe agreed with their interpretation, writing, "To allow one male customer found in the massage room with money displayed to go uncharged, or it appears investigated, and according to the untested-to assertion of the Commonwealth, multiple other customers not to be charged, and to allow the male owner of the business which employed the two defendants, to go uncharged, leads the court only to believe that the target of the police was only the two female masseuses who performed the prostitution or sex work, and not the customers who kept them in business nor the business owner who employed them. ".

Imagine being the guy in the room during the raid. If it was me, they would have taken me out in a hearse. Looks like good news for the ladies but bad news for us moving forward.

[Zimmm33]

The good news is the ladies charges are dismissed. (Though a DA motion will be filed Oct 3rd.) The bad news is the message is out there you have to include and take down male customers when doing an investigation like this.

From Newburyport paper.

SALISBURY A judge dismissed charges last month against two women accused of offering sex for a fee at a local spa and questioned why seven police departments and the USA Homeland Security Department "were unable to investigate" and charge customers or the business owner, according to court records.

Newburyport District Court Judge Mary McCabe ruled in favor of motions to dismiss charges against Fudi Fan, 50, and Yuhua Li, 62 Chinese nationals living in Salisbury who were charged in June 2018 after police raided Yoga Spa at 111 Lafayette Road, No. 2, in Salisbury.

Police said the raid followed a three-month undercover operation involving seven police departments and the federal Department of Homeland Security.

In her ruling, McCabe questioned the actions of law enforcement officials for not investigating or charging anyone but the women.

"To suggest that seven police departments and a federal agency were unable to further investigate the customers who were supporting this business is not credible or is an indication of discriminatory choices and selective prosecution of these women," McCabe wrote. "The complaints brought against the two female defendants were the product of an arbitrary or unequal application of the law, based upon the sex (gender) of the defendants. ".

Salisbury police were tipped off in April 2018 by a concerned citizen regarding young Asian workers at the spa providing sex for a fee and living inside the business, according to court records.

In the weeks to follow, police posed as customers and were offered sex acts for a fee.

A Salisbury police detective obtained a warrant and organized a raid of the business with help from Seabrook, Amesbury, Newbury, Georgetown and Newburyport officers and detectives. When police entered the building, there was one customer inside but he said he wasn't receiving illegal sexual services.

When Li and Fan were asked by a Homeland Security agent whether they were being forced to work there or forced to perform sexual acts on customers, both said no.

The dismissals by McCabe came after the two women nearly reached a plea deal with an Essex County prosecutor in April. At the last moment, they changed their minds when they were told their pleas could lead to them being deported.

Attorneys Jack Humphries and John Bjorlie, however, are not done with the cases.

During the women's appearances in court Wednesday for a final status hearing, Essex County prosecutor Michelle Belmonte told Judge Allen Swan she had filed a motion to amend McCabe's decision. That prompted Swan to schedule a motion hearing in the same courthouse Oct. 3.

When asked what she hoped to accomplish by filing the motion, Belmonte referred a reporter to the Essex County District Attorney's Office.

The spokeswoman Carrie Kimball said she couldn't comment.

"Until the motion is filed, I cannot speak to its purpose," Kimball said in an email.

In their motions to dismiss, Humphries and Bjorlie successfully argued that police officers charged only Fan and Li and not the male customer discovered there during the raid nor the owner of Yoga Spa. They argued that such selective targeting ran contrary to established precedent dating back to the 1970's.

McCabe agreed with their interpretation, writing, "To allow one male customer found in the massage room with money displayed to go uncharged, or it appears investigated, and according to the untested-to assertion of the Commonwealth, multiple other customers not to be charged, and to allow the male owner of the business which employed the two defendants, to go uncharged, leads the court only to believe that the target of the police was only the two female masseuses who performed the prostitution or sex work, and not the customers who kept them in business nor the business owner who employed them. ".