BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[Garthy]

I have not seen Holly but I have seen Jennifer twice back in December. At that time Jennifer confirmed that Holly was her traveling partner. She encouraged me to see her but I don't care for all the ink.

Jennifer is absolutely reliable IMO and one of my ATFs, probably #2 or 3 on my list. So if she vouches for Holly, she is legit as far as I'm concerned.

I know nothing about Holly's fees but if she matches Jennifer, then she is on the high side: $. 5 qv, $$hh. IMO Jen is worth this for a special time. I saw her twice on the same day.

BTW here is Jennifer. Pics are absolutely real. Treat her right please.

http://springfield.backpage.com/Fema...going/33840396

Stay safe.

JS2.

I seem to remember this one. Very cute, but not GFE enough for a $200 hhr. Kissing and SFK, minimal DATY (and she had an odor, not necessarily a bad one, just a bit of a strong one). No BBJ.

Last year she wanted to get right to sex, but I wanted to play with her cute Hispanic goods. She was not really into it, so I never repeated.

[Ish Ling]

If it's the same Maddy I saw (young, Brazilian / Latina), then she was pretty hot, bodywise and facewise.

Think she was working at Anthony's.

Her place was west of Springfield. Has a massage table in a different room.

One time, she annoyingly double booked me.

Does anal, CBJ. She had a nice porn move where she slapped her face with my manhood.

I recommend.

I don't see her posting much (or she deletes the posts quickly).

I didn't realize Vanessa and Maddy were the same.

Yup, same girl, vanessa went by maddy, I won't say her real name but it begins with a J. I don't know anyones dancer names, I know all of them by their real names LOL. But the Donna the other guy is talking is different than Nancy / Natasha.

Not a clue, but my statement wasn't a question and the admin changed an exclamation to question mark. Vanessa on BP and then I think she changed it to maddy.

[Ish Ling]

Care to offer any description of services?

(BBBJ?, Anal?, etc?

I have not seen Holly but I have seen Jennifer twice back in December. At that time Jennifer confirmed that Holly was her traveling partner. She encouraged me to see her but I don't care for all the ink.

Jennifer is absolutely reliable IMO and one of my ATFs, probably #2 or 3 on my list. So if she vouches for Holly, she is legit as far as I'm concerned.

I know nothing about Holly's fees but if she matches Jennifer, then she is on the high side: $. 5 qv, $$hh. IMO Jen is worth this for a special time. I saw her twice on the same day.

BTW here is Jennifer. Pics are absolutely real. Treat her right please.

http://springfield.backpage.com/Fema...going/33840396

Stay safe.

JS2.

[DJP55]

Have seen 'Holly'. She is as pictured. While she fulfilled as agreed. I found her to be very mechanical and lacking any passion whatsoever along with a few rules. When done, got a bit of the rush you out the door attitude. Not what I expect for a premium price. She offered a dual with Jen which I passed on. YMMV.

[TunaSeeker2]

Each time I read a post about Elle I search BP for her and find nothing. Maybe I'm not searching correctly. I don't think she would be involved in any robbing or violence or ripping people off so maybe someone is posting in her name hoping o get her clients especially if she's not working anymore.

I wasn't aware that she was uh. "stateside". My impression from here and elsewhere was that she'd moved out, tried to get on methadone, and ended up in a motel getting pimped. Her old "roommates" are advertising like she's still there, and are essentially just mugging people. I'm not sure how that's sustainable. Again, this is all hearsay to me.

[Opumhrm]

Can't say I have seen either of them, but I did some lurking around the internet for some info. They are both reviewed elsewhere, mostly in NY area. Impression I received from most of what I read was "if it wasn't so mechanical / distant, it be worth the steep amount".

That being said, There is a good chance I may pop by one of them. Both look highly appealing for various reasons.

I have not seen Holly but I have seen Jennifer twice back in December. At that time Jennifer confirmed that Holly was her traveling partner. She encouraged me to see her but I don't care for all the ink.

Jennifer is absolutely reliable IMO and one of my ATFs, probably #2 or 3 on my list. So if she vouches for Holly, she is legit as far as I'm concerned.

I know nothing about Holly's fees but if she matches Jennifer, then she is on the high side: $. 5 qv, $$hh. IMO Jen is worth this for a special time. I saw her twice on the same day.

BTW here is Jennifer. Pics are absolutely real. Treat her right please.

http://springfield.backpage.com/Fema...going/33840396

Stay safe.

JS2.

[JoeySmth2]

Has anyone seen holly?

http://springfield.backpage.com/Fema...k-out/33838928

I have not seen Holly but I have seen Jennifer twice back in December. At that time Jennifer confirmed that Holly was her traveling partner. She encouraged me to see her but I don't care for all the ink.

Jennifer is absolutely reliable IMO and one of my ATFs, probably #2 or 3 on my list. So if she vouches for Holly, she is legit as far as I'm concerned.

I know nothing about Holly's fees but if she matches Jennifer, then she is on the high side: $. 5 qv, $$hh. IMO Jen is worth this for a special time. I saw her twice on the same day.

BTW here is Jennifer. Pics are absolutely real. Treat her right please.

http://springfield.backpage.com/Fema...going/33840396

Stay safe.

JS2.

[Buck Cock]

I wasn't saying "I don't get how cameras do, derp derp". I was saying that I didn't think the logic followed.

The photo is of a lower resolution and quality than you'd expect. I guess that COULD mean that it was intentionally blurred in order to disguise its original source. It could also mean the girl didn't want a high resolution picture of herself on backpage, or that she sucks at photo manipulation, or that she has the phone at a lower quality setting.

Inferior picture = fake picture doesn't seem like a good assumption to me. Maybe cause to look twice? Google image search usually finds the originals of blurry photos anyways.

We all have our own ways to spot fake pics without bothering to waste time with a search.

[Haverhill Lite]

So, what's the deal? Are they posting in Elle's name even though she's on state paid vacation?

.

I wasn't aware that she was uh. "stateside". My impression from here and elsewhere was that she'd moved out, tried to get on methadone, and ended up in a motel getting pimped. Her old "roommates" are advertising like she's still there, and are essentially just mugging people. I'm not sure how that's sustainable. Again, this is all hearsay to me.

[Haverhill Lite]

Has anyone seen holly?

http://springfield.backpage.com/Fema...k-out/33838928

I recall there being a report in Hartford about Jennifer that mentioned her tall blonde doubles partner. I'm 90% sure that's Holly. I don't recall if the original reviewer went for the double or not, but I think those are her real pictures. You can tell because the resolution is so high. (Sorry! Now I'm just being snarky.).

[Haverhill Lite]

Maybe this can help you http://www.vividlight.com/31/images/ImageSizes.jpg. the pic should look more like this at 8 megapixels http://springfield.backpage.com/Fema...0&oid=33785658 If the pics don't belong to the advertiser, would that make them fake, stolen, leading not to the person that you expect will be opening the door because you've already formed an image. Anyway, if you don't follow the reasoning let me reiterate.

8 megapixel camera (megapixels=clarity) pics to grainy.

Also the white boarder around them where the person screenshotted them and did a terrible job cropping.

I wasn't saying "I don't get how cameras do, derp derp". I was saying that I didn't think the logic followed.

The photo is of a lower resolution and quality than you'd expect. I guess that COULD mean that it was intentionally blurred in order to disguise its original source. It could also mean the girl didn't want a high resolution picture of herself on backpage, or that she sucks at photo manipulation, or that she has the phone at a lower quality setting.

Inferior picture = fake picture doesn't seem like a good assumption to me. Maybe cause to look twice? Google image search usually finds the originals of blurry photos anyways.

[Fascia101]

1. Mel is on sabbatical again. 2. Naughty Nessa has been around.

[DudeBob2580]

Has anyone seen holly?

http://springfield.backpage.com/Fema...k-out/33838928

[TunaSeeker2]

So what happened to Elle? PM me if you know. I'm just curious as to what happened.

[Member #5624]

So, what's the deal? Are they posting in Elle's name even though she's on state paid vacation?

Have it that 3 more suckers got robbed on elm.

Can't confirm, but I suspect it's true or close to true.

.