BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[SP508]

http://m.xhamster.com/movies/5691949...eominster.html

Getting the protein bath keeps them guessing your real age apparently she's doing something right! More of these girls should take note 😄

[Dark Soul]

From spencer, any info?

http://worcester.backpage.com/BodyRu...y-rub/32910838

From the burg, I know I've been out of the area for a while, I tend to monitor the websites. I don't recall seeing this one anywhere and I'm sure I would have picked up on an Asian in that area. Does anyone have any info.

http://worcester.backpage.com/Female...unfun/33953762

Doing my homework before a trip back to the area trying to figure out who I want to see and what not, as always trying to do it safely. Thanks for any help you can give guys.

I don't often get out to Leominster-Fitchburg, but every once in a great while I travel west on rt2. Came across the BP ad for the second link (which is now removed). A what-the-hell moment. Calls herself SukiSuki (a play on words of course), or Sofia. Very pleasant texting and on phone. Offered qv-75 and hh-100. Her place. Then it became a hotel in-call, and then it changed to another motel in-call. A real dive of a Motor Inn on rt12.

Mid-30's. Has a belly. SE Asian (mixed). Has the ghetto vibe down, and runs with ghetto locals. After all the driving around and changes of location, I foolishly stayed. Took a qv-- and a CBJ--in one of the skankiest rooms I have landed in. Could not wait to get out, and hoped the ride home was shorter, and I could wash away the experience. She posts infrequently, and is slick enough to remove all traces of her ad when she has made connections. I can only advise to stay away.

[Iman2765]

Had a visit with Jessi on Monday, had a great time, I will repeat http://worcester.backpage.com/Female...-milf/30021191.

[Umbrellaman1]

There are 2 women with the same last name who has lived at K address, Catherine M XXX = 65 and Kathleen M XXX = 52.

Also this police report - "XXX, Kathleen Mary Address: XXX Leominster Dob: 01/11/1964 Charges: Streetwalker, Common".

All have the same last name, it looks like 52 is more likely answer. Any other conclusions?

-BH.

1. It's the Kathleen entry.

2. 52.

I am positive on both of these.

[Aluver]

Video does bring up decidedly mixed memories. She has advertised in Lancaster in the past while residing in Leominster, so I think it is just switching the ads around.

Yeah, as I understand it, she was having trouble getting her old ads reposted so she started a new one. Hasn't moved, but does have a new number. Think the old number still works for now at least. Also looks like an ad with the old number got posted today as well as one with the new number.

[Moses1892]

If she's in Harvard now business must be pretty damned good. Just saying.

Video does bring up decidedly mixed memories. She has advertised in Lancaster in the past while residing in Leominster, so I think it is just switching the ads around.

[TheBurgRider]

From spencer, any info?

http://worcester.backpage.com/BodyRu...y-rub/32910838

From the burg, I know I've been out of the area for a while, I tend to monitor the websites. I don't recall seeing this one anywhere and I'm sure I would have picked up on an Asian in that area. Does anyone have any info.

http://worcester.backpage.com/Female...unfun/33953762

Doing my homework before a trip back to the area trying to figure out who I want to see and what not, as always trying to do it safely. Thanks for any help you can give guys.

[Adobe]

I am standing on 52. Looks it and acts like it.

Born in Feb, March maybe?

You guys are almost convincing me. I've seen the sources that suggest 52 and the ones that suggest 65. She does have a youthful complexion. In many ways, it's just possible that she really is 52. In others, 65 seems more like it.

Okay, for today, I'm going to go with 52. See? Why'all talked me into it!

[Michaelzxc]

I am standing on 52. Looks it and acts like it.

Born in Feb, March maybe?

I know the name of another family member and was able to find that person's age. It supports K's age as 52.

[ClitfLicker]

I find it quite amazing that such an old chick can do what she does. Just sayin'.

I am standing on 52. Looks it and acts like it.

Born in Feb, March maybe?

[ClitfLicker]

There are 2 women with the same last name who has lived at K address, Catherine M XXX = 65 and Kathleen M XXX = 52.

Also this police report - "XXX, Kathleen Mary Address: XXX Leominster Dob: 01/11/1964 Charges: Streetwalker, Common".

All have the same last name, it looks like 52 is more likely answer. Any other conclusions?

-BH.

I find it quite amazing that such an old chick can do what she does. Just sayin'.

[Big Head]

I found a reference to her high school yearbook once, a long time ago. She is not not not 52. She is in her 60's. If she just did something about her hair style, she might pass for her 50's, but she'd still be in her 60's.

Nothing wrong with that, except to advertise in her 30's. . . Yikes.

Adobe.

There are 2 women with the same last name who has lived at K address, Catherine M XXX = 65 and Kathleen M XXX = 52.

Also this police report - "XXX, Kathleen Mary Address: XXX Leominster Dob: 01/11/1964 Charges: Streetwalker, Common".

All have the same last name, it looks like 52 is more likely answer. Any other conclusions?

-BH.

[Adobe]

I agree. 1964 looks right after my research. I think she would do well to advertise the fact she is older. A lot of guys (me anyway).

Like that. People do not remain 38 for 5 years in a row. PM me with full name and I will get back, if you want.

Just my thoughts.

Clit.

I found a reference to her high school yearbook once, a long time ago. She is not not not 52. She is in her 60's. If she just did something about her hair style, she might pass for her 50's, but she'd still be in her 60's.

Nothing wrong with that, except to advertise in her 30's. . . Yikes.

Adobe.

[ClitfLicker]

I researched again and found 2 contradicting sources, one points to her current address and her previous phone number and it states that she 65, another source points to her arrest for prostitution, and it states that she was born in 1964. Her top looks 52, bur below her waste she looks 65+. This needs to get resolved, any other opinions?

-BH.

I agree. 1964 looks right after my research. I think she would do well to advertise the fact she is older. A lot of guys (me anyway).

Like that. People do not remain 38 for 5 years in a row. PM me with full name and I will get back, if you want.

Just my thoughts.

Clit.

[Big Head]

She's had the 4858 number since at least September. And according to my research she's 52, which is about as old as she looks.

I researched again and found 2 contradicting sources, one points to her current address and her previous phone number and it states that she 65, another source points to her arrest for prostitution, and it states that she was born in 1964. Her top looks 52, bur below her waste she looks 65+. This needs to get resolved, any other opinions?

-BH.