Court Finds 'Happy Endings' To Be Legitimate Massage Procedure

[Bozscaggs]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited or deleted to remove references to Transvestites/Transsexuals/SheMales. As provided in the Forum's Posting Guideline, members may not discuss Transvestites/Transsexuals/SheMales. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information. Thanks!

[Top Floor]

https://boston.cbslocal.com/2019/05/...g-arraignment/

[IGotID69]

https://turtleboysports.com/woke-whi...x-trafficking/

I want to light bags of shit on fire on each of their doorsteps.

[Top Floor]

https://turtleboysports.com/woke-whi...x-trafficking/

[Sounds]

To be fair, these women believe girls are being trafficked. It's not just that they're looking to shut down places that don't approve of, but they believe they're work will save these girls. They simply hear the news reports as fact. "Under suspicion of human trafficking" becomes "My God, these poor girls are being trafficked, doing this work against their will!" They might not be as aggressive if they believed these girls were willingly working in these places.

If by chance they actually come across a "real" trafficking establishment, would guess they would not be able to leave and would be put to work themselves.

[EarlSandwich]

In today's Globe:

https://www2.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...lZK/story.html

I am not a lawyer but I am pretty sure that it is illegal to approach random people asking them whether they want to be where they are.

A quick search on the Internet showed this: "Invasion of privacy is a Class A misdemeanor, but can be charged as a Level 6 felony if a person has a prior unrelated conviction for invasion of privacy." These crazy people don't seem to realize that invading providers' privacy may result in jail time. Not for providers.

Someone want to copy and paste the article? I'm over my limit for the paywall.

[Nrlmus]

To be fair, these women believe girls are being trafficked. It's not just that they're looking to shut down places that don't approve of, but they believe they're work will save these girls. They simply hear the news reports as fact. "Under suspicion of human trafficking" becomes "My God, these poor girls are being trafficked, doing this work against their will!" They might not be as aggressive if they believed these girls were willingly working in these places.

Actually it's not that they "believe" that these girls are being trafficked. They just refuse to believe that they are NOT being trafficked.

There is ample info out there that says that 99.9% of those girls do it on their own accord, and many are even proud to be able to support their families back home. Also, considering the quality of life in rural China many of those girls never had it as good as when working in America's whorehouses and look at any attempt to remove it from there as an attempt to do them harm. But accepting that would go against these ladies puritanical heritage (Cotton Mather is grinning in his grave about his values are being alive and well after all that time if not in word then in spirit), would make them feel like evil-doers instead of the heroes, and also hit something Fraudean inside, first of all this action makes them feel superior: since they're saving hoes they not hoes themselves, even if back in the day they were their HS football team's "goto" toys. Also by doing that they're almost "chasing the devil away" from themselves. Also many women who live in Wayland (I personally know two) have a lot of time on their hands and that keeps it all busy and interesting.

There are a lot of reasons for those women doing that but when you strip it all down benevolence is the last one on their list.

[Jack617]

To be fair, these women believe girls are being trafficked. It's not just that they're looking to shut down places that don't approve of, but they believe they're work will save these girls. They simply hear the news reports as fact. "Under suspicion of human trafficking" becomes "My God, these poor girls are being trafficked, doing this work against their will!" They might not be as aggressive if they believed these girls were willingly working in these places.

And they don't see the irony when after their meetings they stop and get their nails done at the expensive salon with Vietnamese woman servicing them.

[ThatGuy23]

Those old crusty fat bags have nothing else better to do with their time.

To be fair, these women believe girls are being trafficked. It's not just that they're looking to shut down places that don't approve of, but they believe they're work will save these girls. They simply hear the news reports as fact. "Under suspicion of human trafficking" becomes "My God, these poor girls are being trafficked, doing this work against their will!" They might not be as aggressive if they believed these girls were willingly working in these places.

[MeatMan]

Go walk your effing dogs.

Those old crusty fat bags have nothing else better to do with their time.

[IGotID69]

In today's Globe:

https://www2.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...lZK/story.html

I am not a lawyer but I am pretty sure that it is illegal to approach random people asking them whether they want to be where they are.

A quick search on the Internet showed this: "Invasion of privacy is a Class A misdemeanor, but can be charged as a Level 6 felony if a person has a prior unrelated conviction for invasion of privacy." These crazy people don't seem to realize that invading providers' privacy may result in jail time. Not for providers.

Go walk your effing dogs.

[Sounds]

In today's Globe:

https://www2.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...lZK/story.html

I am not a lawyer but I am pretty sure that it is illegal to approach random people asking them whether they want to be where they are.

A quick search on the Internet showed this: "Invasion of privacy is a Class A misdemeanor, but can be charged as a Level 6 felony if a person has a prior unrelated conviction for invasion of privacy." These crazy people don't seem to realize that invading providers' privacy may result in jail time. Not for providers.

All of them concerned about the sex trafficking in FL. Which turned out not to be happening.

[Top Floor]

Bunch of fucking busy bodies. Wait until they find one of their husbands walking out of one.

In today's Globe:

https://www2.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...lZK/story.html

I am not a lawyer but I am pretty sure that it is illegal to approach random people asking them whether they want to be where they are.

A quick search on the Internet showed this: "Invasion of privacy is a Class A misdemeanor, but can be charged as a Level 6 felony if a person has a prior unrelated conviction for invasion of privacy." These crazy people don't seem to realize that invading providers' privacy may result in jail time. Not for providers.

.

[OlGary]

In today's Globe:

https://www2.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...lZK/story.html

I am not a lawyer but I am pretty sure that it is illegal to approach random people asking them whether they want to be where they are.

A quick search on the Internet showed this: "Invasion of privacy is a Class A misdemeanor, but can be charged as a Level 6 felony if a person has a prior unrelated conviction for invasion of privacy." These crazy people don't seem to realize that invading providers' privacy may result in jail time. Not for providers.

[punteruk]

Would it be perjury or at least lying to a judge if the claim on a search warrant request identified probable cause for human trafficking? Or can they claim anything (aliens, spilt milk, Bigfoot) and it becomes the judges responsibility to believe them or not? If someone lies to a judge as a defendant or witness its perjury. The sheriff is a witness to a crime and the search warrant is produced based on that proof or probable proof?

Pretty sure the worst that can happen is the evidence gets thrown out if the warrant was improperly obtained. But in this case, the damage they were seeking is done anyway. That's why they offered him the deal.

Just hoping next time the media treats the trafficking claim with healthy skepticism. The irony is that if trafficking is actually taking place (rare) this will actually hurt the cause. Kind of the Jussie Smollet effect.

Perjury is lying under oath. Lying to a Federal Agent is also a felony, as Mr. Flynn discovered. But obtaining a warrant under false pretenses is never prosecuted.