BackPage Advertiser Reviews

**Raven1950** · 04-07-18 11:32

Originally Posted by IinTooDeep [View Original Post]

Looks to me like it's the GOP who's celebrating.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news...ges/310430001/

Guess who's calling the shots in DC these days. Dems got nothing right now. Hopefully the mid-terms change that, but the dems will manage to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory... again

Middle Aged White Women want everything their way.

I'm beginning to think the ERA was a bad idea.

**IinTooDeep** · 04-07-18 10:10

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

I think you're mistaking amigo. The Reps have their problems but it's not the Reps that drive this but rather the Dems. Women rights, human trafficking and so on: these are Democratic issues. The Reps don't give a hoot about things like that, it's the the female side of the Dems that push everybody in that direction. If the Reps had their way we would still have prostitution banned but LE wouldn't pay any attention to it. The Reps would pray in the morning and visit a whorhouse at night.

Looks to me like it's the GOP who's celebrating.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news...ges/310430001/

Guess who's calling the shots in DC these days. Dems got nothing right now. Hopefully the mid-terms change that, but the dems will manage to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory... again

**Admin2** · 04-07-18 09:55

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

I think you're mistaking amigo. The Reps have their problems but it's not the Reps that drive this but rather the Dems. Women rights, human trafficking and so on: these are Democratic issues. The Reps don't give a hoot about things like that, it's the the female side of the Dems that push everybody in that direction. If the Reps had their way we would still have prostitution banned but LE wouldn't pay any attention to it. The Reps would pray in the morning and visit a whorhouse at night.

Executive, Legislative, and Judicial and you're STILL blaming Democrats.

This has to be a joke.

**Admin2** · 04-07-18 09:55

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

I think you're mistaking amigo. The Reps have their problems but it's not the Reps that drive this but rather the Dems. Women rights, human trafficking and so on: these are Democratic issues. The Reps don't give a hoot about things like that, it's the the female side of the Dems that push everybody in that direction. If the Reps had their way we would still have prostitution banned but LE wouldn't pay any attention to it. The Reps would pray in the morning and visit a whorhouse at night.

Executive, Legislative, and Judicial and you're STILL blaming Democrats.

This has to be a joke.

**Nrlmus** · 04-07-18 01:29

Originally Posted by Zimmm33 [View Original Post]

When you control a body, NOTHING comes to the floor that the party in control won't pass. Google Hastert Rule, "amigo"

Off to the Massholes you go Zimmm33.

**GrafDog1** · 04-07-18 00:26

Originally Posted by TheIceGuy [View Original Post]

The sad part is, 99%(I hope) mongers have no problem stopping trafficking or underage stuff. We agree, get that stuff off places like backpage so it can't thrive.

Ironically, banning does more to help traffickers. Every time mongers are forced to dig deeper into the "black market", chances increase of finding and unknowingly supporting trafficking circles. A legalized prostitution system allows us to monitor and protect willing sex workers and a massive amount of people stop using the black market as a result.

It's like weed. I haven't bought it off the street since I got my medical card. Why would I? Now that I'm buying legally, I'm supporting local growers rather than criminals in the streets. It's a win / win just like legal prostitution.

The problem is, nobody wants to fight for it because of the stigma involved. No politician is going to come out in support of it. Especially after MeToo. The best they can do is ease up on places like backpage and allow BP to screen these girls as best they can. Just turn their head and have it about as "illegal" as jaywalking.

IceGuy, what you say is very logical and makes perfect sense.

**Grogrin** · 04-07-18 00:00

LOL. Glad you're not the only one to point it out from that Imbecile.

Originally Posted by Zimmm33 [View Original Post]

Yeah, because the Dems have the House, Senate, and WH. Makes absolute sense.

**TheIceGuy** · 04-06-18 23:48

The sad part is, 99%(I hope) mongers have no problem stopping trafficking or underage stuff. We agree, get that stuff off places like backpage so it can't thrive.

Ironically, banning does more to help traffickers. Every time mongers are forced to dig deeper into the "black market", chances increase of finding and unknowingly supporting trafficking circles. A legalized prostitution system allows us to monitor and protect willing sex workers and a massive amount of people stop using the black market as a result.

It's like weed. I haven't bought it off the street since I got my medical card. Why would I? Now that I'm buying legally, I'm supporting local growers rather than criminals in the streets. It's a win / win just like legal prostitution.

The problem is, nobody wants to fight for it because of the stigma involved. No politician is going to come out in support of it. Especially after MeToo. The best they can do is ease up on places like backpage and allow BP to screen these girls as best they can. Just turn their head and have it about as "illegal" as jaywalking.

**TheIceGuy** · 04-06-18 23:41

Not to continue with politics but I do think it's both sides. Republicans are all "family values" and Dems are all "#MeToo" so both sides can take blame with this shit. No need to fight each other. This is a bipartisan FU to us. Both parties finally agree on something and it screws us.

Now we need to come together and have a good alternative.

**Zimmm33** · 04-06-18 23:18

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

I think you're mistaking amigo. The Reps have their problems but it's not the Reps that drive this but rather the Dems. Women rights, human trafficking and so on: these are Democratic issues. The Reps don't give a hoot about things like that, it's the the female side of the Dems that push everybody in that direction. If the Reps had their way we would still have prostitution banned but LE wouldn't pay any attention to it. The Reps would pray in the morning and visit a whorhouse at night.

When you control a body, NOTHING comes to the floor that the party in control won't pass. Google Hastert Rule, "amigo"

**Zimmm33** · 04-06-18 23:15

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

I think you're mistaking amigo. The Reps have their problems but it's not the Reps that drive this but rather the Dems. Women rights, human trafficking and so on: these are Democratic issues. The Reps don't give a hoot about things like that, it's the the female side of the Dems that push everybody in that direction. If the Reps had their way we would still have prostitution banned but LE wouldn't pay any attention to it. The Reps would pray in the morning and visit a whorhouse at night.

Yeah, because the Dems have the House, Senate, and WH. Makes absolute sense.

**Grogrin** · 04-06-18 23:11

Nrlmus, if you're going to state the facts, try doing the research first. Yes the Reps may have had the problem but its not accurate your assessment.

If you didn't lie about serving in the armed forces, then maybe you'd have a little more credibility when you speak about politics. Some might doubt your claim my friend. Thats being called a fraud.

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

I think you're mistaking amigo. The Reps have their problems but it's not the Reps that drive this but rather the Dems. Women rights, human trafficking and so on: these are Democratic issues. The Reps don't give a hoot about things like that, it's the the female side of the Dems that push everybody in that direction. If the Reps had their way we would still have prostitution banned but LE wouldn't pay any attention to it. The Reps would pray in the morning and visit a whorhouse at night.

**BPNinja** · 04-06-18 22:26

Thanks for sharing. I feel like this is an index / cache of BP. Reason I believe this is that I was on BP earlier today before they pulled it, and the numbers / girls look familiar. I've been on BP enough the last few weeks to be able to tell when the weekend arrivals / new girls turn up. Proof of my theory will be what the site looks like tomorrow! It is still a useful reference though if you have numbers stored but can't rmember the pictures.

Any more technical members know of a good way to make an archive of everything they have on their site for future reference?

Originally Posted by GrafDog1 [View Original Post]

I see a site called -"cityxguide dot com" is running still. It has pretty good pics. Check it out.