Escort Reports

**MissPiggy** · 04-30-23 23:05

Originally Posted by Buster247 [View Original Post]

I just talked to this one. She quoted 140 hh 240 hr but said she would do 100 hh and 200 hr. I told her that would work. I normally don't do that far South to get up with someone. But she is interesting and sexy as all outdoors! Does anyone have any history with Melody? Is she worth the ride?

https://skipthegames.com/posts/delaw...t/403618189546

She used to post in the eastern shore threads. I'm pretty sure she's a no go. Whenever I see Milford, seafood, Bridgeville I avoid.

**Buster247** · 04-30-23 21:58

I just talked to this one. She quoted 140 hh 240 hr but said she would do 100 hh and 200 hr. I told her that would work. I normally don't do that far South to get up with someone. But she is interesting and sexy as all outdoors! Does anyone have any history with Melody? Is she worth the ride?

https://skipthegames.com/posts/delaw...t/403618189546

**BillyBadass12** · 04-29-23 21:43

Originally Posted by Hollywood123 [View Original Post]

Has anyone met with this provider? I thought about putting this under the massage thread, but it doesn't seem like a massage as much as a provider offering a massage. It honestly looks TGTBT but I'm hopeful someone here can tell me otherwise.

https://skipthegames.com/posts/delaw...i/957083072806

There was a post about her in the past few weeks someone said that she was legit. Working in middletown.

**Buster247** · 04-29-23 20:11

Originally Posted by Shampoo55 [View Original Post]

Right there in is an assumption that I do not agree with! It is NOT "alright and acceptable" for providers to request pics from mongers. No one I have read around here thinks that is a good idea. But I don't run the providers, nor act for all mongers so I guess there are plenty of dudes willing to send pics of their face, pics with them holding their ID next to their face and pics of their ID to "prove" they are "real" to some anonymous poster on some website or SM.

To me that is the dumbest thing one could do, especially IF one has an SO and more so if they have kids.

Years ago there was a site called "Exposing Johns" (Google it) where they posed as providers and got dudes to email them, stating sex for money, giving real names, pics, etc. Turns out they provided a website where your info, illegal requests and pics could be found through a Google search. Of course, for a small fee (extortion) they would remove your data. But shoot, there are other vigilanti groups out there trying to effect the hobbying game. Plus who knows what tactics some of these ant-trafficking task forces are doing?

So if you want your family, neighbors, employer, future employer and future relationships to know you are a wh*rem*nger, then by all means send pics as "verification" to anonymous people (providers) on the web!

But what you said next, I do agree with:

YES! We should be able to and often it is a great idea to ask the provider for an additional picture! I have never said one can't or shouldn't ask for pics. What is the issue is the type of picture, not whether we can / should ask for a picture. I prefer something that is pornographic in nature, I. E a picture of her vagina.

But where we apparently differ in our view points is that I don't think a revealing pic ..... Not a totally nude pic. But something more revealing*** is sufficient proof that the poster is NOT LE! LE CAN and might use pictures that are "more revealing," so getting a more revealing picture tells the recipient nothing. Not sure LE can send pics that are porno. But who knows. Now it might be a case where they do it although they are not suppose to, and at that point one has to hire an attorney.

So be clear in what I am saying. A "more revealing" picture is a poor way to do DD and those that rely on that as a way to 'stay safe' are taking chances that could get them jammed up.

Build up some "Spidey Senses" and learn to trust them. Don't be afraid to walk away when the Spidey Senses are tingling. As the old saying goes, [color=green] better safe than sorry.

***http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?7289-Escort-Reports&p=6427006#post6427006

I don't need a lecture doing what's best for me.

**Shampoo55** · 04-29-23 19:47

Originally Posted by Buster247 [View Original Post]

For starters, many of these providers have requested pics from mongers. So it's alright and acceptable for them to request pics from mongers? So why shouldn't we be able to do the same. Especially if we get a strange vibe!? As good as her pics look, combined with the very reasonable prices she's quoting, there are two things going on for sure. One: She doesn't even look close to the pics she's posting. That's a real good possibility. Or two: She's undercover five o, and looking to jam someone up! She doesn't post very often, and doesn't really look like your typical provider. No one else on here has any input or info on this provider. If they do, they're keeping it to themselves. So I have to be careful and do what I feel will be in my best interest. Nobody else is going to look out for me, so I have to.

As of now, I haven't asked her for a pic. It really doesn't look like I'm going to even pursue her anyway. Something just doesn't sit right with me about her. And nobody else knows anything? Hit her up for yourself and let me know what you think!

Right there in red is an assumption that I do not agree with! It is NOT "alright and acceptable" for providers to request pics from mongers. No one I have read around here thinks that is a good idea. But I don't run the providers, nor act for all mongers so I guess there are plenty of dudes willing to send pics of their face, pics with them holding their ID next to their face and pics of their ID to "prove" they are "real" to some anonymous poster on some website or SM.

To me that is the dumbest thing one could do, especially IF one has an SO and more so if they have kids.

Years ago there was a site called "Exposing Johns" (Google it) where they posed as providers and got dudes to email them, stating sex for money, giving real names, pics, etc. Turns out they provided a website where your info, illegal requests and pics could be found through a Google search. Of course, for a small fee (extortion) they would remove your data. But shoot, there are other vigilanti groups out there trying to effect the hobbying game. Plus who knows what tactics some of these ant-trafficking task forces are doing?

So if you want your family, neighbors, employer, future employer and future relationships to know you are a wh*rem*nger, then by all means send pics as "verification" to anonymous people (providers) on the web!

But what you said next, I do agree with:

Originally Posted by Buster247 [View Original Post]

So why shouldn't we be able to do the same. Especially if we get a strange vibe!?

YES! We should be able to and often it is a great idea to ask the provider for an additional picture! I have never said one can't or shouldn't ask for pics. What is the issue is the type of picture, not whether we can / should ask for a picture. I prefer something that is pornographic in nature, I. E a picture of her vagina.

But where we apparently differ in our view points is that I don't think a revealing pic ..... Not a totally nude pic. But something more revealing*** is sufficient proof that the poster is NOT LE! LE CAN and might use pictures that are "more revealing," so getting a more revealing picture tells the recipient nothing. Not sure LE can send pics that are porno. But who knows. Now it might be a case where they do it although they are not suppose to, and at that point one has to hire an attorney.

So be clear in what I am saying. A "more revealing" picture is a poor way to do DD and those that rely on that as a way to 'stay safe' are taking chances that could get them jammed up.

Build up some "Spidey Senses" and learn to trust them. Don't be afraid to walk away when the Spidey Senses are tingling. As the old saying goes, better safe than sorry.

***http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?7289-Escort-Reports&p=6427006#post6427006

Originally Posted by Buster247 [View Original Post]

I just hit her up, trying to get more info. I told her that she doesn't dress like a typical provider and how long she's been in the game. She going to have to send me a revealing pic before I bite. Not a totally nude pic. But something more revealing to show me she ain't five o! That's what really concerns me! Especially the prices she quoted. I ain't biting until I'm comfortable. It seems that nobody else has any info on her. Either they're not sharing any, or there's just nothing to share right now. I know I'm gong to proceed with caution.

**Hollywood123** · 04-29-23 14:24

Has anyone met with this provider? I thought about putting this under the massage thread, but it doesn't seem like a massage as much as a provider offering a massage. It honestly looks TGTBT but I'm hopeful someone here can tell me otherwise.

https://skipthegames.com/posts/delaw...i/957083072806

**Buster247** · 04-29-23 12:37

Originally Posted by Shampoo55 [View Original Post]

Oh jeez. From time to time I see a post like this and it has me shaking my head and my blood boiling in fear for the monger. So now all niceties are aside and please remember I am trying to educate as to help others avoid mistakes. Apologize, but the style isn't going to be all Kumbaya!

But SERIOUSLY? You believe that a "more revealing" photo is going to prove a girl is NOT law enforcement? I don't know where to start with that. Two things come to mind, either ignorance (uneducated) or something LE would say.

If you have read these threads consistently, like any monger should, one will have seen NUMEROUS comments by J Richard about LE's use of photos. They CAN and often DO use photos in their sting operations. The detail on this is better left to him and his expertise.

I will say this, if I'm headed to court on some charges, I want to be able to show that the opponent used pictures that most would consider to be pornographic.*** Therefore, a questionable girl gets a request to provide a picture that is porno, usually a VJ shot. IF she refuses, then I move on. Too many fish in the sea. But according to what I have read here, such a picture may be provided by LE and as such that is no proof at all.

So if one wants to operate on the assumption that a "more revealing" photo is a sign the respondent is not LE, then this is a free country and one is free so to do. NOT me.

One of the ways mongers scr3 w themselves is to get obsessed with one girl, to the point that the little head is driving the bus. Developed Spidey Senses are to be trusted and it is often best to just move on.

Just saying.

Stay safe!
.
.
.
.
.

*** In today's times with Porno being so ubiquitous, it is hard to say what 12 jurors or a sitting judge would find to be "offensive" and thus pornographic..

For starters, many of these providers have requested pics from mongers. So it's alright and acceptable for them to request pics from mongers? So why shouldn't we be able to do the same. Especially if we get a strange vibe!? As good as her pics look, combined with the very reasonable prices she's quoting, there are two things going on for sure. One: She doesn't even look close to the pics she's posting. That's a real good possibility. Or two: She's undercover five o, and looking to jam someone up! She doesn't post very often, and doesn't really look like your typical provider. No one else on here has any input or info on this provider. If they do, they're keeping it to themselves. So I have to be careful and do what I feel will be in my best interest. Nobody else is going to look out for me, so I have to.

As of now, I haven't asked her for a pic. It really doesn't look like I'm going to even pursue her anyway. Something just doesn't sit right with me about her. And nobody else knows anything? Hit her up for yourself and let me know what you think!

**Shampoo55** · 04-29-23 09:33

Originally Posted by Buster247 [View Original Post]

I just hit her up, trying to get more info. I told her that she doesn't dress like a typical provider and how long she's been in the game. She going to have to send me a revealing pic before I bite. Not a totally nude pic. But something more revealing to show me she ain't five o! That's what really concerns me! Especially the prices she quoted. I ain't biting until I'm comfortable. It seems that nobody else has any info on her. Either they're not sharing any, or there's just nothing to share right now. I know I'm gong to proceed with caution.

Oh jeez. From time to time I see a post like this and it has me shaking my head and my blood boiling in fear for the monger. So now all niceties are aside and please remember I am trying to educate as to help others avoid mistakes. Apologize, but the style isn't going to be all Kumbaya!

But SERIOUSLY? You believe that a "more revealing" photo is going to prove a girl is NOT law enforcement? I don't know where to start with that. Two things come to mind, either ignorance (uneducated) or something LE would say.

If you have read these threads consistently, like any monger should, one will have seen NUMEROUS comments by J Richard about LE's use of photos. They CAN and often DO use photos in their sting operations. The detail on this is better left to him and his expertise.

I will say this, if I'm headed to court on some charges, I want to be able to show that the opponent used pictures that most would consider to be pornographic.*** Therefore, a questionable girl gets a request to provide a picture that is porno, usually a VJ shot. IF she refuses, then I move on. Too many fish in the sea. But according to what I have read here, such a picture may be provided by LE and as such that is no proof at all.

So if one wants to operate on the assumption that a "more revealing" photo is a sign the respondent is not LE, then this is a free country and one is free so to do. NOT me.

One of the ways mongers scr3 w themselves is to get obsessed with one girl, to the point that the little head is driving the bus. Developed Spidey Senses are to be trusted and it is often best to just move on.

Just saying.

Stay safe!
.
.
.
.
.

*** In today's times with Porno being so ubiquitous, it is hard to say what 12 jurors or a sitting judge would find to be "offensive" and thus pornographic..

**Buster247** · 04-28-23 18:12

Originally Posted by Nate0110 [View Original Post]

I'm with Shampoo. That's way to fishy. Kinda like this one but I she's from Philly so could be real.

https://skipthegames.com/posts/wilmi...o/571192159030

I just hit her up, trying to get more info. I told her that she doesn't dress like a typical provider and how long she's been in the game. She going to have to send me a revealing pic before I bite. Not a totally nude pic. But something more revealing to show me she ain't five o! That's what really concerns me! Especially the prices she quoted. I ain't biting until I'm comfortable. It seems that nobody else has any info on her. Either they're not sharing any, or there's just nothing to share right now. I know I'm gong to proceed with caution.

**Buster247** · 04-28-23 15:21

Originally Posted by Shampoo55 [View Original Post]

Pics combined with prices = TGTBT IMHO. Spidey Senses suggest proceed with caution.

She texted me the prices and I was shocked. Especially the way she looks. Could be five 0. I'm going to have to chat with her more before I'm comfortable enough to see her.

**Nate0110** · 04-28-23 13:47

Originally Posted by Shampoo55 [View Original Post]

Pics combined with prices = TGTBT IMHO. Spidey Senses suggest proceed with caution.

I'm with Shampoo. That's way to fishy. Kinda like this one but I she's from Philly so could be real.

https://skipthegames.com/posts/wilmi...o/571192159030

**Shampoo55** · 04-28-23 12:59

Originally Posted by Buster247 [View Original Post]

Does anyone have any info on this provider. I talked to her last night. She goes by Jessica, and sounded really good. Almost too good to be true. It looks like she has a New Castle number. I just noticed her posts within the last week. If anyone has any information about Jessica, it will be much appreciated. Her donations are 75 ss, 100 hh, and 200 hour, which works for me. Said she does all the services that her ad describes. Including BBBJ cim.

https://skipthegames.com/posts/delaw...t/810993370160

Pics combined with prices = TGTBT IMHO. Spidey Senses suggest proceed with caution.

**Shampoo55** · 04-28-23 12:57

Originally Posted by JTerry26 [View Original Post]

Tried to see her, had it all set up but when I started heading her way and asked for a specific address she went dark on me. I had contacted her off her StG ad, not SA.

Sorry that happened to you! Stinks when they do that!

So I took the plunge once I seen confirmation that it was the Emma of old! This version is thicker and she still has the same playful provocative style as before. Great date from a wonderful individual.

I think she has grown up in 4-years and now that she is mostly drug free she's more mature. Emma has always impressed me as a bit brighter than the average STG girl. I suspect it would have been harder to see her if she didn't remember me from before. I get more of a vibe of 'low tolerance for BS' these days as a result of life experiences and maturity.

Still has a bit of drama swirling around her, due to her living situation and the neighbors. That said, a genuine girl that is worth the effort to see again and again.

As always YMMV and one dudes trash is another dudes treasure.

**Buster247** · 04-28-23 07:42

Does anyone have any info on this provider. I talked to her last night. She goes by Jessica, and sounded really good. Almost too good to be true. It looks like she has a New Castle number. I just noticed her posts within the last week. If anyone has any information about Jessica, it will be much appreciated. Her donations are 75 ss, 100 hh, and 200 hour, which works for me. Said she does all the services that her ad describes. Including BBBJ cim.

https://skipthegames.com/posts/delaw...t/810993370160

**JTerry26** · 04-27-23 08:00

Originally Posted by Nate0110 [View Original Post]

Looks like Emma is trying to step up her game. Good scouting report on her thanks.

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...9-f8e1efb2d3e9

Tried to see her, had it all set up but when I started heading her way and asked for a specific address she went dark on me. I had contacted her off her StG ad, not SA.