Supereloquent's Reports - Philadelphia

[Supereloquent]

Let me preface my remarks by saying two things:

1. Forth Ryte has always seemed to me to be one of the good guys. He has further seemed to be one of the more intelligent and level-headed good guys, so, my commentary, wherever it disagrees with him, in no way reflects animosity. It is just a healthily different perspective and point of view, although I do agree with much of what he had to say.

2. There are some downsides to only being able to post in your own thread, but the danger of being "off-topic" isn't one of them. Just about anything for me is "on-topic" unless I start babbling in tongues or typing the phone directory. I make an honest attempt to stick to the purposes of this Forum; if I stray from that from time to time I hope you would forgive a slight detour, given that my main highway is littered with useful information.

What goes on in this forum. Especially this Philly forum that is so busy and so populated with prolific sex addicts. Is sometimes just an opportunity to discuss what the poster wants to discuss. And so long as it relates. However remotely. To sex with women it should be 'on topic. '

You have NO argument from me on that one.

For some men, sex with a woman is wham-bam-thank-you-Ma'am. For others, it is seduction. The hunt, the dance, the pleasure. Some want more detail, other just want the essential facts. Some want to see pictures of just the girl with no part of the man, others want to see the girl actively engaged in the sex act. Variety, gentlemen, is what makes this and everything we do in life more interesting. Variety in our discussions should be tolerated and even encouraged. Jumping on someone just because YOU weren't interested in what he had to say or jumping on someone just because YOU didn't like the poses in his pictures or the language that he used, just seems awfully small minded to me.

It couldn't have been said much better: vive la differece.

Some posts are two lines long and others are quite lurid and eloquent. At least one poster here prides himself on his eloquence so what in the world was wrong with one monger discussing the topic of 'eloquence'? JEEZ! Leave the guy alone if that's what he wanted to discuss in the context of the posts on this forum.

Here is where we disagree. It is one thing to "discuss" or even dispute the topic of "eloquence." It is one thing to point out an oversight, like missing an attribution. It is quite ANOTHER thing to use either of these two subjects as a weapon to attack, to ascribe malevolent motivations and to impugn "integrity." If you are a student of World War II and Operation Market-Garden, that was a bridge WAY too far.

I don't need to plagiarize the work of others to "impress" anyone about my writing abilities. My vast body of work here speaks for itself as to whether I am capable of "erudition" or not. If I were to pick a spot to do that it certainly wouldn't be Wikipedia, as if that was a place nobody could easily find! That source was a quick and dirty way of getting my facts straight. However, you try making well over 2000 posts without any errors or oversights, like missing an attribution. A simple interrupting telephone call or unexpected social or business guest can make editing impossible with the new software, which allows a 60 minute window. I miss the old 24 hour window. Even with 24 hours, many mambers made more mistakes in one post than I have since I became a member here, and now they make even more (as did the attacker in question as a prime example). No amount of editing time will be enough, however, for someone with the grammar skills of a third grader.

Should the guy who vilified me have been left alone to make the leap from "discussion" to obviously hostile and vindictive presumptions? I think not, and several others clearly agreed. If you want to make rash and spiteful assumptions, and use them to jump down somebody's throat, and denounce both his talent and his character, then you had better be prepared for like treatment.

[Supereloquent]

Nice find SuperE, I want to see this one splattered in cum.

Thanks for the props. HOWEVER, people in hell want ice water too. I don't do requests, and, even if I did, it would be some trick to do so AFTER the date is over.

I rarely, if ever, do facials. It just isn't my thing. But never say never. I have "dabbled" in that on occasion. I like money shots with my cum in and streaming from their mouths, but, sometimes it just feels too good to interrupt for photos, and I prefer to have her swallow.

[Supereloquent]

Come on, let's see champagne get fucked.

Nawwwwww.... I am having too much fun while fucking to be setting up a remote camera for photos. It is a LOT easier with a BJ.

[Supereloquent]

SE, sorry if I didn't read properly and is already in your reports. I would like to know if Champagne provide Greek? (just to get the fantasy of that wonderful, great ass being worked).

Here is my report:

My Date with Champagne

You tell me.

[Vamp]

SE, sorry if I didn't read properly and is already in your reports. I would like to know if Champagne provide Greek? (just to get the fantasy of that wonderful, great ass being worked).

[Brrr99]

Nice find SuperE, I want to see this one splattered in cum.

[Spa Man 1]

Or, is she doing MY thing? Last but certainly not least is my favorite cock sucking pic from the last set.

Come on, let's see champagne get fucked.

[The P Hunter]

Again, so many good ones to choose just one fav, so I will choose several. But this one would have to be at the top of my list.

FINALLY an anal pic of her! This one is a definate hottie! Thanks for these pics

[Supereloquent]

I totally agree. I wish I could print out some of your collages (especially Champagne's) , frame them and hang them on my wall at home, work or both. But something tells me it would not go over well with others.

I know a monger who lives in the Philly burbs who does exactly that. He takes photos of SWs, and prints his pics in large format, and displays them in frames on his walls. He brings SWs to his home (something I wouldn't do, but to each his own) , and, in addition to knowing this already, I have heard from several SWs who found it interesting and intriguing that he does this.

I should however print them and put them in a vault or deposit box. Maybe in 500 years or so SE's work will be worth millions?

Artists tend not to be appreciated in their lifetimes. Van Gogh's work was spurned. He only ever managed to sell one painting out of the 900 or so that he painted, for 400 francs (about $80) :

The Red Vineyard

Now, of course, he is considered to be one of the best and most recognized painter of all time and his work is worth incalculable millions.

I am not saying I am a Van Gogh. I am just making a point. Anything is possible.

Your analogy to The Mona Lisa is excellent! In addition to her smile. Take a close look at her eyes. They tell it all.

I always thought the Mona Lisa had that "come fuck me" look. Of course, I tend to think a lot of women are saying "fuck me" with their eyes,

[XxATLxX]

Wish I could get my hands on her. She is definitely a BBFS candidate.

[Vbgent4u2c]

I totally agree. I wish I could print out some of your collages (especially Champagne's) , frame them and hang them on my wall at home, work or both. But something tells me it would not go over well with others.

I should however print them and put them in a vault or deposit box. Maybe in 500 years or so SE's work will be worth millions?

Your analogy to The Mona Lisa is excellent! In addition to her smile. Take a close look at her eyes. They tell it all.

Leonardo the Vinci is a name you probably all have heard. He was an Italian polymath: painter, sculptor, architect, musician, scientist, mathematician, engineer, inventor, anatomist, geologist, cartographer, botanist and writer. Leonardo has often been described as the archetype of the Renaissance man, a man whose unquenchable curiosity was equaled only by his powers of invention. He is widely considered to be one of the greatest painters of all time and perhaps the most diversely talented person ever to have lived.

I would aspire to be the kind of monger Leonardo would have been, had he been interested in our hobby. Maybe he did dabble as a monger too, but the times in which he lived frowned upon anything but total discretion in such endeavors. There is a hint of playfulness in this regard reflected in the ambiguous and subtle smile on his famous painting: "Mona Lisa." What he was not permitted to express directly, some say he did very cleverly indirectly in art such as this. .

Today, of course, and especially on this website, we are not constrained by the nit-picky hang-ups of bygone eras, even though we do get some commentary from time to time that seems like a throwback to morality from the 50s. But that's all it is: a flapping of gums about outdated standards and nothing more. I can't be positive, but Leonardo was definitely a free-thinking rebel, and I would surmise it very likely that Mona Lisa just might be sucking on a cock if Leonardo painted his famous masterpiece today. Her mouth seems incredibly ripe for one.

[Supereloquent]

Okay SuperE, here goes:

5. Maddie. B movie horror porn like "Hairy Twatter" and my fav,"Throbbin Hood, Prince of Beaves."

4. Jessica. Yummy, yummy, I've got cum in my tummy.

3. Candace. Slurpee surprise.

2. Jen. Classic.

1. Leigh. Her face and hand gesture says it all.

La Chic

It isn't always how much or how messy or how drooly the cum is. There are many subtle things to enjoy, depending on what you like.

Thank you for your continued attention to my contest and your thoughtful and annotated considerations when you vote.

[Supereloquent]

Or, is she doing MY thing? Last but certainly not least is my favorite cock sucking pic from the last set.

[Supereloquent]

Champagne is cute as a button and here she has a "button" in her mouth to emphasize the point!

[Supereloquent]

Again, so many good ones to choose just one fav, so I will choose several. But this one would have to be at the top of my list.