Posting post names, addresses and photos of arrestees - Part II

[Chamber]

I'm surprised anyone would say "yes" to LE reporting on here. Isn't it counter-productive to get rid of fellow board members who can vet potential situations?

[Alvinc11]

I may be a newbie here but to me what you do and who you do it with is no one's business but yor own especially if you are not a serial killer.

[Clark Kent]

That 'vouch' system you're speaking of really doesn't have much to do with the issue on this thread, which was mug shots. This is more of a mongering website anyway, weighed heavily on the customer's side. Reading the comment, however, I'm reminded of the Allen Iverson 'practice' interview, lol.

[Alecia]

I am against ever post the arrest picture of any person including SW's. If they are posted elsewhere, and then posted here, there is little argument to be made. Once on the net, it is on-the-net. You can't pull it back. Still, I know often I can use the information on the arrest of SW's along with her pick, and never the arrest pix of members. Keeping a low profile is very Key & Essential.

In my area of the world even posting SW's facial shot can bring on the heat of LE, since we have a very limited amount of decent SW's of anykind, in our mid-size, small minded city. Photos of SW's in Big Cities like LAX, ATL, CHI, NYC, DET, and TOO many more, make no difference. LE has better things to do than focus on a few pix of any SW, unless she committed some major felony.

So we need to have a set of standardized RULES, to avoid giving LE anymore help that we already have presently. I just don't think one set of rules will work across the board, but something will have to be done. Maybe each forum can add there own rules to the standard rules of the whole forum.

Just throwing out some ideas, opinions, and suggestions!

Since johnny law could just as easily be reading the same forums we are reading, I suggest we ask the administrator to implement a vouch system. The providers who have been reviewed should be vouched automatically vouched depending on how many good reviews they have. One vouch per client to a provider per good review then after that the provider should in turn vouch the client. Each subsequent visit between provider and client should be provider's responsibility to vouch the client and vise versa. New unvouched clients can be vouched by seeing a provider who is fully vouched and vise versa. On indys you are fully vouched when you have 3 vouches. You can get more and should as vouches there expire after 1 year. We'll leave it up to the administrator how many vouches it will take to become fully vouched. But we definately need that and an alerts or warnings forum for no call no show clients and for providers who do that to clients. It can be separate or on the same form. A guys room and ladies room would be nice too and they should be vouched access only. Just a suggestion.

[Flfcsr]

I would never post a picture of myself here, and if I posted a picture of an escort or SW it would never be without their permission and I would blur out their face, unless I knew for a complete fact they were OK with it, as is more often the case with escorts. As for booking photos - why? I'm generally against public humiliation for crimes as I've been led to believe the 8th amendment is supposed to protect us against that. Is that not an unusual, if not cruel, punishment? Anyway, I'm all for privacy!

[Member #3974]

I, for one, would never post anything of this nature. Granted I am not into mongering as I once was, cause of finances. I have noticed over the course of the last couple years that when one person posts photos, or real names it opens the door for others as well. I would be appalled if my info was posted. Generally though, if mongers are careful and heed warnings from posts of other mongers they don't get put in a situation of anxiety. I understand though that most mongers post such things for one of two reasons. First reason is a vandetta thing against a provider, they got ripped off, or service sucked, something of that nature. Secondly they post just to keep other mongers aware of whats goin on around them. I would like to know if a SW was squeezed by LEO for info, and I would avoid her simply because afterwards she may be setting people up to save her own butt. This activity we all practice isn't what is should be, and never will. We all have to watch out for one another. I have actually met fellow mongers and if I heard of such things I would simply pm them to stay away from a provider who got popped. But I would never post info in a public place, for everyone to C. Just my opinion.

Happy hunting brothers

[FaceMan675]

You allow candid pics of SWs. That is potentialy outing their profession. I don't see the difference. Besides no potential employer or Spouse will be trolling these forums.

For the booking pics to be posted here they must have first been posted on a public ( Police/DA/Community Activist ) site. It's the public site that has the far greater potential for embarrassment.

[Mr Dunkins69]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because the subject was not related to the purpose of this Thread, which is as follows:

Posting post names, addresses and photos of arrestees

[Richiboone]

Isn't that part of the thrill, the risks we all take?

I am for it but then again I am single and don't have to worry.

HH

But will you always be single? Will you never have to look for a job, run for public office?

[Wrelia]

Long time reader, first post. I just wanted to say Hi from Houston.

At first I came to do some research. Now I come back all the time to see what is new.

Thanks for building a great community.

KristinMother of 2 wonderful childrenDog-mom of 1

[Mr Boombastic]

I am against ever post the arrest picture of any person including SW's. If they are posted elsewhere, and then posted here, there is little argument to be made. Once on the net, it is on-the-net. You can't pull it back. Still, I know often I can use the information on the arrest of SW's along with her pick, and never the arrest pix of members. Keeping a low profile is very Key & Essential.

In my area of the world even posting SW's facial shot can bring on the heat of LE, since we have a very limited amount of decent SW's of anykind, in our mid-size, small minded city. Photos of SW's in Big Cities like LAX, ATL, CHI, NYC, DET, and TOO many more, make no difference. LE has better things to do than focus on a few pix of any SW, unless she committed some major felony.

So we need to have a set of standardized RULES, to avoid giving LE anymore help that we already have presently. I just don't think one set of rules will work across the board, but something will have to be done. Maybe each forum can add there own rules to the standard rules of the whole forum.

Just throwing out some ideas, opinions, and suggestions!

[Eddie Hawkins]

How long is this poll going to be up before a decision and a rule is going to be made and announced? It's been six months already, the poll hasn't closed, and there's no sign of a verdict either way by Jackson. Can we please have an answer so we can put this thing to bed?

Literally, the results of this poll are inconsequential. This is Jackson's site, so what he says goes. That has been my opinion from the beginning and it remains so. If Jackson doesn't want it done, it shouldn't be done, whether or not there is an actual rule set on it. But even though Jackson has made his position perfectly clear, he hasn't told people to stop or set a rule, so it continues. Because of that, and because new members will come, I think a rule needs to be set, and it's long past time to do it. Thanks.

[Hell On Wls]

Isn't that part of the thrill, the risks we all take?

I am for it but then again I am single and don't have to worry.

HH

[Jax Fun]

No ABSOLUTELY NOT. There is no reason to degrade or try to degrade the girls nor the hobbyiests. Having to worry about LEO is enough without having to worry about our "brothers or sisters" posting our photos or information on the internet.

[Hodar]

In some of my posts I have posted links to booking photos at the county jail posted in my local newspaper for women arrested for prostitution.
I realize now that this is wrong because if I were to be caught in this activity I would be humiliated.
What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
The posting of providers booking photos should not be allowed because it just perpetuates the societal based shame for sex.