Thread: Indie Therapists
+
Add Report
Results 7,531 to 7,545 of 7629
-
01-10-09 03:46 #99
Posts: 67Asian Invasion?
Noticed a couple very interesting posts on Clist and waswondering if anybody wold be willing to share review?
A-LucyLu from 814 or the lady goes by Wu-407. I would be forever grateful.
-
01-09-09 19:19 #98
Posts: 86Indie Reports-Negative Reviews
Thanks to Wando, we now have a new "Indie Reports. Negative Reports" thread available for us.
Let's remember that this new thread is for NEGATIVE reports only.
It would be helpful if everyone includes the CL or BP link, along with a name and some of the digits, when posting a negative review. Just in case they pull the CL ad.
Thanks Wando
-
01-09-09 16:14 #97
Posts: 195Sensual Touchez
Anyone visited Mandy yet?
http://charlotte.craigslist.org/ths/986274842.html
I remember seeing one of her posts with a pic on it a while back. I believe she is a petite young black gal. Anyone care to share? PM is fine.
-
01-09-09 12:23 #96
Posts: 79Samantha
Anyone have info on samantha?
http://charlotte.craigslist.org/ers/984808116.html
Figured I'd ask before I toftt. I'd prefer a PM. Thanks.
-
01-09-09 10:11 #95
Posts: 216Indie reports
Originally Posted by Rocko2
-
01-08-09 23:18 #94
Posts: 195Indie therapist (Pineville area)
Visited an indie therapist referred by a SM.
Great gal, very nice visit.
Details for SM only. Or those with some posts under their belt.
-
01-08-09 22:09 #93
Posts: 86New Thread Request
I appeal to a member who has the privilege of creating a new thread.
Can you review the “Indie Therapist” thread discussion about creating a new “Negative Reviews - Charlotte” thread?
It appears many agree this new thread would be a benefit to the forum participants.
Rocko
-
01-08-09 21:45 #92
Posts: 86Rochelle
Saw a few of these postings lately. Business must be slow.
Wanted to send a reminder. Same person.
Massage OK, Overweight Yes, Topless Yes, HE No.
http://charlotte.backpage.com/BodyRu...wAd?oid=917682
http://charlotte.craigslist.org/ths/985231670.html
-
01-04-09 18:29 #91
Posts: 67Ter
I agree with the TER ideas there is a lot that doesnt get posted .
A Subfolder of the providers with negative reviews be great.
-
01-04-09 13:59 #90
Posts: 127I posted earlier on her, maybe about a month ago or so. I thought she was okay, if you search on her name you can see my posts, or you can PM me.
Originally Posted by NC Transplant
-
01-03-09 18:37 #89
Posts: 86Indie Therapist Negative Reviews
Sounds like we should continue to pursue this?
What do we need to do or who do we need to contact to either.
1) Determine if a sub folder can be created for a thread.
2) Create an "Indie Therapist Negative Review" thread.
3) Determine acceptable content; ie.
Negative reviews only
Charlotte area only
short & sweet messages
Include links to CL or BP ad
I don't think we should make this a forum for discussions, just a quick and simple way for us to let others know when they've been screwed by a local indie or when an ad does not live up to it's claims.
Any other thoughts?
-
01-03-09 00:13 #88
Posts: 38Ter
Originally Posted by Redskinzzfans
-
01-02-09 23:56 #87
Posts: 748Ter
Originally Posted by Rocko2
-
01-02-09 22:43 #86
Posts: 195Negative reviews
Originally Posted by Rocko2
Thanks to all who have TOFTT and shared their experiences, by the way.
-
01-02-09 16:16 #85
Posts: 86Indie Reviews
I have been very busy lately and wonder if any other other hobbyist experience the same issues I have.
I've tried to post a couple of negative reviews on TER but they don't make it to the review page. Discouraging after you write that lengthy report. Besides, checking each potential indie on TER is a bit cumbersome and is only filtered at the "carolinas" level. It also requires another user name & password.
I was wondering if there is another, easier means of communicating poor indie service to all my hobbying buddies?
Has anyone considered a sub-folder to the Indie Therapist thread to post NEGATIVE reviews? This would be an easy access, very local, database for us to share our negative reviews; saving us from handing money to a below-par provider, as well as (hopefully) change the ways of some bad providers. Poor reports would be more immediate, and only pertain to local girls. Access could also be limited according to the software parameters.
Anyone want to continue discussion on this?