TampaReviewer / GFEReviewer's Scam

[Admin]

Contrast that with this site:

http://www.websiteoutlook.com/www.usasexguide.info

37,479 page views per day

You guys are short-changing me.

The USASG receives approximately 60,000 Unique Visitors every day, said visitors viewing approximately 225,000 page views per day.

http://my.statcounter.com/project/st...146388&guest=1

Thanks,

Jackson

[G Money Cool]

His site is growing. Now he's charging girls to advertise on it. $20.00 per month.

I don't care if he got free or making money. Good for him.

I just don't like if the provider says no, he gives them a bad review.

Hell a LOT of providers are on it, even the shop on Park Blvd.

The owner of the shop reads this board. Right L.E.?

http://www.websiteoutlook.com/

If you use this tool which tracks web traffic and per-view ad revenue, it says Muhanned's site gets 179 page views per day, generating $. 54 in daily revenue. Which means by the end of the week, he will have made enough to buy a small coffee at Starbucks. This obviously doesn't include the $20 he charges girls for ads via paypal, just the banner ads he has.

Contrast that with this site:

http://www.websiteoutlook.com/www.usasexguide.info

37,479 page views per day

The moral of the story: if girls are paying $20 per month to advertise on that site, they aren't getting much for the money. You are better off posting here. See if he can keep the dream alive on 54 cents per day.

"He works hard for the money. So hard for it honey. He works hard for the money so you better treat him right!"

[R Consultant]

Close it and be done with the whole big mess....

Looks like the perfect time to close out this thread.

A happy ending if I ever saw one.

LM

[The Lovemuscle]

Unfortunately the Sperminator is no longer around to bemoan this thread. And there has been reduced chatter here, because it appears Josh has been sufficiently chased into a corner. But when a nugget comes my way, I feel the need to share. This could very well be my last post to this thread, as I don't know what could top this.

This info was sent to me, and I believe it to be accurate. Josh's real name is apparently (drumroll) Muhanned Hasan. Attached is a pic, from a booking on the charge of (drumroll again) purse snatching. The other pic is one he supposedly posted on one of his private sites. It's kinda small, but when you look at it, it's the same guy. I'm sure he'll have no problem with this, as he loves to post booking photos and people's real names on his blog.

The info came by way of the TampaBBW and another guy who did some digging. Regardless of what we think of her drivel here, she has been passionate about chasing this guy down. So now, it appears, Josh himself has finally been "verified". This one goes out to all the ladies who have been harassed.

As the late Paul Harvey would have said: and now you know the rest of the story. Good day.

Looks like the perfect time to close out this thread.

A happy ending if I ever saw one.

LM

[A John]

Got too love this one...... lol

Here's ...

Punctuation! more better!

Please learned how to use proper punctuation in your posting.
Sorry I'm just not feeling more better

[G Money Cool]

Unfortunately the Sperminator is no longer around to bemoan this thread. And there has been reduced chatter here, because it appears Josh has been sufficiently chased into a corner. But when a nugget comes my way, I feel the need to share. This could very well be my last post to this thread, as I don't know what could top this.

This info was sent to me, and I believe it to be accurate. Josh's real name is apparently (drumroll) Muhanned Hasan. Attached is a pic, from a booking on the charge of (drumroll again) purse snatching. The other pic is one he supposedly posted on one of his private sites. It's kinda small, but when you look at it, it's the same guy. I'm sure he'll have no problem with this, as he loves to post booking photos and people's real names on his blog.

The info came by way of the TampaBBW and another guy who did some digging. Regardless of what we think of her drivel here, she has been passionate about chasing this guy down. So now, it appears, Josh himself has finally been "verified". This one goes out to all the ladies who have been harassed.

As the late Paul Harvey would have said: and now you know the rest of the story. Good day.

[Member #4558]

Hi I just wanted to ad my two cents this guy is a joke for real ladies and gentlemen please stop believing this kid I have info that proves him to be just some nerdy guy with a free ning network who harress girls telling them his review is everything ladies it saddens me to know that you beleive this jerk off kid ladies get smart no offense guys but in this buisness you ladies should know better then to trust a guy makig the claims this kid is making! Please pt an end to this kid and the drama he brings! I my self am sick of him! Thanks! Abby!

Here's word for you...

Punctuation!

Please learn how to write more better before you post anything else!

[Jessiwantsu]

Hi I just wanted to ad my two cents this guy is a joke for real ladies and gentlemen please stop believing this kid I have info that proves him to be just some nerdy guy with a free ning network who harress girls telling them his review is everything ladies it saddens me to know that you beleive this jerk off kid ladies get smart no offense guys but in this buisness you ladies should know better then to trust a guy makig the claims this kid is making! Please pt an end to this kid and the drama he brings! I my self am sick of him! Thanks! Abby!

[Peter Rammer]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because the content of the report was largely argumentative. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

[Chase Star]

Why don't you take your inane and senseless drivel someplace else? You're just a waste of bandwidth. No one around here really gives a fuck about you OR Josh-the-wannabe-pimp OR the dispute between the two of you. You've BOTH become completely irrelevant. Now go sell crazy at the Publix bakery counter, cuz no one here is buying any more.

[Zp Nrg]

Long time lurker, 1st time poster.

Not one to gloat over another entrepreneur's misfortunes, it seems like "Josh" has encountered a roadblock in his corner of the world. Without going into detail, his exclusive review site - ********************.ning.com, may have run afoul of NING's policy, placed under the guise of technical difficulties.

Accordingly, ********.com also has a similar policy.

If so, their may be an high influx of new ads in backpage, craigslist, and USG; probably other ad venues. What's ironic are those that proudly displayed the prominent "verified by 'Tampa Escorts Verified'" logo or text will not have any of their positive reviews accessible by the general public; not that they ever did. In effect, "it's not worth a plugged nickle".

My point is that if they need reviews, there's a more than willing population ready to assist them... ;-)

No TARP funding needed - unless you've already have more than one bad review by a "verifiable/validated" member of any review site or fictional writer's forum.

[G Money Cool]

i was hoping to let this thread die in the new year. there really is not much more to be said about his tactics. and he's had to staunchly profess that he does not ask for freebies, to the point that i suspect he may not be able to work that scam anymore.

then today i ran across this on his new message board. he appears to be using the sting as an opportunity to disparage other forums. see his note below specifically about this board.

notice he doesn't tell the girls to have their ter reviews taken down. and why would he. he fancies himself a mini dave elms or charles kelly.

anyway, thought you would get a kick out of it.

3 ladies were visited by federal agents in their hotel room last night but because they had followed the book and did nothing to incriminate themselves even though the agents tried to strong arm them they held their ground and because they knew what they were doing and the agent once they knew they had escorting licenses, turned their attention on asking them questions about any girls that are **** they know about and any pimp that might be employing them, but because they didn't, the agents ended up leaving them alone and moving on in their search for **** girls.

ladies..get that damn license. its only 27 dollars and it covers you and up to 5 other girls. they also questioned them about why they were on usa sex guide and about their reviews on there they had recently gotten and showed them off printed copies of the reviews. ladies. i highly suggest you contact that site and have your reviews moved, deleted or something, but that's completly your choice...do as you wish..i can only warn you ladies so much that they have downloaded, archieved and printed off everything from that site in the last 2 months, on escorts, massage parlors, strip clubs, etc.

[Wildman010]

This was in the Craigslist Reviews section, but it belongs here. Not sure who wildman010 is; he appears to be a new poster.

The section on his site that you speak of is titled "Ripoff Providers". He may go on to further clarify why he labels them ripoffs. But read that heading. It should be titled "Women who won't play Josh's game". He's got the Tampa BBW labelled as the Queen of Ripoffs. For all the things that can be said about her, I've never heard about her actually ripping people off. Same for Miss Lady, who has reviews here as well as TER.

What happens is this. Josh attempts to get a freebie from someone, and they tell him to fuck off. He labels them a ripoff, unless they've already gotten some reviews somewhere. In which case he just labels them Not Recommended. He sprinkles in a few well-documented ripoffs to make it seem legit. But it is effectively his penalty box.

Trust me, he has no aversion to girls using fake pics. Remember the phony review he wrote on Carmen, where he wouldn't even provide a phone number? He took it down when someone spotted her pics in a Portland CL ad. Or the fact that he staunchly defended Kristy/Amanda Luv for months, claiming that he verified their pics via a webcam. He only recanted that when Tampa Tori posted her real pics in an Amanda Luv ad one day and it just became undeniable.

If you are one of those who believes that Josh is a principled, reliable source of information, you should do some more research or watch the blog for longer. See if you can figure out why Jennifer Deepthroat, for example, was public enemy number one on his blog for a while (he had her booking photos and arrest records posted), but now is a featured member of his Ning site. There are numerous other discrepancies of girls with mixed reviews. Some get tossed into "Not Recommended" and others are featured. What do you think the difference is? You guessed it. They give Josh what he wants.

I would venture to guess that the girl he is most obsessed with as a ripoff, Amanda Dyer, would probably even be able to get a glowing review if she gave him a freebie and a few bucks. That's the way the scam works. Go google Charles Kelly or Dave Elms if you want more info on how his story will play out.

G Money,

I feel you dude. I know what the story behind his claim to fame is from the things I've read all over this board. I mentioned this in another post in a different section, but it's like I said, I've been watching his blog, and these posts for awhile now.

I remember the review he wrote on Carmen with no phone number listed. I remember his rant on Amanda Dyer, I remember when that whole situation occurred with Jennifer Deepthroat and her dude Tom, where supposedly he and Josh cleared all that non-sense up (that was according to what he wrote, I myself don't know what really happened with that). I remember when he had April as the Queen of Flagging, I remember the BBW issue with Tammy Toole and Angel Eyez, and I definitely remember the Amanda Luv/Tampa Tori/Reisa/Blah blah blah whatever they want to call themselves situation as well.

So for me, it's like this. I'm not going to say that Josh is a reliable source of information, nor will I say that he's an unreliable source of information. I think I've mentioned this before also, but I myself have had encounters with women from his site that were "verified" and they all turned out positive. Unfortunately for Josh, that doesn't mean a person like myself is going to believe every word he writes on a blog or a message board. To me, I don't care if your name is Josh, John, Jenn Deepthroat, Amanda Dyer, or MyMustang. I just don't buy fully into what any person tells me until I can experience it or have proof for myself that it's 100% true.

The only way I'll ever buy fully into what I hear from anyone is if your name is God, you have named Jesus Christ, and a virgin wife named Mary.

And if everyone really sat down and thought about something, we'd all realize that Josh is only getting everything he's getting because these providers keep giving it to him. Maybe if these providers stop "exchanging freebies for reviews" he wouldn't be so damn popular. Because, hell if I call up a provider and offer her a review for a freebie and she consents, guess what? I'm taking that freebie, then giving her a review, and after that everyone else should feel free to hate to me because I got some nookie for free, and you have to pay! And if you're a hobbyist that's reading this and you say you'd turn down a freebie from a hot provider, then you need to put the drugs down because it's killing too many of your brain cells.

Now, if that's not what the problem with Josh is, the problem must be that he's bashing providers who won't give him what he wants. In which case I say, so what? If he's such a non-creditable source of information why would we believe anything he writes anyway? If he's non-creditable, then we don't believe that his providers are verified, we don't believe that his rip-off providers are rip-offs, we don't believe that he's truly paying these girls to review them, and we don't believe anything he writes, AT ALL!

So, if we don't believe him, and he says a girl is a rip-off when she's not then, .

Who cares? We don't believe him!

[G Money Cool]

Hello all,

This is Scarlett and I'm new to this board but have been around since 2003 in this biz. I pride myself on having good reviews and providing quality to everyone I meet. I was approached by Josh to place me on his blog spot to get more business. I did agree to exchange a session for an "HONEST" review. I made no deals to barter for a GOOD review and he has never approached me to extort money and he has always been a gentleman to me.

Now there seems to be this feud going with Josh and TampaBBW and I'm sick of being caught in the middle of it. Whenever I post an ad on CL, it's flagged within 1 minute. I have no reason to suspect Josh and I am in good standing on his blog. Hmmmmm, wonder who it could be? Well whoever, you are, I've reported this to CL for harrassment. I haven't done anything wrong, I haven't tried to hurt anyone and I don't deserve this. Leave me out of your childish escapades.

I have 2 kids to feed and this isn't funny anymore. Leave me the hell alone!

============================================

Hi Scarlett Love,

Why don't you just promote yourself on this site?

I guarantee that your advertisements won't get flagged, and as a bonus you won't have to "service" Tampa Reviewer in exchange for his agreeing not to trash your reputation.

Think about it.

Thanks,

Jackson

Josh is so insecure, he keeps sending me emails, practically crying about me bashing him here. It really bothers him. He thinks we should all join forces with him for whatever his ultimate goal is (unknown at this point).

When I asked him what he thought about Scarlett's admission that she gave him a freebie, here's what he said:

"scrletts words were twisted around. No one even bothered to get her explaination to that part. She meant I contacted her and asked if she would be interested in getting put on the site, to get her approval ahead of time (sorry but unlike some people, I want the girl to know shes going to be reviewed and how much of the review she cares to have seen in public on a site) to know I would be seeing her not to give me a freebie. I told her I would show up like a regular client and write an honest review and let her know it was me after the session. But like I said. Non of you people even bothered to ask her if what she was implying was a freebie. That's why she got pissed at that board and left it and she has no regreats about it. "

Sorry for the spelling errors. That's actually one of his better ones. He really does seem to read and write at a 5th grade level.

So there you have it. When Scarlett said "exchange a session for a review", she really meant "a pre-advised but completely paid-for session which would result in a review. " Joshie the bologna pimp is truly legit. Spank my ass and call me Charlie. We were wrong all along. Makes you go "Hmmmm".

[G Money Cool]

She wasn't labeled as a ripoff. He placed her in a collective section that contains rip-offs, cash and dash, bait and switch, fake pictures, etc. Every girl in that section is labeled as either one or more of those titles.

He labeled her as having fake pictures, because if you click on the link provided, you can visit the site she linked them from and tell that they are not hers; however, the girl may not be a rip-off. She may be 100% legit, but if anyone is to choose to go and see her (like yourself), they'd be taking a chance at their own risk (like yourself).

Fortunately for you, your experience turned out to be a positive one :-)

This was in the Craigslist Reviews section, but it belongs here. Not sure who wildman010 is; he appears to be a new poster.

The section on his site that you speak of is titled "Ripoff Providers". He may go on to further clarify why he labels them ripoffs. But read that heading. It should be titled "Women who won't play Josh's game". He's got the Tampa BBW labelled as the Queen of Ripoffs. For all the things that can be said about her, I've never heard about her actually ripping people off. Same for Miss Lady, who has reviews here as well as TER.

What happens is this. Josh attempts to get a freebie from someone, and they tell him to fuck off. He labels them a ripoff, unless they've already gotten some reviews somewhere. In which case he just labels them Not Recommended. He sprinkles in a few well-documented ripoffs to make it seem legit. But it is effectively his penalty box.

Trust me, he has no aversion to girls using fake pics. Remember the phony review he wrote on Carmen, where he wouldn't even provide a phone number? He took it down when someone spotted her pics in a Portland CL ad. Or the fact that he staunchly defended Kristy/Amanda Luv for months, claiming that he verified their pics via a webcam. He only recanted that when Tampa Tori posted her real pics in an Amanda Luv ad one day and it just became undeniable.

If you are one of those who believes that Josh is a principled, reliable source of information, you should do some more research or watch the blog for longer. See if you can figure out why Jennifer Deepthroat, for example, was public enemy number one on his blog for a while (he had her booking photos and arrest records posted), but now is a featured member of his Ning site. There are numerous other discrepancies of girls with mixed reviews. Some get tossed into "Not Recommended" and others are featured. What do you think the difference is? You guessed it. They give Josh what he wants.

I would venture to guess that the girl he is most obsessed with as a ripoff, Amanda Dyer, would probably even be able to get a glowing review if she gave him a freebie and a few bucks. That's the way the scam works. Go google Charles Kelly or Dave Elms if you want more info on how his story will play out.