Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 2,116 to 2,130 of 6688
-
11-24-20 22:32 #4573
Posts: 1919Originally Posted by NickTheMan1993 [View Original Post]
But thinking about it, think if they were really watching the place you would not be able to tell they were LEO. But is just speculation on my part.
If they are, certainly is a great use of our tax dollars!
-
11-24-20 21:54 #4572
Posts: 236Getting caught
Originally Posted by IammeIam [View Original Post]
-
11-24-20 17:21 #4571
Posts: 761Originally Posted by Sounds [View Original Post]
Can't is still the best choice for age and beauty, but some of them just want you to chew, screw and be through.
-
11-24-20 16:21 #4570
Posts: 105Canterbury Body Work
I went to Canterbury first because I heard more positives than negatives for my other choice at QQ Spa. I arrived at the location and was going to cross the street to heard over until I saw Uncle LEO parked the other side of the parking lot sitting there. I cut my losses and left and decided to call my next choice of QQ Spa which I reviewed all ready. Just wanted to give you guys a heads up that I saw Uncle LEO sitting in a SUV cruiser looking at the building. It could be nothing or Canterbury might be on LEO radar. I wanted to go here but didn't want to take the risk. Just wanted to share. Thanks for reading.
-
11-24-20 16:17 #4569
Posts: 105QQ Spa
Hi I decided to go with QQ Spa instead of Canterbury the review on QQ Spa was solid 3/5 good for all services good soft massage good CBJ, good DATY, and good FS. Girl was 40-50 years of age named Cici I paid 40 for the massage and 100 for the main event. A few negative things about this place was I was the 1st to go in then 2 Customers came in during my session. I guess this place is very high volume. Another negative is the older woman did have some bad breath don't no if she ate before my visit or what but that's the last of the negatives. I will share some info about Canterbury in the next post because I went there and did not go any further stay turned for the next post. I will recommend coming back here if your looking for solid service.
-
11-24-20 15:43 #4568
Posts: 1919Originally Posted by IammeIam [View Original Post]
Have not done the escort thing in a bit either. But when I did it was 300 to 400 range and never had an issue. Sometimes it is worth the extra for better quality and reliability;.
But those prices are not on my radar anymore. Can see 2 or 3 AMP women for price of just one of those escorts.
And with some of the AMP women, have just as good or better time once get familiar with each other.
-
11-24-20 14:52 #4567
Posts: 927Age vs skills, beauty vs motivation
I am on the same page as Sounds on his comment about attractiveness may not get us better service. Also age can cut both ways, older means you may get a woman who actually enjoys sex, and have a limit on who, but could provide BBFS. The opposite is too young may mean they actually have limited skills. I wrote in the Queens board about a trip to an AMP in Flushing, the girl said she was 18, I believed her, but she seemed confused about my usual plan for a FS visit. I enjoy touching and DATY, this 18 yo almost seemed like she never had anyone DATY. Older woman may not be your cup of tea, but in my case, they are still younger than I am (some woman at local AMPs are just shy of 60, yet reviewers place their ages at 40's), so, I want to enjoy the experience, and hope that they won't just lay there, and also get into it. I saw a 25 yo Taiwanese girl in Astoria, she was young attractive, and seemed to really (really) enjoy sex. Rare, but for every bad time, hopefully there will be a good one.
I read the Escort and AMP forums and have to say, the escort pages seem to only be about how bad the drug infused woman are in the area. The AMPs are never about getting ripped off, and more about some limits and appearance of the woman. Needless to say, with K603 gone, I haven't seen another escort in a few years.
Originally Posted by Sounds [View Original Post]
-
11-24-20 10:01 #4566
Posts: 1919Can't vs Lincoln
Originally Posted by NickTheMan1993 [View Original Post]
I will reply to your question about which is better here. As always YMMV and depends what you are looking for.
QQ / Lincoln / New Envelope.
Girls do not rotate. Pretty much same lineup always. BBFS available. Not as pretty as the Can't women.
Can't.
Girls rotate. Sometimes talent great, sometimes it sucks. Everything covered. Because they are better looking, want a premium on the tip. Will usually pay more than Lincoln.
Beauty is a double edged sword there. Some of the really pretty younger providers think looking hot is good enough and they do not provide good service. Question to answer before going there is "Do you feel lucky today"? Because you are rolling the dice if you do not know who is working.
-
11-24-20 09:38 #4565
Posts: 347Kay at BVR
Hey All you Kay fans, just letting you know that Kay is working on thanksgiving at BVR.
Had a great session with her yesterday.
Bigstar1.
-
11-23-20 23:47 #4564
Posts: 1919Originally Posted by NickTheMan1993 [View Original Post]
-
11-23-20 18:13 #4563
Posts: 105Canterbury or QQ SPA
Hi narrowing my choices down to these two place looking to go to Worcester tomorrow would like to know which of the two places are the best for full service and in general would like pros and cons for each place if you can please pm me looking to make a final decision soon and looking forward to your input.
-
11-22-20 23:48 #4562
Posts: 4Ying Ying / Cici
Originally Posted by SeekGrtMass [View Original Post]
-
11-22-20 06:12 #4561
Posts: 177Originally Posted by Eagle7412 [View Original Post]
-
11-22-20 03:09 #4560
Posts: 466Originally Posted by Sounds [View Original Post]
Like. She's Chinese. They all either look 13 or 90 with no in between. I'm absolutely sure every AMP girl I've been with has been at least in their late 30's and none have looked to be above mid 20's.
-
11-21-20 19:47 #4559
Posts: 1919Originally Posted by Eagle7412 [View Original Post]
https://www.rubmaps.ch/erotic-massage-canterbury-bodywork-center-worcester-ma-18101#rubmaps