2006 Archived General Reports

**Ed Norton** · 10-10-06 19:50

cookyjar,

you need help here. if you have a lawyer, pastor, or buddy you feel comfortable with, you might want to reach out to them. discuss with them your excessive need for attention. it could hurt you in this case. you really don’t need to post those pictures. put them in your archives to show friends. but do not put them on an internet site.

the reason is that cops and da’s running for reelection occasionally look at this site. they see the green suv. they see the background street in your photos. they now know there is a teen out there who may be **** and prostituting herself. and they know nothing makes the voters more angry than a child being used sexually for an adult’s benefit.

if you’re so fond of writing disclaimers and so scared of prosecutors, then hear this: your isp can and will be subpoened for information about you if there is any whiff of your being involved. and ten nude photos, including the genitals, of a young girl of unknown age are more than a whiff...they’re a hurricane.

grow up, man. you’re in trouble, and if your delete option for that post has expired, then i’d pm jackson pronto to remove the child porn.

**Davey1965** · 10-10-06 17:59

although i support all of your picture taking abilities, whether i've found the girls attactive or not was never an issue. was just nice seeing the board active.

but posting pics that you may have beliefs of being an **** girl naked is something that can get the board shut down for all of us.

i could see a clothed pic stating to others to beware that this girl may be **** and wanted to inform others so;

(a) they wouldn't get in trouble by accidently picking her up
(b) not help contribute or cause any harm mental or otherwise to a minor

for the good of the board i suggest (and hope others agree) that you use the edit function to remove the pics. a warning msg with a clothed pic would do fine for most.

**Forth Ryte** · 10-10-06 14:27

peter (and other readers following this):

you have to read the definitons very carefully. the problem (if there is one) would be that it is illegal to photograph a person under 18 engaging in a "prohibited sexual act" and the definiton of a "prohibited sexual act" includes, "...lewd exhibition of the genitals or nudity if such nudity is depicted for the purpose of sexual stimulation or gratification of any person who might view such depiction..."

these are difficult standards. it is hard to know what will be determined to be lewd images or images of a minor (if she is) that are sexually gratifying to a person who might view them.

with child nudity (i.e. under 18) and today's climate, it is always better on err on the side of caution.

when it comes guessing the age to a possibly **** sw, "if you have to ask, you can't afford it."

-- forth ryte

**Peter Johnson** · 10-10-06 13:54

Originally Posted by Forth Ryte

I am not a lawyer but a quick check of easily available internet source shows that the age of consent for sexual intercourse in Pennsylvania is 16.

(b) ..... Any person who knowingly photographs, videotapes, depicts on computer or films a child under the age of 18 years engaging in a prohibited sexual act or in the simulation of such an act is guilty of a felony of the second degree.

From what I can tell, CJ didn't have sexual intercourse with her and he didn't take any photographs of her "engaging in a prohibited sexual act or in the simulation of such an act". I'm not sure what photos you saw, but the ones posted here seem like simple nudes and not illegal photographs, even if she was under 18 or under 16 or whatever.

**DukePV** · 10-10-06 11:25

Originally Posted by Forth Ryte

Guys, here is something that FINALLY beats CJ's pictures.
Its a VIDEO report of my recent escapade. I found this lovely lady on the K then took her to a nearby garage....OK, so it didn't really happen...But what they hey..... we NEEDED a laugh.

Good idea, Forth Ryte. I was just thinking this morning, as I was reading about Google's purchase of YouTube, that the time had come for videos on this site. I have consulted with the Philly Board of Directors, and they have authorized another Monger of the Month award for the first credible video post (outside or inside) of a SW on the K ...

Deadline: December 31, 2006.

**Forth Ryte** · 10-10-06 10:46

Guys, here is something that FINALLY beats CJ's pictures.
Its a VIDEO report of my recent escapade. I found this lovely lady on the K then took her to a nearby garage. Here is what happened next :

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...44950704&hl=en

OK, so it didn't really happen. BTW, "brille notig" means "need glases" and the video was a TV ad for an eyeglass manufacturer.
But what they hey..... we NEEDED a laugh.

-- Forth Ryte

**Forth Ryte** · 10-10-06 07:01

I am not a lawyer but a quick check of easily available internet source shows that the age of consent for sexual intercourse in Pennsylvania is 16.

"...a person commits a felony of the second degree when that person engages in sexual intercourse with a complainant under the age of 16 years and that person is four or more years older than the complainant and the complainant and the person are not married to each other." Title 18 Pa Criminal Statutes, Section 3122.1

BUT when it comes to nude photography, the age gets up to 18.
The relevant portions of Title 18 Pa Criminal Statutes, Section 6312 are here:
======================================
"(a) Definition.--As used in this section, "prohibited sexual act" means sexual intercourse as defined in section 3101 (relating to definitions), masturbation, sadism, masochism, bestiality, fellatio, cunnilingus, lewd exhibition of the genitals or nudity if such nudity is depicted for the purpose of sexual stimulation or gratification of any person who might view such depiction.

(b) ..... Any person who knowingly photographs, videotapes, depicts on computer or films a child under the age of 18 years engaging in a prohibited sexual act or in the simulation of such an act is guilty of a felony of the second degree.

(c) Dissemination of photographs, videotapes, computer depictions and films.--

(1) Any person who knowingly sells, distributes, delivers, disseminates, transfers, displays or exhibits to others, or who possesses for the purpose of sale, distribution, delivery, dissemination, transfer, display or exhibition to others, any book, magazine, pamphlet, slide, photograph, film, videotape, computer depiction or other material depicting a child under the age of 18 years engaging in a prohibited sexual act or in the simulation of such act commits an offense.

(2) A first offense under this subsection is a felony of the third degree, and a second or subsequent offense under this subsection is a felony of the second degree.

(d) Possession of child pornography.--

(1) Any person who knowingly possesses or controls any book, magazine, pamphlet, slide, photograph, film, videotape, computer depiction or other material depicting a child under the age of 18 years engaging in a prohibited sexual act or in the simulation of such act commits an offense.

......

(e.1) Mistake as to age.--Under subsection (b) only, it is no defense that the defendant did not know the age of the child. Neither a misrepresentation of age by the child nor a bona fide belief that the person is over the specified age shall be a defense.
=====================================

NOTE: This is not necesarily comlete information, it is only what I found in one quick search. Other laws, including federal laws (such as relating to child pornography) may be involved.

My advice would be to delete those photos.

**CookyJar** · 10-10-06 06:55

Originally Posted by Anonymous

She was most likely telling the truth. One of my ex gf's had 4 kids and not a mark on her, and smaller tits to boot. If they take care of their skin with cream and stuff (and some even if they don't) just don't get stretch marks. As far as the cig sales go, if the guy in the store saw her get out of your car (and saw you) he woulf figure a state buy-and-bust (which they are starting to do a lot of) and stuck to the letter of the law which is if you don't look 28 you have to show id.

Anonymous

I agree with above quoted information that was received in a PM. I had not thought about the, "state buy-and-bust," angle.

My personal age limit is 18. No particular reason, I just believe there is enough older stuff out there. There were other reasons that I did not believe Alexis. Her story that her boyfriend had abandoned her with the baby seemed amateurish. She was to trusting, to at ease with an older man. I got the feeling that she was putting on airs/lying to a father figure. Most important, no one had shown her the SW ropes. She never asked about money. When we left the gas station I asked her if she needed anything. She said, “Blank dollars.” (I am not telling you dogs what she asked for.) Way, way to low a price. It seemed like I was dealing with a kid. I gave her what she had suggested and ¾’s more as a tip.

Like I originally said, “She may have been 18.” I believe she was. I let this one get away, what the fuck; I reeled in another ten minutes later.

Sometimes it feels good not to be such an asshole.

CookyJar

**Feelz Good** · 10-10-06 05:44

Well done CJ, I have seen your Alexis out and she gave me the look but I didn't partake because I thought she looked rather young. When I saw her she was dressed a little different and to me me she looked suspiciously young. She was alone, and like someone said if some stupid pimp gets a hold of her she will look 22-24 overnight. Most of these girls don't carry ID or have lost it. So, you have to use your gut and refrain from even letting something like Alexis get in your car, because once something like her gets in your car and next you the little head takes over and you could do something you might regret.

**Peter Johnson** · 10-10-06 03:15

Originally Posted by stormrider

i'm usually on cj's side in all his photo postings, but i have to admit, if my intuition told me that she was still a minor, i wouldn't post photos unless she showed me an ironclad id that said she wasn't. and we all probably know that ironclad ids are a just a dream. i think you might have messed up on this one cj.

sr

well, he didn't post any sexual photos of her, just nudes which are legal to take even if she was 5 years old. well, i'm not positive it is legal to post them, but it is not "**** porn" for sure. and if she isn't 18, she isn't far from it, so no big deal fucking her (if you don't get caught).

anyway, i would have hit it but that's just me. i wouldn't be surprised if cj rethinks it and goes back and does the same.

as always, thanks for the hot pics.

**Stormrider** · 10-10-06 00:55

Originally Posted by nico

then why are you posting naked photos of a possible **** girl here? wouldn't the clothed ones suffice?

i'm usually on cj's side in all his photo postings, but i have to admit, if my intuition told me that she was still a minor, i wouldn't post photos unless she showed me an ironclad id that said she wasn't. and we all probably know that ironclad ids are a just a dream. i think you might have messed up on this one cj.

sr

**Nico** · 10-10-06 00:18

Originally Posted by cookyjar

but, there was no denying it, now there were two of us, the clerk and i both thought she looked a bit too young.

then why are you posting naked photos of a possible **** girl here? wouldn't the clothed ones suffice?

**ElMaster** · 10-09-06 23:54

Day-um! A monger with a sense of restraint! I guess you are a better man than most of us. I wouldn't have picked her up to begin with cuz I know that once I cross certain line, I can't stop. But that's as close as I come to having a conscience.

Y'all keep up the good work at the "K"

Elm

**Guthrie** · 10-09-06 23:23

Originally Posted by Pottstown Guy

I have been passing by Lou's around 5 AM lately for business purposes and have seen 2 smoking BSW in traditional streetwalker garb. It seems kinda weird, they look out of place, but there doesn't seem to be LE around at all at that time, and they themselves look like the real deal. any one have any input?

They should be o.k. Anytime I see any bsw they are usually around there and
they usually have the "Huchy Mama" outfits on. I thing they come there after
they "walk" other areas (Camden,NPhilly)

**TexasMonger** · 10-09-06 22:34

I have no words but one action - Respect. One day I will have to meet you...With your good eye and my photo skills and equpment we can rule :-)

Keep up the good deeds man ...You have elevated the game from mongering on the streets to being humans

Cheers

TM