2006 Archived General Reports

[ReckAban]

Barbie

Nothing special. Actually Barbie approached me on the K. She walked across the Street to talk to be on the driver’s side. Normally I would not have stopped for her. Once I saw the bra-lest boobs though the sweater, my curiosity was peaked.

Otherwise, Barbie was a so, so date. Nothing special. Not that she was a bad pickup – she just was not what I had in mind.

Would I stop for her a second time? I don’t think so. She was a once is enough kind of girl. But, of cause YMMV.

CookyJar

OK CJ. I read this forum to look at your pictures. Thank-you! Personnally, this is the finest looking lady you've posted. I'd like to see her for sure, I think my mileage would be satisfactory.

[Ed Norton]

I personally monger all over the Delaware Valley. Where better to post information on SWs working within driving distance then the General Thread.

That's an insult to Mike80, Agt4258, PhillyBoys, Ronald Jeramy, Davey1965, High Pockets, Dr Dong, and Tennis Player. They monger all over the map, but out of courtesy to their fellow mongers, they have posted here when the experience happened here in Philadelphia, and in the South Jersey forum when the experience happened over there.

That's an insult to all the readers of the South Jersey thread, who miss out when information about their area is posted elsewhere.

That's an insult to Jackson, who set up geographic forums to benefit us all. He is very flexible and open to suggestions about regrouping or renaming forums.

[Skrit]

This is my 200th post. I have decide to use it to address a few issues that for one reason or another I’ve put off until now. Some are new, others have been spoken on before.

If you want to complaint or B*tch about something, there is a special thread set up for that purpose, use it, you will be read and answered.

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! Poor CookyJar.

You are such a hypocrite for coming on here and complaining, AGAIN, and then telling others to stop complaining. You did the same thing last Tuesday, you did the same thing last Sunday. No wonder you have 200 posts.

If you don't like the people in here, then leave!

[WebDog]

She easily agreed on the $20 for pictures price after claiming she get $30 for a BJ. I explained to her would I do with the pictures and she agreed. Later she asked if I meant they would be seen all over the world on the World Wide Web. I asked, “Why?” She replied that her mother used the computer.

That's sweet. She's strolling on K and she's worried her mother will see naked pictures of her! I literally laughed outloud when I read that. I am pretty sure they both have bigger things to worry about.

CookyJar -- seriously, have you noticed any street rep yet among the girls on the Ave? I wonder if word gets around like that. Evocative of Emilio Estevez' line in Young Guns -- "I'll make you famous!" That could be your openner when you pull up to one of the girls.

[CookyJar]

Barbie

Nothing special. Actually Barbie approached me on the K. She walked across the Street to talk to be on the driver’s side. Normally I would not have stopped for her. Once I saw the bra-lest boobs though the sweater, my curiosity was peaked.

She easily agreed on the $20 for pictures price after claiming she get $30 for a BJ. I explained to her what I do with the pictures and she agreed. Later she asked if I meant they would be seen all over the world on the World Wide Web. I asked, “Why?” She replied that her mother used the computer. Hmmmm? Why did Barbie wait until I had given her the money to start questioning me? I told her not to worry; her mother wouldn’t see them (unless she checks out SW sites). I have no qualms about posting her pictures. She never told me not to and she waited until she had my money before questioning me. I do sometime wonder if these girls know the deference between e-mail and internet and the Web.

Otherwise, Barbie was a so, so date. Nothing special. My satisfaction may have been tempered by what I found under the sweater. Nothing was as advertised. I got no rush from her okay boobs, semi firm belly and thighs and not so tight ass. Not that she was a bad pickup – she just was not what I had in mind.

Would I stop for her a second time? I don’t think so. She was a once is enough kind of girl. But, of cause YMMV.

CookyJar

[CookyJar]

This is my 200th post. I have decide to use it to address a few issues that for one reason or another I’ve put off until now. Some are new, others have been spoken on before.

One particularly obnoxious poster has posted no less than FIVE posts in the last two weeks alone asking that CJ's pictures go to another thread…

Answer: Said it best in post #1310, "I understand why they jump all over you, Cooky. You have what they desire, the ability to get along with women."

I've thought about this all day. That is the most inciteful comment I've heard yet on this board. The reason that some posters obsess about CJ is jealously.

Forth Ryte

It might serve some of Forth Rytes follow posters to acquaint themselves with the definition of the word general as it relates to the usage here in the term “General Thread.” Please pay special attention to #3.


1gen•er•al
Pronunciation: 'jen-r&l, 'je-n&-
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin generalis, from gener-, genus kind, class -- more at
1 : involving, applicable to, or affecting the whole
2 : involving, relating to, or applicable to every member of a class, kind, or group <the general equation of a straight line>
3 : not confined by specialization or careful limitation
4 : belonging to the common nature of a group of like individuals
5 a : applicable to or characteristic of the majority of individuals involved
b : concerned or dealing with universal rather than particular aspects
6 : relating to, determined by, or concerned with main elements rather than limited details <bearing a general resemblance to the original>

CJ & Ed, you guys are making Philly popular.. we got word even in Chicago to check out this forum

Be safe & have fun!

I see nothing wrong with site members from other areas posting in the General Thread.

Don't worry, Wooly, location's not important anymore. Now they're posting about Camden and Deptford in here!

I personally monger all over the Delaware Valley. Where better to post information on SWs working within driving distance then the General Thread.

I love to look at the young ones, but the older MILF, is much better when it comes to SEX, all forms

I agree, but with this one exception. I like grabbing hold of those tight young tender but legal things once in a while. While the actual deed is usually better with the MILF, how do you expect the younger pro to learn, if some old dirty dog like myself doesn’t take the time to teach them.

Cooky, I still don't know how you do it man, but next time you take pics. Try not to show others what kind of suv you have. We all know it's an explorer cause I have a friend that has one like yours. Try to hide pics of air vents, instrument panel, rims, doors and focus on the pic of SW. There might be a stranger in philly trying to follow you man. Just tryin to help.

Thanks for looking out. I know I have really put myself out there. I have taken some precautions. I cannot mention them. It is too late to take back mistakes. But, if you know of or suspect something pm me? That’s what it’s all about, mongers looking out for each other. Thanks again.



[QUOTE=Peter Owood]
It looks like Jewels is attempting to move onto greener pastures (i.e. better fees). Found this ad on CL. http://philadelphia.craigslist.org/ers/223682189.html
The pics sure do look to me to be her.
QUOTE]

It looks like our girl has changed her name again. Somebody should talk to these SW about changing their names. It confuses some guys.

My Opinion:

We need fewer comments about what the other guy is doing. What we need is more mongers reporting valid information. There are 6 other active threads here in the Philly forum. Do we need another? If you are interested on a specialized subject, try one of the other threads. If you want to complaint or B*tch about something, there is a special thread set up for that purpose, use it, you will be read and answered. Our goal should be to provide an atmosphere that encourages the exchange of useful information.

CookyJar

[Tennis Player]

Pretty 22 yo 5'5" 120 lbs. At Cambria & Kensington Sat afternoon. .30 and .50 plus .05 tip. Nice girl, no signs of drug use (claims not to), technique is a little inexperienced but good attitude. Has a cell phone.

[Ed Norton]

Ed - no offense

None taken. If it's entertainment you want, you've come to the right thread.

[Desibaba]

CJ & Ed, you guys are making Philly popular.. we got word even in Chicago to check out this forum

btw - I loved quality of pics and especially the goods that you guys have got there - may be just for that reason, I want to move to Philly

Some of the best quality pics from this thread
http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...postcount=1271

And some funny ones... (Ed - no offense)!
http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...postcount=1193

Be safe & have fun!

[ClitLicker]

The poll didn't ask anything about CJ's pics. It asked if WE, the other members would post OUR pictures in another thread. Here was the poll question:

"Would you be willing to use a separate thread to post pictures of local providers?".

Big difference. CJ misread that poll as some kind of a referendum on him. It was not. All it "established" was that at least 1/2 the membership would post their pictures in a new thread if CJ started one.

The original poster of that poll stated that it was mis-worded and WAS about CJ, and even with all your phony new-poster ballot stuffing you STILL lost and could not get it in to your non-existent brain that we LIKE CJ's posts and are just waiting for you to off yourself so we don't have to see any more of your drivel (or is that clap dribbel?).

[Ed Norton]

This juvenile poster seems to have forgotten that a poll was taken that established that we WANT CJ's pics posted right here.

The poll didn't ask anything about CJ's pics. It asked if WE, the other members would post OUR pictures in another thread. Here was the poll question:

"Would you be willing to use a separate thread to post pictures of local providers?".

Big difference. CJ misread that poll as some kind of a referendum on him. It was not. All it "established" was that at least 1/2 the membership would post their pictures in a new thread if CJ started one.

[Forth Ryte]

Some people out there have an obsession with trashing CJ.

One particularly obnoxious poster has posted no less than FIVE posts in the last two weeks alone asking that CJ's pictures go to another thread:

"post your pictures in a photo gallery thread, or not at all." Posted 10-19-06

"I would suggest setting up a separate thread and posting the photos from there." Posted on 10-15-06

"You really don't need to post those pictures. Put them in your archives to show friends. But do not put them on an internet site." Posted on 10-10-06

"...if the multiphoto displays were posted in a separate thread, then he and you and people from all over could comment on the merits of the photos, and the artist could converse with them, all without cluttering this thread up." Posted on 9-29-06

"The General Reports thread is not the appropriate thread to display thirty photographs of the same provider" Posted on 9-25-06

This juvenile poster seems to have forgotten that a poll was taken that established that we WANT CJ's pics posted right here.

Question: Why the obsession? Why are there so many posters who have nothing to say except to criticize the most prolific poster this thread has known?

Answer: Said it best in post #1310, "I understand why they jump all over you, Cooky. You have what they desire, the ability to get along with women."

I've thought about this all day. That is the most inciteful comment I've heard yet on this board. The reason that some posters obsess about CJ is jealously.

-- Forth Ryte

[Ed Norton]

Here's a link to the South Jersey forum for those who wish to post about their experiences in Camden and West Deptford. They accept photos.

[Ed Norton]

The problem is, how do you tell what’s underneath the jeans or in the shorts or hidden inside a bra?

It's not a huge problem. First of all, you actually look at the girl before you let her in your car. If her face shows that she's over 40, like many of your subjects, then chances are good the tits are sagging and there are stretch marks. DOH. Second of all, you need to come around to the realization that other people know there are ugly women out there and don't need to be reminded of it. It's actually OK to take pictures, look at them, and NOT post them. We all know what a droopy tit and a flabby ass look like. We don't need to be shown everything that's out there. There's not much difference between wasting bandwidth here with ugly photos and shoving a certain finger in our collective faces. I'll take those insults for what they are. But if you keep asking us silly questions, then I'll keep answering you with my advice: post your pictures in a photo gallery thread, or not at all.

[Just Me 69]

I’d like to get the opinions of some others on MILF vs. Teen but Legal. I know some like the older mature types, and others like myself, prefer tender and legal.)
Quote from Cooky

I love to look at the young ones, but the older MILF, is much better when it comes to SEX, all forms