2006 Archived General Reports

**ILuvIt** · 11-07-06 16:35

If any of you have cameras that use DM cards and if there is a Micro Center in your town, they're selling 1Gig cards for $15.99.

I've bought several and they all work without any problems.

**Mr Stinky** · 11-07-06 16:04

Thanks, Diesel. That's what I was trying to say. Yes, Mister Q, a card can be erased. I have a 256mg card and it holds about 166 pictures. Just went through and transferred all the photo's to disc. Now I have an empty card ready to use again. And the point about Walgreens or whoever developing film is very true. Either you won't get the "questionable" shot back or they turn them over to LE. Go digital and see the world.

**Diesel E** · 11-07-06 13:51

The 1 gig card which I bought for about $50 holds about 600 pictures or an hour of video or a combination of both. Regarding the film and devoloping costs a digital camera blows away a standard camera. Ask yourself on any given roll of film how many shots are either junk or just not print worthy. With a digital camera you can select which shots you want printed and the other ones can either be saved to your hard drive or a cd or deleted. Of course another big issue where the digital camera holds a huge advantage is privacy. I think most Walgreen photo department personel would frown on the " adult themed " photos that are posted on this site lol.

**Mister Quick** · 11-07-06 12:55

Originally Posted by Mr Stinky

Hey! That's my car and my sister. Just kidding. Actually, you can pick up a digital card for about 40 or 50 buck and get 150 or so pictures. You keepp the card and just delete the pictures after you either save them or print them. In the long run, no delevoping costs and the card pays for itself in a short time. Just a suggestion.

I guess that is why you did not pick her up. You just waited until she got home. Just kidding.

I looked into a digital camera when I lost my 35mm SLR last year. The digital card cost about $50 then. It would hold about 100 pictures. I was told by the salesman that the cards could not be reused, like a recordable DVD. (This is why I still tape movies I only want to see once on VHS) For a film camera a roll of film costs ~$3 and developing ~ $6. So ~ $9 for 36 pictures or ~25c each. Even if the digital card can be reused, it still costs ~ 20c each to develop digital pictures. This is according to signs I have seen in Walgreens and CVS. I think Wal Mart is a bit less. The savings are thus not real high. I passed on the digital camera last year since they were rather expensive to get a good one. I found a rather nice Nikon 35mm SLR at a flea market ealier this year for $50 (used). This camera had the advantage that my flash and two spare lens would work with it.

**Mr Stinky** · 11-07-06 11:32

Hey! That's my car and my sister. Just kidding. Actually, you can pick up a digital card for about 40 or 50 buck and get 150 or so pictures. You keepp the card and just delete the pictures after you either save them or print them. In the long run, no delevoping costs and the card pays for itself in a short time. Just a suggestion.

**Diesel E** · 11-07-06 11:20

Tried contacting Meghan but alas the number is no longer in service.....

Originally Posted by Diesel E

When I ran into these two the first time we ended up having a spectacular threesome. Jen and Meghan were friends and lovers and they watched each others backs while out working. Last time I was in Rockford I contacted Meghan hoping for a repeat performance but Meghan said they had broke up but were still somewhat friends but that Jen was acting very weird. Ended up getting some great car head from Meghan, she also said she had not been on the streets for about a month and was trying to get a real job. Meghan is definetly NOT 30 nor does she look 30. From the pic it is hard to tell if it is her though, the clothing and hairstyle make it a possible but it is just too blurry. Unfortunately I have not had the chance to make it back to Rockford lately but I still have the contact numbers from the first meeting and will try calling Meghan on Thursday and report back.

**Mister Quick** · 11-07-06 10:30

As mentioned when I posted the last two pics I had a few more from the trip that were not as good. The first two were not spectacular. This one is not as blurry as the other two but not as much detail since I was further away when it was taken.

This one is of an unknown blonde girl. When I spotted her she was talking to someone in the black car (pretty certain it is neither a Delorean or a Mazzeratti). After I passed the car took off and she was not in it. I circled the block. By the time I got around again the young woman was gone. I used a Sharpie (R) to blot out the license plate on the car before I scanned the picture in. I could not read it. I have seen in the movies where they take a really blurry picture and can turn it into something that looks like a studio portrait. Dont really expect anyone to be able to ID this one.

Wont be posting the oother two I took since they are both blurry and far away. Judging from how this batch came out I will not be wasting anymore film in this manner. Not sure how guys with digital cameras afford it since the digital film cards cost lots more than regular film. Still no idea when I will get back to town.

**Taco Malo** · 11-06-06 05:09

Paid a visit up to Exclusive - saw Tiffany as is my ususal. Good service. Saw a Executive Relaxation alumnus over there. MILF, tall, super muscular bod, big fake tits....she used to have a pic up on the TommyDream. Seems like every time I go over there, some Belvidere women have gone over there.

Afterwards went to Chantilly. Got a 2 girl with...umm..always bad with names. Black girl I believe her name was Michelle, and a very thin blonde. Michelle was nice, and was willing to satisfy some of my kinks, but had some annoying rules...like I couldn't touch one of her breasts, couldn't titty fuck....

Now I forget her name, but the thin blonde I'd highly recommend. If you like petite chicks, her body is tight. Small titties, awsome lean body and sweet ass. But she also is very enthusiastic and GREAT with her hands. She works Sunday nights for sure.

She said that they had not experienced any recent pressure from the cops. Also said how that place has been open for 20 some years. Don't know if it is true, but if its been there for that long, I'm hoping its not going anywhere.

My personal opinion is that all those chicks are coked up. They always emerge from downstairs anf go into the session with a slight case of the sniffles.

Saw a couple of SWs in the immediate vicinity for those of you into that. One was some white lady with glasses who kept tooling around on her bike. I usually try to get "the look", and didn't get one from her. But my spidey sense was tingling especially since I saw her at least 4 times.

**LapDogg** · 11-05-06 22:01

Originally Posted by Mac Man

Yup, no question about it. Ralph's car is definitely a Delorean, though it's reare to see one that's been painted. Most are brushed stainless steel.

Mac Man

Actually, many of the Deloreans were painted after the first couple of years. There was/is a problem with stainless steel in that it does stain. The staining of the deloreans was bad enough that the Delorean company sent painting instructions out for those that didn't want to mess with the brown staining on the stainless steel body.

Oh, BTW, the pics look fake.. they are not even a good photoshop job. Look at the one of the gal staning in front of the arch. Even her arms look fake, and the winter one. Looks like someone tried to cover up her shoes (probably high heels) by making the whole area black.

What a joke.

Horrible paste job.

**Jimmy** · 11-05-06 15:04

And it is a DMC in the picture, not a Maserati.

**Jimmy** · 11-05-06 11:50

Uhhh, not to interupt your controversy, but has thee been anything going on in the Rock?

**Midwest Roam** · 11-05-06 10:48

Originally Posted by Ci-Traveler

Wasn't that a Delorean? Could be a Mazzeratti I suppose.

Also - could have been Italy, but it also looked exactly like the Engineering Arches that University of Michigan is famous for.............

Couldn't tell if she was beautiful - face was blurred. Nice bod tho.

ci-traveler

The Italian flag is a tip off. Many cities in Italia still have their medievel walls with the narrow gates cars barely fit through.

**Mikinrock** · 11-04-06 19:31

I'm really sorry for all who believe Ralphs pictures are all real. Pics 2, 3, and 4 have definitely been doctored. Pic 2 tip offs the the shadowing angles do not match, the girl and car are offscale with each other and the license plate is cut and paste. Pic 3 the pants legs are touched up so poorly the edges are way to crisp. Pic 4 the people in the backgound are wearing winter jackets and see is dressed like it is summer out. And look at the shading on her left arm and the hair wear it meets the left shoulder the blue bleeds into her hair. This can be seen only when you copy the picture and magnify them. Try it. Ralph I believed your stories at first but they just got to unbelieveable to me. Your pics are photoshop prints. I don't know you or have anything against you and I'm sure I will recieve alot of comments on my post.

**Ci-Traveler** · 11-04-06 18:20

So based on the photos of the hottie Angel, you have been to the beach (OK, we have lake michigan), you own a Mazzeratti, you have taken her skiing and have also taken her to Italy.

Wasn't that a Delorean? Could be a Mazzeratti I suppose.

Also - could have been Italy, but it also looked exactly like the Engineering Arches that University of Michigan is famous for.............

Couldn't tell if she was beautiful - face was blurred. Nice bod tho.

ci-traveler