Thread: Senior Membership Criteria
+
Add Report
Results 1 to 15 of 15
-
03-16-24 00:48 #15
Posts: 975Originally Posted by Cheyeane [View Original Post]
-
03-15-24 14:28 #14
Posts: 26Kawkawlin spa
Been going to kawkawlin spa for over 20 years now and still get treated real well there. There is a new lady running it now and she used to be one of the working girls there. Her name is Lily. The prices are reasonable and you can even get two girls if you want. You have to tip well but you are treated very well also. Like any other spa, the good looking women are come and go. Treat them well gentlemen.
-
03-12-23 22:30 #13
Posts: 25Agree
Originally Posted by Cconno5571 [View Original Post]
-
06-23-22 18:51 #12
Posts: 3Senior membership
Can a admin tell me how to obtain a senior membership?
-
09-29-18 07:42 #11
Posts: 2681Mold
To becum a senior member all you have to do is fit "GOD, a2's "mold, suck his dick a few times or let him fuck you in the Ass a few times and you have becum a" Senior" its that easy! Some don't give in and are punished!
Or, put up 25 posts and be a member for six months without doing some shit like this.
3% of the senior members need to continue to be moderated. You make it obvious why you are one of them.
A2
-
04-14-17 23:10 #10
Posts: 542Senior
I have 1 point, not sure what that means. Please explain.
In your case it means that your posts need to be checked by an adult before they go live.
A2
-
07-02-12 22:05 #9
Posts: 153So, what, exactly, are the criteria?
Everything I've read states that it's 6months and 25 posts for an "automatic" upgrade. It's been 6 months, I have 32 posts, and I'm still not a senior. I do note that many of the things I've read about upgrade criteria are some years old but it would be nice to know if they've changed or not.
I'm articulate, able to write coherent sentences, and maybe some of my posts haven't been revelatory they've at least been productive by relating experiences or engaging in conversation. I mean, what more can you really ask for?
So come on, Admins, what's the real story with the elusive Senior status?
-
02-17-12 22:19 #8
Posts: 485Senior Membership Status
Originally Posted by Big Red50 [View Original Post]
-
12-23-07 22:59 #7
Posts: 188Senior
There are senior members and then there are senior members.
I probably don't qualify as either yet, but the difference I see is that there are some posters with many posts and zero quality. Technically they are "senior. " There are other posters with 15 posts with good info that jives with others posters. I think this is what the original poster is getting at.
I agree with checking a posters previous posts to review their credibility, in your best judgment. After all, there is no real "proof" to be had here in the online world.
As for exchaning information in-person, I don't know any "hobbyists" where I live or usually visit. Sure I see their vehicles but I've never stopped to chat one up. I'm usually trying to beat them to the next corner where I saw that great looking SW! Same thing in a MP, I've never talked to anyone else there.
I suppose if I ran into one of you at a high-end place in Nevada, Europe, or Asia I'd have plenty to say and ask; until then, I doubt that I'll find myself talking about the relative merits of the local talent with some guy at the barbershop or lunch counter.
-
01-30-07 10:12 #6
Posts: 81Good point Steel Blue
I agree that the worth or non-worth of a member's contributions pretty much stand on their own - and that as long as senior members are careful in their sharing of information, the designation shouldn't matter as much.
I'm willing to be patient and I'll share what info I discover.
-
01-29-07 19:08 #5
Posts: 1285Senior Membership
The curreent method in use is sufficient. Anyone can find out if annother member, senior or regular is for real or full of Shirt. All that has to be done is look at their past posts.
I often get requests from members who would like a number and I vet them by reading their contributions allong with asking my "known" friends if they know anything about them.
Any rule or requirement can be abused or broken. Like finding a woman you just need to do a little homework.
What I unfortunately need is a spell check. I sometimes kick myself for not paying better attention in spelling class. I was allways looking at Mary's ass...
Steel Blue
-
01-16-07 11:57 #4
Posts: 81Newbie comments... FWIW
I think that members here, or in any other forum on any other subject, "earn" their credibility by the quality of their words, not the quantity. In my very humble opinion, the 25 post figure seems arbitrary. In fact the idea that any quantity of posts is "enough" to prove sincerity and ability is arbitrary in and of itself. It's what you say, not how often you repeat it.
I'll wait six months, report any intel I come up with, and comment on others' posts if I think I have something of interest to others. I'll try to RTFF first on anything, even if that requires going back to archived threads. I'll try to be respectful of senior members and refrain from criticism, even if I think it's "due" in my own mind. If I don't get to 25 posts in six months it will be because I don't have enough to contribute, but I'll certainly avoid the stupid exchanges of kudos or questions that sometimes seem entirely motivated by post count.
So I, for one, have no objection to some sort of voting, screening or vetting that goes beyond the posted requirements. I don't think I've seen a flock of newbie jerks, but I only read a few forums from my region. One thing that has struck me about this forum is the intelligence and writing ability of the senior members. The posts often have a lot of entertainment value of their own. Trusting some sort of group process to vet new members doesn't bother me in the least.
-
01-16-07 00:12 #3
Posts: 515I agree with Aamco
Originally Posted by Aamco
Great Photos. I am still a regular member, and agrre that the current senior members should vote on new senior members of the fraternity. Let your posts speak for them selves, If you don't ant to contribute intel, just lurk, you can still post, just not immediatley.
I will stand on my reports
Big Red
-
12-03-06 19:21 #2
Posts: 231Help Out Jackson, Flame a Newbie
Originally Posted by Whitee
It is a lot of work doing this. Other members can help Jackson out by education or mild correction of a Newbie over the same 6 months or more worth of posts. In certain circumstances a certain amount of flaming might be useful.
After 6 months or however much longer it takes for 25 posts the new senior member should have some inkling of proper procedure. But Jackson's editing ordinarily stops, so the onus of education and correction falls fully on the shoulders of the rest of us.
Sometimes a senior member will demonstrate grounds for demotion back to regular membership or even banning. For example, a senior member with 26 posts in the Baltimore MP thread threatened posting of a phone number, which is forbidden. He had apparently been warned. Perhaps a new thread "Downgrades" should be started under Site Administration. Unworthy Senior Members who had slipped through the cracks could have their inadequacies outed. Demotion to regular or banning could be proposed.
Double Nickle
-
11-30-06 14:24 #1
Posts: 91The rules for becoming a senior member could use some adjustment.
Dear USASG Members:
Under the current system, regular members are upgraded to senior status whenever they have been members for six months and have accumulated at least 25 posts.
I feel that these requirements for senior status are far too easy to manipulate. As a result, senior status is becoming meaningless.
I suggest the following changes:
The problem with the current system is that a person can acquire senior status without acheiving the purpose of this forum, which is the exchange of information between men who are looking for sex with women.
Theoretically, you can wait six months and then post 25 "off the wall " comments in a one week period and be awarded senior status.
Senior status should represent more than just showing up at the game. There should be at least some minor contributions attempted.
I suggest that we keep the current criteria in place but add an additional requirement. After six months and at least 25 posts, let the entire membership of USASG have the final say by voting on whether or not to confer senior status upon an eligible member.
We could set an arbitrary number, let's say 50 votes, as the threshold for obtaining senior status. Once the candidate receives the 50 votes then he is admitted.
Some possible benefits are:
1) This will empower the membership and encourage participation in the forum by allowing members to vote on senior status.
2) This will allow current members to choose between someone who has provided good information versus someone who is offending others.
3) This will reduce the likelihood that people who break the rules of this forum will be granted senior status.
4) This will increase the quality of the posts of those who wish to become senior members.
5) This will make it more difficult for troublemakers to become senior members.
Perhaps someone can suggest a variation of this method that will work better.
Regards,
Aamco