Massage Parlor Reports

**MikeHall** · 01-04-20 15:46

Originally Posted by BlueSkyBlue [View Original Post]

Referenced in the newspaper articles on the subject at the time of the vote was the following These changes are proven to help combat human trafficking while making sure we protect important and legitimate massage therapy professionals, said Councilman Chris Cate before the committee vote.

There it is. The legitimate massage industry is bankrolling the new legislation to cut down on competition. Follow the money; it's always about the $$.

**BlueSkyBlue** · 01-04-20 14:11

Happy New Years San Diego 2020

Enjoy the new massage parlor restrictions that are now in fact public law but stop to think what are these laws really achieving

San Diego is just the latest municipalities attempting to further restrict the interactions between two consenting adults behind closed doors, out of side of the general public.

The city considers this a "public nuisance" and yet they have to secretly send undercover agency in to find out if this "public nuisance " is occurring.

Commonsense would tell you that if you have to go that far out of your way to prove a "crime" of public nuisance it's not.

A "not-for-profit" organization called Polaris basically makes its money getting funding and support to combat this "issue" so they make a living at it and they have an agenda. They have gotten congressional funding to support this "anti-human" trafficking campaign, politicians love the idea that they're saving poor oppressed people.

Apparently police departments love the idea of arresting hundred pound50-year-old Asian females if they give a massage and touch a man's penis.

Instead of the cops fighting real crime, reducing actual physical threats to the population, they spend time and resources seeing if a girl touches a man's penis.

I will personally forever hold in contempt this misguided use of public resources.

On its surface Polaris, speaks to addressing human trafficking worldwide and that's an admirable and decent thing to advocate but the misrepresentation and out right lies used to change ordinances in the local domestic United States massage parlors is really where somebody's moralistic good intentions / their own believes intersections with the rights of people to live their lives the way they want to live. They would be better off to go after domestic housekeepers the massage parlor workers

A futile and unnecessary attempt at social control by making visit to massage parlor more expensive and restrictive.

Be clear right from the start look at all the cases in Seattle several cases in Florida (including the Kraft case) there is not one example of human trafficking. The final adjudication of these court cases confirms there is prostitution but no "human trafficking" is ever found.

Sane and rational people consider prostitution a victimless crime but nevertheless the stories of promote a battle on "human trafficking" and reality all they are doing is promoting overtime resources for law-enforcement to shut down small Woman owned minority business.

When you go to a small Asian massage parlor very good chance it is it's a woman from another country who is trying to pursue the American dream have a business take care of her children and take care of her parents they open a business that provides him the best returns for the limited skills they have in this culture.

Typically they don't read or write English particularly well and majority of them do not speak English very well but they're serving a valuable public need and service that obviously is not going to go away. Prohibition against alcohol was a failure, so was prohibition against marijuana. However this attempt at prohibition is against sex, a basic biological need and an important element in emotional and physical health.

I am a healthy adult male and I have a normal healthy sex drive. My body is hardwired for sex, sex is a underlying influence of all human interactions. Its a biological birthright To have sex. Normal healthy positive sexual interaction improves by psychological as well as my physical health. I also have the right to participate in sexual activity between two consenting adults.

For one hour I can have physical human contact with another human being. Psychologically as well as physiologically human contact is an essential element to maintain mental and physical health.

Human beings that are deprived of human contact inevitably suffer and in this modern society we have enough messed up people that allowing them the opportunity to experience human touch in and of it's self seems a positive not a negative.

However, the state and local governments have determine that it's a "public nuisance" that if I tip that girl for providing me a positive mental and physical benefit. If a woman massages my body for one hour and at the end of the massage manipulates my penis and I have an ejaculation, I have committed a crime.

Sexual release as many well-documented medical benefits to my prostate and my heart but in the wisdom of government this action is a "public nuisance" and a crime. If I had a camera running and was filming it and sold it as pornography fee it would be legal.

Just think how twisted this thought process is, your elected city government is promoting shutting down massage parlors as public law.

Take away the big lie" human trafficking this is an issue of interfering with the consensual activity of two adults. Nobody forces me to get a massage and nobody forces a girl to give me a massage but what we do behind closed doors is not the governments business. The government does not regulate my other bodily functions such as sneezing or defecating in private so why do they have such a interest in my sexual activities.

Be clear your city government is lying when they say that this is to stop human trafficking, it's only intended to stop the sexual interaction between two consenting adults.

Referenced in the newspaper articles on the subject at the time of the vote was the following These changes are proven to help combat human trafficking while making sure we protect important and legitimate massage therapy professionals, said Councilman Chris Cate before the committee vote.

Tell the city Council that prohibition of sex and human contact is wrong

**Zehe123** · 01-04-20 01:16

Originally Posted by BlueSkyBlue [View Original Post]

As we kick off the new year in 2020 remember those parlors they gave excellent service but were forced to close in 2019.

Small businesses that were just trying to pursue the American dream were forced out of operation by the intrusion of a city government that does not give a fuck about the general welfare, health and happiness of its population.

When election time rolls around please vote out the cockroaches that are against women and minority businesses and vote out the government officials that approve of government intrusion in the personal activities of two consenting adults behind closed doors out of side of the public not harming anyone.

I don't keep up with politics, in do look online to see what's going on with the massage parlor / LE crackdowns just to get some insight on what's going on. If you're so kind as to point out those roaches so that I know who to give the finger to, that'd be great LOL.

**MixTape31** · 01-03-20 23:46

Originally Posted by Stupitt [View Original Post]

Yes out the door, I didn't tip. I've got BBJCIM and more.

Went there a few nights ago, saw a cute (ish) viet in her 30's. Massage was weak, stayed fully clothed with very limited mutual touch. BBBJCIM was pretty good but not worth the $.

Lots of better options out there.

**GreekLuver** · 01-03-20 23:04

Originally Posted by Stupitt [View Original Post]

Yes out the door, I didn't tip. I've got BBJCIM and more.

I visited this place a few times in the evening and there was always an older white gentlemen sitting inside. Not sure if he is the bodyguard but this was early last year.

**Stupitt** · 01-03-20 15:09

Originally Posted by Slarson [View Original Post]

Was there about a year ago, first time visitor but was offered the $180 upstairs special. I was a little shocked by the cost, but yes that is out the door, at least for me and she didn't seem perturbed by no tip. It was a nice setting, 60 min, good massage, lots of teasing which resulted in a bit of a premature BBBJCIM situation. She was a trooper and took a little break to spit. Will be in town in a couple of months and its first on my list for a repeat visit. Going to do my best to last a little longer this time!

Yes out the door, I didn't tip. I've got BBJCIM and more.

**Lovable** · 01-03-20 11:40

Originally Posted by TJDog [View Original Post]

Assuming this is the Chinese place on Balboa, next door to the Thai place? It is off my list. Haven't been able to have Mimi for past few visits. Last time, maybe 1 month ago, looked like new crew. Not very good.

Supposedly MiMi went back to China.

**TJ Dog** · 01-03-20 02:40

Originally Posted by Wzrd94 [View Original Post]

I surely do miss the BBBJCIM the ladies offer at this spot. From recent reports and research at a "well known" site, the ladies who used to work here doesn't work there anymore? I'm a little skeptical of visiting the spa again. If they're still there please let me know. Any referrals of any place that offer this type of service around the city?

By the way Happy new year everyone!

Assuming this is the Chinese place on Balboa, next door to the Thai place? It is off my list. Haven't been able to have Mimi for past few visits. Last time, maybe 1 month ago, looked like new crew. Not very good.

**DeadHeadChevy** · 01-02-20 22:06

Originally Posted by Panther2287 [View Original Post]

Fake Pictures.

I figured but had to try. Walked through door, outside of being a female pictures are not even close, so I the used the blame work / my boss just called excuse and was on my way.

https://sandiego.rubratings.com/153575

Yeah, that's pretty much the norm everywhere, the exception is with some independent providers. With them, it's usually a matter of how recent the photos are and if they still look like their photos.

I've been to several AMP's across the country, it's all the same, all downloaded photos from the webs.

**Wzrd94** · 01-02-20 21:29

I surely do miss the BBBJCIM the ladies offer at this spot. From recent reports and research at a "well known" site, the ladies who used to work here doesn't work there anymore? I'm a little skeptical of visiting the spa again. If they're still there please let me know. Any referrals of any place that offer this type of service around the city?

By the way Happy new year everyone!

**Panther2287** · 01-02-20 14:50

Fake Pictures.

I figured but had to try. Walked through door, outside of being a female pictures are not even close, so I the used the blame work / my boss just called excuse and was on my way.

https://sandiego.rubratings.com/153575

**RChangDatyKing** · 01-02-20 12:47

Saw this place 2 weeks ago while trying to make a you-Turn to get back on the 805 freeway. The place is just off the 805 on Main Street in CV. Went in and was greeted by a fairly attractive lady (YoYo) in her 40's. She looks Mexican / Hispanic, but was told she is half Russian and Chinese. She allowed me to see a lineup of the two other girls (Sophia and Alice) working there that day. Both were fairly attractive as well. Alice looked to be the youngest. House fee was $50 for an hour.

Was there a couple times last week, and saw YoYo and Sophia. Sophia gave a better massage. Her hard / deep tissue was amazing. YoYo does a more lighter to medium massage. I will repeat with both. Massage was good. Service and any extra is YMMV.

**GfEnthusiast** · 01-02-20 12:16

Originally Posted by Slarson [View Original Post]

Was there about a year ago, first time visitor but was offered the $180 upstairs special. I was a little shocked by the cost, but yes that is out the door, at least for me and she didn't seem perturbed by no tip. It was a nice setting, 60 min, good massage, lots of teasing which resulted in a bit of a premature BBBJCIM situation. She was a trooper and took a little break to spit. Will be in town in a couple of months and its first on my list for a repeat visit. Going to do my best to last a little longer this time!

I have also visited this spot although it was a little over 2 years ago. Opted for the upstairs for the 180 total. Good service and would have repeated if it wasn't so out of the way from my usual spots.

**Slarson** · 01-02-20 09:55

Originally Posted by DosCocos [View Original Post]

Was that out the door for $180? Can't imagine you had to tip above that. How much time are you getting and service level for the 180?

Was there about a year ago, first time visitor but was offered the $180 upstairs special. I was a little shocked by the cost, but yes that is out the door, at least for me and she didn't seem perturbed by no tip. It was a nice setting, 60 min, good massage, lots of teasing which resulted in a bit of a premature BBBJCIM situation. She was a trooper and took a little break to spit. Will be in town in a couple of months and its first on my list for a repeat visit. Going to do my best to last a little longer this time!

**Spamlocke** · 01-02-20 01:45

Originally Posted by BlueSkyBlue [View Original Post]

If you visit a massage parlor and receive sexual gratification you are a criminal in the eyes of your city government.

The police department seems to focus more on victimless "crimes" which are really the consensus of two consenting adults.

Change the laws, change the culture. Stop the madness that human sexuality is somehow illegal

Speak out and become part of the change.

Think it's unsafe to participate anytime soon? Was thinking maybe to wait a month before I go again.