Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 14,266 to 14,280 of 25321
-
01-06-20 17:53 #11056
Posts: 39Luna?
Hi all,
New year means trying something new.
Just wondering if anyone has any inputs on this one.
https://sandiego.rubratings.com/156479
Pics look good but figured community help is better.
-
01-06-20 16:28 #11055
Posts: 86Originally Posted by SnowGuy07 [View Original Post]
-
01-06-20 13:07 #11054
Posts: 20Originally Posted by SnowGuy07 [View Original Post]
-
01-05-20 18:56 #11053
Posts: 7Sketch?
Has anyone ever caught anything from girls at massage parlors or independents? Seems like a lot are offering BBBJ etc nowadays LOL.
-
01-05-20 18:51 #11052
Posts: 7Unique
Unique massage has moved to 3709 convoy st. Mamasan said the same girls are working. Cheers!
-
01-05-20 14:10 #11051
Posts: 16Fake pictures
A google image search reveals that the pictures are of Jenna Kaey, a very attractive woman. I doubt that she posted the ad.
https://www.pinterest.com/32321190o/jenna-kaey/
Originally Posted by RChangDatyKing [View Original Post]
-
01-05-20 11:59 #11050
Posts: 1Ocean spa? Report
I had been to what was previously V Spa a few times. Read reports that the place closed but a new one opened right next door so went to check it out. Paid. 6 for the hr, but probably should've gone with half.
Didn't get to see any lineup, was greeted and then serviced by Feifei. Short Chinese spinner with big boobs, probably in her mid-late 30's. Pretty to look at but not a lot of ass like I like. The massage itself was mediocre, but she knows that, so she quickly got to the meat of the argument and we agreed on BJ for 1. I was hoping to get BBBJ but no luck with her. She started working on it and we ended up doing 69. Was taking a while with the cover so she ended up finishing me with an HJ.
Overall it wasn't too bad, but probably won't repeat for her. May repeat to see who else they have on offer, since I have had a few great experiences at V spa.
-
01-05-20 00:52 #11049
Posts: 283Spring Valley
Originally Posted by DeadHeadChevy [View Original Post]
Decided to check out the spring valley location. Very small place and requested to see who was available. I ended up going with Ada over Wendy only because she looks a little younger. Had a very lackluster massage, which really set the mood to boring as hell. Couldn't wait to leave. Finish with the norm and will certainly not return. I didn't expect much for being in spring valley, but I'm sure others enjoyed their experience.
-
01-05-20 00:33 #11048
Posts: 52Missin the ol smile spa
Is there any place that offers same service smile spa does? After a couple reviews I've seen at another site I've been skeptical taking my chances coming back to see if the two ladies are officially not working there anymore.
Happy new year everyone!
-
01-04-20 23:58 #11047
Posts: 3075Fake Pictures
Originally Posted by Panther2287 [View Original Post]
No response, or reply back to my texts. Thanks for confirming the pictures are fake.
-
01-04-20 15:48 #11046
Posts: 56Originally Posted by Dream619 [View Original Post]
-
01-04-20 15:46 #11045
Posts: 56Originally Posted by BlueSkyBlue [View Original Post]
-
01-04-20 14:11 #11044
Posts: 707San Diego 2020
Happy New Years San Diego 2020
Enjoy the new massage parlor restrictions that are now in fact public law but stop to think what are these laws really achieving
San Diego is just the latest municipalities attempting to further restrict the interactions between two consenting adults behind closed doors, out of side of the general public.
The city considers this a "public nuisance" and yet they have to secretly send undercover agency in to find out if this "public nuisance " is occurring.
Commonsense would tell you that if you have to go that far out of your way to prove a "crime" of public nuisance it's not.
A "not-for-profit" organization called Polaris basically makes its money getting funding and support to combat this "issue" so they make a living at it and they have an agenda. They have gotten congressional funding to support this "anti-human" trafficking campaign, politicians love the idea that they're saving poor oppressed people.
Apparently police departments love the idea of arresting hundred pound50-year-old Asian females if they give a massage and touch a man's penis.
Instead of the cops fighting real crime, reducing actual physical threats to the population, they spend time and resources seeing if a girl touches a man's penis.
I will personally forever hold in contempt this misguided use of public resources.
On its surface Polaris, speaks to addressing human trafficking worldwide and that's an admirable and decent thing to advocate but the misrepresentation and out right lies used to change ordinances in the local domestic United States massage parlors is really where somebody's moralistic good intentions / their own believes intersections with the rights of people to live their lives the way they want to live. They would be better off to go after domestic housekeepers the massage parlor workers
A futile and unnecessary attempt at social control by making visit to massage parlor more expensive and restrictive.
Be clear right from the start look at all the cases in Seattle several cases in Florida (including the Kraft case) there is not one example of human trafficking. The final adjudication of these court cases confirms there is prostitution but no "human trafficking" is ever found.
Sane and rational people consider prostitution a victimless crime but nevertheless the stories of promote a battle on "human trafficking" and reality all they are doing is promoting overtime resources for law-enforcement to shut down small Woman owned minority business.
When you go to a small Asian massage parlor very good chance it is it's a woman from another country who is trying to pursue the American dream have a business take care of her children and take care of her parents they open a business that provides him the best returns for the limited skills they have in this culture.
Typically they don't read or write English particularly well and majority of them do not speak English very well but they're serving a valuable public need and service that obviously is not going to go away. Prohibition against alcohol was a failure, so was prohibition against marijuana. However this attempt at prohibition is against sex, a basic biological need and an important element in emotional and physical health.
I am a healthy adult male and I have a normal healthy sex drive. My body is hardwired for sex, sex is a underlying influence of all human interactions. Its a biological birthright To have sex. Normal healthy positive sexual interaction improves by psychological as well as my physical health. I also have the right to participate in sexual activity between two consenting adults.
For one hour I can have physical human contact with another human being. Psychologically as well as physiologically human contact is an essential element to maintain mental and physical health.
Human beings that are deprived of human contact inevitably suffer and in this modern society we have enough messed up people that allowing them the opportunity to experience human touch in and of it's self seems a positive not a negative.
However, the state and local governments have determine that it's a "public nuisance" that if I tip that girl for providing me a positive mental and physical benefit. If a woman massages my body for one hour and at the end of the massage manipulates my penis and I have an ejaculation, I have committed a crime.
Sexual release as many well-documented medical benefits to my prostate and my heart but in the wisdom of government this action is a "public nuisance" and a crime. If I had a camera running and was filming it and sold it as pornography fee it would be legal.
Just think how twisted this thought process is, your elected city government is promoting shutting down massage parlors as public law.
Take away the big lie" human trafficking this is an issue of interfering with the consensual activity of two adults. Nobody forces me to get a massage and nobody forces a girl to give me a massage but what we do behind closed doors is not the governments business. The government does not regulate my other bodily functions such as sneezing or defecating in private so why do they have such a interest in my sexual activities.
Be clear your city government is lying when they say that this is to stop human trafficking, it's only intended to stop the sexual interaction between two consenting adults.
Referenced in the newspaper articles on the subject at the time of the vote was the following These changes are proven to help combat human trafficking while making sure we protect important and legitimate massage therapy professionals, said Councilman Chris Cate before the committee vote.
Tell the city Council that prohibition of sex and human contact is wrong
-
01-04-20 01:16 #11043
Posts: 254Originally Posted by BlueSkyBlue [View Original Post]
-
01-03-20 23:46 #11042
Posts: 6Originally Posted by Stupitt [View Original Post]
Lots of better options out there.