This forum thread is moderated by Admin
-
Senior Member
Posts: 25
What does she look like.
Originally Posted by
OldFreak
[View Original Post]
I stopped by today and while the younger one hid in a room when I walked in, the older one was down for just about anything at the prices mentioned, even though they did try to ask for a higher amount at first. I just wish her mouth didn't smell like an ash tray.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 74
Yeah it gets confusing.
Originally Posted by
SconnieNation7
[View Original Post]
Agreed. Post below is getting a little too sensitive / offended for someone else.
Even as a senior member who frequents here couple times a week I am still thrown off by some of the lingo used in the Massage section. With new places popping up and people just use street numbers I am not sure where they are referring to or which places are even good these days. Some more clarity without to much information would be huge for new members and old like me who might be away for a bit. Just a thought I guess.
No clue what 590 is and which second floor place off of gammon even is at this point. Anyone want to DM me feel free lmao.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 412
Originally Posted by
Sanctimonious6
[View Original Post]
The problem is that using the secret codes obscures meaning and make communication worse. This is largely because people are using them inconsistently, many of them obviously having never read the guidelines about them. In the example you are calling me out for, the poster's comment was completely incomprehensible, to the point where we readers couldn't agree on what he was saying, and I don't think he ever chimed back in to clarify. That's not a personal swipe at that individual. That's a straightforward statement that the code he was trying to use did not accomplish what he was trying to accomplish. And since the codes serve no legitimate LEO-avoidance purpose anyway, it would be better if people just stopped with the roses and such. That way, people wouldn't have to constantly ask for clarification.
Agreed. Post below is getting a little too sensitive / offended for someone else.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 711
Originally Posted by
TimWatley1973
[View Original Post]
Why do you feel the need to denigrate fellow mongers? He gave his experience in his way, which is the EXACT purpose of this board. If you have an honest question about something you don't understand, ask it. If you don't like the report or find it irrelevant to your needs or not reliable, move on. If your primary concern is that LEO understands the report without the code, then that means YOU also understand the code. What's the problem?
All you're doing is conditioning users of this platform to NOT report their experiences. Congrats on killing the board one report at a time.
The problem is that using the secret codes obscures meaning and make communication worse. This is largely because people are using them inconsistently, many of them obviously having never read the guidelines about them. In the example you are calling me out for, the poster's comment was completely incomprehensible, to the point where we readers couldn't agree on what he was saying, and I don't think he ever chimed back in to clarify. That's not a personal swipe at that individual. That's a straightforward statement that the code he was trying to use did not accomplish what he was trying to accomplish. And since the codes serve no legitimate LEO-avoidance purpose anyway, it would be better if people just stopped with the roses and such. That way, people wouldn't have to constantly ask for clarification.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 388
Why?
Why do you feel the need to denigrate fellow mongers? He gave his experience in his way, which is the EXACT purpose of this board. If you have an honest question about something you don't understand, ask it. If you don't like the report or find it irrelevant to your needs or not reliable, move on. If your primary concern is that LEO understands the report without the code, then that means YOU also understand the code. What's the problem?
All you're doing is conditioning users of this platform to NOT report their experiences. Congrats on killing the board one report at a time.
Originally Posted by
Sanctimonious6
[View Original Post]
Okay, but why would would anybody think they need to use secret code for number of therapists? I mean the number of therapists they are going to pay roses to dream about.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 86
Originally Posted by
TimWatley1973
[View Original Post]
I stopped in and popped a Cherry on E. Wash last Friday. Veni, Vidi, Vici, not necessarily in that order. Buck ninety five was the total damage, all in. You can find it before GH by the KT, good time, lots of fun, not 60 yrs old.
I stopped by today and while the younger one hid in a room when I walked in, the older one was down for just about anything at the prices mentioned, even though they did try to ask for a higher amount at first. I just wish her mouth didn't smell like an ash tray.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 90
Wendy at 590
Originally Posted by
Acajtr222
[View Original Post]
Anybody know what happened to Wendy from the old Cherry Spa. Although I never got nor asked for FS she always took good care of me. Good massage, plenty of mutual finger play and a couple BBBJ's. Never shorted me on time.
I can confirm that 590 is open and Wendy is there. Tip her well and she will take very good care of you.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 711
I very recently saw a sign on the door at 590 saying they had moved to an address on Gammon. I did not investigate the Gammon location.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 368
Wendy
Originally Posted by
Acajtr222
[View Original Post]
Anybody know what happened to Wendy from the old Cherry Spa. Although I never got nor asked for FS she always took good care of me. Good massage, plenty of mutual finger play and a couple BBBJ's. Never shorted me on time.
Wendy next door at 590. Curb.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 37
Wendy
Anybody know what happened to Wendy from the old Cherry Spa. Although I never got nor asked for FS she always took good care of me. Good massage, plenty of mutual finger play and a couple BBBJ's. Never shorted me on time.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 944
Originally Posted by
R2623
[View Original Post]
Anyone know if she is still around? Hoping to see her again, but her email bounced. I have some time finally over the holidays and hoping to get in somewhere. Anyone tried Lana that posts on CL lately? Looking for a decent massage and hopefully a HE but will settle for the massage at this point. Most grateful if anyone has recommendations or knows if Jacinda has new contact methods.
I haven't been in touch with her. Did you try the phone number listed on her TER profile?
Edited: Removed the url since it contains her phone number. Anyway, search for her on TER, there's a phone number listed there.
-
Regular Member
Posts: 6
Jacinda
Anyone know if she is still around? Hoping to see her again, but her email bounced. I have some time finally over the holidays and hoping to get in somewhere. Anyone tried Lana that posts on CL lately? Looking for a decent massage and hopefully a HE but will settle for the massage at this point. Most grateful if anyone has recommendations or knows if Jacinda has new contact methods.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 87
Not Leah
Originally Posted by
AxMan223
[View Original Post]
Can confirm. Leah from Cherry is there. Solid massage and standard ending.
It's not Leah. That is Cici.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 27
2nd floor
Can confirm. Leah from Cherry is there. Solid massage and standard ending.
Originally Posted by
HamFister
[View Original Post]
Hit the new second floor place off Gammon.
Heavy teasing, standard finish 55 minutes. Will repeat if on this side of town but won't go out if my way to visit.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 86
Originally Posted by
Sanctimonious6
[View Original Post]
Okay, but why would would anybody think they need to use secret code for number of therapists? I mean the number of therapists they are going to pay roses to dream about.
Your guess is as good as mine, unless the OP weighs in. I see no need for that kind of obfuscating.