Escort Classified Ads - Member Discussions

[ARegularGuy]

She rotates back and forth between here and Florida and maybe a third place. She has a great little body, super nice tits and a cute face but she doesn't look like her photo. The photos were done in Florida and the make-up she has on in them makes a huge difference. In person she waers street clothes and has little to no make-up and dark circles around/under her eyes. Not bad but nothing like the pics. Service? Its all about the coin, she is neither into it or very good and clearly not anything close to GFE. If you just want the thrill of young pussy, she's okay. If you want a fuller experience, some personal attention or anything more than a very brief CBJ & and equally quick screw, look elsewhere.

ARG

Is Natasha that post in CL and backpage in the Worcester area legit?

She looks TGTBT.

She has had a few numbers over the past year but this is her latest:

Eight/six/zero-eight/four/one/seven/four/seven/nine 860-XXX-7479

Or

978}-XXX-1657

And here is the backpage link

http://worcester.backpage.com/Female...-a-t-e/3503422

[Steve2319]

Anyone have any experience with this provider:

http://worcester.craigslist.org/ads/1757449197.html

I pinged her last night trying to set something up for the weekend and her donations are relatively cheap, which makes you wonder.

[Umbrellaman1]

She advertises as GFE, but previous report claims she is no where near that. We have to start acting like erotic police and start calling them on their false advertising, bait and switches etc. I had to convince a fellow monger to post a negative review on escorts.com for the same reasons.

Darlene on the other hand! Thank you fellow momngers for giving me the info. Now THAT is GFE. I mean, the only downside is that she IS old, and there's a little trouble getting the soldier to stand to attention after a while. She's not for everyone, but in terms of a fun, down to earth relaxing time she is great.

[NewAgain]

She advertises as GFE, but previous report claims she is no where near that. We have to start acting like erotic police and start calling them on their false advertising, bait and switches etc. I had to convince a fellow monger to post a negative review on escorts.com for the same reasons.

I received no response to 2 her contact forms sent to her that were filled out per the instructions.

[Spoogeman2]

I received no response to 2 her contact forms sent to her that were filled out per the instructions.

[Trailblazer99]

She is for real but pics are a few years old and they could best be described as professional glamor shots where she is all made up for them. She does have an attitude on the phone and my visit was not the great with a fee of $$1/2 and not even close to a GFE. I think there are better ladies to see. She is definitely a YMMV lady.

[NewAgain]

I had contacted her before, she responded to the call, she even picked up with out the annoying music, waiting for party to pick up crap...we just couldn't work out a time.

Well, not only has no one given me a # but she didn't respond to the (very polite) message I sent her from the contact screen on her website? Is there some secret code I'm missing?

[Umbrellaman1]

Well if someone could PM me a # I'd appreciate it.

The reviews, both off site and here, seem right up my alley.

Well, not only has no one given me a # but she didn't respond to the (very polite) message I sent her from the contact screen on her website? Is there some secret code I'm missing?

[Big Titties]

Is Natasha that post in CL and backpage in the Worcester area legit?

She looks TGTBT.

She has had a few numbers over the past year but this is her latest:

Eight/six/zero-eight/four/one/seven/four/seven/nine 860-XXX-7479

Or

978}-XXX-1657

And here is the backpage link

http://worcester.backpage.com/Female...-a-t-e/3503422

[Umbrellaman1]

Well if someone could PM me a # I'd appreciate it.

The reviews, both off site and here, seem right up my alley.

[NewAgain]

For her age, she absolutely loves sex. I had an hour with her, which included showering together and her bbbj while in shower, then to bed for a terrific ride cowgirl style. Big titties and if she would take care of the cig breath, even a good kisser.

Just had a visit (about my 10th) with Darleen. I agree with what everyone says --- she's quite a hot, sexy thing. And yes, she does have the "Hoover" talent --- never felt anything like it! Highly recommend the massage and "Hoover".

[Boston528]

Just had a visit (about my 10th) with Darleen. I agree with what everyone says --- she's quite a hot, sexy thing. And yes, she does have the "Hoover" talent --- never felt anything like it! Highly recommend the massage and "Hoover".

[Seek Grt Mass]

She is indeed legit and lives up to her rep. She is an older woman but has a mouth like a hoover and an ass of steel! She is definitely worth the trip. Her rates are sometimes lowered once you get there if she finds you attractive and is horny as hell! Have fun and be safe out there! PM me if you need her digits!

She's got a lot of reviews on escorts and they are all pretty good. So if an older woman is your thing....

[Willy O]

She seems a little out there, and even advertises specific services for a fee.
So I'm wondering if she's real, or possibly a sting operation or just some sort of joke? Anyone know here? Here is the link to her page.

http://darlin1948.escort-site.com/services.phtml

If she was legit, I might consider taking one for the team, emphasis on MIGHT.
She's older than most of us would like, and a smoker which I'm not too fond of.
But who knows, if the service was good...

She's got a lot of reviews on escorts and they are all pretty good. So if an older woman is your thing....

[Olepapa]

I sent her an email and got an answer. She seems legit since she has been doing this for a while. The emails were sent last Fall or early winter, that is too long for a sting.

She's been around for a few years. Has received decent reviews on another board I subscribe to. Too old for my taste, but sounds like she would be good for those who prefer a mature woman. She is NOT LE, and not a sting.