Escort Reports

[AsMong]

Hi didn't had a chance to post. Went to see a c-org off San Gabriel Blvd. The house was on the busy street next to a restaurant couple weeks ago. The house was really run down. Saw a pretty good looking fruit. I would say age about late 20 early 30 with pretty good melon. The services was okay and was kind of lack lusting. The BJ was okay. Went in for the final fire after the okay BJ. The services was nothing much, had better services. The shot was for 120 hhr.

Have anyone try out the place near the restaurant and how was your experience?

[LostLimit]

Called up one of the C-org at their new location in rosemead near Kami buffet by the 60 fwy. Told me new girl Abby working today and only today. Great service young, blah blah blah. Hesitant but decided to go check out anyways for fun. Previous girl at this same location was very lack luster. Just lied there and didn't want to do anything.

Asked for real pic and booker sent me one that doesn't look too much photoshopped like those typical model photos you see.

Girl open door upon arrival and she somewhat resemble the pic, but I could tell its not her. Offer to rinse me in shower. 5 minute of quick washing down south and we head to bed. Started with some kissing on the chest then moved down south and sucked on my balls before putting on the cover. CBJ was good and she was able to take a lot of it in without any gag reflex. I pulled her in for some light kissing and she didn't resist. Hop on and rode me for 2 minutes before switching to mish. Finished me off with a HJ. Had a lot of LFK, and light DFK towards the end for basic hhr service. Not many girls will offer this, all depends if they like you or not. Usually have to tip more. In my case, I guess she liked me so had plenty of lip to lip action.

She was not skinny or thick, just right amount of fat, although I prefer less on the tummy (just my own preference). Told me she was 25 but looked older. Had a sweet personality and willing to please.

Definitely recommended to try her out once at least. Service was better than most C-org girls. Was told only staying at that location today only.

[LostLimit]

Any communication other than text and maybe emails for high end providers, is a scam. I've been around the block in many a state and at no time did I ever need more than a burner number.

THERE SHOULD NEVER BE A DEPOSIT GIVEN. Ever. If they ask for one and claim they just want to be safe, they're a fucking liar. Unless it is a well documented provider and I don't mean 3 reviews that you could find, but like 200+ reviews from verified bros who all say the same thing, then and only then should you give a deposit. It should not be be for an ACS nor some seedy motel operation.

Use the big head fellasI beg of you.

100% on this. Any deposits asked in advance or snapchat is scam. Move on. Plenty of fish out there.

[LoveFromFrank]

Hi was use telegram and saw "escort" girl on nearby me search. Lot them ask deposit upfront. I figure those scammers. Wonder any you have actually use telegram and actually meet any of them.

Any communication other than text and maybe emails for high end providers, is a scam. I've been around the block in many a state and at no time did I ever need more than a burner number.

THERE SHOULD NEVER BE A DEPOSIT GIVEN. Ever. If they ask for one and claim they just want to be safe, they're a fucking liar. Unless it is a well documented provider and I don't mean 3 reviews that you could find, but like 200+ reviews from verified bros who all say the same thing, then and only then should you give a deposit. It should not be be for an ACS nor some seedy motel operation.

Use the big head fellas—I beg of you.

[AsMong]

That's what I've seen with Snapchat. Either pushing for crypto investing or asking for upfront payment for bargain-priced encounters.

I see the same with snap too. Snap or telegram doesn't look like you can actually meet just see only scam.

[Willie23]

Hi was use telegram and saw "escort" girl on nearby me search. Lot them ask deposit upfront. I figure those scammers. Wonder any you have actually use telegram and actually meet any of them.

That's what I've seen with Snapchat. Either pushing for crypto investing or asking for upfront payment for bargain-priced encounters.

[AsMong]

Hi was use telegram and saw "escort" girl on nearby me search. Lot them ask deposit upfront. I figure those scammers. Wonder any you have actually use telegram and actually meet any of them.

[WgBaller]

I've noticed that depending on the color of the text on the picture of the girl means something different for each girl. Example yellow means they look like they're picture where as red is very young. Can anyone confirm this or tell me what each color means for the fleet girls?

[KeepFishn]

If so, I think we saw the same girl. Una was a good find and their stable seems to be well, stable. Finally a young roster of c girls instead of grandmas. Took her for a spin and got a solid hour with her. Nothing about her was fake. Nice tits and seemingly stable stream of younger girls that seem to enjoy the work. Got to the house and had a nice girl greet me and provided above average service in terms of her BBBJ and riding rhythm. She could bounce it better than some kgirls imo. Would absolutely repeat should I be in the area.

If you daty with this one, would recommend to hit the underside of her clit. It'll do well to stimulate her and get her going for some quality O's from a young girl and boost your ego.

https://www.sweetkgirl.com/products/una-gfe

Damage: three Benjamin's plus Andrew.

Concur on Una. She's probably in her 30's but has a nice slim figure. Photo is kinda representative of her facial features. If you're a fan of pencil eraser nips, you'll definitely be in for a treat. She's also pretty loud if you hit the right spots.

[PogeyBait]

Another monger informed me that girls without the BBFS option are typically prettier or even younger since they don't want to get preggo so by that metric, I decided to pull the trigger on Una. Very sweet and objectively attractive. Pics were photoshopped but thought it was here based on facial structure. Took her for a spin for the hour and liked where it was headed as soon as she started the BJ and thought she had great technique. I opted for a cover this time to play it safe and the BJ didn't feel any worse since her technique was great. Unsure what she did but it worked and almost makes me wish I opted for the BBBJ upgrade but I didn't want to break the mood by renegotiating. She hopped on for cg and I filled the bag in doggy. Pretty young and tight and still had a lot of spunk which aligns that she's fairly new to this as advertised. Would recommend.

https://www.sweetkgirl.com/products/una-gfe

If so, I think we saw the same girl. Una was a good find and their stable seems to be well, stable. Finally a young roster of c girls instead of grandmas. Took her for a spin and got a solid hour with her. Nothing about her was fake. Nice tits and seemingly stable stream of younger girls that seem to enjoy the work. Got to the house and had a nice girl greet me and provided above average service in terms of her BBBJ and riding rhythm. She could bounce it better than some kgirls imo. Would absolutely repeat should I be in the area.

If you daty with this one, would recommend to hit the underside of her clit. It'll do well to stimulate her and get her going for some quality O's from a young girl and boost your ego.

https://www.sweetkgirl.com/products/una-gfe

Damage: three Benjamin's plus Andrew.

[ItsNotNothing2]

Another monger informed me that girls without the BBFS option are typically prettier or even younger since they don't want to get preggo so by that metric, I decided to pull the trigger on Una. Very sweet and objectively attractive. Pics were photoshopped but thought it was here based on facial structure. Took her for a spin for the hour and liked where it was headed as soon as she started the BJ and thought she had great technique. I opted for a cover this time to play it safe and the BJ didn't feel any worse since her technique was great. Unsure what she did but it worked and almost makes me wish I opted for the BBBJ upgrade but I didn't want to break the mood by renegotiating. She hopped on for cg and I filled the bag in doggy. Pretty young and tight and still had a lot of spunk which aligns that she's fairly new to this as advertised. Would recommend.

https://www.sweetkgirl.com/products/una-gfe

[Rizzler808]

Is screening easy? I don't really like my k-org booker and try to locate an alternative.

Same deal for Korgs but I've been verified with a few bookers now and just accept my information is going to be available and that's that. Figured one more couldn't hurt.

[Vince682]

Been mongering but not much posting so I thought I'd drop this one here. Normally I take c-orgs with a grain of salt but given there is a hybrid agency with both kgirls and some c-girls, I figured I'd give it a shot. Not a bad selection and in a sense, the selection is quite broad given that it isn't just one demographic. Asked the booker who had real pics and to my surprise, they only listed a few names. I asked what about the rest and they said they weren't sure or they thought it was heavily photoshopped. Honestly goes a long way with me so I TOFFT on Nancy given that my last Nancy (Greek homemovie queen of Ktown) was a solid choice.

Got to the place in Rosemead and was let in easy enough. Nancy's pics are definitely here and she's a younger girl for sure. Hard to pin point her age but I'm confident she's not older than maybe 27. Overall I was satisfied what was before me and ime, only younger girls refuse BBFS so it made sense she didn't have that on the menu given her age. She was partial to dfk which was a surprise as dfk isn't normally given by cgirls in my experience but this was a pleasant surprise with an ability to take a slightly larger than average package down the love tunnel. Hit all the positions I like to go through with an A+ in acg. She really threw herself down onto my spear and didn't leave anything on the table, nor in my balls. Would recommend and encourage a different stable of providers to keep doing what they're doing.

https://www.sweetkgirl.com/products/nancy

Is screening easy? I don't really like my k-org booker and try to locate an alternative.

[WhoreMaster 91]

I know they have a bad rep, but occasionally it's a win. I go to Ruby house, and they always honor 120 for 20 min. Recently saw Apple. What she lacks in looks, she makes up in service. Hands down the best service I've received so far. She a little thick and has huge nipples pretty short too. Nice foreplay and Good moaning sounds and seems super into it. This chick was either super into me or just loves to fuck. Receptive to different positions, dfk, and didn't rush like other girls I've seen. Overall, great experience, even though her looks are just whatever. Probably late 20's early 30's if I were to guess. Pussy lips were a little weird looking, too, but still felt great. I never go down on these girls so it was a non-issue. No smell either.

Where is this Ruby House? Thanks.

[CNative]

I agree, the profile listing for Nancy has an accurate photo (at least of her face). There are younger girls than her and she's probably not in her 20's. She her in good lighting and she's most likely in her 30's or early 40's but her body is very well maintained.

I agree, she does look like the photo in the hx profiles, but she is not in her 20's. 30's for sure.

Also those HX bookers are charging a lot more than other bookers. I saw baby via K-Dreams on HX. It was $220 hhr and she was up charging for BBJ.

I saw Nancy via https://www.princehouse.info/, it was $150 for hhr and included BBBJ.