Massage Parlor Reports

[Stressed Out]

Didn't get her name but a desent looking as ou an chick greeted me, she's around 5'6" pro nb ably 38, claims 28.

She looked good with a nice rack so I folowed her to a small room in the back.

$60 / hr actualy a prety good massage (better then expected).30 min later she flips me over grabs my shaft asking for a $40 tip. I say ok if you lift your top, next thing I know I'm staring at the nicest pair of Fake C cups I've seen in a while. She let me honk the horns while she shifts the gears like a race car driver. Didn't take me long to blow a gasket playing with thoes amazing, firm cans.

She cleans me up from head to toe with hot towel & gives me a hug before I get dressed giving me a bonus rub.

I'd say a desent time for a see note.

I'm guessing it was with Jenn. The last note I had was that jenn and alice were there. Both gave nice massages and endings but Jen was more layful and allowed access and Alice was OTC only. But please feel free to update on Alice or if someone else is there.

[Stressed Out]

I don't need to get into the lengthy details, but a week or 2 ago the state enacted the strictest and highest penalty laws in the country and that means more pressure on sites promoting the behavior as well. Won't stop anything tho, just make people go to rhode island more.

There was an article in the Herald a little bit ago which had some interviews from some of the independent escorts around who complained that the 'human trafficing' they were looking to stop didn't exist as much as those who passed the law were led to believe by the do-gooders. As a matter of fact the article pointed out that there were more instances of 'human traffic' arrests in the toney suburbs for 'maids, nannies and live in help' then for 'escorts'. Of course all the do=gooders came on board and slammed the ladies interviewed.

In short (I believe although this is from quotes) that the law treats those 'taken into custody' for 'performing' the act as victims of 'human traffic' without penalty and the 'johns' as the cause with severe penalties. Besides driving it underground and to RI as stated I have read (and I'm not a lawyer) that several test cases may cause issues since the aim of the law was for a specific reason (human traffic) and if that reason doesn't exist than the law may not apply for a specific circumstance. One opinion I read state that was why there were no further penalties for the ladies as the gents caught were less likely to fight it. But I could be totally wrong. Anyone who understands better please chime in.

[Stressed Out]

Good review and to each his own. My two cents is that you can AMP when you are married, middle-ages, etc. If I were a good looking single guy in my early 20s, I would be snagging as much pert coed T&A as possible. When we heard about how supposedly wild young girls are now and the concept of friends with benefits, most of us probably thought we were born at the wrong time. Are the stories about chicks your age true or exaggerated? Also, keep in mind hot MILFs. I did not realize until I was married myself how many hot MILFS were hitting on me at your age while I was clueless to the whole thing.

I absolutely agree! I have been in this hobby one way or another since the late 70's back in the days of Royal Sauna, Danish Health Club and the many offshoots that existed in the day. My first few experiences of a rub and'tug were at Royal and Ole English and were performed by middle 20 something ladies. It was a pleasure indeed. My first foray into FS however was at an unlikely place and it was performed by a pair of mid 30 ladies (not at the same time LOL). It was at a small massage place in the basement of the bowling alley just down the street from Royal. It was so different from the 'younger' ladies I had seen before. And to this day while I certainly do like the 'younger hotties' for a quick reminder of what it used to be like (not that I can remember much LOL) I find that the 'older and more mature' MILF's generally have a little something extra to share. Maybe it is experience or maybe it is a slower more caring time or maybe it is that they appreciate the 'act' more. Who knows. But don't just discount the older ladies as I've found that it can make this 54 year old dude happy and feeling a little younger. Just a couple of cents from SO

[Ampman44]

Good review and to each his own. My two cents is that you can AMP when you are married, middle-ages, etc. If I were a good looking single guy in my early 20s, I would be snagging as much pert coed T&A as possible. When we heard about how supposedly wild young girls are now and the concept of friends with benefits, most of us probably thought we were born at the wrong time. Are the stories about chicks your age true or exaggerated? Also, keep in mind hot MILFs. I did not realize until I was married myself how many hot MILFS were hitting on me at your age while I was clueless to the whole thing.

Been reading these boards for a few months and decided to get into the hobby. I should preface this by mentioning I am in my early 20's and considered a good looking guy so my standards may be different than other reviewers. Before people call bs, I personally enjoy the rush I guess from the hobby. Anyways on to the good stuff.

Decided to try out Nini's for my first time at an AMP in early December, called ahead and could barely understand the girl on the phone but made successfully made an appt. For 4pm on a Thursday. Showed up and was greeted by a semi-attractive girl at the desk, Mixu, and opted for the hr. She claimed she was late 20's but I think more along the lines of mid-30's. Gave a pretty good massage and taking a hint from some of the other reviews I engaged with a little touching to let her know. Light teasing, but mainly just a good massage with not too much oil. On the flip she pointed and went to work, technique was lackluster but allowed UTC to help. Never asked for extra but ended up giving the normal 60+40.

Early January on a Saturday I decided to give the place another shot seeing if I could get Mixu again hoping for an even better experience for a repeat customer. Called ahead and was told she wasn't there but that I would be happy with Cindy. Arrived met Cindy and wasn't too pleased with the attractiveness, and should've walked out. She was probably late 30's and had a decent rack but a little extra padding and not really my type. Figured I was already there and that maybe she would make up for it with extra effort. Massage was good once again with minimal teasing, on the flip she asked about junior and then repeated the price multiple times before starting which was a total turn off. Better skills than Mixu but still hammering the price is a huge no-no for me. Still was normal 60+40 but definitely won't repeat with her and possibly not at there again after seeing some recent reviews.

Hope this was a decent first review.

[BlackStick75]

I apologize ahead of time. This is my first report. I made a visit to Lotus Massage earlier this week. Located on Harrison Ave in Chinatown, it's a small clean establishment which offers both half hour and one hour sessions for 0. 40 and 0. 60 respectively. On my visit I drew Judy, probably late 30s fit body, spoke very good English and was very friendly. There was also a younger woman there, also attractive who spoke very little English. Massage was very good. There wasn't much of a tease though it may have been because it was my first time. On the flip I was asked if I needed anything else massage and the technique was fantastic. I will return.

[Maximus77]

Second time I heard about these "new laws" but no details as to what they are. Care to enlighten me?

I don't need to get into the lengthy details, but a week or 2 ago the state enacted the strictest and highest penalty laws in the country and that means more pressure on sites promoting the behavior as well. Won't stop anything tho, just make people go to rhode island more.

[Top Floor]

Second report I know but figured I would separate locations to make it easier for searching. Recently moved into Boston and figured I'd give CT a shot. Read some good things about Aiko from a massage quality and 2 pop expectation. Arrived for appt. And did not find her attractive at all. I don't mind an older woman but she didn't really appeal at all, once again I decided if I am going to try to get into the hobby I need to try the spectrum for good ideas of what to expect. Massage was pretty good with lots of teasing and eventually the reach under for the first pop. Good technique and overall a good massage. I understand she's a 1 person shop but still the endless phone ringing and knocking on the door causing interruptions made it a terrible time. Had the flip at 5 min left and didn't even try for a second pop, gave 60+40 and will not repeat despite good massage skills mainly due to the annoyance of stopping 8+ times.

Good report. Try Lisa at Relax Time (you might get shorted on time though) or Coco at 5 Knapp St.

[Top Floor]

Before someone annoys the previous poster about not mentioning competitors websites. The website no longer exists, in an way shape or form, so its no longer a competitor and no longer a website. It will never exist again and if it somehow does it will never include anything relating to Massachusetts since the new laws is probably the reason its website was shutdown permanently.

Second time I heard about these "new laws" but no details as to what they are. Care to enlighten me?

[Assman3]

Welcome to the world of mongering. Good job on these reports. That's how to go about it.

Looking forward to sharing some info with you.

A. M.

Been reading these boards for a few months and decided to get into the hobby. I should preface this by mentioning I am in my early 20's and considered a good looking guy so my standards may be different than other reviewers. Before people call bs, I personally enjoy the rush I guess from the hobby. Anyways on to the good stuff.

Decided to try out Nini's for my first time at an AMP in early December, called ahead and could barely understand the girl on the phone but made successfully made an appt. For 4pm on a Thursday. Showed up and was greeted by a semi-attractive girl at the desk, Mixu, and opted for the hr. She claimed she was late 20's but I think more along the lines of mid-30's. Gave a pretty good massage and taking a hint from some of the other reviews I engaged with a little touching to let her know. Light teasing, but mainly just a good massage with not too much oil. On the flip she pointed and went to work, technique was lackluster but allowed UTC to help. Never asked for extra but ended up giving the normal 60+40.

Early January on a Saturday I decided to give the place another shot seeing if I could get Mixu again hoping for an even better experience for a repeat customer. Called ahead and was told she wasn't there but that I would be happy with Cindy. Arrived met Cindy and wasn't too pleased with the attractiveness, and should've walked out. She was probably late 30's and had a decent rack but a little extra padding and not really my type. Figured I was already there and that maybe she would make up for it with extra effort. Massage was good once again with minimal teasing, on the flip she asked about junior and then repeated the price multiple times before starting which was a total turn off. Better skills than Mixu but still hammering the price is a huge no-no for me. Still was normal 60+40 but definitely won't repeat with her and possibly not at there again after seeing some recent reviews.

Hope this was a decent first review.

[Member #5013]

Before someone annoys the previous poster about not mentioning competitors websites. The website no longer exists, in an way shape or form, so its no longer a competitor and no longer a website. It will never exist again and if it somehow does it will never include anything relating to Massachusetts since the new laws is probably the reason its website was shutdown permanently.

Silly question. With that in mind. Why is this one still up with a Massachusetts board?

BB

[MickPK]

Decided to hit my favorite Somerville place again this past week. After being bait-and-switched out of a session with Coco last month (which generated some discussion on this board regarding her moving on to another location) , I didn't bother asking for anyone in particular when I called 15 minutes ahead of my arrival; I hadn't been disappointed here yet, so I figured why be picky?

Lo and behold, I arrived and drew Coco. Now, perhaps this isn't the same "Coco" that had been discussed previously, but I was not disappointed. Not at all. Looks were fantastic, body was incredible, the medium massage was excellent (though I might ask for hard next time) , and I was only shorted of the full hour by perhaps 5 or 6 minutes (I was concerned after having been shorted 15-20 minutes my last visit).

Damages were $60 + $40 which, in hindsight, probably should have been a little more. Hopefully I'll get a chance to make it up to her sometime soon.

[Ski Boz]

Didn't get her name but a desent looking as ou an chick greeted me, she's around 5'6" pro nb ably 38, claims 28.

Soundp1. Thanks for the report. I think the proper address is 299 Newport. But most people who monger in Quincy know the place.

I've had more miss's than hits there, but when you find someone who is good. It can be really good if you repeat with them. If you visit again and figure out the name, please report back as I'm sure others in the area would appreciate a good option in Quincy. I know I would.

[Moby9]

Second report I know but figured I would separate locations to make it easier for searching. Recently moved into Boston and figured I'd give CT a shot. Read some good things about Aiko from a massage quality and 2 pop expectation. Arrived for appt. And did not find her attractive at all. I don't mind an older woman but she didn't really appeal at all, once again I decided if I am going to try to get into the hobby I need to try the spectrum for good ideas of what to expect. Massage was pretty good with lots of teasing and eventually the reach under for the first pop. Good technique and overall a good massage. I understand she's a 1 person shop but still the endless phone ringing and knocking on the door causing interruptions made it a terrible time. Had the flip at 5 min left and didn't even try for a second pop, gave 60+40 and will not repeat despite good massage skills mainly due to the annoyance of stopping 8+ times.

When going to AMPs, I try for the first of the day appointment. In CT, that's usually 10 am. It seems I have pretty good luck with less interruptions and friendlier providers.

Just sayin.

[Turbate]

Second report I know but figured I would separate locations to make it easier for searching. Recently moved into Boston and figured I'd give CT a shot. Read some good things about Aiko from a massage quality and 2 pop expectation. Arrived for appt. And did not find her attractive at all. I don't mind an older woman but she didn't really appeal at all, once again I decided if I am going to try to get into the hobby I need to try the spectrum for good ideas of what to expect. Massage was pretty good with lots of teasing and eventually the reach under for the first pop. Good technique and overall a good massage. I understand she's a 1 person shop but still the endless phone ringing and knocking on the door causing interruptions made it a terrible time. Had the flip at 5 min left and didn't even try for a second pop, gave 60+40 and will not repeat despite good massage skills mainly due to the annoyance of stopping 8+ times.

[Turbate]

Been reading these boards for a few months and decided to get into the hobby. I should preface this by mentioning I am in my early 20's and considered a good looking guy so my standards may be different than other reviewers. Before people call bs, I personally enjoy the rush I guess from the hobby. Anyways on to the good stuff.

Decided to try out Nini's for my first time at an AMP in early December, called ahead and could barely understand the girl on the phone but made successfully made an appt. For 4pm on a Thursday. Showed up and was greeted by a semi-attractive girl at the desk, Mixu, and opted for the hr. She claimed she was late 20's but I think more along the lines of mid-30's. Gave a pretty good massage and taking a hint from some of the other reviews I engaged with a little touching to let her know. Light teasing, but mainly just a good massage with not too much oil. On the flip she pointed and went to work, technique was lackluster but allowed UTC to help. Never asked for extra but ended up giving the normal 60+40.

Early January on a Saturday I decided to give the place another shot seeing if I could get Mixu again hoping for an even better experience for a repeat customer. Called ahead and was told she wasn't there but that I would be happy with Cindy. Arrived met Cindy and wasn't too pleased with the attractiveness, and should've walked out. She was probably late 30's and had a decent rack but a little extra padding and not really my type. Figured I was already there and that maybe she would make up for it with extra effort. Massage was good once again with minimal teasing, on the flip she asked about junior and then repeated the price multiple times before starting which was a total turn off. Better skills than Mixu but still hammering the price is a huge no-no for me. Still was normal 60+40 but definitely won't repeat with her and possibly not at there again after seeing some recent reviews.

Hope this was a decent first review.