Escort Reports

**Member #4183** · 11-02-10 16:17

Her name is "Angel", she works / lives by the airport and dances at one of the clubs in town (Not anywhere hot chicks dance. Sorry for the misname.

Originally Posted by Dodgeboy27 [View Original Post]

Had a chick scam me for a bit of cash today. Not more than I can afford but the principle of the thing demands I at least post her name and info:

Her name is Tina. Recommended by a SM on the board. Gave her $50 to go check into a hotel and she went in the front and out the back. $50 seems to be an awfully small amount to retire from the business on, but that's her choice. PM me for her phone # and other stats. I don't blame the SM / TM for recommending her, as he's never led me wrong before, so I'm not trying to out him but I'll give all the info I have on the lady in question.

Later!

DB27

**Funningunnin** · 11-02-10 15:27

Originally Posted by Richmond Fotog [View Original Post]

http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleE...exy-24/3821473

Imagine that. New photos.

As the one dubbed the "white knight" (I've been called worse) I want to assure that I really have no dog in the fight, except for the fact that one gal who I really enjoyed I don't want to see turned cynical and hateful, like so many other providers. Morgan is new in the business with an unrelated career on the horizon, and I want to be able to enjoy her at her best for the time that she remains available.

My condolences go to those of you who have had a bad experience with her. That's too bad, because my time with her was quite fine.

I did notice the new ad pics this morning. Having already acknowledged to me (on our date 3 weeks ago) that her "manager" had come up with the original pics, she says these two new pics were taken of her this past weekend. They do look like the gal I saw. If any of you can find these pics elsewhere on the net, proving her to be fraudulent this time around, I'll accept my spanking for being naive. In the meantime, I'll hold on to my happy memories, as renewed by ogling on the photos, and I'll look forward to making more memories with her soon.

**Member #4183** · 11-02-10 13:47

Had a chick scam me for a bit of cash today. Not more than I can afford but the principle of the thing demands I at least post her name and info:

Her name is Tina. Recommended by a SM on the board. Gave her $50 to go check into a hotel and she went in the front and out the back. $50 seems to be an awfully small amount to retire from the business on, but that's her choice. PM me for her phone # and other stats. I don't blame the SM / TM for recommending her, as he's never led me wrong before, so I'm not trying to out him but I'll give all the info I have on the lady in question.

Later!

DB27

**Richmond Fotog** · 11-02-10 11:23

http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleE...exy-24/3821473

Imagine that. New photos.

Originally Posted by Funningunnin [View Original Post]

So there you have it, guys. Morgan's the real thing IMHO.

**Richmondfun** · 11-01-10 12:49

Originally Posted by Richmond Fotog [View Original Post]

You must have seen a different Morgan than the rest of us or you're sugar-coating your review.

Two weeks ago, I purposely set up an appointment with this girl. She quoted me a rate of $ for an HOUR of "unrushed service." When I arrived, she look NOTHING like the girl in the photos she's using. She was also very flaky. She clearly told me she was NOT a F / S escort. She went on some rant about guys coming there thinking she is and she's not.

This is one of these photos she's using of two different girls. She looks nothing like this.

http://lewd-babes.com/free/realgf/pi...18.com_001.jpg

Stolen from:

http://lewd-babes.com/free/realgf/pi.../worldsex.html

Give her a call back and tell her she has another bad review. She's a flaky provider with stolen, inaccurate photos. If she needs some real ones done, let me know.

I was denied FS as I reported earlier. I did ask for it, but was told that she didn't offer it. After money had changed hands and the activities had begun.

**Richmond Guy** · 10-30-10 21:34

Originally Posted by Richmond Fotog [View Original Post]

If Morgan is a member here she certainly has some 'splaining to do and not through her white knight.

Is she a member? Probably not. You don't have to be a subscribed member to read the forum posts here. If she's a member she could have read the review herself and contacted the member with her offer to make amends to him.

Most likely, the culprit behind this is the same senior member who is known to have a few extra handles on this forum and a past history of contacting providers about reviews and comments posted here. Some of us already know who that person is. .

Intrigue on the forum! Who is this person?

**Richmond Fotog** · 10-30-10 18:45

If Morgan is a member here she certainly has some 'splaining to do and not through her white knight.

Is she a member? Probably not. You don't have to be a subscribed member to read the forum posts here. If she's a member she could have read the review herself and contacted the member with her offer to make amends to him.

Most likely, the culprit behind this is the same senior member who is known to have a few extra handles on this forum and a past history of contacting providers about reviews and comments posted here. Some of us already know who that person is. .

Originally Posted by Lone Wolf [View Original Post]

No I am even more curious, she claims to be a member but will not give her name here, so can't check and see, she then claims to be FS and the person that wrote the review got mad because she wouldn't permit bareback, funny never heard that was the case prior to that.

Makes me wonder why do we only defensive post when the party they are about seems to get knowledge of this site, and quite often that is the only post that is ever made by the defender?

Maybe we found Morgan's name here after all.

**Albus D** · 10-30-10 14:13

Originally Posted by Lone Wolf [View Original Post]

So I called her to see what was the real deal, first question I asked are you an FS provider I immediately got "I know the reviews on USA Sex Guide say I am not". No I am even more curious, she claims to be a member but will not give her name here, so can't check and see, she then claims to be FS and the person that wrote the review got mad because she wouldn't permit bareback, funny never heard that was the case prior to that.

Now you say the pics are representative of how she looks, then say she carries an extra 25 lbs, that would make the pics non representative of her current look, so how can you say they are. She will make it up to him, in her words the issue's were much different than his, and how would she know who he is?

Makes me wonder why do we only defensive post when the party they are about seems to get knowledge of this site, and quite often that is the only post that is ever made by the defender?

Maybe we found Morgan's name here after all.

Interesting thoughts there Lone Wolf. You may be on the money with Morgan's posting name! =+)

I would like to see her get a positive post from a senior member, but I am not going to hold my breath on that one!

Albus

**Lone Wolf** · 10-30-10 12:53

Originally Posted by Funningunnin [View Original Post]

Although I've cycled through a bunch of the local providers through recent years, I just discovered this page a few months ago. I've opted to just lurk – not join till now. I've been prompted by seeing some really bad reports about a provider – Morgan – that, well, don't match my experience with her.

I made an appointment with Morgan about three weeks ago after reading a positive review of her in this forum. I set up for hh at $.6. Upon arrival I realized immediately that the pics were not of her. I don't mind that just as long as the photos are a pretty accurate representation of who they are (what self-respecting person would want their loved ones to see their pics on such pages. Well in person, she is carrying about 25 more lbs. Than the girl in the picture. Then again, she's got a beautiful face, long & thick blond hair, and a nice rack. She welcomed me so warmly, too, that I immediately decided to stay (I have walked out on some others along the way.

After some nice chat, including her telling me that this is a new kind of work for her, we got comfortable, engaged in sensual LFK. Then BBBJ, mish, and K-9. True to her claim to be new in the business, boinging felt, as Madonna would say, like a virgin. Awesome.

Pretty enthusiastic performance. Not a hint of rushing. Not my ATF, but way above average.

So what happened with the guy denied FS? I called to tell her of the bad review. She said that not all guys want FS, and sometimes it's not clear what they want. She acknowledged that she may have misunderstood the guy's intentions, and that she feels bad about that. I told her I'the be writing a good review to counter his. 'If you don't mind, ' she said, 'tell that guy that if he makes another appointment I'll make it up to him. '

So there you have it, guys. Morgan's the real thing IMHO.

So I called her to see what was the real deal, first question I asked are you an FS provider I immediately got "I know the reviews on USA Sex Guide say I am not". No I am even more curious, she claims to be a member but will not give her name here, so can't check and see, she then claims to be FS and the person that wrote the review got mad because she wouldn't permit bareback, funny never heard that was the case prior to that.

Now you say the pics are representative of how she looks, then say she carries an extra 25 lbs, that would make the pics non representative of her current look, so how can you say they are. She will make it up to him, in her words the issue's were much different than his, and how would she know who he is?

Makes me wonder why do we only defensive post when the party they are about seems to get knowledge of this site, and quite often that is the only post that is ever made by the defender?

Maybe we found Morgan's name here after all.

**Albus D** · 10-30-10 11:32

No offence intended here Funningunnin, but I am more inclined to believe Richmond Fotog & Illegal Smile on this.

First, let's face it, this is your first post and they have 'been around'. Yea, I know I am new as well, but one has a tendency to believe people who have 'been there / done that' more than a newbie.

Second, she could easily post real pictures, block out her face and still have accurate, but non-recognizable photos posted. If she is that cute, I don't see her having a problem getting a customer to help make them.

Last, at $$/hour, she had better be smoking hot with mad skills. Sounds to me like she got a couple of bad reviews that have hurt her in the economic sense.

**Richmond Fotog** · 10-30-10 01:32

You must have seen a different Morgan than the rest of us or you're sugar-coating your review.

Two weeks ago, I purposely set up an appointment with this girl. She quoted me a rate of $$ for an HOUR of "unrushed service. " When I arrived, she look NOTHING like the girl in the photos she's using. She was also very flaky. She clearly told me she was NOT a F / S escort. She went on some rant about guys coming there thinking she is and she's not.

This is one of these photos she's using of two different girls. She looks nothing like this.

http://lewd-babes.com/free/realgf/pi...18.com_001.jpg

Stolen from:

http://lewd-babes.com/free/realgf/pi.../worldsex.html

Give her a call back and tell her she has another bad review. She's a flaky provider with stolen, inaccurate photos. If she needs some real ones done, let me know.

Originally Posted by Funningunnin [View Original Post]

I made an appointment with Morgan about three weeks ago after reading a positive review of her in this forum. I set up for hh at $.6. Upon arrival I realized immediately that the pics were not of her.

So what happened with the guy denied FS? I called to tell her of the bad review. She said that not all guys want FS, and sometimes it's not clear what they want. She acknowledged that she may have misunderstood the guy's intentions, and that she feels bad about that. I told her I'the be writing a good review to counter his. 'If you don't mind, ' she said, 'tell that guy that if he makes another appointment I'll make it up to him. '

So there you have it, guys. Morgan's the real thing IMHO.

**Richmond Fotog** · 10-30-10 00:38

It's an escort service out of Illinois. They advertise on TBD, another site, etc.

Originally Posted by Bigcity Boy [View Original Post]

The three girls pictured in the links are all different girls.

**Bigcity Boy** · 10-29-10 21:48

The three girls pictured in the links are all different girls.

Originally Posted by Dodgeboy27 [View Original Post]

http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/super-freak-24/4128751. Alicia.

http://atlanta.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/bubbly-blonde-bright-blue-eyes-22/7119156. Tonya.

http://dallas.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/bubbly-passionate-gorgeous-blonde-21/11571368. Charlotte.

Tara was in Baltimore. Different girl. Ad is gone.

Heidi was in Baton Rouge using the same number. Different girl and ad is gone.

Phone # is 630.363.5191.

Proceed with caution.

Nearly saw this girl the other day (http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/new-new-hot-blonde-busty-playmate_-ive-been-bad-so-come-to-my-room-25/4104477) but girl in the room was a very light-skinned black girl and not the girl in the pic so I opted out. She wasn't bad looking. A little thicker and an obvious wig, but the principle had been broken. A good weekend to all.

**Member #4183** · 10-29-10 16:02

Was thinking of seeing Alicia, advertising on BP with the first ad. However, after googling the phone # I came up with a bunch of chicks using the same #. Decided it was probably a scam. Oh well.

http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleE...eak-24/4128751. Alicia.

http://atlanta.backpage.com/FemaleEs...yes-22/7119156. Tonya.

http://dallas.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...de-21/11571368. Charlotte.

Tara was in Baltimore. Different girl. Ad is gone.

Heidi was in Baton Rouge using the same number. Different girl and ad is gone.

Phone # is 630.363.5191.

Proceed with caution.

Nearly saw this girl the other day (http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleE...oom-25/4104477) but girl in the room was a very light-skinned black girl and not the girl in the pic so I opted out. She wasn't bad looking. A little thicker and an obvious wig, but the principle had been broken. A good weekend to all.