Thread: Non Pro's
+
Add Report
Results 1 to 15 of 8056
-
Yesterday 22:45 #8056
Posts: 19At the end of the day every guy pays for pussy. If they have a GF they are paying for it. Buying her clothes. Paying for her meals. If she lives with him he's probably the only one paying rent. If you got a wife then you are paying for all of her shit and you may still not even be getting laid! A lot of marriages these days are sexless. So at the end of the day. It doesn't matter if its a hooker or your GF. You still paid for it.
-
Yesterday 16:47 #8055
Posts: 68Originally Posted by MarkoRamius [View Original Post]
Since 2019 I've had five SA relationships evolve into real dating relationships not involving explicit exchange of money. We caught feelings, etc. These were all between 19 and 27 years old when I met them and the relationships lasted from a few months to a couple years. There are still women on seeking who are looking for $$$ but also have a side motive of just looking for an older guy to date who isn't a creepy loser. Those are the ones I'm looking for.
-
Yesterday 14:17 #8054
Posts: 390Originally Posted by MarkoRamius [View Original Post]
There comes a price to where it becomes financially and practically irresponsible to not take the offer because the alternative for most people is decades of work and life being taken away to make the equivalent. You can read up on any social media thread where this question is asked and you'd see most of the responses saying they'd do it.
So essentially everyone is a provider, woman and guys alike, and most definitions, arguments, labels, etc are entirely meaningless. The only exceptions would be those who are already well off or have super strict morals (i.e. would need to talk to their SO first), but even then the price just needs to be adjusted and/or they'd be in the minority.
-
Yesterday 13:54 #8053
Posts: 575About "Non Pros"
Originally Posted by Mamouna [View Original Post]
So to my mind a strict definition is friggin' useless because it catches so much. Human behavior is inevitably messy and black-and-white distinctions are piss poor.
Usually the "non pros" on the sugar sites are exercising a lot more discrimination in who they bang than the typical TNA whale. And of course, on the average, the typical SA girl is seeing fewer clients than the typical druggie on STG. That's enough of a distinction to me to be relevant.
-
04-27-24 20:48 #8052
Posts: 19Originally Posted by Mamouna [View Original Post]
-
04-27-24 15:35 #8051
Posts: 112Change this sub forum name to Arrangements or Sugaring?
Just a thought, can any of these women on sugar sites really still be considered not professional? The only difference is they're not on TNA etc. I'm all for GND types but the posts here are mainly commentary on how to get a PPM arrangement with a sugar baby and who got burned. I dropped seeking 5 months ago. & most of the "non-pros" I've mentioned recently were from other apps. They don't even bother hiding it anymore.
-
04-26-24 22:01 #8050
Posts: 9Originally Posted by SeaBurner [View Original Post]
To get repeat gigs in porn you have to be particularly hot in a way that stands out and be consistent in performance that translates on camera. Otherwise you are just going to get the occasional gig for $1-2 k, depending on what you can demand. It's why porn girls will do escorting or sugar on the side. Their shoots will effectively be advertising that lets them get above escort market prices for their time.
Now things have shifted since the pandemic and OnlyFans effectively took over. Mainstream porn shoots drive subs to a girl's OnlyFans and maybe discreet escorting too. If you look at someone like Riley Reid you have someone who at the beginning of her career was doing shoot-by-shoot hustling, but was popular enough to get consistent repeat requests from studios. Which has translated to her now making a few million dollars a year on OnlyFans.
So it's totally possible for the right girl to make 600 k a year in this environment. But it's a lot of work, and the market is only going to support so many girls at that level. I don't know if the girls linked earlier in the thread, Britt and Theodora, could get to that level. They seem to be basically "generically hot" porn girls who don't stand out that much.
-
04-26-24 18:38 #8049
Posts: 333MaleFromHome for Vasectomy testing
Originally Posted by PopItFank69 [View Original Post]
-
04-26-24 16:49 #8048
Posts: 92Originally Posted by PriceIsRight39 [View Original Post]
-
04-25-24 16:57 #8047
Posts: 1547Originally Posted by SocratesRvng [View Original Post]
-
04-25-24 16:32 #8046
Posts: 478Originally Posted by PriceIsRight39 [View Original Post]
-
04-25-24 13:56 #8045
Posts: 1547Not a good match on pics.
Was going to try a meet with this one. Looks cute enough on her profile, right? Yes you can see a bit if a tummy (my go to has a slight tummy but it's a nice little pot and fits her well) hey no biggie. I've started at ask for a non filtered selfie via txt (they all lie). Most send the same filtered BS. She actually sent a full body pic from her bedroom (it was a mess). She's much larger than those cute pics on her profile. Much! And not as attractive, not close. Wanted $$ I don't know, a lot of guys say they are paying 3-400 but is this the quality at that price. I don't want to drive up rates, just a honest assessment.
She may work for someone. She was cool via txt. Super ready to hook up. You'd be shocked at the difference in her profile. Again, some minor thickness is quit nice actually.
Got a hold of a flat back white girl and that's my new type. Haha.
https://members.seeking.com/member/9...6-fbc0f514dbf3
-
04-25-24 13:46 #8044
Posts: 1547Originally Posted by SeaBurner [View Original Post]
-
04-25-24 13:43 #8043
Posts: 1547Originally Posted by PoonHound1969 [View Original Post]
-
04-25-24 09:19 #8042
Posts: 1809Originally Posted by Eymeux267 [View Original Post]