This forum thread is moderated by Admin
-
Banned Member
Posts: 286
Part time Cara
I just got a text from Cara asking me to come over and give her a big creampie LOL. She's at her incall today, so if you have nothing to do go check her out. She only does this part time. A lot of you PM'd me for her number so I'm guessing it out there, and don't worry, you won't get sloppy seconds behind me I'm out of town. LOL.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 231
Safe
Originally Posted by
BobDm
[View Original Post]
She has posted for a couple years but tends to disappear for long periods of time. In the past she has posted under the name diamond. I have seen her twice, once at a hotel south of downtown and another time I picked her up and brought her to a secure location. She gives good service, looks like her photos, but has ghosted my texts many times. I do enjoy seeing her it's just so hard to do because she is so skittish. I certainly wouldn't discourage anybody from reaching out and seeing her as I wish I can make it happen one more time.
She is very skittish but safe. I've had all good services with her. Never rushed. Once she is comfortable she is fun.
-
Banned Member
Posts: 286
I tried
Originally Posted by
BobDm
[View Original Post]
She has posted for a couple years but tends to disappear for long periods of time. In the past she has posted under the name diamond. I have seen her twice, once at a hotel south of downtown and another time I picked her up and brought her to a secure location. She gives good service, looks like her photos, but has ghosted my texts many times. I do enjoy seeing her it's just so hard to do because she is so skittish. I certainly wouldn't discourage anybody from reaching out and seeing her as I wish I can make it happen one more time.
I've missed her as well in the past, thought I would try and be early this time. I text her a few times over the last several days and zero response. It's just a waste of everyone's time.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 175
I'm still fairly young but been in this game a bit. Early on I thought BBFS was some very off limits special deal. Last 7 or so years its about all I do and if not, its by my choice due to some potential red flag or hygiene concern. Sometimes you just ask, sometimes you just do it and nobody says anything.
Last few years I've figured out nonworking facebook chicks are the same way. So rare that anyone wants to use protection.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 201
Rose
She has posted for a couple years but tends to disappear for long periods of time. In the past she has posted under the name diamond. I have seen her twice, once at a hotel south of downtown and another time I picked her up and brought her to a secure location. She gives good service, looks like her photos, but has ghosted my texts many times. I do enjoy seeing her it's just so hard to do because she is so skittish. I certainly wouldn't discourage anybody from reaching out and seeing her as I wish I can make it happen one more time.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 833
Made contact but
When she first started posting I made contact but she was only doing incall at Cadilac motel on 41. I don't like seedy provider motels and I couldn't get her to go someplace else so I gave up. Later someone PM'd me and said she was legit but I never followed thru.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1473
If you get to her, please relate how she got to 174 lbs!
-
Senior Member
Posts: 111
A rose by any other name.
Has anyone met this Nubian goddess? She comes and goes. I always seem to just miss her.
https://sarasota.skipthegames.com/fe...e/350931319332
-
Banned Member
Posts: 286
She reads this thread
Originally Posted by
XFormed99
[View Original Post]
Had just seen it in my feed. Time stamp 11:01 a today.
So "breaking news" this AM for sure.
Given the subject being the conveying of info being by some means (called this "sources and methods" in a career a while back), just wanted mongers to get the intel.
Timing? Well it's fresh caught stuff. You can see time stamp of tweet.
I'm certainly not proposing polygraphs for all to find a snitch..
She reads this thread, actually she the one that told me about this site. I'd only used paid forums in the past, though it would be safer but it's nice getting far more opinions because there's a lot more contribution here. The administrators do a good job keeping the riffraff out.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 3568
Mongers are not created equal
Originally Posted by
ShaftDrive
[View Original Post]
OK so there are some providers that allow BBFS routinely and they are generally not the hottest girls out there. Then there are better ones where YMMV, so we ask WHY? The YMMV girls may think much like some of us mongers. I am generally not a BBFS guy but if the provider is "HOT" and I deem her "CLEAN" as in freshly showered and she passes the finger and then perhaps DATY sniff tests, I may opt for the BBFS. That is no guarantee of anything, but I ain't BB'ing no "stank". That being said, when I have a dream I make sure I am also clean / freshly showered and let them know that (even though may can figure it out using their own criteria). Based on experience, that will likely increase your chances of BBFS and you may be surprised when they jump into other unanticipated and unadvertised extras (GFE, rimming, squirting, etc.). You are also more likely to score repeat visits.
I concur, some mongers get more than others for a number of reasons.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 269
Ymmv
Originally Posted by
BigDog07
[View Original Post]
If you look at her Ter reviews, about 90 percent say the FS was covered. So 10 percent?? The question is 10 percent of how many! LOL.
OK so there are some providers that allow BBFS routinely and they are generally not the hottest girls out there. Then there are better ones where YMMV, so we ask WHY? The YMMV girls may think much like some of us mongers. I am generally not a BBFS guy but if the provider is "HOT" and I deem her "CLEAN" as in freshly showered and she passes the finger and then perhaps DATY sniff tests, I may opt for the BBFS. That is no guarantee of anything, but I ain't BB'ing no "stank". That being said, when I have a dream I make sure I am also clean / freshly showered and let them know that (even though they can figure it out using their own criteria). Based on experience, that will enhance the experience for her and likely increase your chances of BBFS; and you may be surprised when they jump into other unanticipated and unadvertised extras (GFE, rimming, squirting, etc.). You are also more likely to score repeat visits.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 493
I think. You refocused me.
Thanks.
Brevity sometimes masks the full context.
I get that now.
Originally Posted by
StauggieDoggie
[View Original Post]
I think he meant, how many is a "few" in her reference to "a few people" she trusted and did BBFS with.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 432
10 percenters.
Originally Posted by
StauggieDoggie
[View Original Post]
I think he meant, how many is a "few" in her reference to "a few people" she trusted and did BBFS with.
If you look at her Ter reviews, about 90 percent say the FS was covered. So 10 percent?? The question is 10 percent of how many! LOL.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 49
Originally Posted by
XFormed99
[View Original Post]
Had just seen it in my feed. Time stamp 11:01 a today.
So "breaking news" this AM for sure.
Given the subject being the conveying of info being by some means (called this "sources and methods" in a career a while back), just wanted mongers to get the intel.
Timing? Well it's fresh caught stuff. You can see time stamp of tweet.
I'm certainly not proposing polygraphs for all to find a snitch. 😉.
I think he meant, how many is a "few" in her reference to "a few people" she trusted and did BBFS with.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 493
I posted at 12:55 p
Had just seen it in my feed. Time stamp 11:01 a today.
So "breaking news" this AM for sure.
Given the subject being the conveying of info being by some means (called this "sources and methods" in a career a while back), just wanted mongers to get the intel.
Timing? Well it's fresh caught stuff. You can see time stamp of tweet.
I'm certainly not proposing polygraphs for all to find a snitch. 😉.