General Reports

**McRider** · 02-21-11 13:41

Originally Posted by Bebop60 [View Original Post]

I don't care who pays their taxes or not, I want to know where to have a good time! How about some reports?

You are right, this does suck, but if we don't get our heads together and can't talk about it here, how are we ever going to get things changed in the government? The LEOs reading these posts are laughing that we can't even get together and stand up for something the government has not been able to stop for thousands of years. So we (yes, the girls are more at risk but so are you) have to go hide worried about arrest and can't even talk freely about the good ones least they get targeted.

You are right, this is not a political forum, but it is one of many places that we need to free to express ourselves about bad laws.

**Ghostface89** · 02-21-11 12:33

Has anyone ever tried "Alpha Male (TM) Ultimate Formula"? It is an herbal that is available non-scrip.

I tried one recently and it seems to be as good as V for me. In fact, my honey actually commented on how much stronger I was performing that day. (I did not tell her what I had popped.)

Just thought you mongers would be interested in a report.

**Khai Yai** · 02-21-11 00:30

Originally Posted by Bebop60 [View Original Post]

I don't care who pays their taxes or not, I want to know where to have a good time! How about some reports?

With the little head.

Fool.

**Bebop60** · 02-20-11 23:25

I don't care who pays their taxes or not, I want to know where to have a good time! How about some reports?

**Davidonecall** · 02-20-11 22:35

Originally Posted by McRider [View Original Post]

That is exactly right! I am lucky to travel the world and where it is legal, even in very, very expensive places like Switzerland, a woman willing to take care of you is very reasonable, about 1/3 of the cost here. Why? The woman are NOT treated like they are criminals or less then perfect citizens. It is a job that pays well. That is all it is. And without fear of arrest and with forced STD checks, the price is brought way down. A win-win for everyone.

What more can you ask for. Getting them checked for std will keep them safe and use hobbies too.

**McRider** · 02-20-11 16:57

Originally Posted by Undie Radar [View Original Post]

My thought is that the potential increase if fees for any additional taxes / fees would be offset by the additional number of women who would take up the occupation if the risk of arrest and jail were removed.

That is exactly right! I am lucky to travel the world and where it is legal, even in very, very expensive places like Switzerland, a woman willing to take care of you is very reasonable, about 1/3 of the cost here. Why? The woman are NOT treated like they are criminals or less then perfect citizens. It is a job that pays well. That is all it is. And without fear of arrest and with forced STD checks, the price is brought way down. A win-win for everyone.

**Undie Radar** · 02-20-11 16:54

Originally Posted by Ghostface89 [View Original Post]

A number of posters seem to want prostitution legal "so it can be taxed."

Beware! If prostitution is taxed it will be a service tax, like dog grooming and lawn care. If a local service tax is ever enacted, then add 10 percent (or more) to massage parlor visits and all other "services" we now enjoy here, etc.

The fact is taxes should already be collected on prostitution (according to IRS statutes). If the girls list the income with the IRS, as they are required to do. Profit made from illegal activity is still to be reported to the Feds.

When you don't list report income to the Feds, you can wind up like Al Capone or the Palos Park Madame.

My thought is that the potential increase if fees for any additional taxes / fees would be offset by the additional number of women who would take up the occupation if the risk of arrest and jail were removed.

**George W. Bush** · 02-20-11 15:44

But think of how many people in LE could be let go from their jobs if it were to become legal, and the costs of incarceration, court costs etc. We could shave millions off our budget. It seems like the people that holler the loudest usually have the most to lose.

**Horny Dog #2** · 02-20-11 15:20

Originally Posted by Ghostface89 [View Original Post]

A number of posters seem to want prostitution legal "so it can be taxed."

Beware! If prostitution is taxed it will be a service tax, like dog grooming and lawn care. If a local service tax is ever enacted, then add 10 percent (or more) to massage parlor visits and all other "services" we now enjoy here, etc.

The fact is taxes should already be collected on prostitution (according to IRS statutes). If the girls list the income with the IRS, as they are required to do. Profit made from illegal activity is still to be reported to the Feds.

When you don't list report income to the Feds, you can wind up like Al Capone or the Palos Park Madame.

As one of the posters that weighed in on the conversation about the legality of prostitution, I can assure you that "so it can be taxed" is NOT the reason I questioned the justification for it not being legal.

However, to be honest with you, if I could contact any provider without any worry about being busted, I would be willing to pay an extra 10% for that.

**Carpe Dium** · 02-20-11 14:59

This is the current standard of "legal","tolerated" and "illegal" for countries across the world.

http://prostitution.procon.org/view....ourceID=000772

**Ghostface89** · 02-20-11 14:03

A number of posters seem to want prostitution legal "so it can be taxed."

Beware! If prostitution is taxed it will be a service tax, like dog grooming and lawn care. If a local service tax is ever enacted, then add 10 percent (or more) to massage parlor visits and all other "services" we now enjoy here, etc.

The fact is taxes should already be collected on prostitution (according to IRS statutes). If the girls list the income with the IRS, as they are required to do. Profit made from illegal activity is still to be reported to the Feds.

When you don't list report income to the Feds, you can wind up like Al Capone or the Palos Park Madame.

**Chrisj321** · 02-20-11 12:01

I was going to say almost the same thing as Adrick but not to that extreme. IMO the biggest hypocrisy that I see everyday is that someone can buy a pack of cigarettes, get TAXED out the ass for them, and that's all perfectly legal. But the second you try to use this legally purchased item, in its intended use, now it is illegal and you can get a fine! Outrageous!

Originally Posted by Adrick Ian [View Original Post]

I agree, this seems silly, but it happens all the time. It is legal to adopt a baby, but illegal to purchase one. It is legal to receive a donated organ, but illegal to purchase one.

**Adrick Ian** · 02-20-11 00:12

Originally Posted by Horny Dog #2 [View Original Post]

I've frequently wondered what is the Constitutional justification for making prostitution illegal? . . .

There is no federal law against prostitution in the United States, nor is there anything in the USA Constitution forbidding it. This would be why it is possible for prostitution to be legal in several counties in Nevada. In Illinois,"The legislative power is vested in a General Assembly.

Consisting of a Senate and a House of Representatives" (Illinois Constitution Article 4, Section 1). The Illinois General Assembly of elected officials chose to exercise that legislative power to create a law against prostitution. There are a few limits on their powers encoded into a Bill of Rights in the Consititution. Also Illinois can't create a law that prevents the federal government from exercising its powers. But beyond that, the state legislatures have quite a bit of power to create laws as they choose.

Originally Posted by Horny Dog #2 [View Original Post]

. . .How can a lawmaker justify that if an action itself is legal, that it becomes illegal just because money is exchanged?

I agree, this seems silly, but it happens all the time. It is legal to adopt a baby, but illegal to purchase one. It is legal to receive a donated organ, but illegal to purchase one.

**Castlerae** · 02-20-11 00:07

Originally Posted by Horny Dog #2 [View Original Post]

I've frequently wondered what is the Constitutional justification for making prostitution illegal? If I meet a girl (either online or in person at a club or bar) , and we decide to have sex, that is completely legal. However, in the same scenario, if money is exchanged, it becomes illegal. How can a lawmaker justify that if an action itself is legal, that it becomes illegal just because money is exchanged?

Also, it would appear to me that the filming of pornography would essentially be paying people to have sex. I'm assuming that pornography, although offensive to some, is not illegal. So if I pay a girl to have sex with me and I film it, does that now make it legal?

You know, you're right about the Constitutional question, but I would be willing to bet some fair money that if you asked the folks who are pushing the hardest to make prostitution a more serious crime, to try to 'stamp it out', they'd tell you they follow a "Higher Law" and that if there are any questions, well, the Constitution is just going to have to be bent / ignored.

**Horny Dog #2** · 02-19-11 21:27

Originally Posted by Castlerae [View Original Post]

Raoul,

I think you're right, but prostitution will never be legalized in the US. If you do that, then the various moral-mongers won't be able to stare down their noses at you, me, the providers and anyone else involved. How would they give their pathetic lives meaning if they didn't have someone to run down (and make themselves feel 'superior' in the process)? Too many fools like that with too much power in this nation, I'd add "God help us!", but I fear the only way this will be stopped is if Americans can finally see these frauds for what they are and tell them to set down and shut the fuck up.

I've frequently wondered what is the Constitutional justification for making prostitution illegal? If I meet a girl (either online or in person at a club or bar) , and we decide to have sex, that is completely legal. However, in the same scenario, if money is exchanged, it becomes illegal. How can a lawmaker justify that if an action itself is legal, that it becomes illegal just because money is exchanged?

Also, it would appear to me that the filming of pornography would essentially be paying people to have sex. I'm assuming that pornography, although offensive to some, is not illegal. So if I pay a girl to have sex with me and I film it, does that now make it legal?