Thread: General Reports
+
Add Report
Results 121 to 135 of 1616
-
06-28-12 19:41 #1496
Posts: 9First visit to MP. Made the long trip to ERS and really wanted to try Laura or Tarin, but both were already in session. So my choices were Liz or Angela. I opted for Liz. She is quite good looking and has a nice body overall, a bit smallish breasts. First went to jacuzzi, and she let me do whatever (well of course all within the rules.). Wanted to spend more time there, but knock on door so had to come back to table. On the table got a decent massage. I tried to push the envelope a bit here while roaming, but was politely told not to go inside (based on reviews, I think Tarin might be more accommodating here, but YMMV). But my intention was never to go inside, I was simply roaming on the outside only. I didn't want to upset her, so avoided the area. She offered the foot rub but I declined, just not my thing. My turn to massage, again full roaming allowed, but she got uncomfortable when getting close to cookie. Got back on table, and a nice finish.
Overall, I would say the session was nice. I won't know until I try the others but it felt like she lands on the stricter side of the rules. I am going to try Laura next. She is almost always in session so I'll probably have to do an appointment.
-
06-28-12 14:40 #1495
Posts: 67ERS Liz
Finally had the chance to see Liz and have to admit my session didn't live up to the other ones I've read about her. She is beautiful with a great body and a very easy girl to talk to, no complaints there, but the rest of the session seemed mechanical. Could've been a YMMV issue or I caught her on an off day. The rub itself was good, everything within the rules. I rubbed her for a while which she really enjoyed (she loves getting her feet rubbed and rubs your feet very well) , and she used good technique on the finish. I don't think I'll repeat with her although I will say a below average session at ERS is still leaps and bounds ahead of most other good sessions elsewhere. Still waiting to see Samantha since she's been talked up so well, although it's almost impossible for me to pass on Dawn whenever she's available.
-
06-24-12 21:40 #1494
Posts: 24[Commercial Message deleted by Admin]
EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted because it appeared to be a commercial message and/or it contained links to a commercial website. Please post reports consisting primarily of a commercial nature and/or reports with links to commercial websites in the Classified Advertisement section of the Forum. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines and the Forum's FAQ for further information.
-
06-05-12 20:41 #1493
Posts: 466Geez. Get a life and understand what this forum is about and let this nonsense go.
The standard for libel / slander is a three leg stool. You need all three to prove it.
1. The information must be false.
2. You must know that the information is false.
3. You must have had malicious intent when you wrote it.
Number three is why there are so few cases that ever go to court.
BTW I had read the review and I would of been a little less specific. During the 18 years I have gone to ERS, I have run into some "creative" techniques like that
-
06-05-12 12:23 #1492
Posts: 109Since the review is a written document it would be libel, but that review doesn't even approach the standard for libel.
The standard for libel / slander is a three leg stool. You need all three to prove it.
1. The information must be false.
2. You must know that the information is false.
3. You must have had malicious intent when you wrote it.
Number three is why there are so few cases that ever go to court.
BTW I had read the review and I would of been a little less specific. During the 18 years I have gone to ERS, I have run into some "creative" techniques like that.
Originally Posted by Pluto2 [View Original Post]
-
06-04-12 20:30 #1491
Posts: 555Samantha at ERS
Had a nice session with Samantha, all within ERS rules. Standard. 95 and my. 2 tip. She might be the best all-around ERS provider, IMO, when you factor in appearance, personality, & service. She's generally there on M, T, Th, & F.
-
06-04-12 14:15 #1490
Posts: 69Not so nice
What the poster told you about ERS is slanderous at best.
This place is better run and cleaner than most doctors offices in just about every way.
Originally Posted by Too Nice [View Original Post]
-
05-12-12 01:03 #1489
Posts: 7Sorry
Originally Posted by Thrillseeker2 [View Original Post]
-
05-11-12 07:48 #1488
Posts: 48Originally Posted by Rocktown [View Original Post]
-
05-10-12 17:21 #1487
Posts: 7Hey guys
Just to fill you in I been going to ERS an EB. CL for years an always had a good time. But there is a girl at CL that I've never seen before calls her self leslie. Blonde blue eyes great personality, nice bod. Never had a session like that before! Wow! Blew my mind. I would check it out if I was you. Just so you know.
-
05-08-12 00:46 #1486
Posts: 391Originally Posted by Too Nice [View Original Post]
-
05-07-12 18:58 #1485
Posts: 368I read a review someplace, someplace else, and the guy said he was rubbing his bare cock, all cocks are bare at ERS, rubbing his bare cock against the outside of the lady's pussy. Is that what guys mean when they say "all within the rules"?
-
05-07-12 15:59 #1484
Posts: 703Ditto on Liz
Originally Posted by Jocleary [View Original Post]
-
05-07-12 09:30 #1483
Posts: 91Desk
Originally Posted by Teabagplain [View Original Post]
-
05-06-12 18:28 #1482
Posts: 196ERS Dawn
Argh. Has new boobs. I'm probably in the minority on this, but never been a fan of enhancements. Still gives a great massage though.
Also, huge apology to whoever I walked in on Saturday. Got discombobulated after the shower and didn't remember which door I had come through. Remember to lock the door from your side! On a related note, wondering who the girl is. I don't think I've seen her before. Think I might like to see her in the future....