Thread: General Reports
+
Add Report
Results 1,246 to 1,260 of 13745
-
03-20-19 14:27 #12500
Posts: 419Rbg! Rbg!
Originally Posted by Glockman [View Original Post]
I'm looking forward to watching "On the Basis of Sex" when it comes out on DVD...I wonder if RBG, in her youth, was as hot as Felicity Jones?
-
03-20-19 13:43 #12499
Posts: 6038Timbs v. Indiana
I have been wanting to post about this case since it first came out but until now never had the time. It is a landmark case for those mongers whose vehicles are impounded from picking up streetwalkers and subjected to civil forfeiture. In Timbs, the State of Indiana confiscated his Land Rover, worth over $40,000. 00, after a drug sting. His fine was $10,000. 00, only one fourth the value of his vehicle. He alleged the excessive fine clause of the Eighth Amendment violated his constitutional rights. The Indiana Supreme Court held the the excessive fine clause did not apply to the States, but only to the Federal Government. The United States Supreme Court, under Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and a unanimous Court, held otherwise and that the 14th Amendment made the prohibition of excessive fines applicable to the States. The Bill of Rights, the first 10 amendments, only apply to the Federal Government, not the States. However, the 14th Amendment makes the Bill of Rights apply to the States for all citizens. The 14th Amendment also goes on to define who is a citizen, just in case there is confusion. You remember the 14th Amendment don't you? That's the Amendment that Trump says he can abolish just by executive order. The 14th Amendment is pretty fucking important, especially if you are a gun enthusiast like myself. Without the 14th Amendment, although the Federal Government could not confiscate your guns, the states certainly could. So us gun enthusiasts can thank that the 14th Amendment and the Supreme Court case of McDonald v. City of Chicago that the 2nd Amendment also applies to the States. Justice Ginsburg held that a civil forfeiture of a $40,000 vehicle when the actual fine was only $10,000 violated the 8th Amendment. She effectively held that civil forfeiture of in itself violates the 8th Amendment. Therefore, civil forfeiture will no longer be available. This will not only assist mongers in getting their vehicles back, it will also allow mongers to bring what is known as a 1983 suit against the City and the police for violating their constitutional rights. Under 1983 suits, you can collect a wide variety of damages, including punitive damages against the individual policement, but not the City. What you have to show is that the individual policeman intended to violate your rights. Since he intended to confiscate your velicle, this would be easy to show. Lets say you have a vehicle worth $20,000 and it is impounded because you tried to pick up a SW. The Supreme Court has held that punitive damages are limited to 10 times your actual damages. This means you would be entitled to $200,000. 00 in punitive damages, in addition to any other damages, which the officer is personally liable for. Punitive damages cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. I suspect that this will give an office pause before impounding your vehicle. So you mongers have Ruth Bader Ginsburg's wrinkly old ass to thank for saving your ass.
-
03-14-19 11:10 #12498
Posts: 2469Originally Posted by B1974 [View Original Post]
-
03-13-19 19:34 #12497
Posts: 8Looking to try
https://milfy.com.memphis.listcrawle...post/30168981/
Any info on this one.
-
03-09-19 04:59 #12496
Posts: 220Strange?
Originally Posted by Glockman [View Original Post]
-
03-06-19 14:01 #12495
Posts: 220[Deleted by Admin]
EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because the content of the report was pointless, unproductive drama. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!
You knew I didn't approve the post so you thought you would take advantage of being an unmoderated member and post something you knew I didn't want posted.
Care to guess who will never get off moderation again?
I deleted the post because the forum isn't about he said/ she said. I don't care how well regarded the chick is, I don't care if it's your sister.
Guys post info, the more info posted the better. Then guys read it and make up their own minds.
The purpose of the forum for 20 years has been to provide a place for MEN to talk about WOMEN for SEX.
None of this bullshit has anything to do with that.
A2
-
03-06-19 12:50 #12494
Posts: 276Still waiting for Manda to explain.
[Deleted by Admin]
She never will, would you please stop instigating this bullshit. How many fucking times are you going to post this?
If you post once more about it I'm putting you back on moderation.
A2
-
03-05-19 14:44 #12493
Posts: 276Still waiting Manda.
[Deleted by Admin]
EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because the content of the report was pointless, unproductive drama. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!
-
03-03-19 08:35 #12492
Posts: 457Originally Posted by MemphisChris [View Original Post]
-
03-02-19 12:22 #12491
Posts: 153Sexy Latinos!
Anyone have any digits or contact with any Latino females? Want to fulfill a fantasy this weekend.
PM me if you have any connections or suggestions.
-
03-02-19 11:55 #12490
Posts: 457Originally Posted by Sinbadd [View Original Post]
-
03-01-19 21:17 #12489
Posts: 6038Manda
Originally Posted by Cumndumn73 [View Original Post]
-
03-01-19 19:09 #12488
Posts: 212Tina, them
Anybody have any info on Tina, posting on Erotic Monkey?
https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/tina-escort-memphis-402433
Looks potentially TGTBT.
-
03-01-19 11:54 #12487
Posts: 276Thief?
Originally Posted by TerryMefford [View Original Post]
-
03-01-19 11:43 #12486
Posts: 250Originally Posted by SweetMemoryA [View Original Post]