Cuddle Comforts?

[SteelyDan33]

Can you clear your inbox?

Deleted some messages.

[ToddRichards12]

Like so massive you slap her thigh and ride the wave in? Or so massive when she says haul ass, she has to make two trips?

Never met her in person but judging by the pictures I'd say the latter. Or perhaps so massive they make her buy 2 seats on the plane.

[DigMeSome]

She is so massive that I passed on her for free when she matched with me on a dating app.

Like so massive you slap her thigh and ride the wave in? Or so massive when she says haul ass, she has to make two trips?

[ToddRichards12]

Intel. She's massive af! And you can get FS but you'll be paying $400 or so (didn't see her but that was discussed).

She is so massive that I passed on her for free when she matched with me on a dating app.

[JoeJoesph]

Pm if you have intel on her. I have intel to share.

Intel. She's massive af! And you can get FS but you'll be paying $400 or so (didn't see her but that was discussed).

[TheseDelights]

I'm hoping my experience with pyt1318 will get me some information on lavanhy. She's this latina with an awesome body, for sure man made. She deleted her profile right now.

Anyway, pyt1318 is full service and she's a little big, which you can see in her pictures. Anyway, her BBBJ skills are out of this world. I almost instantly came. You can tell she loves to suck and fuck. I paid for FS but my condom ripped so I just asked for BBBJ twice. Great time and highly recommend.

What was the total damage for FS?

[BobTailr1]

I lost my contact number with Birdigrl when I got kicked off CC. If anyone could PM me her contact number again please I would appreciate it.

[Vermillion21]

Had a great session with Cutencuddlysd, she is super cool to talk to and really open to different cuddle positions. Cute smile and nice big "pillows" she was squeezing against me felt really relaxing. Being that I am pretty new to this she was great for me.

https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/Cutencuddlysd

Did you do more than cuddling with cutencuddly? If so, how did you initiate? Did you ask her for extras beforehand?

[Vermillion21]

Anyone had any sort of "luck" with her?

Thinking of giving her a try.

https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/Cutencuddlysd

[BoulderBoy]

So, just curious who has seen Gennyv and what that was like. I saw one report. I was going to see her over a year ago but it fell through and then I just sort of discovered her online and saw a forum where I think she basically admitted to having herpes so that freaks me out a little. But, I'm still intrigued. No, I'm not sharing where I saw that. I'm just sometimes pretty good at finding people. Still, despite that, I'm tempted to know what a cuddle session with her is like. Like, is it a nice cuddle at just the base pay and/or what would protected upgrades look like pricewise. Seems cool but, then again, maybe she's a little ratchet. I can't tell. I may delete this later. Don't want to offend her.

[FarFarAway]

That is interesting to hear you've banged a few who state platonic only. That's going to make me revisit my stance on that belief.

I agree with all of this. I also don't want an obvious SW from CC because like you I would just skip the BS and hire a known commodity with good reviews for an expected price.

Ultimately it all comes down to you and if you click with her. She might have no intention of offering extras but end up doing it because she's attracted to you.

And, don't discount what mood you have caught the girl in that day. Likely connected to her cycle. Those of us who bought rather than rent know all about this.

When a girl is ovulating, she gets horny, and you might catch a break. I also find when I am active on sugar sites, there can be flurries of activity that seem to coincide w / the full moon. I am a scientist by training, IK this sounds bogus, but it happens. I had a cuddle w / a pretty busy gal from SD, she mentioned early on she was on her monthly, so I didn't even have to worry about it. She posted nice Karma about me though, capital to use in the future.

[ToddRichards12]

I don't know. I have several reports of girls who show a lot of cleavage or skin but don't provide any extras at all. I've also personally seen three cuddlers who state "platonic only" on their profile and I banged all three of them with no trouble at all. There's one up in LA / OC who's basically a known escort who says "platonic only" on her profile. It's easy to pick out the obvious SW's disguising themselves as cuddlers, but some of us don't want that. If I want an escort I'll just skip the BS and hire an escort. I think most of us like the thrill of the chase and are going after the girl next door who doesn't spread her legs for a living. It all just goes to show it is very much a YMMV game.

What I do believe is this. You're in an intimate setting. You're in a hotel room with a girl, cuddled up in bed, possibly wearing minimal clothing, and you're locked in an embrace. That sets the stage for anything to happen. One person shifts position resulting in the other person's hands ending up in a personal spot and it sets off a little spark that sends clothes flying across the room. I think there's potential for consensual sex even with "strictly platonic" cuddlers if the conditions are right. I also think some of these female cuddlers enjoy some occasional sex they might get, but won't give it up for every client. Trying to read the subtle signs might drive you insane, or they might help make the tough decision on who to see next.

That is interesting to hear you've banged a few who state platonic only. That's going to make me revisit my stance on that belief.

I agree with all of this. I also don't want an obvious SW from CC because like you I would just skip the BS and hire a known commodity with good reviews for an expected price.

Ultimately it all comes down to you and if you click with her. She might have no intention of offering extras but end up doing it because she's attracted to you.

[Grimmy23]

I think trying to read into subtle signs is the wrong approach. I tend to think it makes sense to do the opposite and look for obvious signs.

I think profiles with firm statements like "platonic only" or "no extras" or "will terminate the session if. " means extras are not available. But the lack of such a statement likely is a subtle sign that extras might be available if she likes you.

Then of course some of the pictures are obvious. Showing lots of cleavage isn't a subtle sign, it's an obvious one IMO. Some of the profiles are so obviously SW's in disguise there's nothing subtle about it.

I don't know. I have several reports of girls who show a lot of cleavage or skin but don't provide any extras at all. I've also personally seen three cuddlers who state "platonic only" on their profile and I banged all three of them with no trouble at all. There's one up in LA / OC who's basically a known escort who says "platonic only" on her profile. It's easy to pick out the obvious SW's disguising themselves as cuddlers, but some of us don't want that. If I want an escort I'll just skip the BS and hire an escort. I think most of us like the thrill of the chase and are going after the girl next door who doesn't spread her legs for a living. It all just goes to show it is very much a YMMV game.

What I do believe is this. You're in an intimate setting. You're in a hotel room with a girl, cuddled up in bed, possibly wearing minimal clothing, and you're locked in an embrace. That sets the stage for anything to happen. One person shifts position resulting in the other person's hands ending up in a personal spot and it sets off a little spark that sends clothes flying across the room. I think there's potential for consensual sex even with "strictly platonic" cuddlers if the conditions are right. I also think some of these female cuddlers enjoy some occasional sex they might get, but won't give it up for every client. Trying to read the subtle signs might drive you insane, or they might help make the tough decision on who to see next.

[ToddRichards12]

Once again I'm fairly new to this cuddling game. This has been talked about quite a bit on this forum but I think I'm picking up on some of the subtle signs from girls' profiles that extras might be available. I'd like to hear some of your thoughts on these:

- Pics showing a lot of skin (goes without saying). However, this isn't by any means a guarantee. Some girls who show a lot of skin have been reported to be platonic only. YMMV.

- Pics focusing on cleavage and / or booty. Same comment as above.

- Pics of the girl with the "come fuck me look" on her face. This is hard to describe exactly but I think most of you know exactly what I mean.

- Pics with puckered lips / kissy face.

- Usernames with things like xoxo in them.

Karma. This is a tough one. There was a discussion on this thread a ways back about how girls with lots of karma probably aren't providing extras. However, I know that to not be true. There's one girl in particular in OC who is well known for her handjobs, and she has over 70 karma. I say this is a toss-up and something you can't read reliably.

Karma from repeat clients: I'm on the fence with this one. If a girl is getting repeat clients, I have to seriously wonder how many guys would spend 150 or more for a platonic cuddler with a girl more than once. One I'm scheduled to see later this week has karma from 3 or 4 repeat clients. I'm trying to judge if this is a good sign or not.

Karma comments about the girl having "soft skin" or having a "soft touch. " Also trying to judge this one. To me, this implies that she's at least making some skin available to touch.

Anything I'm missing?

I think trying to read into subtle signs is the wrong approach. I tend to think it makes sense to do the opposite and look for obvious signs.

I think profiles with firm statements like "platonic only" or "no extras" or "will terminate the session if. " means extras are not available. But the lack of such a statement likely is a subtle sign that extras might be available if she likes you.

Then of course some of the pictures are obvious. Showing lots of cleavage isn't a subtle sign, it's an obvious one IMO. Some of the profiles are so obviously SW's in disguise there's nothing subtle about it.

[Grimmy23]

Once again I'm fairly new to this cuddling game. This has been talked about quite a bit on this forum but I think I'm picking up on some of the subtle signs from girls' profiles that extras might be available. I'd like to hear some of your thoughts on these:

- Pics showing a lot of skin (goes without saying). However, this isn't by any means a guarantee. Some girls who show a lot of skin have been reported to be platonic only. YMMV.

- Pics focusing on cleavage and / or booty. Same comment as above.

- Pics of the girl with the "come fuck me look" on her face. This is hard to describe exactly but I think most of you know exactly what I mean.

- Pics with puckered lips / kissy face.

- Usernames with things like xoxo in them.

Karma. This is a tough one. There was a discussion on this thread a ways back about how girls with lots of karma probably aren't providing extras. However, I know that to not be true. There's one girl in particular in OC who is well known for her handjobs, and she has over 70 karma. I say this is a toss-up and something you can't read reliably.

Karma from repeat clients: I'm on the fence with this one. If a girl is getting repeat clients, I have to seriously wonder how many guys would spend 150 or more for a platonic cuddler with a girl more than once. One I'm scheduled to see later this week has karma from 3 or 4 repeat clients. I'm trying to judge if this is a good sign or not.

Karma comments about the girl having "soft skin" or having a "soft touch. " Also trying to judge this one. To me, this implies that she's at least making some skin available to touch.

Anything I'm missing?