Thread: General Reports
+
Add Report
Results 136 to 150 of 3403
-
09-28-22 13:38 #3268
Posts: 1849Blow Job
No one can complain about getting a BJ the next few days. 😎 Thanks to Ian. Be and stay safe everyone.
NC HUNTER.
-
09-28-22 09:44 #3267
Posts: 1739Stay Safe
Hope you all weather the storm safely.
Cook72.
-
09-19-22 08:17 #3266
Posts: 196Eyes Wide Shut
Is Eyes Wide Shut still open? Does anyone have a report on recent visits there? If so please post or PM to me. I will be in Tampa in a few weeks and would lie to visit.
-
06-17-22 12:32 #3265
Posts: 238Sting
Can't find any news reports of more hotel and motel raids, so it looks like there was a sting at the Fairfield on Lois. They picked up a few working ladies and confiscated their meds.
-
06-16-22 09:46 #3264
Posts: 772Assistance - - -
I will be at Hilton Downtown Tampa in a few weeks.
(Q) Anything close by? Providers or AMP's.
Thanks.
-
06-10-22 17:03 #3263
Posts: 1991Would like to know more
Originally Posted by MFever [View Original Post]
-
06-09-22 09:00 #3262
Posts: 914[URL]Fetlife.com[/URL]
Things are tougher, more expensive and more dry with the working girls here but I've had some nice experiences on Fetlife. I've gone to hotel and house parties, gangbangs and met some ladies for fun that are just as horny and kinky as we are.
Does not cost anything to sign up unless you want to view people personal videos. There are many groups on Fet in the Tampa area to get in the know about meets, parties etc. I even met a sexy house cleaner!
If any of you are on Fetlife let's share our experience and hook ups.
-
05-25-22 22:54 #3261
Posts: 178Sting
They are running a sting today around Publix to Hillsborough on neb. While cutting across seminol height area. There was a pretty chic Latin long hair very nice body wearing a wife beater and daisydukes on.
-
04-27-22 09:49 #3260
Posts: 70Maybe a civilian
I seen this same girl for two day at the same spot with the same clothes. And she is carrying her stuff. Idk if she's on some bad luck. Couldn't stop to chat cause of work. She was on 50th and by Broadway just past that adult book store.
-
04-21-22 13:57 #3259
Posts: 967Thanks
Originally Posted by WhyTry [View Original Post]
-
04-20-22 12:22 #3258
Posts: 232Thanks
Originally Posted by BestSwimmer [View Original Post]
-
04-20-22 09:44 #3257
Posts: 824Originally Posted by BestSwimmer [View Original Post]
The reason for that according to the website is "VerifyHim is a girls-only community. We don't want a blacklisted rapist joining us and then run a check on himself. That's why we don't allow anybody but ONLY girls to join our screening network."
But why not allow an ALLEGED rapist see what is being posted about him and give him an opportunity for counternarrative (or at least to have other providers he sees post alternative reviews of him as needed). After all, we all know that some of these providers are not exactly the most stable personalities and it wouldn't be beyond one of them from making things up just out of spite for reasons having nothing at all to do with anything the John did to really deserve it. Case in point, the recently reviewed Brittny who was blocking callers left and right for the tiniest of perceived slights before they ever even got to see her.
Furthermore, every other site I've ever seen, from the commercial record search sites to the escort listing sites with reviews like ListCrawler to this site itself, doesn't go to such extremes to prevent individuals from seeing what is being said about them or otherwise reported and provides the opportunity for counternarrative or, in the case of the record search, the opportunity to correct the record.
However, be that as it may, even with a resource for escorts like verifyhim being out there, I wouldn't lose too much sleep over it. As most of you have seen, out of the thousands of providers who are out there in our community only, when you go to try to pull up a review only a very tiny percentage of them actually have any reviews and a high percentage of those reviews one manages to find are somewhat suspect. What makes you think it'd be any different on the other side with John's and the reviews that might be out there on them?
Furthermore, the providers that get the bad reviews invariably fall off the radar and try to stay ahead of those bad reviews by pulling their ads and changing the working name and number (and, LOL, by using different fake pics). Why would that be any different for bad John's?
As I covered in my previous post, for our part (unless we're making a date with one of those extremely rare providers with an incredibly rigorous screening process down to inspecting our ID's and not coincidentally most likely to be using verifyhim) we generally provide much less identifiable information than they do when making a date and what we do provide can be fake and easily changed as needed.
For example, unlike them we don't post pics of ourselves (with the possible exception of an SD ad) and we're not as tied to our burner #'s because we're not looking for any of the ones we see to contact us again for future dates (we're the ones that call them). If we ever suspect a provider may have (unfairly or otherwise) posted a bad review on us, it's an even simpler matter for us to create a new identity. Not that I'm suggesting that over simply not being a dickhead and warranting such reviews.
-
04-20-22 07:49 #3256
Posts: 967Review
Originally Posted by CosmicBingo [View Original Post]
-
04-19-22 12:50 #3255
Posts: 824Originally Posted by WhyTry [View Original Post]
The strongest argument for this is the simple fact that any such site is so hard to find. After all, it's a simple matter for anyone to find an escort review site. Why would it be so much harder to find a John review site, other than the simplest explanation that they simply don't exist? Or perhaps it could be that these sex workers are so much smarter and craftier than us at hiding their tracks (and off of Google). Put another way, if some of us can be so indiscrete and let it slip to a provider the existence and even where to go to find it, one would think that one of us could have managed to extract that equivalent information from one of them, if such a site really existed.
Another argument against their existence is the question of how it would even work. For escorts we have links to their ads, the name they go by and their work # (each of which they'd change only to try to outrun bad reviews). How would they reference us on their website? By a phone number which if we're smart is a burner # that we can easily change if we ever run into a pissed off provider (and remember for privacy reasons we're not allowed to post #'s on this site so why would their site be any different) or by the fake name we gave them? Unlike them we don't have any static (or at least semi-static) web address, no posted pics on-line (unless we stupidly sent them a pic or a means to find our social media pages)
But, let's next consider the other possibility that such sites do in fact exist (perhaps on the dark web?) and the digital footprints to them are just much much better hidden. I just did a quick Google search and, while I wasn't any more successful at discovering such a site than Why Try, I did find a couple of interesting links.
The 1st is https://nowtoronto.com/let-s-rate-the-johns-instead. While that link doesn't really answer our question of the moment, it does provide an interesting (and not particularly complimentary) perspective on our own reviews from the escort point of view (or at least from one of them).
The 2nd interesting link DOES reference an actual John review website called Switter https://switter.at which was started in 2018 but was forced to shutdown just last month.
I also found this post from an escort on Quora (which imhe is not the most reliable source). She references phone # search services, which as far as I know can provide all sorts of interesting info but not anything about performance as a John, and simple informal local word of mouth, which I'd think wouldn't be particularly effective in a large market such as ours.Originally Posted by Escort
-
04-19-22 07:39 #3254
Posts: 232Anyone have an answer to this question
Originally Posted by CosmicBingo [View Original Post]