Comment on Forum Rules Here

**Big Red50** · 01-07-07 23:59

Originally Posted by Steel Blue

I enjoy the photo section with one exception. I think the rule for posting a photo only of someone who you have had sex with should apply. Pictures of potiential SW or cut and copy remakes of Craigs List pictures are lame.

It is more of a trophy when you have put your time and effort into getting a picture of a woman you have been with. It takes balls enough to find and have sex with these women. Getting a picture is taking it to the next level.

Snapping a picture out the window and posting it is a waste of time with the exception of warning Mongers of who to be wary of. IMHO, Steel Blue.

The other suggestion I have is a spell check for us Mongers who are "accidamecially disencliened". See what I mean!

Hey Steel Blue:

I agree whole heartedly Blue Steel, I do need Monger Spell Check, I have been flamed for my spelling, see report by Big Red50 10/24/06 Baltimore-General Reports #2225

I have a pointed question for learned Senior Members

Should we post CL photo re-prints for CL reviews?

There are members, whom do not think we should post CL re-printed photos.

I have also reprinted the USG Rules-Photo Guidelines, yes I do RTFF Bench.

What’s allowed.
The following types of photographs are acceptable for publication in the Forum:
•Photographs taken by you of women in any state of dress or undress.
•Photographs taken by you documenting your travels, including photos of hotels, restaurants, cuisine, street scenes, beach scenes, night clubs and tourist attractions.
•Photographs of escorts copied from escort websites.
•Reports accompanying photographs should identify the city, country and approximate date of the photograph.

What’s Not Allowed
The following types of photographs ARE NOT acceptable for publication in the Forum:
•Photographs copied from other websites, unless you are the original photographer.

PLEASE NOTE: Given the difficulties in verifying photos suspected to have been copied from other websites, said photos will not be investigated unless I am contacted by the webmaster directly.
If you suspect that another forum member is posting photographs copied from other websites, you are encouraged to challenge them in The Forum.
End of USG Rules-Photo Guidelines

Big Red Comments:

CL Photos are of escorts copied from escort websites and are clearly allowed. These CL providers change their names so often you need a photo to identify them. Since I don’t have the balls to take and post photos of myself and SW’s, all I post are photos of providers, I have seen or want to see.

Like to hear from other members,

Just trying to play by the rules

Big Red

=============================================

Hi Big Red,

You are correct. Photos of escorts copied from their ads are perfectly acceptable for posting in the USASG Forum.

Thanks,

Jackson

**Wallie** · 11-16-06 03:28

Originally Posted by Double Nickle

I think the use of blue text which is reserved to Jackson does not include links in blue. I have seen at least one post where the poster says blue links are only allowed to be used by Jackson. Tell me I am right.

It is OK if I post a blue link to a commercial website such as a massage parlor site unless I have some sort of affiliation to the site. Correct? If I have any affiliation I should only post under classified ads. Right? How about if I play safe and only post this type of info to classified ads?

Double Nickle

Not sure about the second part of your question, so I won't even attempt an answer.

However, the blue law is in effect. However, due to web standards, a hyper-link on any webpage will appear blue by default. Jackson could change this, but blue is somewhat an expected color online for hyperlinks. If you post a link in a report, it will appear blue automatically. I'm sure this is not a violation of the Blue Law, as the Forum software colors the links automatically.

You can change the color of the the link you type if want, and add italics, etc., like I have, in any of your posts using VB script. A link to how to use VB is here: (OK, I just can' resist changing the color to show you what I mean.) http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/misc.php?do=bbcode

Originally Posted by Wallie

(OK, I just can' resist changing the color to show you what I mean.)

Ooops, nope. You can't change the color of the link. The forum's software seems to over-ride the VB Script for a URL color link automatically. My bad.

However, VB does work for italics bold, etc.

Wallie

**Double Nickle** · 11-12-06 19:41

I think the use of blue text which is reserved to Jackson does not include links in blue. I have seen at least one post where the poster says blue links are only allowed to be used by Jackson. Tell me I am right.

It is OK if I post a blue link to a commercial website such as a massage parlor site unless I have some sort of affiliation to the site. Correct? If I have any affiliation I should only post under classified ads. Right? How about if I play safe and only post this type of info to classified ads?

Double Nickle

**Old Moman** · 07-11-06 14:53

I have recently added several reviews of providers and do not see the review count under my user ID change. Am I missing something?

Old Moman

**Mister Quick** · 05-03-06 11:14

Not sure if this is the proper place for this or not.

Was wondering what the rule is on editing a a post one has made. Some time I see an old report of mine andit can be edited other times not. One I wanted to edit today whihc I posted yesterday I was not allowed to.

At other times I have seen ones I made weeks ago that I have been given the option of editing.

Seems so of random to me.

**Member #3948** · 09-24-05 17:13

I enjoy the photo section with one exception. I think the rule for posting a photo only of someone who you have had sex with should apply. Pictures of potiential SW or cut and copy remakes of Craigs List pictures are lame.

It is more of a trophy when you have put your time and effort into getting a picture of a woman you have been with. It takes balls enough to find and have sex with these women. Getting a picture is taking it to the next level.

Snapping a picture out the window and posting it is a waste of time with the exception of warning Mongers of who to be wary of. IMHO, Steel Blue.

The other suggestion I have is a spell check for us Mongers who are "accidamecially disencliened". See what I mean!

**Best Tx Monger** · 09-22-05 18:11

I must un-willingly agree with some of the members on this specific thread in reference to photos and the on-slaught of useless comments that fellow Mongers make.

I have noticed that more specifically on the International Site but more specifically on the Brazil Photo Section. I have seen a guy post a photo and an onslaught of useless comments ensue the photo. I have gradually seen that trend on the usa guide but it has been to a minimal extent.

Just wanted to vent and ensure others that they are not the only ones that have noticed this un-yielding trend.

Regards,
007

**Taco Malo** · 09-12-05 20:42

Great site and great people. 98% of my experiences with the site and the people on it have been great. But I'm starting to notice a disturbing trend on the Illinois board - don't know if it's gone over to the states as well.

It's the infamous "Has anyone seen _________ from Craig's List" post.

If you go to Chicago Craig's List the site is swamped with these annoying and useless posts. Which is why I was excited to see a Craig's List review section here as I hoped it would cut through the crap on that weak (but potentially useful) site. Well, those posts are starting to migrate over here - mainly on the CL section, but they have begun to fan out into other city specific sections as well.

It's not a lot, and it's not like every post I have put up is strictly a report, but since I've seen the first one, I've begun to see them multiply. It's like being infested by cockroaches.

Just some food for thought. "Have you seen _______" 1 line posts that add nothing should be deleted before they infest this near flawless forum.

And while I'm here...yeah this Craig's List stuff is a pet peeve of mine...the CL Reviews section should be about exactly that. Reviews and getting info on women. There's a ton of useless crap up there that is basically turning that section into a chat room about the misadventures of Craig's List posters, and the wacky things they post! A freaking message board about a message board!

Sorry had to vent. Peace

**Gudel** · 12-11-04 20:40

Originally Posted by Redneck3565

Here's a suggested (and will probably be ignored!) rule!: Mongers need to know some damn geography! Its pathetic to see a post about an SW/AMP in one area that is NOWHERE NEAR the area of that forum (e.g. a post about Pomona, CA in the "Los Angeles" section!). Of course if this board was more "geography-friendly", this would not be a problem. Then again, if the MODERATOR actually paid attention to what the problem is, and FIXED IT, it would not be a problem!

I agreed with this gentleman. Similar problem with Santa Barbara forum, people who are living an hour and a half away posting it there!

At least in your case Pomona is about 25 miles away from LA. Non geographic compliant posters in the Santa Barbara forum are living 60 to 80 miles away!

I love poon, but there is little point of driving 80 miles and come back for another 80 miles to just get one pop. Very annoying indeed, please make it stop, show them the light to the "Other Area's forum.

**eltib** · 12-02-04 16:49

Thanx,

I'm glad I brought some excitement to the forum.

Originally Posted by Daddy Lows

Rolly,

That said, the Thai Photo Gallery is beyond help. At least eltib's movie posting temporarily stalled the long missives. I miss the pics of the Thai humpers a lot.

Jackson,

Thanks for a great site and all the work you do for us.

Peace

**Terry Terrier** · 11-13-04 05:42

Hello Jackson

I have noted increased use of the word 'skank', referring to prostitutes, on the Forum. Am I the only poster who finds this word derogatory and de-humanising? Surely, it should be put on the banned list.

On a different and more important topic, I see that the performance of the new software is improving daily. We all appreciate the great work.

TT

**Rocky Mtn Man** · 09-14-04 22:20

Repetative postings in the Photo sections are a waste of band width. The area should be for photos. Even I have done the "Atta Boy" thing to some pictures although it is very rare that I do. The only exception is if there is a picture of children in the photo section. I think this should be brought to the attention of the poster that it is in bad taste.

There is no place for picts of kids in a web site devoted to sex. I know it is sometimes hard to tell the differece between a 16 and an 18 year old girl, but if the child is obviously 10 to 14 it is usually easy to tell. As far as I am concerned it does not matter the situation, even if it is a harmless pict of kids at the beach building a sand castle. It either belongs at a disney site, or a pedofiles site.

I dont know how you would police this Jackson. Maybe it is impractical, maybe not, but I think it should be done.

RMM

**Member #2001** · 09-14-04 21:57

Who cares about California anyway.

Maybe I will post everywhere and anywhere on that board just to confuse, and irritate you. What do you think about that redneck?

**Member #5605** · 09-14-04 10:20

Here's a suggested (and will probably be ignored!) rule!: Mongers need to know some damn geography! Its pathetic to see a post about an SW/AMP in one area that is NOWHERE NEAR the area of that forum (e.g. a post about Pomona, CA in the "Los Angeles" section!). Of course if this board was more "geography-friendly", this would not be a problem. Then again, if the MODERATOR actually paid attention to what the problem is, and FIXED IT, it would not be a problem!

**Elegante Rei** · 08-22-04 01:08

Jackson,

Ignore my previous post regarding 'search' function. I just read the 'Letters to the Editor' topic and understand the situation.

Thanks for a great site.

ER