This blog is moderated by BonerAppetitty
-
Senior Member
Posts: 185
Originally Posted by
RedRoddddd
[View Original Post]
Which porn star we talking about? Cindy Starfall or Lucy Thai? Seen one in a Stanton mp years ago. Tiny thing with a big smile.
I was thinking like pornstar companions or tryst agency (if you just goog terms pornstar escorts).
-
Senior Member
Posts: 142
Originally Posted by
HapaBoy86
[View Original Post]
Pornstar escort is Now $1200 and above!
Not even $ 6 bills anymore.
Which porn star we talking about? Cindy Starfall or Lucy Thai? Seen one in a Stanton mp years ago. Tiny thing with a big smile.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 6820
Pornstar escort is Now $1200 and above!
Not even $ 6 bills anymore.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 185
Originally Posted by
Mrmd8891
[View Original Post]
600 for 1 hour. Not sure about hhr pricing. 100 plus for bb.
That's like almost pornstar escort level.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 102
600 for 1 hour. Not sure about hhr pricing. 100 plus for bb.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 282
Originally Posted by
LabiaFedora
[View Original Post]
This is pretty self-explanatory, but thanks for your post nonetheless. This is clearly price gouging. It ultimately comes down to what Johns are willing to pay. Based off what I have been hearing and experiencing, their marketing is clearly preying on those who were unable to book her last time she was here, perhaps also some lucrative clientele or irresponsible white knights. Regardless, we would only be applauding such behavior by both provider and agency by contributing to this, and I would not want to encourage this type of behavior or else next time she is in town it would lead to even higher rates. To each their own, though. Simple capitalism in full effect. I am one of those people who are easily annoyed from the up charges and see this as no different, some would argue it is worse.
Not price gouging, smart business on her end. Lets says she was $300 doing 8 guys a day. Now she can make the same money and only need to do 4 guys a day. Work smarter, not harder.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 185
Originally Posted by
Mrmd8891
[View Original Post]
Summary: pretty, young, pleaser and submissive. Probably not worth the extra charge if I'm being honest but we clicked and I'll be repeating in the future despite the steep upcharge.
P: it's her. I told yall Amy was the ig girl and many didn't believe but the pictures on the website are her and with minimal to no photoshop. Pretty k drama type pale girl face. Body is nice but not other worldly. Mmm cups with minimal sag, smallish waist with nice solid ass. I've seen better bodies in the hobby. Purple comes to mind (albeit she was a little short). You're really paying extra for youth and face. Great white teeth and nice straight black hair (looks dyed).
A: she's very sweet and aims to please. She knows she's charging more and she put in the effort despite being super tired and jet lagged.
S: pretty typically in most aspects so will not bore you with the usual details (blue toast / shower but no preview BBBJ). Highlight was her naturally wet kitty. Her BJ was nothing special but after some daty she got super wet. No line needed. Went to town for 25 straight minutes of different positions. She never once got dry and felt great through. Submissive moans put me over the edge in flat doggie. Her body looks so nice in doggie with her nice ass and small waist.
Are: yes but maybe less often then I would if she was normal pricing. I suspect she will be busy initially but after a month or 2 the hype wil die down and she will go down in pricing or quit. I do think part of her pricing scheme is due to booker drama. Last time she was in oc other oc bookers were really upset that she was exclusive to sbc. I think they agreed that if she was priced that high then she'd be in a different category and thus be not real competition.
What is the surcharge for hhr and hr?
-
Senior Member
Posts: 102
Freeasia thoughts
Summary: pretty, young, pleaser and submissive. Probably not worth the extra charge if I'm being honest but we clicked and I'll be repeating in the future despite the steep upcharge.
P: it's her. I told yall Amy was the ig girl and many didn't believe but the pictures on the website are her and with minimal to no photoshop. Pretty k drama type pale girl face. Body is nice but not other worldly. Mmm cups with minimal sag, smallish waist with nice solid ass. I've seen better bodies in the hobby. Purple comes to mind (albeit she was a little short). You're really paying extra for youth and face. Great white teeth and nice straight black hair (looks dyed).
A: she's very sweet and aims to please. She knows she's charging more and she put in the effort despite being super tired and jet lagged.
S: pretty typically in most aspects so will not bore you with the usual details (blue toast / shower but no preview BBBJ). Highlight was her naturally wet kitty. Her BJ was nothing special but after some daty she got super wet. No line needed. Went to town for 25 straight minutes of different positions. She never once got dry and felt great through. Submissive moans put me over the edge in flat doggie. Her body looks so nice in doggie with her nice ass and small waist.
Are: yes but maybe less often then I would if she was normal pricing. I suspect she will be busy initially but after a month or 2 the hype wil die down and she will go down in pricing or quit. I do think part of her pricing scheme is due to booker drama. Last time she was in oc other oc bookers were really upset that she was exclusive to sbc. I think they agreed that if she was priced that high then she'd be in a different category and thus be not real competition.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 158
Judy was quite fantastic in personality. Quite shy and pensive at first. You will get the impression that she does not really want to stay in this business long. Nice long and full body hair. Bubbly featured face, round eyes, roundish nose. Cute but very civvy type of lady. Great MMs Cs and overall nice body. She does have a naturally smallish tight canal however the only thing was the movements we made were awkward and couldn't get a good pound on. She wanted slow but I was in mood for fast. We were both thrusting and just pounding in the same direction which made no sense and feeling. In fact that happened multiple times. Otherwise she is a good civvy vibe decision. The crotch tattoo was crazy as I haven't seen that yet inner legs above box all over. Would probably repeat.
If you can get past eclecticisms Aphrodite in OC is a larger girl but she has a much tighter canal which will surprise.
-
Regular Member
Posts: 10
Baby Judy in a Nutshell
She's basically a K Girl that they found at Hong Kong Club. Pretty much. She's got this air of hot trashiness due to her tattoos on her bikini line. Her ad pics give a decent depiction of her body. Legs are little shorter, skin a little bit on the tan side. Face has more texture than the super filtered pics. She has nice big lips and a great big smile.
-
Regular Member
Posts: 84
Originally Posted by
PePe44
[View Original Post]
Yes. A huge one that kind of covers her whole crotch! For what reasonI have no idea. A few here and there on her back and arm.
Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't Diane with CKD have a tattoo on her crotch?
-
Regular Member
Posts: 84
Originally Posted by
BuddhaHead
[View Original Post]
Price gouging? Preying on those who were unable to book her last time? GMAFB. If one doesn't think she's worth it or can't afford her rates, then there's other girls. This is whining about her pricing or other customers' behavior. It's her business what she charges and provides and it's each individual's business whether they want to pay or not.
It's simple supply / demand. I did not mean it in any form of disrespect or judgement, it is what it is. Just calling a spade a spade. I am not saying she is not worth it, at the end of the day it is worth whatever someone is willing to pay. Good for her and them (agency), they see an opportunity to maximize revenue and are taking it. You cannot say its every provider's business what they charge, if one woke up and decided to do charity work and offer the best deal at 100 bucks a pop I guarantee you there will be some admins complaining.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 88
Thoughts on Baby Judy
Originally Posted by
PePe44
[View Original Post]
Yes. A huge one that kind of covers her whole crotch! For what reasonI have no idea. A few here and there on her back and arm.
What're your thoughts on her?
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...521&viewfull=1#post6835521.
Someone shared a review here! I'm more focused on the "type" of girl that their body / looks are.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 158
Baby Judy
Originally Posted by
WlMays24
[View Original Post]
I will try to see her this weekend. Does she have any tattoos if you recall?
Yes. A huge one that kind of covers her whole crotch! For what reasonI have no idea. A few here and there on her back and arm.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 739
Originally Posted by
LabiaFedora
[View Original Post]
This is pretty self-explanatory, but thanks for your post nonetheless. This is clearly price gouging. It ultimately comes down to what Johns are willing to pay. Based off what I have been hearing and experiencing, their marketing is clearly preying on those who were unable to book her last time she was here, perhaps also some lucrative clientele or irresponsible white knights. Regardless, we would only be applauding such behavior by both provider and agency by contributing to this, and I would not want to encourage this type of behavior or else next time she is in town it would lead to even higher rates. To each their own, though. Simple capitalism in full effect. I am one of those people who are easily annoyed from the up charges and see this as no different, some would argue it is worse.
Price gouging? Preying on those who were unable to book her last time? GMAFB. If one doesn't think she's worth it or can't afford her rates, then there's other girls. This is whining about her pricing or other customers' behavior. It's her business what she charges and provides and it's each individual's business whether they want to pay or not.